Next Article in Journal
An Investigation on the Softening Mechanism of 5754 Aluminum Alloy during Multistage Hot Deformation
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure Evolution and Biodegradation Behavior of Laser Rapid Solidified Mg–Al–Zn Alloy
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Metals 2017, 7(4), 108; doi:10.3390/met7040108

Measuring Plasticity with Orientation Contrast Microscopy in Aluminium 6061-T4

1
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
2
EEMMeCS Department, Ghent University, Technologiepark 903, 9052 Zwijnaarde-Gent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Nong Gao
Received: 22 February 2017 / Revised: 12 March 2017 / Accepted: 17 March 2017 / Published: 23 March 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2207 KB, uploaded 24 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

Orientation contrast microscopy (i.e., electron backscattered diffraction, EBSD) was employed to monitor the plastic strain in loaded tensile samples of aluminium alloy Al6061 in T4 condition. The kernel average misorientation (KAM) is known to be an appropriate parameter in orientation contrast microscopy which has the potential to characterise the plastic strain by monitoring the local misorientations. This technique was applied here to gauge the extent of the plastic zone around a fatigue crack. To establish the magnitude of strain (which can be identified by the KAM parameter), a series of tensile samples were strained in the range of 1% to 25%. KAM maps were compared, and the average misorientations were related to the tensile strain values. The KAM distribution functions for all the strained samples were derived from a large scanned area. In addition, Vickers microhardness tests were conducted for these series of samples. This allowed the comparison of the mesoscopic plastic strain measured by Vickers microhardness with the micro plastic strain locally obtained by KAM. Noise was observed in the average KAM values up to a plastic strain of 1.5%. For the plastic strain exceeding 1.5%, noise no longer dominates the KAM map, and a positive—though not linear—correspondence between plastic strain and KAM was observed. The observed plastic zone at the tip of the fatigue crack by micro-Vickers hardness measurements was about an order of magnitude higher than the plastic zone observed on the KAM maps. In view of the calibration of KAM values on the tensile samples, it could be concluded that in the larger area of the plastic zone, the strain did not exceed the critical value of 1.5%. View Full-Text
Keywords: orientation contrast microscopy; electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD); kernel average misorientation (KAM); aluminium; plastic zone orientation contrast microscopy; electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD); kernel average misorientation (KAM); aluminium; plastic zone
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghodrat, S.; Riemslag, A.C.; Kestens, L.A.I. Measuring Plasticity with Orientation Contrast Microscopy in Aluminium 6061-T4. Metals 2017, 7, 108.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Metals EISSN 2075-4701 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top