Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Buckling and Post-Buckling Behavior of a Central Notched Thin Aluminum Foil with Nonlinearity in Consideration
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties of High Strength Aluminum Alloy EN AW-7075 Additively Manufactured by Directed Energy Deposition
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Titanium–Equine Bone Biocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Single Crystals through a µ-Helix Grain Selection Process during Electron Beam Metal Additive Manufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal Frequency Drift of 3D Printed Microwave Components

by
Gregory Peter Le Sage
U.S. Government, Washington, DC 20001, USA
Metals 2020, 10(5), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050580
Submission received: 14 March 2020 / Revised: 10 April 2020 / Accepted: 26 April 2020 / Published: 29 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Additive Manufacturing – State of the Art 2020)

Abstract

:
Fabrication of microwave slot array antennas and waveguide bandpass and notch filters using 3D printing has significant advantages in terms of speed and cost even for parts with high mechanical complexity. One disadvantage of Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed, copper plated microwave components is that some SLA resins have a high Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE), quoted in micrometers per meter per degree or 10−6 per degree. Compared to typically used metals such as aluminum (CTE 24 × 10−6·K−1) and copper (CTE 17 × 10−6·K−1), SLA resin can have CTE above 100 × 10−6·K−1. Resonant structures experience significant frequency drift with temperature changes on the order of 10–50 °C. The issue of 3D printed microwave structures changing frequency characteristics significantly with temperature shift has not been addressed or reviewed in current literature. We measured and simulated the effect of temperature change on a slot array, cavity notch filters, and post loaded waveguide bandpass filters. We tested several types of SLA resin, different plating techniques, and also Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Binder Infusion metal 3D printing. Performance as a function of temperature is presented for these alternatives.

1. Introduction

Microwave slot array antennas and bandpass and notch filters can be produced quickly and inexpensively using 3D printing [1,2,3]. The high CTE of SLA resins causes frequency drift with temperature to be notably worse than solid metal structures [4]. Somos Taurus SLA resin [5] has CTE of 105.3 × 10−6·K−1 over the temperature range 0–50 °C. Choosing lower CTE resin, strengthening metal coatings using multiple layers of nickel and copper, and switching to 3D metal printing with DMLS or binder infusion improves frequency dependence on temperature. In this paper, the frequency dependence with temperature is presented for multiple SLA resins, multiple metal coatings, and 3D metal printed structures. Theoretical fits to expected temperature variation are presented to confirm the predictability of performance. Armed with these predictions and results, requirements for temperature stability can be applied to make decisions regarding the materials and processes to use for 3D printed fabrication of microwave devices.
Another notable advantage of 3D printed parts is that they are much lighter than metal parts. Invar is a 36% nickel alloy with iron. It is used when temperature stability is important. It is ductile and weldable. Its CTE over 20–100 °C is <1.3 × 10−6·K−1, with σ = 0.202 × 106 S/m (must be plated for use in microwave circuits). Its density is 8.1 to 8.2 g·cm−3. Accura Bluestone [6] has solid density of 1.78 g·cm−3 at 25 °C, so invar is 4.6 times heavier than Accura Bluestone. Using metals with low CTE [7] is a conventional way to attack the temperature variation problem. There are also various methods of compensating temperature variations in microwave structures [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
It is possible to achieve metal CTE characteristics with 3D printing using DMLS. The AlSi10Mg alloy used for DMLS 3D printing has a CTE of 20.5 × 10−6·K−1 [20] and σ = 11.3 × 106 S/m [21], which is better CTE than pure aluminum. There are a range of CTE values from 53 × 10−6·K−1 to 145 × 10−6·K−1 available for a desktop SLA 3D printer [22]. Electroplating can also use layers of copper and nickel to strengthen the metal coating and resist the expansion of plastic. Relatively broad band structures such as slot arrays and bandpass filters are not as badly affected by frequency drift as narrow band notch filters.

2. Materials and Methods

We measured the effect of temperature change on a slot array, cavity notch filters with single and multiple cavities, and post loaded waveguide bandpass filters. We tested several types of SLA resin, different plating techniques, and also DMLS and Binder Infusion metal 3D printed structures.
Analytical predictions of frequency shifts with temperature and calculation of effective CTE are estimates based on bulk scaling of resonators. Analytical scaling and HFSS bulk scaling results are consistent. Mechanical complications of the expansion of the structure causing it to expand in a more complicated way than bulk scaling cannot be simulated analytically or with HFSS. Metal coatings decrease the effect of plastic expansion. Quoted commercial CTE values for 3D printed resin are assumed to be accurate, and their quoted values change with temperature ranges. There is no quoted CTE for the binder infusion metal. The DMLS metal CTE is based on a publication. Measurements present the actual frequency drift performance of each device. Calculations and predictions offer a way to know the impact of material and construction choices.
The oven used for temperature testing was a Test Equity model 107, with temperature range −42 to +130 °C. The network analyzer used in the measurements was a Keysight N5242A. Commercial waveguide to coaxial transitions were used to test both filters and a slot array antenna.
An 18 GHz slot array was cycled in temperature from −10 to +60 °C six times in 24 h intervals. Only S11 was measured. After six cycles, there was visible warping of the structure. The S11 minimum changed permanently after each cycle, so there was a hysteresis effect with a 70 °C temperature excursion. Our theory is that the plastic expanding during heating pushes the metal plating, and when the plastic shrinks during cooling, the metal does not return exactly to its original position.
As shown in Figure 1, the minimum S11 was −20.047 dB at 18.07 GHz on the first cycle, −33.16 dB at 18.12 GHz after the second cycle, −32.11 dB at 18.13 GHz after the third cycle, −28.94 dB at 18.14 GHz after the fourth cycle, −22.19 dB at 18.15 GHz after the fifth cycle, and −27.36 dB at 18.14 GHz after the sixth cycle.
The maximum frequency excursion was 80 MHz, which is a 0.44% permanent change. The −10 dB bandwidth did not change from 100 MHz or 0.55%. A 70 °C temperature shift, a minimum of −10 °C and a maximum of +60 °C cause permanent damage to a 3D printed, copper plated microwave slot array. An obvious alternative that would avoid hysteresis and damage is metal 3D printing. Metal 3D printing with DMLS becomes expensive for part dimensions greater than six inches.
Three slot arrays were simulated with CTE of 50 × 10−6·K−1 to examine the effects of temperature change on gain and S11 parameters. A 315 × 323 mm array designed to operate at 18.4 GHz showed an S11 minimum at 18.375 GHz, with S11 = −30.52 dB with no temperature offset. The –10 dB S11 width was from 18.3 to 18.44 GHz (140 MHz bandwidth). With a 20-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 18.356 GHz (Δf = −19 MHz), with S11 = −30.78 dB. The −10 dB S11 width was from 18.28 to 18.43 GHz. With a 50-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 18.330 GHz (Δf = −45 MHz), with S11 = −35.5613 dB. The −10 dB S11 width was from 18.25 to 18.40 GHz. The temperature scaling is shown in Figure 2. This array used a four-point corporate network, so it had a wide bandwidth (145 MHz or 7.9%). The realized gain at the design frequency of 18.4 GHz was 34.16 dB with no temperature offset, and reduced to 33.92 dB with a 20-degree temperature offset and to 33.53 dB with a 50-degree temperature offset (−0.62 dB). This is due to the shift in optimum S11.
A 301 × 319 mm array designed to operate at 10.73 GHz had a minimum S11 at 10.7305 GHz, with S11 = −20.26 dB with no temperature offset as shown in Figure 3. The −10 dB S11 width was from 10.69 to 10.76 GHz (70 MHz bandwidth). With a 20-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 10.721 GHz (Δf = −9.5 MHz), with S11 = −20.1103 dB. The −10 dB width was from 10.6842 to 10.7530 GHz. With a 50-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 10.705 GHz (Δf = −25.5 MHz), with S11 = −20.87 dB. The −10 dB S11 width was from 10.67 to 10.74 GHz. This array was coaxial fed in the center of a centered feeding waveguide. The realized gain at the design frequency of 10.73 GHz reduced from 28.42 dB with no temperature offset to 28.45 dB with a 20-degree temperature offset and 28.13 dB with a 50-degree temperature offset (−0.29 dB).
A 448 × 420 mm array designed to operate at 8.18 GHz showed an S11 minimum at 8.171 GHz, with S11 = −30.11 dB with no temperature offset as shown in Figure 4. The −10 dB S11 width was from 8.13 to 8.22 GHz (90 MHz bandwidth). With a 20-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 8.161 GHz (Δf = −10 MHz), with S11 = −32.42 dB. The −10 dB S11 width was from 8.12 to 8.21 GHz. With a 50-degree temperature offset, the minimum S11 shifted to 8.147 GHz (Δf = −24 MHz), with S11 = −35.4 dB. The −10 dB S11 width was from 8.11 to 8.19 GHz. The array used a center feeding waveguide fed from the end, which is why it has smaller bandwidth. The realized gain at the design frequency of 8.18 GHz was 29.84 dB with no temperature offset, reduced to 29.81 dB with a 20 °C offset, and reduced to 29.66 dB with a 50-degree temperature offset (−0.18 dB).
Given that all three arrays lose less than one dB of realized gain with a 50 °C temperature increase, slot array performance is apparently not significantly affected by operating at high temperatures. The effect of temperature variation is much less pronounced than it is for narrow band notch filters and to a lesser degree bandpass filters. On the other hand, a high enough temperature will cause permanent changes to the array, and with a high enough temperature, visible damage.
A microwave notch filter can be created by coupling a single or multiple resonant cavities to a waveguide [23]. The cavity resonance causes a dip in S21, notching the frequency out of the passband. Not only do the resonant cavity dimensions grow with increasing temperature, but the coupling apertures will also increase in size, which also decreases the resonant frequency assuming that the cavity was originally under-coupled.
The resonant frequency of a TE101 rectangular cavity is given by
f 101 = c 2 π μ r ε r ( π a ) 2 + ( π d ) 2
For a resonant frequency of 10 GHz based on WR-90 waveguide (a = 0.9 inches = 22.86 mm), the guide wavelength is given by
λ g = λ 0 1 ( λ 0 λ c ) 2
where λc is the cutoff wavelength given by two times the waveguide width ‘a.’ At 10 GHz, λ0 = 29.979 mm and λg = 39.707 mm.
The length of a TE101 cavity is exactly λg/2 so d = 19.854 mm. As temperature increases, cavity dimensions change according to the following formulas:
a = 22.86 mm × ( 1 + C T E × Δ T )
d = 19.854 mm × ( 1 + C T E × Δ T )
The resonant frequency as a function of temperature and CTE is shown in Figure 5 below.
For a notch filter centered at 10 GHz, the slope for CTE 20 × 10−6·K−1 is −200 kHz·K−1. For CTE of 50 × 10−6·K−1, the slope is −499 kHz·K−1. For CTE of 100 × 10−6·K−1, the slope is −997 kHz·K−1. Equation (1) combined with Equations (3) and (4) yields the approximate result that the slope of resonant frequency change with temperature is –CTE multiplied by the unmodified resonant frequency. This matches the fit slopes for CTE 20, 50, and 100 × 10−6·K−1.
For a TE101 notch filter centered at 15.7 GHz, using the same analytical scaling, CTE of 20 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −300 kHz·K−1, a CTE of 50 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −800 kHz·K−1, and a CTE of 100 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −1.6 MHz·K−1. For a DMLS 3D printed cavity filter made with AlSi10Mg, with a notch at 15.644 GHz, with CTE published as 20.5 × 10−6·K−1, we measured −16 MHz shift for a temperature range from 23 to 55 °C, corresponding to −500 kHz·K−1. Measurement of S21 at 20, 23, 35, 40, 45, and 50 °C was followed by plotting the S21 null versus temperature and applying a linear fit to the data. An analytical fit to this frequency change corresponds to a CTE of 32 × 10−6·K−1. An image of the single cavity DMLS metal 3D printed notch filter is shown in Figure 6.
A single cavity filter SLA 3D printed with Formlabs Tough resin at 15.9 GHz using WR-62 waveguide, and plated with 12.7 μm copper, 25.4 μm nickel, and 12.7 μm copper measured 15.933 GHz with S21 = −16.04 dB at 20 °C, 15.91 GHz with S21 = −16.26 dB at 35 °C, 15.9036 GHz with S21 = −15.48 dB at 40 °C, and 15.913 GHz with S21 = −28.97 dB at 45 °C. The linear slope fit to these data is −856.23 kHz per °C. The analytical fit to CTE for this resonant cavity is 53.95 × 10−6·K−1. The published CTE of Formlabs Tough resin [24] in the cured state is 119 × 10−6·K−1, so the stronger metal coating did have an effect. The heated plastic expands, but a stronger metal coating more strongly resists this expansion. In the limit where the metal coating was very thick, it is obvious that the plastic would be completely prevented from expanding. Returning to 20 °C, the S21 null was −29.89 dB (−13.85 dB change) at 15.939 GHz (Δf = +6 MHz). There was some hysteresis effect.
Images of SLA 3D printed, copper plated single cavity notch filters using WR-42 and WR-62 waveguide are shown in Figure 7.
A single cavity filter SLA 3D printed with Taurus resin at 17.1 GHz using WR-62 waveguide, and plated with copper measured an S21 minimum at 17.068 GHz with S21 = –9 dB at 20 °C, 17.037 GHz with S21 −8.15 dB at 35 °C, 17.027 GHz with S21 = −8.31 dB at 40 °C, 17.015 GHz with S21 = −6.52 dB at 45 °C, and 17.001 GHz with S21 = −7.61 dB at 50 °C. As shown in Figure 8, the linear slope fit to these data is −2197.9 kHz per °C. The analytical fit to CTE for this resonant cavity is 129 × 10−6·K−1. The published CTE of Somos Taurus is 105.3 × 10−6·K−1. Returning to 20 °C, the S21 null was –7.61 dB (+ 1.39 dB change) at 17.055 GHz (Δf = −13 MHz). There was some hysteresis effect.
A three-cavity filter at 17.2 GHz was fabricated using binder infusion metal 3D printing. In this process, a binder is printed on tungsten powder and infused with bronze [25]. The percentage of tungsten is 50–55%. For a TE101 notch filter centered at 17.2 GHz, using the same analytical scaling, CTE of 20 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −343 kHz·K−1, a CTE of 50 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −859 kHz K−1, and a CTE of 100 × 10−6·K−1 produces a slope of −1.71 MHz·K−1. The binder infusion three cavity notch filter measured a frequency shift of 3 MHz over a temperature range from 23 to 50 °C, corresponding to −111.11 kHz·K−1. Compared to analytical scaling, this corresponds to an effective CTE of 6.5 × 10−6·K−1. Since bronze has CTE of 17 × 10−6·K−1 and tungsten has CTE of 4.5 × 10−6·K−1, assuming 50% of each one should expect overall CTE of 10.75 × 10−6·K−1. An image of the binder infusion metal 3D printed notch filter is shown in Figure 9.
One remedy for the temperature drift problem is to adjust the coupling aperture of a single cavity filter to be near critical coupling. This increases the resonant bandwidth. If the notch width is 150 MHz and the interfering signal has a bandwidth of 50 MHz or less, significant temperature drift can be tolerated while still attenuating the target signal. One problem with this technique is that it does not allow filtering of an interfering signal that is closer in frequency than the notch bandwidth.
The bandpass filter design that was 3D printed is a post loaded waveguide. The inductive posts form coupled resonant cavities. This filter was designed based on a technique described in [24]. The filter has openings along the center of the waveguide broad wall, following the technique described in [1] to enable internal electroplating of a 3D printed structure.
The SLA 3D printed, copper electroplated bandpass filter measured a passband shift of −549 kHz·K−1. The DMLS 3D printed bandpass filter measured a passband shift of −243.4 kHz·K−1. This was determined by measuring the S21 = −15 dB point of each bandpass S21 characteristic plot as a function of frequency. These were measured at 20, 23, 35, 40, 45, and 50 °C with frequencies 12.6892 GHz (20 °C), 12.6883 GHz (23 °C), 12.6850 GHz (35 °C), 12.6842 GHz (40 °C), 12.6833 GHz (45 °C), and 12.6817 GHz (50 °C) as shown in Figure 10. The value of f for S21 = −15 dB at each temperature was plotted and a linear fit was used to characterize the overall temperature variation. The high temp SLA, copper plated bandpass filter measured a passband shift of −365.89 kHz·K−1. The measured frequencies were 12.6742 GHz (20 °C), 12.6733 GHz (23 °C), 12.6708 GHz (35 °C), 12.6658 GHz (40 °C), 12.6650 GHz (45 °C), and 12.6642 GHz (50 °C). Images of the SLA and DMLS 3D printed, post-loaded, waveguide microwave bandpass filters are shown in Figure 11.
Simulation with HFSS using bulk scaling of the structure corresponding to CTE of 20 × 10−6·K−1 showed a frequency shift of −300 kHz·K−1, very close to the measured value for DMLS with actual reported CTE of 20 × 10−6·K−1. The HFSS simulation result is shown in Figure 12 for ΔT = 0 to 50 °C.

3. Conclusions

Resins used for stereolithography 3D printing typically have high CTE. Microwave structures manufactured with 3D printing using SLA and copper plated can have strong frequency dependence on temperature. In particular, multi-cavity filters with narrow bandwidth are strongly affected by dependence of resonant frequency on temperature. This can preclude their usefulness if the frequency drift approaches the bandwidth of the device. Electroplating with layers of copper and nickel to strengthen the metal coating resists the expansion of plastic and reduces temperature dependence. Using DMLS metal printing approaches metal structure performance, so that metal 3D printed structures can approach temperature characteristics of solid metal structures. Single cavity notch filters printed with lower CTE resin can be useful if a wide enough notch bandwidth is used to accommodate frequency drift. One must choose the right 3D printing materials and processes to achieve the temperature stability required by the application.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

Page: 9The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Le Sage, G.P. 3D printed waveguide slot array antennas. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1258–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Le Sage, G.P. Dielectric steering of a 3-D printed microwave slot array. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 2141–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hindle, P. First flight-worthy metal printed RF filter developed by airbus and 3D system. Microw. J. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tamayo-Dominguez, A.; Fernandez-Gonzales, J.; Sierra-Perez, M. Groove Gap Waveguide in 3-D Printed Technology for Low Loss, Weigh, and Cost Distribution Networks. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 4138–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Somos Taurus Resin Specification. Available online: https://www.dsm.com/solutions/additive-manufacturing/en_US/resource-center/user-guide/somos-taurus.html (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  6. Accura Bluestone Specification. Available online: https://www.buildparts.com/materials/accurabluestone (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  7. Martín-Iglesias, P.; Raadik, T.; Teberio, F.; Percaz, J.M.; Martín-Iglesias, S.; Pambaguian, L.; Arregui, I.; Arnedo, I.; Lopetegui, T.; Laso, M.A.G. Multiphysic Analysis of High Power Microwave Filter Using High Performance Aluminium Alloy. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Bochum, Germany, 16–18 July 2019; pp. 58–60. [Google Scholar]
  8. Djerafi, T.; Wu, K.; Deslandes, D. A Temperature-Compensation Technique for Substrate Integrated Waveguide Cavities and Filters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2012, 60, 2448–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keats, B.F. Bimetal Temperature Compensation for Waveguide Microwave Filters. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2007. Available online: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/3529/BFKPhDThesis.pdf;jsessionid=5258AA80CC2EEDBB50BBB511BC90A52E?sequence=1 (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  10. Martin, T.; Ghiotto, A.; Vuong, T.; Lotz, F. Self-Temperature-Compensated Air-Filled Substrate-Integrated Waveguide Cavities and Filters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018, 66, 3611–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lisi, M. Temperature compensation of microwave resonators and filters for space applications. Microw. J. 2015, 58, 100–108. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lisi, M. A Review of Temperature Compensation Techniques for Microwave Resonators and Filters. In Proceedings of the Micro and Millimetre Wave Technology and Techniques Workshop 2014, Estec, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 25 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Temperature Compensated Cavity Filters. EverythingRF. Available online: https://www.everythingrf.com/product-datasheet/521-334-temperature-compensated-cavity-filters (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  14. Hsieh, L.; Dai, S. Temperature Compensated Bandpass Filters in LTCC; SAND2013-2744C; Sandia National Lab.: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Temperature Compensated Microwave Resonator. US Patent 4677403, 30 June 1987.
  16. Temperature Compensated Resonator and Method. US Patent 6131256A, 17 October 2000.
  17. Filter with Temperature Compensated Tuning Screw. US Patent CA2206942C, 17 January 1999.
  18. Temperature Compensated Microwave Filter. US Patent US5867077A, 2 February 1999.
  19. Temperature Compensated High Power Bandpass Filter. US Patent US6529104B1, 4 March 2003.
  20. Gumbleton, R.; Cuenca, J.A.; Klemencic, G.M.; Jones, N.; Porch, A. Evaluating the coefficient of thermal expansion of additive manufactured AlSi10Mg using microwave techniques. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30, 100841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silbernagel, C.; Ashcroft, I.; Dickens, P.; Galea, M. Electrical resistivity of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg for use in electric motors. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Formlabs Resin Specifications. Available online: https://formlabs.com/3d-printers/form-3/tech-specs/#data-sheets (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  23. Matthaei, G.; Young, L.; Jones, E.M.T. Microwave Filters, Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures; Artech House: London, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  24. Available online: https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/Tough_Technical.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  25. Available online: http://exone.com/Admin/getmedia/79471d50-8b99-41e5-945d-4f151409ef42/X1_MaterialData_Tungsten-Bronze_Tekna_062519.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2020).
Figure 1. Minimum S11 frequency of slot array temperature cycled −10 °C to +60 °C.
Figure 1. Minimum S11 frequency of slot array temperature cycled −10 °C to +60 °C.
Metals 10 00580 g001
Figure 2. 18.4 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Figure 2. 18.4 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Metals 10 00580 g002
Figure 3. 10.73 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Figure 3. 10.73 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Metals 10 00580 g003
Figure 4. 8.18 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Figure 4. 8.18 GHz slot array temperature scaling.
Metals 10 00580 g004
Figure 5. Frequency scaling of 10 GHz TE101 Resonant Cavity – Temperature versus CTE.
Figure 5. Frequency scaling of 10 GHz TE101 Resonant Cavity – Temperature versus CTE.
Metals 10 00580 g005
Figure 6. DMLS metal 3D printed single cavity notch filter.
Figure 6. DMLS metal 3D printed single cavity notch filter.
Metals 10 00580 g006
Figure 7. SLA 3D printed single cavity notch filter using WR-42 and WR-62 waveguide.
Figure 7. SLA 3D printed single cavity notch filter using WR-42 and WR-62 waveguide.
Metals 10 00580 g007
Figure 8. Somos Taurus SLA 3D printed copper plated notch filter.
Figure 8. Somos Taurus SLA 3D printed copper plated notch filter.
Metals 10 00580 g008
Figure 9. Binder infusion metal 3D printed cavity notch filter.
Figure 9. Binder infusion metal 3D printed cavity notch filter.
Metals 10 00580 g009
Figure 10. Bandpass Filter -15 dB S21 Points versus Temperature.
Figure 10. Bandpass Filter -15 dB S21 Points versus Temperature.
Metals 10 00580 g010
Figure 11. SLA 3D printed, copper plated and DMLS microwave bandpass filter.
Figure 11. SLA 3D printed, copper plated and DMLS microwave bandpass filter.
Metals 10 00580 g011
Figure 12. Bandpass filter scaling in HFSS ΔT = 0–50 °C.
Figure 12. Bandpass filter scaling in HFSS ΔT = 0–50 °C.
Metals 10 00580 g012

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le Sage, G.P. Thermal Frequency Drift of 3D Printed Microwave Components. Metals 2020, 10, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050580

AMA Style

Le Sage GP. Thermal Frequency Drift of 3D Printed Microwave Components. Metals. 2020; 10(5):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le Sage, Gregory Peter. 2020. "Thermal Frequency Drift of 3D Printed Microwave Components" Metals 10, no. 5: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10050580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop