Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
No Future without Humanities: Literary Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Integrity and Quality in Universities: Accountability, Excellence and Success
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessEssay
Humanities 2015, 4(1), 118-130; doi:10.3390/h4010118

Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences

UCL Institute of Education, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK
Academic Editor: Cinzia Ferrini
Received: 4 November 2014 / Revised: 2 December 2014 / Accepted: 3 December 2014 / Published: 4 February 2015
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [189 KB, uploaded 4 February 2015]

Abstract

The humanities are going through a period of exceptional vitality characterised by the proliferation of novel interpretative frameworks, methodologies and perspectives. Yet they—and, to a lesser extent, the social sciences—feel threatened by the rising tide of research assessment which appear to be predominantly derived from the needs and experience of the physical and natural sciences and depend on the application of standardized assessment tools. This position paper intends to contribute to the debate on the current criteria of evaluation and measures for excellence in the Humanities by casting light on their conceptual implications and methodological assumptions. It argues that decisions about their relative weight are not simply technical but also reflect underlying value systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: research assessment; peer review; metrics; excellence research assessment; peer review; metrics; excellence
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Scott, P. Clashing Concepts and Methods: Assessing Excellence in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Humanities 2015, 4, 118-130.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Humanities EISSN 2076-0787 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top