Next Article in Journal
Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Austempering SUS440 Steel Thin Plates
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Structural Analysis of Copper-Zirconium Oxide
Previous Article in Journal
Monte Carlo Modelling of Single-Crystal Diffuse Scattering from Intermetallics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wear Behaviour of A356/TiAl3 in Situ Composites Produced by Mechanical Alloying

Manufacturing Engineering of Technology Faculty, Karabuk University, 78100 Karabuk, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2016, 6(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/met6020034
Submission received: 26 December 2015 / Revised: 20 January 2016 / Accepted: 2 February 2016 / Published: 5 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Powder Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
In this study, the effects of in situ TiAl3 particles on dry sliding wear behavior of A356 aluminum alloy (added Ti) composites were investigated. The wear samples were prepared by adding different amounts of Ti (4%, 6%, and 8%) into A356 powder alloy by mechanical alloying. The mechanically alloyed powders were cold pressed at 600 MPa and sintered 530 °C for 1 h in argon atmosphere and cooled in the furnace. After the sintering process, the samples were characterized. The results show that AlTi and TiAl3 intermetallic phases were formed and their amount increased depending on the amount of Ti added into A356 powder alloy. Out of the samples sintered with different titanium amounts (1 h at 530 °C), the highest hardness value and, accordingly, the lowest wear amount, were observed in the alloy containing 8% Ti.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aluminum and its alloys are commonly used in structural applications in the automotive and aerospace industry, owing to their low densities and high specific resistances. However, these materials have poor tribological properties [1]. Magnesium is an important element which forms a significant solid solution in Al-Si alloys and increases the strengths of alloys with precipitation hardening. A356 alloys constitute the most important group of Al-Si-Mg alloys whose strength can be increased with Mg2Si precipitates in Al matrix [2,3,4,5]. Another important method used to improve the mechanical properties of the alloy is to compose stable in situ intermetallic phases in the structure [6,7,8]. In the production of aluminum metal matrix composites (AMMC), which are defined as materials having superior tribological properties, the most common materials used as reinforcement phase are SiC [9,10,11,12,13,14], Al2O3 [15,16], TiB2 [17,18] and TiC [19]. In the production of many AMMC materials, ex situ techniques are preferred (supplements made to the matrix ex situ in order to increase strength). The biggest contribution of ex situ addition of reinforcement materials to the matrix is that they protect the stable condition of the reinforcement phase in the structure at elevated temperatures. However, certain reinforcement phases are subject to phase transformation at elevated temperatures and, thus, AMMCs exhibit unstable structure. As to in situ composite materials, reinforcement phases are formed during solidification, sintering, or synthesizing [7,20,21,22]. Thus, in situ reinforcement phases make processes shorter and reduce the costs. In Al-Ti alloy system, TiAl3 and AlTi intermetallic phases are formed in situ at the equilibrium conditions and these phases increase the hardness and strength of AMMC materials. Aluminum alloys reinforced with aluminates particles are preferred due to their high strengths and mechanical properties at elevated temperatures [23,24]. In comparison to other Al-rich (NiAl3, FeAl3, etc.) intermetallic, they are more attractive as they have lower densities (3.4 gr/cm3) and higher melting points (~1350 °C) [22,25,26,27]. This present study aims at developing new materials with improved wear properties by adding Ti to A356 alloy. The influence of intermetallic phases (TiAl3 and AlTi) formed in situ during the sintering process on the wear behaviors were investigated.

2. Experimental Procedure

For the experimental studies, A356 (Al-Si-Mg) alloy powder having a mean particle size of <50 μm was used as the matrix material. The chemical composition of the alloy powder is given in Table 1. Titanium powder with 99.7% purity and 10 μm mean particle size was added into A356 alloy powder samples with three different percentages, namely 4%, 6%, and 8%, by weight. The samples were then mechanically alloyed for 45 min at 10:1 ball-to-powder ratio a SPEX SamplePreb unit (SPEX SamplePreb, Standmore, UK) [28]. The mechanically-alloyed A356-Ti powder samples were then cold pressed unidirectionally at 600 MPa to obtain 6 mm height small cylindrical samples having 10 mm diameter. The samples were sintered at 530 °C for 1 h at a 10 °C/min heating rate in an argon atmosphere and cooled in the furnace. After the sintering process had been completed, the samples were cleaned with alcohol and acetone and left to dry. Following standard metallographic processes, the samples were etched for 30–45 s with 2 mL (HF), 90 mL pure water, 5 mL (HNO3), and 3 mL (HCl) for microstructural examinations. Archimedes’ method was used for density measurements of the samples. Following the density measurements, the samples were characterized through X-ray diffraction method (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI, Hilliboro, OR, USA), transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI, Hilliboro, OR, USA), and hardness measurements. For XRD examinations, an INEL unit (INEL, Artenay, France) was used, while a FEI Quanta 250 (30 kV) (FEI, Hilliboro, OR, USA) was used for SEM and EDS examinations. As for TEM examinations, an FEI Tecnai G2 F30 unit (200 kV) (FEI, Hilliboro, OR, USA) was used. Hardness values of the samples were determined by calculating the mean of five measurements obtained using an AFFRI hardness measurement device (HV2) (AFFRI, Olona, Italy). Wear tests were carried out on an AISI 4423 steel disc having 58 HRC and rotating continuously in a pin-on-disc wear device.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the A356 alloy.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the A356 alloy.
AlloySiFeCuMnMgZnTiPb
A3566.50.150.030.030.40.050.20.03
Prior to the wear tests, the surfaces of each sample were prepared with 1200 grade SiC abrasive to ensure a full contact between the abrasive steel disc and sample surfaces. All wear tests were carried out at room temperature and under dry sliding conditions. In these tests, a 30 N load, 1 m·s−1 sliding speed, and five different sliding distances, namely 400 m, 800 m, 1200 m, 1600 m, and 2000 m, were used. Following the wear tests, the worn surfaces of the samples were examined using SEM.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 gives SEM images of the microstructure of A356-Ti alloy sintered at 530 °C for 1 h. It is clear in Figure 1 that Ti added into a A356 matrix at different ratios (4%, 6%, and 8%) showed different distribution patterns in the microstructure following the mechanical alloying process. The presence of large titanium grains within the A356 matrix may be explained in two different ways. First, since the size of the titanium particles added into the matrix was too small (10 µm), the powders might have become agglomerated. Secondly, this situation may have resulted from the characteristic feature of the mechanical alloying process. As is well known, mechanical alloying is a solid-state process that starts with cold welding of powder particles that are squeezed between two balls and/or between a ball and the container wall, as high-energy balls crash into one another and the container wall during the process. Then, powder particles undergo work hardening and in the last phase, particles are fragmented. Previous studies reported a slight increase in the powder dimension with the effect of cold welding taking place in the first stage of the mechanical alloying process [29,30,31]. Therefore, titanium powder particles in the matrix can be combined together during mechanical alloying and form coarse grains. Intermetallic compounds (TiAl3), resulting from the reaction between Al matrix and Ti during sintering of cold-formed compacts, are also observed in the SEM images. It can also be seen that TiAl3 intermetallic phase (Figure 1a) that seems to come out in the structure during sintering is surrounded by the matrix and is very small. In addition, a reaction takes place between the aluminum matrix and reinforcement phase interface in A356 alloy that has added titanium. This was also pointed out in a study carried out by Yu et al. [32].
Figure 1. SEM images of Al-Ti alloys 4% Ti (a); 6% Ti (b); and 8% Ti (c) sintered at 530 °C for 1 h.
Figure 1. SEM images of Al-Ti alloys 4% Ti (a); 6% Ti (b); and 8% Ti (c) sintered at 530 °C for 1 h.
Metals 06 00034 g001
AlTi and TiAl3 particles are formed in situ form within the matrix [8,33]. To better examine the dimensions of intermetallic compounds formed in the in situ structure, TEM examinations were carried out. Figure 2 gives an image of TEM bright-area and selected-area diffraction pattern, where it is seen that in situ titanium aluminate particles with a particle size of about 50 nm are formed in the structure during the sintering.
In the bright-area TEM image, TiAl3 intermetallic phase is evident in A356 matrix depending on the sintering process. Additionally, a ringed structure is clearly seen in the diffraction pattern image of the selected area. The ringed appearance is associated with deformation of the crystal structure during the mechanical alloying process as well as the formation of a harmonic, wide-angle grain structure. An increase in the amount of deformation occurring in the powder particles during the mechanical alloying process reduces the recrystallization temperature. Thus, a larger grained structure is expected to form during the sintering following the deformation. However, as Ti is added into the A356 matrix it reacts and forms a TiAl3 phase, it is clear that the grain growth of newly-formed grains in the structure is not excessive. This is because of the fact that certain phases added into the Al matrix, such as TiAl3, TiB2, TiC, and B, inhibit the grain growth [17,34]. X-ray diffraction results of A356-Ti alloy having different ratios of Ti are given in Figure 3.
Figure 2. TEM images of 6% Ti added A356 alloy bright-area (a) and selected-area (b) diffraction pattern.
Figure 2. TEM images of 6% Ti added A356 alloy bright-area (a) and selected-area (b) diffraction pattern.
Metals 06 00034 g002
Figure 3. XRD results of A356-Ti alloy with 4% (a); 6% (b); and 8% (c) Ti.
Figure 3. XRD results of A356-Ti alloy with 4% (a); 6% (b); and 8% (c) Ti.
Metals 06 00034 g003
It is known that different intermetallic compounds (α2-Ti3Al, γ-TiAl, TiAl3, and TiAl2) are formed in the Al-Ti phase diagram depending on the ratios of Al and Ti elements and alloying conditions [35]. In the present study, it was determined that TiAl3 and AlTi reinforcement phases which were expected to be formed in the structure with X-ray diffraction were actually formed via in situ reactions. This in situ reaction is as follows:
Ti + 3 Al TiAl 3
In situ titanium aluminate intermetallic compounds in the structure are intermetallic compounds whose crystal structures are different from metals. In the study conducted by Chianeh et al. [33], it was reported that only the TiAl3 intermetallic phase was obtained in the samples sintered at 500 °C for 9 h and the samples sintered at 600 °C for 3 h. In this study, XRD results given in Figure 3 show that both AlTi and TiAl3 phases can be formed following sintering at 530 °C for 1 h. XRD results also demonstrate that the TiAl3 phase can be formed during the sintering lasting for 1 h and increases depending on the increase in the Ti amount added into the alloy. Post-sintering hardness values of A356-Ti powder alloy produced with mechanical alloying where different amounts of Ti are added are given in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Hardness values of A356 different amounts of Ti added.
Figure 4. Hardness values of A356 different amounts of Ti added.
Metals 06 00034 g004
As can be seen in Figure 4, the hardness values of samples containing 4% Ti, 6% Ti, and 8% Ti are 37 HV, 41 HV, and 46 HV, respectively. The lowest hardness value was observed for the samples containing 4% Ti, while the highest hardness value was measured for the samples containing 8% Ti. Accordingly, as the Ti amount in the alloy increases, the hardness of Al-Ti alloy also increases. That increase in hardness is associated with the increase of the volume fraction of the TiAl3 intermetallic phase. This finding is supported by a previous study [8]. Post-sintering densities of A356 alloy into which different amounts of Ti were added are given in Figure 5. Archimedes method was used for the density measurement.
Figure 5. Densities of A356 alloy containing different amounts of Ti.
Figure 5. Densities of A356 alloy containing different amounts of Ti.
Metals 06 00034 g005
When post-sintering density values of A356 alloy into which different amounts of Ti were added are examined, the highest value is observed for the samples containing 8% Ti (2.68 g·cm−3), while the lowest value is obtained for the samples containing 4% Ti (2.61 g·cm−3). As the amount of % Ti in the alloy increases, density and hardness values of alloys also increase. The reason behind this hardness and density increase is the fact that the density of titanium is higher than the density of A356 alloy. Weight losses of A356-Ti alloys produced with mechanical alloying under 30 N load for different distances (400 m, 800 m, 1200 m, 1600 m, and 2000 m) are given in Figure 6.
Figure 6. Weight losses of the samples depending on the sliding distances.
Figure 6. Weight losses of the samples depending on the sliding distances.
Metals 06 00034 g006
As evident in Figure 6, the highest weight loss occurs in the alloy containing 4% Ti, while the lowest weight loss is observed for the alloy containing 8% Ti. However, weight loss values of the alloys containing 6% and 8% Ti are extremely close to each other. The highest weight loss of the sample containing 4% Ti can be attributed to its lower hardness, as well as the lower amount of intermetallic phases. The hardness of the AMCs increased with increasing Ti amount. As it is known, the weight loss of a material in a wear test decreases with an increase in the hardness of the material [12,15]. Vencl et al. [36] pointed out that the rate of reinforcement should be increased to reduce plastic deformation and to increase hardness of the material. Average friction coefficients of Al-Ti alloys containing different amounts of titanium (at the end of 2000 m) are given in Figure 7.
Figure 7. Average friction coefficients of Al-Ti alloys.
Figure 7. Average friction coefficients of Al-Ti alloys.
Metals 06 00034 g007
The friction coefficients given in the Figure 7 are average values obtained for each alloy at the end of 2000 m sliding distance. The lowest friction coefficient was obtained for the alloy containing 8% Ti, while the highest friction coefficient was obtained for the alloy containing 4% Ti. As there is a relationship between weight losses and friction coefficients, the friction coefficient decreases with the increase in the hardness of the alloy. It was determined that both the weight loss and friction coefficient of the alloy, which has the lowest hardness value and contains 4% Ti are higher than the others. SEM images taken from the worn surfaces of Al-Ti alloys are given in the Figure 8.
Figure 8. SEM images of the worn surface of Al-Ti alloys 4% Ti (a); 6% Ti (b); and 8% Ti (c).
Figure 8. SEM images of the worn surface of Al-Ti alloys 4% Ti (a); 6% Ti (b); and 8% Ti (c).
Metals 06 00034 g008
When the SEM image of the worn surface of Al-4% Ti alloy that has the highest weight loss is examined (Figure 8a), it is seen that plastic deformation and adhesion occurred on the surface. That can be explained by the fact that the particles pulled off the surface during the wear test are moved and smeared onto the worn surface once more [37,38]. Smearing which occurs during the wear test is also observed in the worn surfaces of other alloys containing 6% Ti and 8% Ti. Another important point observed from the worn surfaces is the lack of deep marks on the surface. Additionally, it is seen that oxidation occurs on the worn surfaces of the samples into which 4%, 6%, and 8% titanium are added. As mentioned in a previous study, the oxidation on the worn surfaces results from the heat caused by the friction occurring during the wear tests [18]. That stable oxide structure forming on the worn surfaces acts as solid lubricant during dry sliding. When looking at the hardness values in Figure 4, it is clear that as the amount of titanium added into the alloy increases, hardness also increases. Another impact of hardness values (Figure 7) is that friction coefficients decrease depending on the titanium amount added into the alloy.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, Al-Ti alloy powders were produced by mechanical alloying to contain 4%, 6% and 8% titanium respectively. They were then compacted cold and sintered at 530 °C for 1 h. The effect of the percentage of titanium on the hardness and the wear properties of the various sintered samples were examined. The following could be concluded:
  • As the amount of Ti in Al-Ti alloys increases, the hardness value increases.
  • As the amount of added Ti increases in the composites, the density value also increases since the density of Ti is higher than that of Al.
  • The XRD examinations show that the titanium aluminate phases (TiAl3 and AlTi), which increase strength in the samples, are formed in the alloy following the sintering process.
  • The amount of intermetallic phases in the structure during sintering increases depending on the increasing titanium addition and that affects the wear properties.
  • Sintered samples with higher percentages of titanium would exhibit less weight loss and a lower coefficient of friction.

Author Contributions

Study design: D. Özyürek and V. Demir; Experimental work: S. Cam; Results analysis and Manuscript preparation: All authors; Manuscript proof and submission: D. Özyürek.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, S.; Balasubramanian, V. Developing a mathematical model to evaluate wear rate of AA7075/SiCp powder metallurgy. Wear 1999, 264, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Azadi, M.; Shirazabad, M.M. Heat treatment effect on thermo-mechanical fatigue and low cycle fatigue behaviors of A356.0 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 2013, 45, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ragab, K.A.; Samuel, A.M.; Al-Ahmari, A.M.A.; Samuel, F.H.; Doty, H.W. Influence of fluidized sand bed heat treatment on the performance of Al-Si cast alloys. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 1177–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, M.; Jian, Z.; Yang, G.; Zhou, Y. Effects of T6 heat treatment on the microstructure, tensile properties and fracture behavior of the modified A356 alloys. Mater. Des. 2012, 36, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kliauga, A.M.; Vieira, E.A.; Ferrante, M. The influence of impurity level and tin addition on the aging heat treatment of the 356 class alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 480, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahmed, S.; Haseeb, A.S.M.A.; Kurny, A.S.W. Study of wear behaviour of Al-4.5% Cu-3.4% Fe in situ composite: Effect of termal and mechanical processing. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2007, 182, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niu, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, X. In-situ synthesis of Al3Ti particles reinforced Al-Based composite coating. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, 1387–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Özyürek, D.; Tekeli, S.; Tuncay, T.; Yılmaz, R. The effect of synthesis time on the wear behavior of Al-8% Ti alloy produced by mechanical alloying. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2012, 51, 491–495. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lu, L.; Lai, M.O.; Ng, C.W. Enhanced mechanical properties of an Al based metal matrix composite prepared using mechanical alloying. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1998, 252, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, Q.; McColl, I.R.; Harris, S.J.; Waterhouse, R.B. The role of debris in the fretting wear of a SiC reinforced aluminium alloy matris composite. Wear 2000, 245, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, N.; Nash, P.; Yang, X. The effect of mechanical alloying on SiC distribution and the properties of 6061 aluminum composite. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2005, 170, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Özyürek, D.; Tekeli, S. An investigation on wear resistance of SiCp-reinforced aluminium composites produced by mechanical alloying. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2010, 17, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aztekin, H.; Özyürek, D.; Çetinkaya, K. Production of hypo-eutectic Al-Si alloy based metal matrix composite with thixomoulding processing. High Temp. Mater. Process. 2010, 29, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Walker, J.C.; Rainforth, W.M.; Jones, H. Lubricated sliding wear behaviour of aluminium alloy composites. Wear 2005, 259, 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Özyürek, D.; Tekeli, S.; Güral, A.; Meyveci, A.; Gürü, M. Effect of Al2O3 amount on microstructure and wear properties of Al-Al2O3 metal matrix composites prepared using mechanical alloying method. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2010, 49, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Daoud, A.; Reif, W. Influence of Al2O3 particulate on the aging response of A356 Al-based composites. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2002, 123, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mandal, A.; Murty, B.S.; Chakraborty, M. Wear behaviour of near eutectic Al-Si alloy reinforced with in-situ TiB2 particles. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 506, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Özyürek, D.; Ciftci, I. An investigation into wear behaviour of TiB2 particle reinforced aluminum composites produced by mechanical alloying. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2011, 18, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruiz-Navas, E.M.; Fogognolo, J.B.; Valesco, J.B.; Ruiz-Prieto, J.M.; Froyen, L. One step production of aluminium matrix composite powders by mechanical alloying. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Clemens, H.; Wallgram, W.; Kremmer, S.; Ther, V.G.; Otto, A.; Bartels, A. Design of novel β-solidifying TiAl alloys with adjustable β/B2-phase fraction and excellent hot-workability. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2008, 10, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tetsui, T.; Shindo, K.; Kaji, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Takeyama, M. Fabrication of TiAl components by means of hot forging and machining. Intermetallics 2005, 13, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hsu, C.J.; Chang, C.Y.; Kao, P.W.; Ho, N.J.; Chang, C.P. Al-Al3Ti nonocomposites produced in-situ by friction stir processing. Acta Mater. 2006, 54, 5241–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yeh, C.L.; Su, S.H. In situ formation of TiAl-TiB2 composite by SHS. J. Alloy. Compd. 2006, 407, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Xiu, Z.; Wu, G.; Jiang, L.; Gou, H.; Jiang, G. Microstructure evolution of Ti-Al-C system composite. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2010, 39, 1152–1156. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shi, T.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Chen, L. Fabrication, microstructure and mechanical properties of TiC/Ti2AlC/TiAl3 in situ composite. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2011, 27, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, T.; Zhang, J. Thermoanalytical and metallographical investigations on the synthesis of TiAl3 from elemantary powders. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 99, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Prakash, U.; Sauthoff, G. Structure and properties of Fe-Al-Ti intermetallic alloys. Intermetallics 2001, 9, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Özyürek, D.; Tunçay, T.; Evlen, H.; Çiftçi, I. Synthesis, Characterization and Dry Sliding Wear Behavior of In-situ Formed TiAl3 Precipitate Reinforced A356 Alloy Produced by Mechanical Alloying Method. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 813–820. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rafiei, M.; Khademzadeh, S.; Parvin, N. Characterization and formation mechanism of nanocrystalline W-Al alloy prepared by mechanical alloying. J. Alloy. Compd. 2010, 489, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, J.; Ma, X. Preparation of a high strength Al-Cu-Mg alloy by mechanical alloying and press-forming. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 550, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gu, D.; Zhang, G.; Dai, D.; Wang, H.; Shen, Y. Nanocrystalline tungsten-nickel heavy alloy reinforced by in-situ tungsten carbide: Mechanical alloying preparation and microstructural evolution. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2013, 37, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, P.; Zhang, L.C.; Zhang, W.Y.; Das, J.; Kim, K.B.; Eckert, J. Interfacial reaction during the fabrication of Ni60Nb40 metallic glass particles-reinforced Al based MMCs. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 444, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chianeh, V.A.; Hossein, H.R.; Nofar, M. Microstructural features and mechanical properties of Al-Al3Ti composite fabricated by in-situ powder metallurgy route. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 473, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rao, A.K.P.; Das, K.; Murty, B.S.; Chakraborty, M. Microstructural and wear behavior of hypoeutectic Al-Si alloy (LM25) grain refined and modified with Al-Ti-C-Sr master alloy. Wear 2006, 261, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mishin, Y.; Herzig, C. Diffusion in the Ti-Al system. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 589–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vencl, A.; Rac, A.; Bobic, I.; Miskovic, Z. Tribological properties of Al-Si alloy reinforced with Al2O3 particles. Tribol. Ind. 2006, 28, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sağlam, I.; Özyürek, D.; Çetinkaya, K. Effect of ageing treatment on wear properties and electrical conductivity of Cu-Cr-Zr alloy. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 1465–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Attar, H.; Prashanth, K.G.; Chaubey, A.K.; Calin, M.; Zhang, L.C.; Scudino, S.; Eckert, J. Comparison of wear properties of commercially pure titanium prepared by selective laser melting and casting processes. Mater. Lett. 2015, 142, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çam, S.; Demir, V.; Özyürek, D. Wear Behaviour of A356/TiAl3 in Situ Composites Produced by Mechanical Alloying. Metals 2016, 6, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6020034

AMA Style

Çam S, Demir V, Özyürek D. Wear Behaviour of A356/TiAl3 in Situ Composites Produced by Mechanical Alloying. Metals. 2016; 6(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6020034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çam, Seda, Vedat Demir, and Dursun Özyürek. 2016. "Wear Behaviour of A356/TiAl3 in Situ Composites Produced by Mechanical Alloying" Metals 6, no. 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/met6020034

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop