Next Article in Journal
Periodic Leg Movements during Sleep Associated with REM Sleep Behavior Disorder: A Machine Learning Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Microvascular Changes after Epiretinal Membrane Vitrectomy with Intraoperative Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: An OCT Angiography Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
“Bezoar Egg”—A Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Use of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Retinal Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Self-Inflicted Laser-Induced Retinopathy

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125, USA
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(4), 361; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14040361
Submission received: 16 December 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Coherence Tomography in Diagnosis of Ophthalmology Disease)

Abstract

:
This photo essay details a patient with self-inflicted laser-induced retinal injury progressing to full-thickness macular holes in both eyes. A 40-year-old patient presented after a self-inflicted injury by a handheld class 3 blue laser (450 nm) he purchased on the internet. The patient reported shining the laser through a window, which reflected the beam back into his eyes. Visual acuity was measured at 20/400 in both eyes. The initial fundus photographs revealed vitreous and preretinal hemorrhages in the right eye, and multiple yellow-white fresh laser burns in the macula of the left eye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed preretinal hemorrhage in the right eye and retinal disruption with preretinal hyper-reflective lesion in the left eye. After one month, his vision deteriorated to finger counting in each eye. He developed a full-thickness macular hole and hyperfluorescent curvilinear streaks in the superior maculae in both eyes. OCT images showed retinal pigment epithelium clumping and outer retinal atrophy in curvilinear streak areas in both eyes, which point to self-inflicted injury. This case illustrates laser-pointer-induced retinopathy and reinforces the necessity of public education on the dangers of utilizing handheld lasers without eye protection.

Figure 1. A 40-year-old patient presented after a self-inflicted injury by a handheld class 3 blue laser (450 nm) he purchased on the internet. The patient reported shining the laser through a window, which reflected the beam back into his eyes. The patient’s initial vision was 20/400 in both eyes. Fundus photographs taken at presentation show: (A) vitreous and preretinal hemorrhages in the right eye and (B) multiple yellow-white fresh laser burns in the central macula of the left eye. One month later, the patient was only able to count fingers with each eye. Fundus autofluorescence images taken at 1-month visit demonstrate hyperfluorescent curvilinear streaks in superior maculae in the right eye (C) and left eye (D). as well as hyperfluorescence in the fovea of both eyes. Retinal streaks point to self-inflicted laser injury, while peer-inflicted laser injuries have been described to result in focal foveal lesions [1]. Retinal damage from laser pointers may vary in morphology and include subretinal or intraretinal hemorrhage, retinal edema, retinal pigment epithelium scarring, foveal granularity, vitreous or chorioretinal hemorrhage, perifoveal drusenoid-like deposits/pigment clumps, ring-shaped hypopigmented lesions in fovea, macular holes, and rarely, choroidal neovascularization [2]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have identified 4 major classes of lasers (1–4), of which laser pointers belong to class 3R [3]. Exposures to direct and even reflected beam should be avoided without eye protection with class 3 or 4 lasers. Injuries to the eye can occur within moments with exposure to class 3 lasers emitting powers greater than 5 mW, and protective mechanisms of blinking or looking away are ineffective with such high powers. Labeling of the devices may not be accurate. The laser institute of America also cautions against pointing a laser at a mirror-like surface as the reflected beam may act like a direct beam on the eye [3,4].
Figure 1. A 40-year-old patient presented after a self-inflicted injury by a handheld class 3 blue laser (450 nm) he purchased on the internet. The patient reported shining the laser through a window, which reflected the beam back into his eyes. The patient’s initial vision was 20/400 in both eyes. Fundus photographs taken at presentation show: (A) vitreous and preretinal hemorrhages in the right eye and (B) multiple yellow-white fresh laser burns in the central macula of the left eye. One month later, the patient was only able to count fingers with each eye. Fundus autofluorescence images taken at 1-month visit demonstrate hyperfluorescent curvilinear streaks in superior maculae in the right eye (C) and left eye (D). as well as hyperfluorescence in the fovea of both eyes. Retinal streaks point to self-inflicted laser injury, while peer-inflicted laser injuries have been described to result in focal foveal lesions [1]. Retinal damage from laser pointers may vary in morphology and include subretinal or intraretinal hemorrhage, retinal edema, retinal pigment epithelium scarring, foveal granularity, vitreous or chorioretinal hemorrhage, perifoveal drusenoid-like deposits/pigment clumps, ring-shaped hypopigmented lesions in fovea, macular holes, and rarely, choroidal neovascularization [2]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have identified 4 major classes of lasers (1–4), of which laser pointers belong to class 3R [3]. Exposures to direct and even reflected beam should be avoided without eye protection with class 3 or 4 lasers. Injuries to the eye can occur within moments with exposure to class 3 lasers emitting powers greater than 5 mW, and protective mechanisms of blinking or looking away are ineffective with such high powers. Labeling of the devices may not be accurate. The laser institute of America also cautions against pointing a laser at a mirror-like surface as the reflected beam may act like a direct beam on the eye [3,4].
Diagnostics 14 00361 g001
Figure 2. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images taken at presentation show preretinal hemorrhage in the right eye (A) and retinal disruption with preretinal hyper-reflective lesion in the left eye (B). One month later, the OCT images demonstrate the development of full-thickness macular holes in the right (C) and left eye (D), and retinal pigment epithelium clumping and outer retinal atrophy in curvilinear streak areas in the right eye (E). While laser-induced macular holes may spontaneously close, surgical intervention may be necessary for persistent cases and may result in increased visual acuity [4]. Spectral domain OCT is reportedly a sensitive tool for evaluating retinal damage and the subsequent evolution of retinal changes [5].
Figure 2. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images taken at presentation show preretinal hemorrhage in the right eye (A) and retinal disruption with preretinal hyper-reflective lesion in the left eye (B). One month later, the OCT images demonstrate the development of full-thickness macular holes in the right (C) and left eye (D), and retinal pigment epithelium clumping and outer retinal atrophy in curvilinear streak areas in the right eye (E). While laser-induced macular holes may spontaneously close, surgical intervention may be necessary for persistent cases and may result in increased visual acuity [4]. Spectral domain OCT is reportedly a sensitive tool for evaluating retinal damage and the subsequent evolution of retinal changes [5].
Diagnostics 14 00361 g002

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Z.G.; methodology, N.Z.G. and L.C.; investigation, N.Z.G., L.C. and Y.M.; resources, N.Z.G.; data curation, N.Z.G. and L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Z.G., L.C. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, N.Z.G.; supervision, N.Z.G.; project administration, N.Z.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bhavsar, K.V.; Wilson, D.; Margolis, R.; Judson, P.; Barbazetto, I.; Freund, K.B.; Cunningham, E.T., Jr. Multimodal imaging in handheld laser-induced maculopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 159, 227–231.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Turaka, K.; Bryan, J.S.; Gordon, A.J.; Reddy, R.; Kwong, H.M.; Sell, C.H. Laser pointer induced macular damage: Case report and mini review. Int. Ophthalmol. 2012, 32, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. ANSI® Z136.1-2007; American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Revision of ANSI Z136.1-2000. American National Standards Institute: Orlando, FL, USA, 2007.
  4. Birtel, J.; Harmening, W.M.; Krohne, T.U.; Holz, F.G.; Issa, P.C.; Herrmann, P. Retinal Injury Following Laser Pointer Exposure. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2017, 114, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hossein, M.; Bonyadi, J.; Soheilian, R.; Soheilian, M.; Peyman, G.A. SD-OCT features of laser pointer maculopathy before and after systemic corticosteroid therapy. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2011, 42, e135–e138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gregori, N.Z.; Cai, L.; Moshiri, Y. Self-Inflicted Laser-Induced Retinopathy. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14040361

AMA Style

Gregori NZ, Cai L, Moshiri Y. Self-Inflicted Laser-Induced Retinopathy. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(4):361. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14040361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gregori, Ninel Z., Louis Cai, and Yasman Moshiri. 2024. "Self-Inflicted Laser-Induced Retinopathy" Diagnostics 14, no. 4: 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14040361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop