Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Word of Caution: Human Rights, Disability, and Implementation of the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals
Previous Article in Journal
Legal Instruments for Marine Sanctuary in the High Arctic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can International Human Rights Law Help Restore Access to Justice for Disabled Workers?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Laws 2016, 5(2), 21; doi:10.3390/laws5020021

NGO-Ization and Human Rights Law: The CRPD’s Civil Society Mandate

1
Law, Societies & Justice Program, University of Washington, Box 353565, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2
The Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington, Box 353565, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Academic Editor: Anna Arstein-Kerslake
Received: 21 March 2016 / Revised: 1 May 2016 / Accepted: 6 May 2016 / Published: 11 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disability Human Rights Law)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [215 KB, uploaded 11 May 2016]

Abstract

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is unique among international human rights instruments for including a “civil society mandate”. Within the convention, disabled persons organizations (DPOs) are identified as having the responsibility to “be involved and participate fully in the monitoring process” of the CRPD. In response to this mandate, international funders, NGOs (non-governmental organizations), and networks committed to the CPRD have begun to implement capacity-building programs that target grassroots DPOs with the goal of ensuring they become advocates and monitors of the CRPD. While the goals of these capacity-building programs are admirable, they must be critically assessed. The NGO-ization theory within development studies offers a framework for analyzing the potential unintended consequences of donors providing new funding, NGOs providing training, and global networks integrating local partners. NGO-ization studies have identified how grassroots associations are co-opted by outside actors through formalization and professionalization processes that significantly alter local groups and alienate members, thus making those associations less representative and less responsive to local needs and interests. Human rights scholars and international organizations focused on the CRPD should incorporate an NGO-ization perspective into their research and project-implementation to ensure that grassroots voices are heard and local needs addressed. View Full-Text
Keywords: civil society; human rights law; non-governmental organizations; disabled persons organizations; capacity building; grassroots associations civil society; human rights law; non-governmental organizations; disabled persons organizations; capacity building; grassroots associations
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Meyers, S. NGO-Ization and Human Rights Law: The CRPD’s Civil Society Mandate. Laws 2016, 5, 21.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top