Are Mental Biases Responsible for the Perceived Comfort Advantage in “Green” Buildings?
AbstractPrevious research has shown that merely calling an indoor environment environmentally certified will make people favor that environment over a conventional alternative. In this paper we explore whether this effect depends on participants deliberately comparing the two environments, and whether different reasons behind the certification influence the magnitude of the effect. In Experiment 1, participants in a between-subjects design assigned higher comfort ratings to an indoor environment that had been labeled “environmentally certified” in comparison with the exact same indoor environment that was unlabeled, suggesting that the effect arises even when participants do not compare the two environments when making their estimates. The results from Experiment 2 indicate that climate change mitigation (as the reason for the certification) is a slightly better trigger of the effect compared to climate change adaptation. The results suggest that studies on psychological effects of “green” buildings should experimentally control for the influence from participants’ judgmental biases. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Holmgren, M.; Sörqvist, P. Are Mental Biases Responsible for the Perceived Comfort Advantage in “Green” Buildings? Buildings 2018, 8, 20.
Holmgren M, Sörqvist P. Are Mental Biases Responsible for the Perceived Comfort Advantage in “Green” Buildings? Buildings. 2018; 8(2):20.Chicago/Turabian Style
Holmgren, Mattias; Sörqvist, Patrik. 2018. "Are Mental Biases Responsible for the Perceived Comfort Advantage in “Green” Buildings?" Buildings 8, no. 2: 20.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.