Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy
Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK
Received: 23 May 2013; in revised form: 19 June 2013 / Accepted: 9 July 2013 / Published: 10 July 2013
Abstract: In Contingency, irony and solidarity Rorty attempts to solve what Robert Pippin calls the ‘Modernity Problem’ by outlining a new self-understanding for the intellectuals of the ideal liberal society. The so-called liberal ironists of this post-philosophical milieu are no longer characterized by the quest for what Rorty describes as ‘a single vision’. This paper evaluates Rorty’s attempt to conceptualize the self-image of post-philosophical intellectuals in the light of two similar endeavors; namely, Nietzsche’s and the ancient Sceptics’. The preliminary conclusion is that although Rorty’s attempt fails, it points to an alternative way of interpreting the desire for a single vision; namely, as a form of autobiography. Drawing on Nietzsche, Nagel and Mill, the paper proceeds to argue that Rorty’s own autobiographical fragment exemplifies the way in which the narration of a failed attempt to find a ‘single vision’ can itself be seen as the achievement of such a vision.
Keywords: liberal ironist; autobiography; ancient scepticism; Nietzsche; modernity problem; intellectual self-understanding; Mill; Nagel
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Gascoigne, N. Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy. Humanities 2013, 2, 384-403.
Gascoigne N. Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy. Humanities. 2013; 2(3):384-403.
Gascoigne, Neil. 2013. "Double Visions: Autobiography and the Ends of Philosophy." Humanities 2, no. 3: 384-403.