CAMPYAIR, a New Selective, Differential Medium for Campylobacter spp. Isolation without the Need for Microaerobic Atmosphere
1
Tecnología Médica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Universidad 330, Valparaíso 2373223, Chile
2
Poultry Microbiological Safety and Processing Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA 30605, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(7), 1403; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071403
Submission received: 11 June 2022
/
Revised: 5 July 2022
/
Accepted: 8 July 2022
/
Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Pathogens: Infections and Pathogenesis)
Abstract
:Campylobacter spp. are considered the most frequent bacterial cause of acute gastroenteritis worldwide. Although the diarrhea produced by these bacteria is self-limiting, the pathogen has been associated with severe long-term sequelae following acute signs and symptoms of the illness. However, research on Campylobacter is hampered by costs and technical requirements for isolating and culturing the bacterium, especially in low and middle-income countries. Therefore, attempts have been made to simplify these culture methods and to reduce costs associated with conducting research on Campylobacter. Recently, a liquid medium which allows selective enrichment of Campylobacter using aerobic incubation has been described. However, a solid medium is also needed for the isolation of pure colonies, enumeration of bacterial populations, and other studies on the pathogen. Therefore, a new medium (CAMPYAIR) was developed, based on the formulation of the liquid medium. CAMPYAIR is a solid chromogenic medium that supports the growth of Campylobacter isolates within 48 h of incubation in aerobic atmospheres. Moreover, CAMPYAIR contains antibiotic supplements with an enhanced ability to recover Campylobacter from environmental samples that may also contain non-campylobacter bacteria. The addition of the indicator 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium (TTC) to the medium differentiates Campylobacter from other bacteria growing on the media. The findings from studies on CAMPYAIR suggest that the utilization of the new selective, differential medium could help to reduce the costs, equipment, and technical training required for Campylobacter isolation from clinical and environmental samples.
1. Introduction
Campylobacter spp., in particular thermotolerant species such as Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, have been identified as major concerns in food safety and general public health. In fact, Campylobacter is responsible for more human food-borne illnesses than any other bacterium worldwide [1,2,3,4]. It is estimated that C. jejuni and C. coli produced between 400 and 500 million cases of campylobacteriosis per year in the world [5]. Risk factors for Campylobacter infection are mostly associated with foodborne transmission routes and poor food hygiene and handling, particularly with the consumption of undercooked poultry. However, during the COVID pandemic, there was a decrease in laboratory reporting of Campylobacter and other gastrointestinal pathogens. This decrease may have been due to the prioritization of testing for SARS-CoV-2 testing and a decrease in testing for causes of foodborne illnesses [6].
Although the diarrhoea produced by Campylobacter and other enteropathogens are usually self-limiting and do not require specific treatment, some complications have been associated with campylobacteriosis such as septicaemia, meningitis, haemolytic uremic syndrome, pancreatitis, and abortions. Additionally, reactive arthritis and syndromes of Guillain-Barré (GBS) have been identified as sequela of the illness [2,7]. Furthermore, Toledano et al. [8]) reported three cases of severe infections caused by Campylobacter spp. in which symptoms mimicked a Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children (MIS-C), normally associated with COVID-19. On the other hand, increasing rates of resistance to fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and even erythromycin which is the treatment of choice have been observed; therefore, the WHO does not recommend the use of empirical therapies for Campylobacter spp. [8]. In this line, this organization also recommends the use of culturing over culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) because it provides isolates for subtyping and resistance monitoring that can produce useful information for further public health action [9].
Research on Campylobacter is hampered by the costs and technical requirements associated with the isolation and culture of Campylobacter spp., especially in low- and middle-income countries [10]. Therefore, attempts have been made to simplify culture methods by the formulation of blood-free media and other media that allow the growth of the pathogen without the need for producing artificial, microaerobic atmospheres [11]. Some research has shown that it is possible to grow the bacterium under aerobic conditions in a liquid medium supplemented with a mixture of organic acids associated with the Krebs cycle, vitamins, minerals, and sodium bicarbonate [12]. Later research indicated that liquid medium was improved by adding soy extracts and peptones [9]. Based on those studies, Hinton et al. [13] proposed a selective liquid medium intended to be used in the recovery of Campylobacter spp. Under aerobic conditions. The improved medium included high concentrations of organic and amino acids, as well as selective antibiotics supplements that had been previously used in media such as Cefex, Bolton, and Skirrow [13].
The liquid medium described above may be used for selective enrichment of Campylobacter spp. from food and environmental samples; however, isolation of colonies and other microbiological techniques can only be performed by using a solid, agar medium dispensed in Petri dishes. In the present study, the selective liquid medium was modified to formulate a novel solid medium base which allows for obtaining growth of Campylobacter spp. under aerobic conditions. For this objective, the recovery of C. jejuni, C. coli, and other Campylobacter isolates recovered from clinical samples on CAMPYAIR was determined. Additionally, different antibiotic supplements were tested for the ability to increase the selectivity of the new medium by inhibiting the growth of non-Campylobacter while enhancing the recovery of Campylobacter spp. from complex matrices such as human faeces or foods.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Non-Selective Basal Solid Medium
The non-selective basal medium was based on Hinton and Cox’s [13] medium, which was composed of (g/L) beef extract (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA; Catalog Number (CN) B4888); 50.0 g/L, tryptose or tryptone (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; CN 70937); 10.0 g/L, sodium lactate, syrup, 60% w/v (Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA; CN L1375); 3.0 mL/L, sodium bicarbonate 1.5 g/L (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA; CN 1.06329); and 900 mL of distilled water. The medium was prepared as described by the authors. The solid medium was prepared by adding concentrations of 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% of agar-agar (Liophilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, TE, Italy; CN 611001) to the medium. Additionally, the growth of Campylobacter on solid media containing 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% concentrations of soluble starch (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; CN S9765) was also determined.
Other supplements were also examined for the ability to improve the growth or detection of Campylobacter on the medium. The medium was supplemented with sodium deoxycholate (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA; CN 106504) at 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.2% and supplementation with 10% defibrinated sheep blood was also tested. In addition, the indicator 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium (TTC, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; CN T8877) was used at a concentration of 200 μg/mL to facilitate recognition of Campylobacter colonies [14].
The basal medium was prepared by dissolving all the components, except sodium bicarbonate, in distilled water. The medium was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. The autoclave media was tempered to 55 °C and 900 mL aliquots of medium were supplemented with 100 mL of 1.5% sodium bicarbonate that had been filter sterilized by passing through a 0.2 µm filter. The basal medium that was supplemented with blood and sodium bicarbonate was prepared in 800 mL aliquots and supplemented with 100 mL of 1.5% sodium bicarbonate and 100 mL of defibrinated sheep blood.
The supplemented medium was distributed in sterile Petri dishes and allowed to cool. Plates with solidified media were sealed with parafilm or plastic tape (3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA) to avoid the interchange of oxygen with the environment. Furthermore, and very importantly, after inoculating the surface of the solid medium with the Campylobacter isolates, Parafilm® or plastic tape was reapplied to the plates to seal them.
2.2. Selective Media Supplements
The effect of supplementing the media with selective antibiotics on the growth of bacteria on the media was examined by comparing bacterial growth on the media with the new medium not supplemented with antibiotics to the growth of the bacteria on media that had been supplemented with antibiotics after aerobic incubation at 37 C for 48 h. Modifications of two antibiotic mixtures used as selective Campylobacter media supplements were tested. One selective supplement tested was the CCDA supplement that contained 32 mg/L of cefoperazone and 10 mg/L of amphotericin B (Lyophilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, TE, Italy; CN 81037), with and without the addition of 10 mg/L or 20 mg/L of vancomycin hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; CNs 75423). The other supplement was the Skirrow antibiotic supplement that contained 10 mg/L of vancomycin hydrochloride, 20 mg/L of trimethoprim lactate, and 2500 IU polymyxin B 2500 IU (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA; CNs T0667, and 1405-20-5, respectively). Concentrations listed for each supplement are the final concentration of antibiotics after addition to the medium.
2.3. Campylobacter Isolates
Growth of Campylobacter on the solid medium under aerobic incubation, with and without the antibiotics supplements listed above was tested. The growth of C. jejuni, C. coli, and ten Campylobacter field strains obtained from clinical samples [15] on the media were examined. All bacterial isolates were streaked onto blood agar (Trypticase soy agar, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood and incubated under microaerobic conditions at 42 °C for 48 h.
Non-Campylobacter bacteria used to determine the selectivity of the medium were Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli ATCC, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Bacterial suspension of approximately 108 CFU/mL was prepared by suspending bacterial colonies of the cultures in 0.85 NaCl to achieve an optical density of 0.05 at 520 nm. For qualitative analyses, a 10 µL aliquot of the bacterial suspensions was streaked directly onto the surface of agar media using a calibrated loop to perform quadrant streaks. After incubation, growth observed in only one quadrant (1+) was defined as “low”; growth observed in two quadrants (2+) was defined as “regular”; while bacterial growth observed in three or four quadrants (3+) was considered “abundant”. In addition, the selectivity of the medium was also qualitatively assessed by culturing a prepared sample of human faeces artificially inoculated with Campylobacter and non-Campylobacter isolates. For this, 4 g of non-diarrheic faeces were inoculated with 100 µL of each bacterial suspension of C. jejuni, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa prepared as described above. The sample was homogenized and then used to inoculate triplicate plates of the new medium and incubated aerobically for 48 h at 42 °C
All the experiments were performed in triplicate. BA plates were streaked as controls to demonstrate the growth of Campylobacter and other non-Campylobacter isolates incubated microaerobically at 42 °C for 48 h.
3. Results
Growth of the strain C. jejuni on medium supplemented with 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2% agar-agar was tested, but there was no difference in Campylobacter growth on media containing either agar-agar concentration. Therefore, all remaining studies were conducted using media containing 1.5% agar-agar (Table 1). Results of studies that examined the bacterial growth on media containing different concentrations of soluble starch indicated that the best Campylobacter growth was obtained on media with starch concentrations of 0.5% and 1.0% (Table 1); therefore, the 1.0% concentration was selected for further analyses.
Results of the effect of different concentrations of sodium deoxycholate on the growth of Campylobacter on the media incubated aerobically are in Table 1. Findings indicated that media supplemented with 0.1% deoxycholate produced colonies with regular and abundant Campylobacter growth. Then, the basal medium was supplemented with 1.5% agar-agar, 1.0% soluble starch, and 0.1% deoxycholate. Furthermore, 10% of defibrinated sheep blood was also added to enhance the growth of the Campylobacter strains. The newly formulated medium has been named “CAMPYAIR” and was subjected to further testing.
Moreover, the addition of TTC to CAMPYAIR media allows the recognition of Campylobacter spp. colonies which produce a purple colour with or without metallic sheen when growing on the medium even though blood agar is red (Figure 1). Petri plates were initially sealed with Parafilm®, however, a better performance was observed when plates were sealed with plastic adhesive tape because of the reduced interchange of gases allowed by the latter. Additionally, although results were recorded after 48 h incubation, all plates were also observed after 24 h incubation, and by that time, only slight growth was observed (data not shown).
To demonstrate the capacity of the new medium, CAMPYAIR, to support the aerobic growth of the Campylobacter isolates, serial dilutions of the strains C. jejuni and C. coli were carried out in parallel to BA incubated under microaerobic conditions. The bacterial counts obtained using the Miles and Misra method [16] showed similar performance for both media (Table 2).
The qualitative growth of Campylobacter isolates obtained from clinical samples in a previous study [15] were assessed in the CAMPYAIR medium incubated under aerobic conditions, compared with BA incubated under microaerobic conditions (Table 3) and CAMPYAIR showed a similar performance to BA.
Finally, the inhibition of other bacteria by antibiotic supplements was tested. The best inhibition was obtained with the CCDA supplement plus 10 μg/L vancomycin compared to CCDA alone or the Skirrow supplement (Table 4). The selectivity of the new medium was also qualitatively assessed by culturing a prepared sample of human faeces inoculated with C. jejuni, S. aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa. The C. jejuni strain showed growth on CAMPYAIR (1+,1+, 1+) and no growth of other bacteria present naturally or artificially in the faecal sample was observed.
4. Discussion
The liquid medium previously described by Hinton and Cox [13] was modified in this study to produce a solid medium by adding 1.5% of agar-agar, 1.0% of soluble starch, 0.1% of deoxycholate, 10 μg/L TTC, and 10% of sheep blood. The new medium was named “CAMPYAIR” and it supported the aerobic Campylobacter growth after 48 h of incubation. Field strains of C. jejuni and C. coli, which are the species most associated with foodborne cases of human gastroenteritis, were able to grow on this medium with aerobic incubation. Furthermore, the addition of the indicator TTC allowed easy recognition of Campylobacter colonies growing on the medium. Furthermore, the addition of the antibiotic supplement CCDA and 10 μg/L vancomycin increased its selectivity and allowed Campylobacter to be isolated from human faecal samples In this line, the isolation of Campylobacter from a prepared faecal sample demonstrated the ability of the medium to isolate Campylobacter from complex samples using this antibiotics supplement. Altogether, these findings suggest that the utilization of CAMPYAIR could help to reduce the costs, equipment, and technical training required for Campylobacter isolation from clinical or environmental samples. The new medium could increase the number of laboratories able to conduct research on Campylobacter and especially in low-income countries. However, the capacity of CAMPYAIR to recover field isolates of Campylobacter spp. from complex matrices such as human faces or foods should be assessed in future studies in comparison with other selective mediums commonly used. Moreover, the ability of this medium to support the growth of other Campylobacter spp. other than C. jejuni and C. coli should also be examined.
CAMPYAIR may support the growth of Campylobacter in primary containers without microaerobic incubation because of the concentration of CO2 released by the medium and by additional CO2 released by Campylobacter growing in the medium (Hinton, personal communication). Sealing of the plate prevents the exchange between the atmosphere inside of the plate and the aerobic atmosphere outside of the plate. Therefore, this also helps to decrease the concentration of oxygen in the primary container. The resistance to oxygen could also be related to the production of pyruvate in the medium. Pyruvate is widely recognized as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) because it attenuates the H2O2-induced ROS formation in the culture medium [18]. Moreover, pyruvate embodies antioxidant properties due to its α-ketocarboxylate structure, enabling it to directly neutralize peroxides and peroxynitrite. The metabolism of pyruvate also generates NADPH that can maintain glutathione-reducing power [19]. Even though CAMPYAIR does not contain pyruvate in its formulation, this organic acid has been observed to have a central role in the metabolism of the citric-acid cycle in Campylobacter. Pyruvate may be produced by the metabolism of serine, lactate, and L-fucose [20], therefore, CAMPYAIR organic acid may be produced by of metabolism of lactate and amino acids present in the formula. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that Campylobacter has some oxygen-regulated genes that increase their expression under aerobic conditions. These genes include several citric-acid cycle enzymes, that become more abundant with increasing aerobiosis [21]. In this line, we observed only slight growth after 24 h of incubation and a better growth after 48 h. This is probably because bacterial cells grow slowly under aerobic conditions until their citric-acid cycle is upregulated producing a higher intracellular concentration of pyruvate for ROS scavenging. Additional studies will be conducted to improve the ability of CAMPYAIR to isolate Campylobacter from environmental samples and to improve the utilization of the media for food safety and medical studies.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.L. and A.H.J.; methodology, A.L.; formal analysis, A.L. and A.H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, A.H.J.; funding acquisition, A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grant Fondecyt Iniciación 11181262 by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID, Chile); and by grant PUCV DIE 035.691-35/2018 by Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (PUCV, Chile).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Allos, B.M. Campylobacter jejuni infections: Update on emerging issues and trends. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 32, 1201–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, J.; Corcoran, D.; Dooley, J.; Fanning, S.; Lucey, B.; Matsuda, M.; McDowell, D.; Mégraud, F.; Millar, B.; O’Mahony, R.; et al. Campylobacter . Vet. Res. 2005, 36, 351–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dasti, J.I.; Tareen, A.M.; Lugert, R.; Zautner, A.E.; Gross, U. Campylobacter jejuni: A brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and disease-mediating mechanisms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lapierre, L.; Gatica, M.; Riquelme, V.; Vergara, C.; Yañez, J.; San Martín, B.; Sáenz, L.; Vidal, M.; Martínez, M.; Araya, P.; et al. Characterization of Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Its Association with Virulence Genes Related to Adherence, Invasion, and Cytotoxicity in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates from Animals, Meat, and Humans. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friedman, C.R.; Neimann, J.; Wegener, H.C.; Tauxe, R.V. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialzed nations. In Campylobacter; Nachamkin, I., Blaser, M.J., Eds.; American Society for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 2000; pp. 121–138. [Google Scholar]
- Ondrikova, N.; Clough, H.E.; Douglas, A.; Iturriza-Gomara, M.; Larkin, L.; Vivancos, R.; Harris, J.P.; Cunliffe, N.A. Differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on laboratory reporting of norovirus and Campylobacter in England: A modelling approach. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willison, H.J.; Jacobs, B.C.; van Doorn, P.A. Guillain-Barré syndrome. Lancet 2016, 388, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Toledano, J.; Saavedra-Lozano, J.; Navarro-Gómez, M.L.; Santiago-García, B.; Aguilera-Alonso, D. Severe Foodborne Bacterial Infections Mimicking Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated With COVID-19. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021, 40, e210–e211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Organisation for Animal Health. The Global View of Campylobacteriosis: Report of An Expert Consultation, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 9–11 July 2012. 2013. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/80751 (accessed on 1 July 2022).
- Platts-Mills, J.A.; Kosek, M. Update on the burden of Campylobacter in developing countries. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 27, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hinton, A., Jr. Growth of Campylobacter incubated aerobically in fumarate-pyruvate media or media supplemented with dairy, meat, or soy extracts and peptones. Food Microbiol. 2016, 58, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hinton, A., Jr. Aerobic growth of Campylobacter in media supplemented with C3-monocarboxylates and C4-dicarboxylates. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hinton, A., Jr.; Cox, N.A. Selective Medium for Aerobic Incubation of Campylobacter. J. Food Microbiol. Saf. Hyg. 2018, 3, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Line, J.E. Development of a selective differential agar for isolation and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 1711–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levican, A.; Ramos-Tapia, I.; Briceño, I.; Guerra, F.; Mena, B.; Varela, C.; Porte, L. Genomic Analysis of Chilean Strains of Campylobacter jejuni from Human Faeces. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1902732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Miles, A.A.; Misra, S.S.; Irwin, J.O. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 1938, 38, 732–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Levican, A.; Alkeskas, A.; Günter, C.; Forsythe, S.J.; Figueras, M.J. Adherence to and invasion of human intestinal cells by Arcobacter species and their virulence genotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 4951–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bogosian, G.; Aardema, N.D.; Bourneuf, E.V.; Morris, P.J.; O’Neil, J.P. Recovery of hydrogen peroxide-sensitive culturable cells of Vibrio vulnificus gives the appearance of resuscitation from a viable but nonculturable state. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 5070–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, X.; Perez, E.; Liu, R.; Yan, L.J.; Mallet, R.T.; Yang, S.H. Pyruvate protects mitochondria from oxidative stress in human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells. Brain Res. 2007, 1132, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stahl, M.; Butcher, J.; Stintzi, A. Nutrient acquisition and metabolism by Campylobacter jejuni. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Guccione, E.J.; Kendall, J.J.; Hitchcock, A.; Garg, N.; White, M.A.; Mulholland, F.; Poole, R.K.; Kelly, D.J. Transcriptome and proteome dynamics in chemostat culture reveal how Campylobacter jejuni modulates metabolism, stress responses and virulence factors upon changes in oxygen availability. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 4326–4348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Strain C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) was streaked on CAMPYAIR and incubated at 42 °C under aerobic conditions for 48 h.
Figure 1.
Strain C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) was streaked on CAMPYAIR and incubated at 42 °C under aerobic conditions for 48 h.
Table 1.
Qualitative growth of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T incubated under aerobic or microaerobic conditions.
Table 1.
Qualitative growth of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T incubated under aerobic or microaerobic conditions.
| Concentration of agar-agar | |||||
| 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.0% | BA (control) | ||
| Aerobic | 2+/2+/1+ | 2+/2+/2+ | 2+/2+/2+ | NG | |
| Microaerobic | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | |
| Concentration of starch | |||||
| 2.0% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.25% | BA (control) | |
| Aerobic | 1+/NG/1+ | 2+/2+/1+ | 2+/2+/1+ | NG/1+/1+ | NG |
| Microaerobic | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| Concentration of Sodium deoxycholate | |||||
| 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.025 | BA (control) | |
| Aerobic | 1+/NG/1+ | 3+/2+/3+ | 2+/2+/1+ | 2+/1+/1+ | NG |
| Microaerobic | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
1+, low growth; 2+, regular growth; 3+, abundant growth; NG, no growth; BA, blood agar (control medium). The concentration of each component selected is in bold.
Table 2.
Quantitative growth (CFU/mL) of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) and C. coli (DSM 4689T) on BA incubated under microaerobic conditions and on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions. Bacteria were enumerated using the Miles and Misra method.
Table 2.
Quantitative growth (CFU/mL) of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) and C. coli (DSM 4689T) on BA incubated under microaerobic conditions and on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions. Bacteria were enumerated using the Miles and Misra method.
| Strain | Species | BA/Microaerobic | CAMPYAIR/Aerobic |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC 33560T | C. jejuni | 3.5 × 108 9.0 × 108 1.0 × 108 | 2.0 × 109 3.0 × 108 3.0 × 108 |
| DSM 4689T | C. coli | 1.8 × 108 4.2 × 108 1.2 × 108 | 1.2 × 109 3.1 × 108 2.2 × 108 |
Table 3.
Qualitative growth of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) and C. coli (DSM 4689T) and 10 clinical strains on BA incubated under microaerobic conditions and on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions.
Table 3.
Qualitative growth of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T) and C. coli (DSM 4689T) and 10 clinical strains on BA incubated under microaerobic conditions and on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions.
| Strain | Species | CAMPYAIR/Aerobic | BA/Microaerobic |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSM 4688T | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| DSM 4689T | C. coli | 3+/2+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 1 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 2 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 3 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 4 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 5 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 6 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/2+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 7 | C. coli | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 8 | C. coli | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 9 | C. jejuni | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
| TM-PUCV 10 | C. jejuni | 3+/2+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ |
1+, low; 2+, regular; 3+, abundant growth; BA, blood agar.
Table 4.
Qualitative growth of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T), C. coli (DSM 4689T), S. aureus ATCC 25923, E. coli ATCC 25922, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions and supplemented with different antibiotic formulations.
Table 4.
Qualitative growth of strains C. jejuni (ATCC 33560T), C. coli (DSM 4689T), S. aureus ATCC 25923, E. coli ATCC 25922, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 on CAMPYAIR incubated under aerobic conditions and supplemented with different antibiotic formulations.
| Antibiotic Formulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDA | CCDA + 10 μg/L Van | CCDA + 20 μg/L Van | Skirrow | BA/Aerobic | |
| DSM 4688T | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | NG | |
| DSM 4689T | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/2+/3+ | NG | |
| TM-PUCV 1 | 3+/3+/3+ | 3+/2+/3+ | 3+/2+/3+ | NG | |
| E. coli | NG | NG | NG | NG | 3+/3+/3+ |
| P. aeruginosa | NG/1+/NG | NG | NG | NG/1+/NG | 3+/2+/3+ |
| S. aureus | 1+/1+/NG | NG | NG | NG | 3+/3+/3+ |
Van, vancomycin; 1+, low; 2+, regular; 3+, abundant growth; NG, no growth; BA, blood agar (control).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Levican, A.; Hinton, A., Jr. CAMPYAIR, a New Selective, Differential Medium for Campylobacter spp. Isolation without the Need for Microaerobic Atmosphere. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071403
AMA Style
Levican A, Hinton A Jr. CAMPYAIR, a New Selective, Differential Medium for Campylobacter spp. Isolation without the Need for Microaerobic Atmosphere. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(7):1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071403
Chicago/Turabian StyleLevican, Arturo, and Arthur Hinton, Jr. 2022. "CAMPYAIR, a New Selective, Differential Medium for Campylobacter spp. Isolation without the Need for Microaerobic Atmosphere" Microorganisms 10, no. 7: 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10071403
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
