Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Linking the Local and the Global. What Today’s Environmental Humanities Movement Can Learn from Their Predecessor’s Successful Leadership of the 1965–1975 War to Save the Great Barrier Reef
Previous Article in Journal
Narrating Entanglement: Cixous’ “Stigmata, or Job the Dog”
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Humanities 2017, 6(4), 76; doi:10.3390/h6040076

How Can Humanities Interventions Promote Progress in the Environmental Sciences?

School of Social Transformation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 86287-6403, USA
Received: 30 August 2017 / Revised: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 6 October 2017 / Published: 16 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Humanities for the Environment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [246 KB, uploaded 17 October 2017]

Abstract

Environmental humanists make compelling arguments about the importance of the environmental humanities (EH) for discovering new ways to conceptualize and address the urgent challenges of the environmental crisis now confronting the planet. Many environmental scientists in a variety of fields are also committed to incorporating socio-cultural analyses in their work. Despite such intentions and rhetoric, however, and some humanists’ eagerness to incorporate science into their own work, “radical interdisciplinarity [across the humanities and sciences] is ... rare ... and does not have the impact one would hope for” (Holm et al. 2013, p. 32). This article discusses reasons for the gap between transdisciplinary intentions and the work being done in the environmental sciences. The article also describes a project designed to address that gap. Entitled “From Innovation to Progress: Addressing Hazards of the Sustainability Sciences”, the project encourages humanities interventions in problem definition, before any solution or action is chosen. Progress offers strategies for promoting expanded stakeholder engagement, enhancing understanding of power struggles and inequities that underlie problems and over-determine solutions, and designing multiple future scenarios based on alternative values, cultural practices and beliefs, and perspectives on power distribution and entitlement. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental science; humanities; progress; innovation; stakeholders; scenarios; communication; problem identification; solution proposal; values; epistemology; language; power relationships; social justice; knowledge communities; transdisciplinary environmental science; humanities; progress; innovation; stakeholders; scenarios; communication; problem identification; solution proposal; values; epistemology; language; power relationships; social justice; knowledge communities; transdisciplinary
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitch, S.L. How Can Humanities Interventions Promote Progress in the Environmental Sciences? Humanities 2017, 6, 76.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Humanities EISSN 2076-0787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top