Next Article in Journal
“Well, It Should Be Changed for One, Because It’s Our Bodies”: Sex Workers’ Views on Canada’s Punitive Approach towards Sex Work
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Mothers’ Infant Feeding Decisions and Practices
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(2), 51; doi:10.3390/socsci6020051

The Economic Impact of SPS Measures on Agricultural Exports to China: An Empirical Analysis Using the PPML Method

1
Department of Asia Business International Studies, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 31434, Korea
2
Department of International Trade, Chungnam National University, 99, Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 31434, Korea
3
College of International Business, Department of English Language, Konkuk University, 322, Danwol-dong, Chung-ju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do 380-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Martin J. Bull
Received: 26 January 2017 / Revised: 19 April 2017 / Accepted: 11 May 2017 / Published: 18 May 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [271 KB, uploaded 18 May 2017]

Abstract

Since China first joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, many countries around the world have sought to capitalize on lower tariff rates and China’s increasing demand for high quality agricultural products. However, as competitive pressures in its agricultural sector have intensified, the Chinese government has implemented other forms of protectionist measures. Known as non-tariff measures (NTMs), these policy initiatives have added another dimension to international trade activities that needs to be better understood. Using a set of variables clearly identified in academic literature, our paper analyzes the effect that sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) have on New Zealand, U.S., Korean, and Japanese agricultural exports to China. To measure the effect that NTMs have on exports, we use an adapted version of the gravity model and the Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood method. The key findings from the empirical projection show that Chinese SPS measures have a negative, albeit insignificant effect on the sample as a whole. However, when looking at the individual countries, the SPS measures were seen to have a negative effect on Japan and the U.S., while from a Korean perspective, their impact was positive and significant. As part of a secondary analysis, it was interesting to note that the SPS measures had a positive effect on New Zealand’s exports before its free trade agreements (FTA) with China came into force. However, in the years since then, they were seen to have a negative impact. View Full-Text
Keywords: non-tariff barriers; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; China; agricultural exports; international trade non-tariff barriers; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; China; agricultural exports; international trade
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wood, J.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Jang, H. The Economic Impact of SPS Measures on Agricultural Exports to China: An Empirical Analysis Using the PPML Method. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top