Origin of the Granite Porphyry and Related Xiajinbao Au Deposit at Pingquan, Hebei Province, Northeastern China: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and H–O–S–Pb–Hf Isotopes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Regional Geology
3. Ore Deposit Geology
3.1. Host Rocks and Structures
3.2. Ore Bodies, Ore Types and Mineralogy
3.3. Alteration Assemblages
3.4. Mineral Paragenesis
4. Sampling and Testing Methods
4.1. Sample Sites
4.2. Testing Methods
5. Results
5.1. Whole-Rock Geochemistry
5.2. Zircon Trace Elements and U–Pb Chronology
5.3. Hf Isotopic Compositions
5.4. H and O Isotope Compositions
5.5. S–Pb Isotope Compositions
6. Discussion
6.1. Age of the Xiajinbao Granite and Related Au Mineralization
6.2. Magma Sources
6.3. Petrogenesis of the Xiajinbao Granite Porphyry
6.4. The Source of Ore-Forming Materials
6.5. Origin of the Granite Porphyry and Related Xiajinbao Au Mineralization
6.6. Evolution of the Mesozoic Gold Mineralization in the Jidong Area
7. Conclusions
- (1)
- The Xiajinbao granite porphyry have relatively high SiO2, K2O contents; but low MgO and CaO contents; high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic characteristics. The rock is enriched in LREE and large ion lithophile elements (LILE) such as Rb, Ba and U, and it is strongly depleted in HREE and in HFSE and Sr, P. The petrographic features, major and trace elements, and zircon Hf isotopic model ages suggest that the Xijinbao granite is derived from partial melting of the Changcheng sediments.
- (2)
- The zircon LA-ICP-MS age of the Xiajinbao granite is 157.8 ± 3.4 Ma, which is close to the gold metallogenic age (153.9–163.4 Ma), indicating that both are related to the same tectonic setting.
- (3)
- H–O isotope of the auriferous quartz vein show that the early metallogenic fluids are derived from magmatic waters, while increasingly more meteoric water mixed with this fluid. S–Pb isotope results show that the metals were derived from both the magma and plagioclase hornblende gneisses.
- (4)
- The gold mineralization of the Xiajinbao deposit is closely associated with the high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic granite magma emplaced during the Yanshannian collision. The Xiajinbao deposit is an intrusion-related gold deposit.
- (5)
- The magmatic events mainly occurred during the period between 223–153 Ma, characterized by three main periods during the late Triassic (225–205 Ma), the early Jurassic (200–185 Ma) and the middle–late Jurassic (175–160 Ma), respectively. The metallogenic events mainly occurred during the period between 223 Ma and 155 Ma, including two main periods during the late Triassic (223–210 Ma) and during the middle–late Jurassic (175–155 Ma).
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hart, C.J.R.; Goldfarb, R.J.; Qiu, Y.; Snee, L.; Miller, L.D.; Miller, M.L. Gold deposits of the northern margin of the North China Craton: Multiple late Paleozoic–Mesozoic mineralizing events. Miner. Depos. 2002, 37, 326–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Santosh, M.; Deng, Z.; Guo, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, P.; Bai, X.; Guo, R. Late Paleoproterozoic geodynamics of the North China Craton: Geochemical and zircon U–Pb–Hf records from a volcanic suite in the Yanliao rift. Gondwana Res. 2015, 27, 300–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, N.J.; Ciobanu, C.L.; Mao, J. Textural control on gold distribution in As–free pyrite from the Dongping, Huangtuliang and Hougou gold deposits, North China Craton (Hebei Province, China). Chem. Geol. 2009, 264, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, Y.X. The Metallogenic Characteristic and Evolution of Gold Deposits in Jidong Region, Hebei Province, China. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China, 1997. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y.; Jiang, S.H.; Bagas, L.; Li, C.; Hu, J.Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, W.; Ding, H.Y. The geology and geochemistry of Jinchangyu gold deposit, north China Craton: Implications for metallogenesis and geodynamic setting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 73, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, W.M.; Wang, S.C.; Wang, L.F. Fission track study on the metallogenetic age of Xiayingfang gold deposit in eastern, Hebei. Nuclear Tech. 1999, 22, 411–413. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zou, T.; Wang, Y.W.; Wang, J.B.; Zhang, H.Q.; Zhao, L.T.; Xie, H.J.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Y.Z.; Liu, G.Q. Geochronology of the Xiayingfang Au Deposit in Eastern Hebei Province. Geol. Explor. 2016, 52, 84–97. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Luan, W.L.; Yu, Y.X. Geochemistry of fluid inclusion of Xiayingfang gold deposit in Pingquan of Hebei province and ore-searching significance. J. Precious Met. Geol. 1995, 4, 161–167. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yang, T.D. The study of complex mineralization and metallogenic series of Xiayingfang gold deposit, Hebei province. Earth Sci. 1989, 12, 405–413. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Shao, J.L.; Mei, J.M. Study on pyrite in a volcanic gold deposit in Pingquan, Hebei Province. Gold 1984, 5, 3–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Jia, S.; Wang, E.; Fu, J. Geological differences and mineralization unity of the key gold ore concentrated regions in eastern Hebei and Western Liaoning provinces. Acta Geol. Sin. 2011, 85, 1493–1506. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Liu, D.Y.; Nutman, A.P.; Compston, W.; Wu, J.S.; Shen, Q.H. Remnants of ≥3800 Ma crust in the Chinese part of the Sino-Korean craton. Geology 1992, 20, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.S.; Zeng, Q.L.; Song, B.; Du, J.J.; Yang, F.Q.; Zhao, Y. SHRTMP U–Pb dating of zircon from Panshan granitoid pluton in Yanshan orogenic belt and its tectonic implications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 547–556. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Niu, S.Y.; Li, F.Y.; Chen, H.S.; Sun, A.Q.; Wang, B.D.; Wang, J.Z.; Ma, B.J. The exploration and prognosis in the depth and the periphery of the Jinchangyu gold deposit in eastern Hebei. Chin. Geol. 2012, 39, 999–1006. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, G.R.; Xu, J.H.; Wei, H.; Song, G.C.; Zhang, Y.B.; Zhao, J.K.; He, B.; Chen, D.L. Structure, alteration, and fluid inclusion study on deep and surrounding area of the Dongping gold deposit, northern Hebei, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012, 28, 637–651. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Huang, X.; Ziwei, B.; DePaolo, D.J. Sm–Nd isotope study of early Archean rocks, Qian’an, Hebei Province, China. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1986, 50, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahn, B.M.; Auvray, B.; Cornichet, J.; Bai, Y.L.; Shen, Q.H.; Liu, D.Y. 3.5 Ga old amphibolites from eastern Hebei Province, China: Field occurrence, petrography, Sm–Nd isochron age and REE geochemistry. Precambrian Res. 1986, 34, 311–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, D.Z. The Early Precambrian Geology of the Eastern Hebei; Tianjin Science and Technology Press: Tianjin, China, 1984; pp. 1–273. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Luo, Z.K.; Miao, L.C.; Guan, F.; Qiu, Y.S.; Qiu, Y.M.; McNaughton, N.J.; Groves, D.I. SHRIMP U–Pb zircon dating of the Dushan granitic batholith and related granite-porphyry dyke, eastern Hebei Province, China, and their geological significance. Geochimica 2003, 32, 173–180. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Yang, F.L.; Niu, B.G.; Ren, J.S.; Li, S. Zircon U–Pb ages and geochemical characteristics of the Mesozoic intrusive bodies along the core of the Malanyu anticline and their tectonic significances. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2015, 36, 455–465. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Guo, S.F.; Tang, Z.L.; Luo, Z.H.; Zhao, W.H. Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb dating and geological significance from granite bodies in Tangzhangzi and Niuxinshan, eastern Hebei Province, China. Geol. Bull. China 2009, 28, 1458–1464. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.G.; Shao, Y.J.; Wang, C.; Liu, Z.F.; Xiong, Y.Q. Characteristics of gold-bearing minerals in Xiajinbao gold deposit of Hebei and their metallogenic indicating significance. J. Cent. South Univ. 2018, 49, 901–909. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.G.; Xia, Q.X.; Zheng, Y.F.; Hu, Z.C. Poly–phase growth of garnet in eclogite from the Hong’an orogen: Constraints from garnet zoning and phase equilibrium. Lithos 2014, 206–207, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.S.; Gao, S.; Hu, Z.C.; Gao, C.G.; Zong, K.Q.; Wang, D. Continental and oceanic crust recycling–induced melt–peridotite interactions in the Trans–North China Orogen: U–Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths. J. Petrol. 2010, 51, 537–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, K.J.; Li, Y.H.; Zou, T.R.; Qu, X.M.; Shi, Y.R.; Xie, G.Q. Laser ablation–MC–ICP–MS technique for Hf isotope microanalysis of zircon and its geological applications. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 2595–2604. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Elhlou, S.; Belousova, E.; Griffin, W.L.; Pearson, N.J.; O’reilly, S.Y. Trace element and isotopic composition of GJ-red zircon standard by laser ablation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2006, 70, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.Q.; Li, B.; Shao, Y.J.; Lu, A.H.; Lai, J.Q.; Li, Y.F.; Luo, Z.C. Molybdenum mineralization related to the Yangtze’s lower crust and differentiation in the Dabie Orogen: Evidence from the geochemical features of the Yaochong porphyry Mo deposit. Lithos 2017, 282/283, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.R. I- and S-type granites in the Lachlan fold belt. Earth Sci. 1992, 83, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Belousova, E.A.; Griffin, W.L.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Fisher, N.L. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 143, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoskin, P.W.O.; Schaltegger, U. The composition of zircon and igneous metamorphic petrogenesis. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2003, 53, 27–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clayton, R.N.; O’Neil, J.R.; Mayeda, T.K. Oxygen isotope exchange between quartz and water. J. Geophys. Res. 1972, 77, 3057–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.K.; Qiu, Y.S.; Guan, K.; Miao, L.C.; Qiu, Y.M.; McNaughton, N.J.; Groves, D.I. SHRIMP U–Pb dating on zircon from Yu’ erya and Niuxinshan granite intrusions in eastern Hebei provence. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2001, 20, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.C.; Ye, H.S.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, X.K.; Lu, D.Y.; Hu, H.B. Re–Os age of molybdenite from the Yuerya Au deposit in eastern Hebei Province and its geological significance. Geol. China 2014, 41, 1565–1576. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.Y.; Ye, H.S.; He, W.; Cao, J.; Zhang, X.K.; Wang, S.; Lu, D.Y.; Li, C. Geological characteristics and molybdenite Re–Os isotopic dating of Tangzhangzi gold (molybdenum) deposit in eastern Hebei Province. Miner. Depos. 2014, 33, 1366–1378. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Hu, D.X. Gold-Bearing Quartz vein 40Ar-39Ar Age at the Margin of the North China Craton; China University of Geosciences Press: Beijing, China, 1996; pp. 1–100. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Bea, F.; Arzamastsev, A.; Montero, P.; Arzamastseva, L. Anomalous alkaline rocks of Soustov, Kola: Evidence of mantle-derived metasomatic fluids affecting crustal materials. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2001, 140, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, W.; Mao, J.W.; Zhao, H.J.; Zhao, C.S.; Yu, X.F. Two Late Cretaceous A-type granites related to the Yingwuling W–Sn polymetallic mineralization in Guangdong province, South China: Implications for petrogenesis, geodynamic setting, and mineralization. Lithos 2017, 274/275, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sylvester, P.J. Post-collisional strongly peraluminous granites. Lithos 1998, 45, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.Y.; Jiang, N.; Fan, W.B.; Hu, J.; Zong, K.Q. Petrogenesis and geological implications for the Mesozoic granites in Qinglong area, eastern Hebei province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2016, 32, 212–232. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zartman, R.E.; Doe, B.R. Plumbotectonics—The model. Tectonophysic 1981, 75, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.L.; Song, Y.; Hu, J.Z.; Zhao, B.; Wang, T.; Liao, Y.Z. Characteristics and geological significance of stable isotopes in the Huajian gold deposit, Hebei province. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2015, 34, 362–368. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xin, C.L.; Gong, X.; Zhu, X.L.; Zhao, Z.P. Geological characteristics and genesis of Dongliang gold deposit in eastern Hebei province. Contrib. Geol. Miner. Resour. Res. 2014, 29, 51–58. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Lin, E.W.; Guo, Y.J. Lead isotope studies on goldfields in eastern, Hebei, China. J. Jilin Univ. 1985, 1, 1–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chappell, B.W. Aluminium saturation in I- and S-type granites and the characterization of fractionated haplogranites. Lithos 1999, 46, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chappell, B.W.; White, A.J.K. Two contrasting granite types. Pac. Geol. 1974, 8, 173–174. [Google Scholar]
- Frost, C.D.; Frost, B.R. Reduced rapakivi type granites: The tholeiitic connection. Geology 1997, 25, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whalen, J.B.; Currie, K.L.; Chappell, B.W. A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987, 95, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.B.; Shao, Y.J.; Liu, Z.F.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, H.T.; Wang, C. Geochemical characteristics of ore-bodies in Xiajinbao Au deposit in Pingquan of Hebei and its relationship with mineralization. Miner. Resour. Geol. 2014, 28, 356–360. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Münker, C.; Wörner, G.; Yogodzinski, G.; Churikova, T. Behavior of high field strength elements in subduction zones: Constraints from Kamchatka–Aleutian arc lavas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 224, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bau, M. Controls on the fractionation of isovalent trace elements in magmatic and aqueous systems: Evidence from Y/Ho, Zr/Hf, and lanthanide tetrad effect. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1996, 123, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.D.; Jiang, S.Y. Rare earth element and yttrium analyses of sulfides from the Dachang Sn-polymetallic ore field, Guangxi Province, China: Implication for ore genesis. Geochem. J. 2007, 41, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, X.H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.H.; Chen, F.K.; Tu, X.L.; Qi, C.S. Rapid separation of Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd from a single rock dissolution and precise measurement of Hf–Nd isotopic ratios for national rock standards. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2007, 23, 221–226. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sheppard, S.M.F. Characterization and isotopic variations in natural waters. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 1986, 16, 165–183. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T. Study on the Ore-Forming Geological Process in Niuxinshan Section of Hebei Huajian Gold Deposit. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.S.; Yang, Z.S.; Gao, D.Y. Jidong Jinchangyu Regional High-Grade Metamorphic Geology and Gold Deposits; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1991; pp. 1–445. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Jie, B. The Geochemical Characteristic and the Ore-Forming Material Source of Yuerya Gold Mine in Hebei Province. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2013. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- He, W. The Study of Geology, Geochemical and Mineralization of Tangzhangzi Au Polymetallic Deposit, East Hebei Province. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2015. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Ohmoto, H. Systematics of sulfur and carbon isotopes in hydrothermal ore deposits. Econ. Geol. 1972, 67, 551–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohmoto, H.; Rye, R.O. Isotope of sulfur and carbon. In Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits, 2nd ed.; Barnes, H.I., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 509–561. [Google Scholar]
- Chaussidon, M.; Albaréde, F.; Sheppard, S.M.F. Sulphur isotope variation in the mantle from microprobe analysis of micro–sulphide inclusion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1989, 92, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Su, W.C. Lead isotopic composition of ores in the antimony deposits at the southern margin of the Yangtze massif and its geological implication. Geol. Geochem. 2000, 28, 43–47. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Windley, B.F.; Maruyama, S.; Xiao, W.J. Delamination/thinning of sub-continental lithospheric mantle under Eastern China: The role of water and multiple subduction. Am. J. Sci. 2010, 310, 1250–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.J.; Zhang, H.F.; Santosh, M.; Ying, J.F. Differential destruction of the North China Craton: A tectonic perspective. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2013, 78, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, S.W.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Long, C.X.; Yang, Z.Y.; Ji, Q.; Wang, T.; Hu, J.M.; Chen, X.H. Jurassic tectonic revolution in China and new interpretation of the Yanshan movement. Acta Geol. Sin. 2007, 81, 1449–1461. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Tomurtogoo, O.; Windley, B.F.; Kroner, A. Zircon age and occurrence of the Adaatsag ophiolite and Muron shear zone, central Mongolia: Constraints on the evolution of the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean, suture and orogen. J. Geol. Soc. 2005, 162, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorin, Y.A. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongolia–Okhotsk collisional belt, Trans-Baikal region (Russia) and Mongolia. Tectonophysics 1999, 306, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, F.Y.; Yang, J.H.; Lo, C.H. The Heilongjiang group: A Jurassic accretionary complex in the Jiamusi massif at the western Pacific margin of northeastern China. Island Arc 2007, 16, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isozaki, Y. Jurassic accretion tectonics of Japan. Island Arc 1997, 6, 25–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maruyama, S.; Isozaki, Y.; Kimura, G.; Terabayashi, M. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands: Plate tectonic synthesis from 750 Ma to the present. Island Arc 1997, 6, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, S.; Kemlcin, I.V.; Kametaka, M. A correlation of accretionary complexes of southern SiKhote–Alin of Russia and the Inner Zone of Southwest Japan. Geosci. J. 2000, 4, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burnham, C.W.; Ohmoto, H. Late-stage processes of felsic magmatism. Soc. Min. Geol. Jpn. 1980, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi, K.; Ohmoto, H. Solubility of gold in NaCl and H2S-bearing aqueous solutions at 250 °C–350 °C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1991, 55, 2111–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, D.R.; Drummond, S.E. The effect of transport and boiling on Ag/Au ratios in hydrothermal solutions: A prelim in ray assessment and possible implications for the formation of epithermal precious metal ore deposits. Geochem. Explor. 1986, 25, 45–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.H. Some new advances in ore-forming fluid geochemistry on boiling and mixing of fluid during the processes of hydrothermal deposits. Adv. Earth Sci. 1997, 12, 546–552. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, G.F.; Shao, J.L. On the study of the typomorphism of minerals in the applications of approaching gold deposits genesis and prospection. Gansu Geol. 1984, 6, 1–19. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, J.F.H.; Sillitoe, R.H.; Baker, T.; Lang, J.R.; Mortensen, J.K. Intrusion-related gold deposits associated with tungsten-tin provinces. Mineral. Depos. 1999, 34, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sillitoe, R.H. Gold-rich porphyry deposits: Descriptive and genetic models and their role in exploration and discovery. Rev. Econ. Geol. 2000, 13, 315–345. [Google Scholar]
- Lang, J.R.; Baker, T.; Hart, C.J.R.; Mortensen, J.K. An exploration model for intrusion–related gold systems. Soc. Econ. Geol. Newsl. 2000, 40, 1, 6–15. [Google Scholar]
- Blevin, P.L.; Chappell, B.W.; Allen, C.M. Intrusive metallogenic provinces in eastern Australia based on granite source and composition. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Earth Sci. 1996, 87, 281–290. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, T.; Pollard, P.J.; Mustard, R.; Graham, J.L. A comparison of granite-related tin, tungsten, and gold-bismuth deposits: Implications for exploration. Soc. Econ. Geol. Newsl. 2005, 61, 5–17. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.B.; Ishiyama, D.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Y.J. Geology and geochemical characteristics of the Xiajinbao gold deposit in the Hebei Province, China. J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. 2018, 113, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mitchell, A.H.G.; Garson, M.S. Mineral Deposits and Global Tectonic Settings; Academic Press: London, UK, 1981; 405p. [Google Scholar]
- Sawkins, F.J. Metal Deposits in Relation to Plate Tectonics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1984; 325p. [Google Scholar]
- Duuring, P.; Cassidy, K.F.; Hagemann, S.G. Granitoid-associated orogenic, intrusionrelated, and porphyry style metal deposits in the Archean Yilgarn craton, Western Australia. Ore Geol. Rev. 2007, 32, 157–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khashgerel, B.E.; Kavalieris, I.; Hayashi, K.I. Mineralogy, textures, and whole–rock geochemistry of advanced argillic alteration: Hugo Dummett porphyry Cu–Au deposit, Oyutolgoi mineral district, Mongolia. Mineral. Depos. 2008, 43, 913–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sillitoe, R.H.; Thompson, J.F.H. Intrusion-related vein gold deposits: Types, tectono-magmatic settings and difficulties of distinction from orogenic gold deposits. Resour. Geol. 1998, 48, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.L.; Hart, C.J.R.; Goldfarb, R.J.; O’Dea, M.; Harris, S. Geology and metallogenic signature of gold occurrences at Scheelite Dome, Tombstone gold belt, Yukon. In Yukon Exploration and Geology 1999; Emond, D.S., Westen, L.H., Eds.; Exploration and Geological Services Division, Yukon, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada: Whitehorse, YT, Canada, 2000; pp. 165–176. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, S.S.; Wang, E.D.; Fu, J.F.; Guo, Y.Y. Ore-forming geological characteristics, geochemistry and formation mechanism of Jinchangyu gold deposit in eastern Hebei province. J. Jilin Univ. 2012, 33, 1492–1494. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, W.J.; Windley, B.F.; Hao, J.; Zhai, M.G. Accretion leading to collision and the Permian Solonker suture, Inner Mongolia, China: Termination of the central Asian orogenic belt. Tectonics 2003, 22, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jian, P.; Lui, D.; Kröner, A.; Windley, B.F.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Miao, L.; Zhang, L.; Tomurhuu, D. Evolution of a Permian intraoceanic arc–trench system in the Solonker suture zone, Central Asian Orogenic Belt, China and Mongolia. Lithos 2010, 118, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q. Triassic–Jurassic Volcanic Rocks in Western Liaoning: Implications for Lower Crustal Reworking and Lithospheric Destruction in the North Part of Eastern North China Craton; China University of Geosciences: Wuhan, China, 2013. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, X.L. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Dongliang Gold Deposit in Eastern Hebei; Northwest Normal University: Lanzhou, China, 2014. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Sample No. | Location | Ore Types | Stage | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Z46-1 | 133 m, drill hole ZK401 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite. |
Z49 | 97 m, drill hole ZK701 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite. |
Z78-2 | 85 m, drill hole ZK501 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by gold, pyrite. |
Z95 | 64 m, drill hole ZK502 | quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein | III | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena sphalerite, tetrahedrite. |
Z124 | 132.5 m, drill hole ZK403 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by gold, pyrite. |
Z148 | 147 m, drill hole ZK403 | quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein | III | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena sphalerite, tetrahedrite. |
Z149 | 93 m, drill hole ZK602 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by gold, pyrite. |
Z158 | 102 m, drill hole ZK602 | quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein | III | Vein texture; Ore minerals dominated by pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena sphalerite, tetrahedrite. |
Sample No. | Location | Ore Types | Stage | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
K4 | open pits | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Ore minerals dominated by gold and pyrite; gangue material dominated by quartz |
K5 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K11 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K13 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Ore minerals dominated by gold and pyrite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
Z33 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K2 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Ore minerals dominated by gold and pyrite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K4 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K5 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Ore minerals dominated by gold and pyrite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K11 | quartz–galena–sphalerite vein | II | Ore minerals dominated by gold, galena, sphalerite; gangue material dominated by quartz | |
K13 | quartz–pyrite vein | I | Ore minerals dominated by gold and pyrite; gangue material dominated by quartz |
Sample No. | Z144-2 | Z153 | Z176-2 | Z188 | Z190-1 | Z175-3 | Z48 | Z52 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 70.420 | 71.010 | 70.050 | 70.800 | 70.970 | 70.890 | 72.747 | 72.976 |
Al2O3 | 14.330 | 14.080 | 14.300 | 14.310 | 14.110 | 13.920 | 14.607 | 14.792 |
TFe2O3 | 1.940 | 1.870 | 2.160 | 2.210 | 1.990 | 2.450 | 1.269 | 1.342 |
MgO | 0.493 | 0.413 | 0.454 | 0.482 | 0.521 | 0.480 | 0.530 | 0.498 |
CaO | 1.540 | 1.550 | 1.510 | 1.480 | 1.460 | 1.478 | 1.396 | 1.360 |
Na2O | 3.830 | 3.910 | 3.730 | 3.330 | 3.630 | 3.420 | 3.538 | 3.126 |
K2O | 4.770 | 4.560 | 4.960 | 4.970 | 4.910 | 4.810 | 5.421 | 5.830 |
MnO | 0.035 | 0.041 | 0.029 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 0.029 | 0.043 | 0.037 |
TiO2 | 0.205 | 0.198 | 0.215 | 0.206 | 0.189 | 0.191 | 0.186 | 0.173 |
P2O5 | 0.078 | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.075 | 0.078 | 0.075 | 0.069 | 0.065 |
K2O + Na2O | 8.600 | 8.470 | 8.690 | 8.300 | 8.540 | 8.230 | 8.959 | 8.956 |
K2O/K2O + Na2O | 0.555 | 0.538 | 0.571 | 0.599 | 0.575 | 0.584 | 0.605 | 0.651 |
Na2O/K2O | 0.803 | 0.857 | 0.752 | 0.670 | 0.739 | 0.711 | 0.653 | 0.536 |
A/NK | 1.666 | 1.662 | 1.646 | 1.724 | 1.652 | 1.691 | 1.630 | 1.652 |
A/CNK | 1.413 | 1.405 | 1.402 | 1.463 | 1.411 | 1.434 | 1.411 | 1.434 |
σ | 2.697 | 2.561 | 2.792 | 2.478 | 2.607 | 2.429 | 2.698 | 2.676 |
Sample | Z144-2 | Z153 | Z176-2 | Z188 | Z190-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Granitic Porphyry | |||||
Rb | 136 | 116 | 104 | 119 | 110 |
Ba | 1083 | 1132 | 980 | 1001 | 977 |
Th | 11 | 10.5 | 8.84 | 9.31 | 9.33 |
U | 1.75 | 2.98 | 2.56 | 2.28 | 3.1 |
Ta | 0.83 | 0.799 | 0.739 | 0.746 | 0.75 |
Nb | 13 | 11.4 | 13.4 | 11.3 | 11.5 |
Sr | 215 | 290 | 211 | 160 | 176 |
P | 3.41 | 3.23 | 3.63 | 3.63 | 3.41 |
Zr | 198 | 132 | 154 | 152 | 202 |
Hf | 5.9 | 4.22 | 4.85 | 4.95 | 6.16 |
Ti | 12.3 | 13.68 | 12.9 | 12.36 | 13.26 |
La | 39.90 | 45.20 | 37.60 | 42.40 | 38.00 |
Ce | 71.10 | 76.60 | 65.60 | 73.70 | 67.00 |
Pr | 7.98 | 8.09 | 7.05 | 7.85 | 7.21 |
Nd | 27.10 | 27.20 | 23.90 | 27.00 | 24.80 |
Sm | 4.32 | 3.94 | 3.51 | 3.77 | 3.54 |
Eu | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
Gd | 3.35 | 2.91 | 2.57 | 2.80 | 2.74 |
Tb | 0.55 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.42 |
Dy | 2.54 | 2.19 | 1.83 | 1.93 | 1.90 |
Ho | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
Er | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
Tm | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
Yb | 1.80 | 1.40 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.31 |
Lu | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
Y | 15.1 | 12 | 10.7 | 11.2 | 11 |
δEu | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
δCe | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
Sample | Ti | Y | Nb | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu | Hf | Ta | Th | U |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K6-01 | 15.68 | 1332 | 5.7 | 0.06 | 67.5 | 0.10 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 23.7 | 8.0 | 103.3 | 40.9 | 200 | 45.8 | 491 | 95.8 | 20,457 | 1.3 | 171 | 274 |
K6-02 | 8.2 | 1356 | 6.1 | 0.10 | 64.7 | 0.10 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 22.3 | 8.1 | 101.6 | 41.1 | 203 | 47.5 | 521 | 101 | 22,005 | 1.3 | 189 | 300 |
K6-03 | 13.27 | 956 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 39.7 | 0.40 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 0.85 | 17.6 | 5.7 | 75.2 | 29.3 | 142 | 32.8 | 359 | 70.2 | – | 0.71 | 94.7 | 171 |
K6-04 | 9.3 | 1508 | 7.1 | 0.02 | 66.5 | 0.09 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 23.0 | 8.2 | 110 | 45.4 | 229 | 53.6 | 586 | 113 | 17,118 | 1.6 | 150 | 279 |
K6-05 | 12.92 | 968 | 2.9 | 0.02 | 33.8 | 0.05 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 0.81 | 15.1 | 5.6 | 72.8 | 28.9 | 146 | 34.0 | 378 | 74.7 | 17,529 | 0.74 | 84.6 | 185 |
K6-07 | 17.64 | 1339 | 6.1 | – | 55.6 | 0.06 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 21.2 | 7.7 | 99.6 | 40.1 | 203 | 47.9 | 534 | 105 | 21,111 | 1.4 | 120 | 241 |
K6-09 | 18.95 | 1500 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 82.9 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 25.5 | 8.5 | 114 | 45.8 | 224 | 52.7 | 579 | 108 | 20,492 | 1.6 | 202 | 336 |
K6-10 | 7.9 | 1066 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 57.9 | 0.49 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 19.2 | 6.5 | 82.6 | 32.7 | 158 | 36.1 | 404 | 748 | 22,367 | 0.98 | 164 | 267 |
K6-11 | 19.36 | 1303 | 6.3 | 0.03 | 75.8 | 0.09 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 23.3 | 8.5 | 106 | 40.7 | 192 | 43.7 | 479 | 85.7 | 19,363 | 1.6 | 238 | 364 |
K6-15 | 11.31 | 880 | 3.4 | – | 51.4 | 0.08 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 0.80 | 16.1 | 5.7 | 71.7 | 27.1 | 132 | 30.5 | 331 | 60.1 | 13,872 | 0.98 | 152 | 254 |
Z176-16 | – | 1517 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 62.1 | 1.09 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 1.9 | 29.5 | 10.1 | 122 | 47.2 | 222 | 50.1 | 535 | 99.8 | 19,131 | 0.93 | 198 | 268 |
Z176-17 | 16.08 | 1440 | 6.1 | 0.7 | 63.5 | 0.29 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 23.1 | 8.2 | 106 | 43.9 | 217 | 52.2 | 564 | 111 | 18,141 | 1.4 | 157 | 277 |
Z176-18 | – | 1467 | 4.9 | 0.08 | 61.2 | 0.13 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 29.7 | 9.4 | 115 | 44.9 | 217 | 50.3 | 546 | 105 | 10,046 | 1.2 | 186 | 283 |
Z176-19 | 24.79 | 1340 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 68.8 | 0.85 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 24.2 | 8.2 | 103 | 40.5 | 199 | 46.2 | 504 | 96.0 | 24,539 | 1.3 | 191 | 295 |
Z176-29 | 5.4 | 1265 | 4.6 | 0.49 | 48.2 | 0.17 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 21.0 | 7. 6 | 95.7 | 38.6 | 188 | 45.2 | 495 | 93.6 | 17,039 | 1.1 | 118 | 219 |
Z176-32 | 20.8 | 1324 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 59.6 | 0.52 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 1.2 | 21.9 | 7.6 | 101 | 40.0 | 197 | 46.4 | 506 | 96.0 | 21,069 | 1.3 | 159 | 263 |
Sample | w(B)/10−6 | Isotopic Ratio Values | t/Ma | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Th | U | 207Pb/206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ | 208Pb/232Th | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ | |
K6-01 | 170.8 | 273.9 | 0.0528 | 0.0030 | 0.1870 | 0.0105 | 0.0259 | 0.0005 | 0.0080 | 174.0 | 9.0 | 164.5 | 2.8 |
K6-02 | 188.7 | 299.5 | 0.0518 | 0.0027 | 0.1768 | 0.0097 | 0.0249 | 0.0005 | 0.0084 | 165.3 | 8.3 | 158.3 | 2.9 |
K6-03 | 94.7 | 171.0 | 0.0594 | 0.0037 | 0.2187 | 0.0131 | 0.0273 | 0.0006 | 0.0089 | 200.8 | 10.9 | 173.9 | 3.7 |
K6-04 | 150.0 | 278.8 | 0.0552 | 0.0036 | 0.1902 | 0.0136 | 0.0249 | 0.0007 | 0.0072 | 176.8 | 11.6 | 158.3 | 4.5 |
K6-05 | 84.6 | 185.3 | 0.0605 | 0.0034 | 0.2116 | 0.0115 | 0.0259 | 0.0005 | 0.0090 | 194.9 | 9.6 | 164.8 | 3.4 |
K6-07 | 119.8 | 240.6 | 0.0520 | 0.0028 | 0.1814 | 0.0101 | 0.0252 | 0.0005 | 0.0089 | 169.2 | 8.7 | 160.5 | 3.1 |
K6-09 | 201.8 | 336.2 | 0.0518 | 0.0027 | 0.1777 | 0.0092 | 0.0250 | 0.0005 | 0.0088 | 166.1 | 8.0 | 159.4 | 2.8 |
K6-10 | 163.8 | 266.8 | 0.0491 | 0.0028 | 0.1674 | 0.0095 | 0.0246 | 0.0005 | 0.0085 | 157.2 | 8.3 | 156.7 | 3.1 |
K6-11 | 237.7 | 363.6 | 0.0495 | 0.0022 | 0.1669 | 0.0070 | 0.0250 | 0.0005 | 0.0075 | 156.7 | 6.1 | 159.0 | 3.0 |
K6-15 | 152.1 | 254.1 | 0.0535 | 0.0029 | 0.1786 | 0.0087 | 0.0251 | 0.0005 | 0.0082 | 166.9 | 7.5 | 159.7 | 3.0 |
Z176-16 | 197.7 | 267.7 | 0.0501 | 0.0026 | 0.1725 | 0.0081 | 0.0255 | 0.0005 | 0.0077 | 161.5 | 7.0 | 162.5 | 3.1 |
Z176-17 | 157.1 | 277.0 | 0.0518 | 0.0023 | 0.1759 | 0.0081 | 0.0250 | 0.0004 | 0.0078 | 164.5 | 7.0 | 159.1 | 2.7 |
Z176-18 | 185.7 | 282.9 | 0.0476 | 0.0025 | 0.1623 | 0.0088 | 0.0250 | 0.0005 | 0.0076 | 152.7 | 7.7 | 159.3 | 3.3 |
Z176-19 | 191.0 | 294.6 | 0.0520 | 0.0025 | 0.1759 | 0.0085 | 0.0253 | 0.0005 | 0.0085 | 164.5 | 7.3 | 160.9 | 3.0 |
Z176-29 | 118.5 | 218.6 | 0.0561 | 0.0035 | 0.1830 | 0.0104 | 0.0249 | 0.0006 | 0.0081 | 170.7 | 8.9 | 158.8 | 3.8 |
Z176-32 | 143.4 | 243.6 | 0.0583 | 0.0033 | 0.1954 | 0.0108 | 0.0247 | 0.0006 | 0.0081 | 181.3 | 9.2 | 157.5 | 3.8 |
Sample | t/Ma | 176Hf/177Hf | 1σ | 176Lu/177Hf | 1σ | 176Yb/177Hf | 1σ | εHf(0) | εHf(t) | TDM/Ma | TDMC/Ma | fLu/Hf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K6-1 | 164.5 | 0.282406 | 0.000014 | 0.001509 | 0.000030 | 0.033249 | 0.000597 | −12.950635 | −9.53827 | 1211.893 | 1606.254 | −0.95454 |
K6-2 | 158.3 | 0.282420 | 0.000012 | 0.001374 | 0.000020 | 0.030778 | 0.000424 | −12.459401 | −9.11657 | 1187.877 | 1579.874 | −0.95861 |
K6-4 | 158.3 | 0.282408 | 0.000013 | 0.001206 | 0.000036 | 0.026823 | 0.000853 | −12.889740 | −9.27519 | 1199.685 | 1598.064 | −0.96369 |
K6-5 | 164.8 | 0.282416 | 0.000012 | 0.001262 | 0.000010 | 0.028677 | 0.000229 | −12.597570 | −9.05277 | 1189.849 | 1583.42 | −0.96198 |
K6-7 | 160.5 | 0.282424 | 0.000012 | 0.001187 | 0.000015 | 0.026191 | 0.000352 | −12.299078 | −8.91533 | 1175.589 | 1569.586 | −0.96424 |
K6-9 | 159.4 | 0.282383 | 0.000015 | 0.001265 | 0.000043 | 0.028439 | 0.000987 | −13.741773 | −10.3668 | 1235.559 | 1649.706 | −0.96189 |
K6-10 | 156.7 | 0.282421 | 0.000012 | 0.001237 | 0.000028 | 0.028503 | 0.000686 | −12.417700 | −9.03925 | 1181.872 | 1576.42 | −0.96274 |
K6-11 | 159.0 | 0.282402 | 0.000012 | 0.001213 | 0.000008 | 0.027417 | 0.000189 | −13.085197 | −9.70445 | 1207.707 | 1613.162 | −0.96346 |
K6-15 | 159.7 | 0.282409 | 0.000013 | 0.000774 | 0.000006 | 0.017566 | 0.000127 | −12.828529 | −9.44415 | 1183.666 | 1597.336 | −0.97669 |
Z176-16 | 162.5 | 0.282384 | 0.000015 | 0.001440 | 0.000007 | 0.033357 | 0.000196 | −13.727737 | −10.2662 | 1240.788 | 1648.013 | −0.95661 |
Z176-17 | 159.1 | 0.282415 | 0.000016 | 0.001345 | 0.000012 | 0.029965 | 0.000326 | −12.613840 | −9.28907 | 1193.124 | 1588.626 | −0.95949 |
Z176-18 | 159.3 | 0.282462 | 0.000032 | 0.001561 | 0.000034 | 0.038918 | 0.001354 | −10.948415 | −7.5828 | 1133.043 | 1496.638 | −0.95298 |
Z176-19 | 160.9 | 0.282419 | 0.000012 | 0.001440 | 0.000009 | 0.032785 | 0.000246 | −12.478206 | −9.10025 | 1190.719 | 1580.521 | −0.95663 |
Z176-29 | 158.8 | 0.282401 | 0.000013 | 0.001276 | 0.000011 | 0.028400 | 0.000263 | −13.117993 | −9.80727 | 1211.03 | 1616.476 | −0.96158 |
Sample No. | Mineral | δDV-SMOW (‰) | δ18OV-SMOW (‰) | δ18OH2O-SMOW (‰) | Homogenization Temperature (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z46-1 | Quartz | −91.4 | 13.6 | 2.34 | 207.0 |
Z49 | −91 | 14 | 2.74 | 207.0 | |
Z78-2 | −91.4 | 15.8 | 7.26 | 258.9 | |
Z95 | −93.3 | 11.7 | −5.95 | 151.5 | |
Z124 | −96.6 | 16.6 | 8.06 | 258.9 | |
Z148 | −83.1 | 12.1 | −5.55 | 151.5 | |
Z149 | −88.4 | 17.5 | 8.96 | 258.9 | |
Z158 | −96.1 | 8.4 | −9.25 | 151.5 |
Sample No. | Minerals | δ34SV-CDT (‰) |
---|---|---|
K4 | Pyrite | 3.7 |
K5 | 3.4 | |
K11 | 3.2 | |
K13 | 3.6 | |
Z33 | 2.4 | |
K2 | Galena | 0.7 |
K4 | 0.1 | |
K5 | −0.2 | |
K11 | 0.7 | |
K13 | −0.2 |
Sample No. | Minerals | 208Pb/204Pb | 207Pb/204Pb | 206Pb/204Pb | μ | ω | Th/U |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K2 | Galena | 36.154 | 15.226 | 16.107 | 9.13 | 36.73 | 3.89 |
K4 | 36.204 | 15.231 | 16.176 | 9.12 | 36.53 | 3.88 | |
K5 | 35.975 | 15.16 | 16.106 | 8.98 | 35.08 | 3.78 | |
K11 | 36.099 | 15.197 | 16.157 | 9.04 | 35.75 | 3.83 | |
K13 | 36.05 | 15.19 | 16.1 | 9.05 | 35.84 | 3.83 |
Sample Locations (Intrusion) | Host Rock | Age [Ma] | Analytical Method | Data Source |
Xiajinbao | Granitic porphyry | 157.0 ± 3.4 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | This study |
Qianfenshuiling | Monzonite granite | 153.8 ± 2.7 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | Yang et al. [20] |
Wangpingshi | Monzonite granite | 162.3 ± 1.3 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | Song et al. [5] |
Maoshan | Monzonite granite | 162.7 ± 1.5 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | |
Madi | Granite | 166.3 | Rb–Sr | Yang et al. [20] |
Qibaizi | Granite | 168 ± 3 | LA-ICP-MS | Song et al. [5] |
Monzonite granite | 159.5 ± 0.5 | LA-ICP-MS | Song et al. [5] | |
Xiaoyingzi | Granodiorite | 164.4 ± 2.2 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | Yang et al. [20] |
Gaojiadian | Quartz diorite | 170.5 ± 1.8 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | |
Niuxinshan | Granite | 172–173 | SHRIMP | Guo et al. [21], Luo et al. [32], Hu et al. [35] |
Yuerya | Granite | 174–175 | SHRIMP | |
Tangzhangzi | Granitic porphyry | 173 ± 2 | LA-MC-ICP-MS | Guo et al. [21] |
Dazigou | Monzonite granite | 176.5 ± 1.0 | LA-ICP-MS | Luo et al. [32] |
Wubaizi | Granitic porphyry | 189.8 ± 0.7 | LA-ICP-MS | Luo et al. [32] |
Laosanjia | Granitic porphyry | 196.4 ± 0.8 | LA-ICP-MS | |
Luowenyu | Monzonite granite | 196.7 ± 7.0 | LA-ICP-MS | Luo et al. [32] |
Qinshankou | Monzonite granite | 199 ± 2 | SHRIMP | Song et al. [5], Luo et al. [32] |
Liuzhuping | Monzonite granite | 205.7 ± 0.8 | LA-ICP-MS | Luo et al. [32] |
Sanbaizi | Monzonite granite | 211.1 ± 1.1 | LA-ICP-MS | |
Panshan | Monzonite granite | 203–207 | SHRIMP | Ma et al. [13] |
Dushan | Granite | 210 ± 4 | SHRIMP | Luo et al. [19] |
Dushan | Granite | 223 ± 2 | SHRIMP | Luo et al. [32] |
Dashiyu | Granite | 222 ± 1 | LA-ICP-MS | Luo et al. [19] |
Monzonite granite | 224 ± 2 | LA-ICP-MS | ||
Sanjia | Granitic porphyry | 222 ± 4 | SHRIMP | Luo et al. [19] |
Sample Locations (Deposit) | Geological Characteristics | t/Ma | Testing Method | Data Source |
Xiajinbao | Alterated rocks | 155.73 | K–Ar | Yuan et al. [6], Zou et al. [7] |
Daoliushui | Ore-bearing quartz | 155 | Rb–Sr | Mei [4] |
Maoshan | Ore-bearing quartz | 174.2 | K–Ar | Yang et al. [20] |
Huajian | Ore-bearing quartz | 175.8 | Ar–Ar | Guo et al. [21], Luo et al. [32], Hu et al. [35] |
Yuerya | Ore-bearing quartz | 169.8 | Re–Os | |
Tangzhangzi | Ore-bearing quartz | 170.1 ± 1.6 | Re–Os | Yang et al. [20] |
Shiziping | Ore-bearing quartz | 179.5 | Rb–Sr | Yang et al. [20] |
Jinchangyu | Ore-bearing quartz | 169.8/242.6 | K–Ar/Re–Os | Song et al. [5]; Luo et al. [32] |
Chagou | Alterated rocks | 166 | K–Ar | Mei [4] |
Xiangshuigou | Ore-bearing quartz | 170.5 | K–Ar | Mei [4] |
Piandaogou | Ore-bearing quartz | 161 | Rb–Sr | Mei [4] |
Shuiquangou | Ore-bearing quartz | 212.5 ± 0.4 | Ar–Ar | Mei [4] |
Toudaomengou | Ore-bearing quartz | 217.3 ± 2.0 | Ar–Ar | Mei [4] |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, Q.; Shao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C. Origin of the Granite Porphyry and Related Xiajinbao Au Deposit at Pingquan, Hebei Province, Northeastern China: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and H–O–S–Pb–Hf Isotopes. Minerals 2018, 8, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8080330
Liu Q, Shao Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wang C. Origin of the Granite Porphyry and Related Xiajinbao Au Deposit at Pingquan, Hebei Province, Northeastern China: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and H–O–S–Pb–Hf Isotopes. Minerals. 2018; 8(8):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8080330
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Qingquan, Yongjun Shao, Zhongfa Liu, Jianguo Zhang, and Cheng Wang. 2018. "Origin of the Granite Porphyry and Related Xiajinbao Au Deposit at Pingquan, Hebei Province, Northeastern China: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and H–O–S–Pb–Hf Isotopes" Minerals 8, no. 8: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8080330