Next Article in Journal
Class and Gender Relations in the Welfare State: The Contradictory Dictates of the Norm of Female Autonomy
Next Article in Special Issue
Science Possible Selves and the Desire to be a Scientist: Mindsets, Gender Bias, and Confidence during Early Adolescence
Previous Article in Journal
New Zealand Prostitutes’ Collective—An Example of a Successful Policy Actor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gendered Perceptions of Cultural and Skill Alignment in Technology Companies
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(2), 47; doi:10.3390/socsci6020047

Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus

Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Maria Charles and Sarah Thébaud
Received: 10 September 2016 / Revised: 6 April 2017 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 / Published: 10 May 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [956 KB, uploaded 10 May 2017]   |  

Abstract

Although women graduate from college at higher rates than men, they remain underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This study examines whether women react to failing a STEM weed-out course by switching to a non-STEM major and graduating with a bachelor’s degree in a non-STEM field. While competitive courses designed to weed out potential STEM majors are often invoked in discussions around why students exit the STEM pipeline, relatively little is known about how women and men react to failing these courses. We use detailed individual-level data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS) Postsecondary Transcript Study (PETS): 1988–2000 to show that women who failed an introductory calculus course are substantially less likely to earn a bachelor’s degree in STEM. In doing so, we provide evidence that weed-out course failure might help us to better understand why women are less likely to earn degrees. View Full-Text
Keywords: higher education; gender; STEM; inverse probability weighting higher education; gender; STEM; inverse probability weighting
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanabria, T.; Penner, A. Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 47.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top