Next Article in Journal
Mineral Neutralizers as a Tool for Improving the Properties of Soil Contaminated with Copper
Previous Article in Journal
The Volcanic-Rich Layer of the “Camporotondo (Marche, Italy)” Section: Petrography and Sedimentation of an Unknown Distal Messinian Eruption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Study on Colour and Spectral Characteristics of Beihong Agate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical and Spectral Variations between Untreated and Heat-Treated Rubies from Mozambique and Madagascar

1
School of Gemology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Gem Appraisal Center of Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
Wuzhou Gemstone Vocational School, Wuzhou 543002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(7), 894; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070894
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Revised: 10 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 16 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gems and Gem Minerals)

Abstract

:
The chemical composition and spectra of untreated and heat-treated rubies from Mozambique and Madagascar were analyzed by an electron probe microscopy analysis, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma quadrupole mass spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and UV-visible spectroscopy. Due to the different content of Fe and different inclusions, rubies from Madagascar belong to alkaline basalt deposit, while rubies from Mozambique belong to amphibole metamorphic rock. The ruby samples were heated to 900 °C to change their color. As Fe and Ti ions can be transferred into different valences and diffused into the interior of rubies, Cr ions in cracks or cleavages entered the crystal lattice during heat treatment and the content of Fe and Ti decreased, while the content of Cr increased in heat-treated rubies. After heating, blue-purple decreased and the red hue increased, while the blue color band disappeared and yellow appeared in the cracks of the samples because of the chemical changes. Compared with untreated rubies, the infrared absorption peaks of 2123 cm−1 and 1990 cm−1 related to inclusions disappeared, and the existence of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 absorption peaks was a typical characteristic of heat-treated ruby, which was produced by changes in its inclusion. In addition, due to the weakened charge transfer of Fe2+ and Ti4+ and the increasing reaction of Fe2+ → Fe3+ along with the heat treatment, the UV-visible absorption peak at 400 nm shifted to purple.

1. Introduction

Ruby is one of the most precious gemstones on the market; it is a variety of corundum, and its structural formula is Al2O3, in which a small amount of Al3+ is replaced by Cr3+ ions [1]. Most natural rubies show uneven color saturation, sometimes with bands of blue color. To overcome these issues, various processing methods have been developed, such as heat treatment [2], glass-filled [3], ion implantation [4], etc. Heat treatment is one of the earliest methods used to improve the color, clarity and value of rubies. Previous studies have shown that the dark core and blue color band of rubies can be removed by heat treatment under an oxidizing atmosphere [5,6]. This method simulates the growth environment of natural ruby, makes oxygen atoms diffuse into a ruby lattice at high temperature and pressure, changes the valence state of chromogenic ions, or changes the internal structural defects, thus eliminating the blue or purple colors that are superimposed on red and obtaining the ideal color [7,8]. Therefore, it is important to discriminate between untreated and heat-treated rubies on the base of their gemological characteristics and chemical composition, as the two types of gems have different values on the market.
Modern research is beginning to employ surface-sensitive techniques to analyze untreated and heat-treated rubies in many different areas, e.g., X-ray electron probe microscopy analysis (EPMA) [9]; secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) [10]; proton-induced X-ray emission spectrometry (PIXE) [11]; and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [5]. Among these techniques, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is a sensitive method that is used to analyze the trace element composition in the untreated and heat-treated rubies. In addition to the analytical techniques that are used to determine the chemical composition, there are also other techniques that allow the discrimination of untreated rubies from heat-treated ones, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, Photoluminescence, and UV–vis–NIR spectrometry to characterize gemstones [8].
In general, the formation of corundum requires a geological environment that is rich in Al and poor in Si; in addition, the formation of ruby also requires an abundance of Cr and little Fe [11]. Rubies from Mozambique are mainly found in amphibolite metamorphic deposits [7]. However, rubies from Madagascar have a complex geological background and several types of ruby deposits, such as basalt kimberlite, alkaline basalt and mafic ultramafic rock type, in which metamorphic rock deposits are widely distributed [12].
Rubies from Africa are mostly pink or purplish red and have large sizes and poor transparency. Madagascar and Mozambique are famous for producing rubies in Africa. The geological conditions for ruby formation are diverse [12]. Three major deposit types of gem-quality ruby exist: marble-hosted (Myanmar, Afghanistan, Vietnam); basalt-hosted (Thailand, Cambodia); and metasomatic type (Kenya, Sri Lanka, India) [13,14]. The gemological properties and geological settings of rubies from Madagascar and Mozambique are similar, and their distinction is therefore difficult [12]. The origin of natural rubies cannot be identified solely on the basis of microscopic observations of the inclusions. The accurate determination of trace elements such as Mg, Ti, V, Cr, Fe and Ga in rubies is essential to determine their origin. The trace element contents in rubies vary owing to their different natural origins. The various types of rubies can be recognized based on their chemical composition and the characteristics of the inclusions. However, heat treatment produces different appearances in the different types of rubies. It is difficult to distinguish untreated and heat-treated rubies because of their similar appearance, especially when they are heated at a low temperature (below 1000 °C) [5,7]. As the commercial value of heat-treated rubies is lower than that of natural rubies, it is important to distinguish heat-treated rubies from natural ones. In this paper, rubies from Madagascar and Mozambique are heated to 900 °C at an oxidizing atmosphere to change their color. EPMA and LA-ICP-MS are employed to compare the chemical composition and trace elements between untreated and heat-treated rubies from Madagascar and Mozambique. Moreover, the changes in color and spectral characteristics are also fully studied by microscope, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy and UV–vis–NIR spectrometry. This provides a reference for the heat treatment and identification of rubies from Madagascar and Mozambique.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Six ruby samples from Madagascar (MD) and eight ruby samples from Mozambique (MS) are selected to study their gemological characteristics. The ruby samples from Mozambique are purple red, with a small amount of gray tint, and have the shape of a triangular plate. The color distribution is uneven and there is a blue color band in the center, surrounded by associated minerals. The Madagascar ruby samples are mostly columnar or barrel shaped, and a few are plate-shaped. Hexagonal columns and rhombohedrons can be observed in all of the samples. The ruby samples from Mozambique have a bright color, light pink and purplish red, and the color distribution of the samples is uniform. There are cleavages or cracks in all of the samples, which affects the transparency of the gemstone. Cleavage is the smooth surface that is produced along the crystallization direction under the external force, while crack is an irregular section under the external force, which is significantly different from cleavage. The weight of the samples ranges from 8.14 to 18.54 ct, the specific gravity (SG) of the samples ranges from 3.96 to 3.98 (obtained by hydrostatic weighing method), and the transparency of the samples ranges from slightly transparent to opaque. The basic gemological characteristics of all the samples are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Heat Treatment Experiments

Ruby samples from Madagascar (MD-1, MD-2, MD-3) and Mozambique (MS-1, MS-2, MS-3) were selected and cut into two parts, one part for heat treatment, and the other untreated part for comparing their gemological properties. Before heat treatment, the raw samples were cleaned with isopropanol to remove any dirt and grease. The heat treatment was then carried out in a muffle furnace (SX2-4-10, Tianjin Central Experimental Electric Furnace Co., Tianjin, China). The furnace was heated to 900 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min with an open crucible (oxidizing atmosphere), and the peak temperature was maintained for 12 h. Then, the ruby samples were cooled in the air for further testing. The heat experiment was performed in the State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing).

2.3. Analytical Methods

Color distribution and inclusions were observed using a GI-MP22 binocular microscope. The chemical composition of the heat-treated and untreated samples was determined by a JXA-8100 electron microprobe (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). The accelerated voltage was 15 kV, the beam current was 20 nA, and the diameter of the beam spot was 10 μm. The following standards were used for calibration: diopside for Si and Mg, rutile for Ti, hematite for Fe, rhodonite for Mn, wollastonite for Ca, synthetic NiO for Ni, and chromite for Cr. The intensity data were corrected using the ZAF3 method. The detection limits of the samples for EPMA were 100 ppm and the total error of the result was 1.5% (W/W). Trace elements were collected using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) systems, which was equipped with Angilent7900 laser ablation system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The laser repetition rate was 10 Hz and the laser wavelength was 193 nm. Ablation was carried out with 44 μm spot sizes, and the energy density was 6.02 J/cm2. The detection limits varied slightly through the course of the analyses but were generally <10%. The detection limits of the analyzed samples by LA-ICP-MS were 0.1–0.3 ppm, 0.03–0.2 ppm, 1–3 ppm, 3–5 ppm and 5–20 ppm for Mg, V, Ti, Ga and Fe, respectively.
The IR spectra of the ruby samples were recorded by a Tensor 27Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (CUGB, Beijing, China) in the 4000–400 cm−1 region. Inclusions were identified, when possible, using an HR-Evolution Raman spectroscopy with a Renishaw in Via Raman microscope system (Horiba, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The Raman spectra of the inclusions were excited by a Mode-Laser. A Stellar-REN Arion laser produced highly polarized light at 532 nm and collected at a nominal resolution of 3 cm–1 in the 2000–100 cm–1 range. In many cases, the confocal capabilities of the Raman system allowed inclusions beneath the surface to be analyzed. The UV-visible spectra were recorded with a UV-3600 Spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) in the range of 300–900 nm, using a high-speed scanning and reflection method. The sampling interval was 1 s.

3. Results

3.1. Microscopic Examination

The color and appearance of the heat-treated (MD-H-1, MS-H-1) and untreated samples (MD-1, MS-1) were observed under a biomicroscope (Figure 1). After heat treatment, the red hue of the Madagascar sample (MD-H-1) increased, while the purple tone decreased significantly. Moreover, the color of the sample (MD-H-1) became bright, and the cracks more evident. The purple tone of the Mozambique sample (MS-H-1) was significantly weakened, showing a different degree of red tone. At the same time, sample (MS-H-1) showed a different degree of yellow on the surface and crack. In addition, the blue color band in the center of sample (MS-H-1) disappeared and the surrounding color became pure. It is speculated that the oxidization and diffusion of Fe ions are the main reason for the disappearance of the blue color band and the appearance of yellow [8], which needs further research in subsequent experiments. The white material on the sides of sample MS-H-1 is alumina, which is added before heat treatment.

3.2. Electron Microprobe Analysis

In natural gemstones, it is normal to find chemical zoning in accordance with the crystallographic axes. For example, the MD-1 and MS-1 samples (Figure 1) both have a color band and inhomogeneous chemical composition along the c axis. The crystal plane for EPMA was selected parallel to the c axis, and the points were selected perpendicular to the blue color band. A total of 12 points were selected to compare their chemical composition, including three points of the untreated samples (MD-1, MD-2, MD-3); 3 points of the heat-treated samples (MD-H-1, MD-H-2, MD-H-3); 3 points of the untreated samples (MS-1, MS-2, MS-3); and 3 points of the heat-treated samples (MS-H-1, MS-H-2, MS-H-3) from Madagascar and Mozambique, respectively. The position of the ruby samples is shown in Figure 2.
The chemical composition of the untreated (MD-1, MD-2, MD-3, MS-1, MS-2, MS-3) and heat-treated samples (MD-H-1, MD-H-2, MD-H-3, MS-H-1, MS-H-2, MS-H-3) and average contents is reported in Table 2. Other than the main component of Al2O3, all the samples have similar impurities, such as Na2O, Cr2O3, SiO2, MgO, FeO, TiO2, MnO and NiO. In the ruby samples from Madagascar, after heat treatment, the average Cr2O3 content increases from 0.190% to 0.275%; the average FeO content decreases from 0.594% to 0.506%; and the average TiO2 content decreases from 1.104% to 0.732%. The result is consistent with the color changes, where the purple tone of the samples is reduced and the red hue is stronger after the heat treatment.
Similarly, after heat treatment, the average Cr2O3 content of the rubies from Mozambique increases from 0.092% to 0.123%, the FeO content decreases from 0.352% to 0.326%, while the TiO2 content decreases from 1.940% to 1.371%. The results therefore show that after the heat treatment, the contents of Fe and Ti both decrease, which is why the purple-blue band disappears.
The red color and Cr ions of the untreated samples are unevenly distributed. After the heat treatment, the Cr ions on the surface or crack of the ruby samples enter the lattice, so that their distribution becomes uniform and the average Cr2O3 content increases, compared with the untreated samples. However, the Fe and Ti ions diffuse into the interior of the ruby samples after heating in oxidizing conditions, so their contents on the surface of the heat-treated samples are relatively low. At the same time, brown substances appear in the cracks of the heat-treated samples, and the FeO content in the cracks is relatively high. It can be concluded that Fe2+ is oxidized to Fe3+ during heat treatment [15,16,17], and yellow appears on the surface and cracks (Figure 1), which is consistent with the results that are observed under the microscope.

3.3. LA-ICP-MS Analysis

The LA-ICP-MS trace element results of 12 points in six untreated and six heat-treated samples are reported in Table 3, and the points were selected perpendicular to the blue color band. Limited amounts of trace elements such as Cr, Fe, Ti, V, Mg and Ga were found in all the analyzed ruby samples. The geographic determination is based on the Fe content and not on the Cr content of ruby, which is not considered to be useful for the certification of origin [12]. Rubies can be divided into three types according to their Fe content, which are related to marble type, metasomatic rock type and basalt type deposits, respectively [18]. As pointed out in previous studies [18,19], the range of Fe content with marble type is 0–200 ppm, that with metasomatic rock is 200–2000 ppm, while that with basalt type deposits is >2000 ppm. Based on the data of Table 3, the average content of Fe (3219 ppm) in the rubies from Madagascar is higher than that of the rubies from Mozambique (1717 ppm). Thus, the rubies from Mozambique belong to amphibole metamorphic rock, and the rubies from Madagascar belong to alkaline basalt.
We can also observe that the average content of Cr in the rubies from Madagascar (853 ppm) is higher than that of the rubies from Mozambique (664 ppm). Thus, the rubies from Madagascar show red with a high saturation, while those from Mozambique show dark red with a blue band in the center. The Cr content of the samples from Madagascar is high, up to 1091 ppm, and it is close to that in basalt ruby deposit. Meanwhile, the Cr content of Mozambique ruby is relatively low, and it is consistent with the type of metasomatic rock [12].
In the rubies from Madagascar, after heat treatment, the average content of Ti decreases from 67.6 to 38.8 ppm; that of Fe decreases from 3219 to 2989 ppm; that of Ga decreases from 87.0 to 83.2 ppm; and Cr increases from 853 to 1091 ppm. In the Mozambique rubies, after heat treatment, the average content of Ti decreases from 39.6 to 34.2 ppm; that of Fe decreases from 1717 to 1565 ppm; that of Ga decreases from 37.3 to 35.1 ppm; and Cr increases from 664 to 718 ppm.
The ruby samples have an uneven color distribution, especially on the surface. During heating under oxidizing conditions, the Fe and Ti ions can be transferred into different valences and diffused into the interior of the ruby samples [6]. Therefore, the purple hue on the surface of the samples decreases and the red hue increases. During heat treatment, the Cr ions in the cracks or cleavages of the samples enter the crystal lattice, causing the content of the Cr ions to increase and making the color of the surface more evenly distributed.
Comparing the data in Table 2 and Table 3, discrepancies are observed on the chemical composition that is obtained with the EPMA and LA-ICP-MS analyses. Natural rubies have chemical heterogeneity in the ruby samples (Figure 1), and the points that are selected for EPMA are not the exactly same as the position for LA-ICP-MS. It is normal for there to be differences in the results of chemical composition between EPMA and LA-ICP-MS, such as Cr, Fe and Ti.

3.4. Infrared Spectra

Typical spectra in the spectral range of 3400 cm−1 to 1500 cm−1 before and after heat treatment at 900 °C are reported in Figure 3. The untreated samples of MD-1, MS-1 and the heat-treated samples of MD-H-1, MS-H-1 were selected to compare their changes in IR spectra. The absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 is the most characteristic peak in ruby, which is produced by the OH stretching band because of its inclusion, such as diaspore [20,21]. The intensity of the infrared peaks in the different samples is different, and this depends on the amount of diaspore that is present. The presence of diaspore shows that the ruby has not been heated or has been heated at a low temperature (below 1000 °C), and the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 significantly weakens or even disappears completely after being heated [22]. The infrared spectra of the ruby samples from Madagascar show a weak absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 before heating (MD-1), and the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 is significantly weakened after heating (MD-H-1). The absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 of (MS-1) is stronger than that of (MD-1), and the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 decreases significantly after heating (MS-H-1). When the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 is strong enough before heating, new peaks of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 are generated after heating, which are produced by changes in its inclusion. The peaks of 3310 cm−1, 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 are usually called 3309 cm−1 series [23]. Therefore, the existence of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 absorption is evidence that the ruby has been heated and still has inclusions after heat treatment [8].
Similarly, the spectra of samples MD-H-1, MS-H-1 in the spectral range of 3000 cm−1 to 1500 cm−1 in Figure 2 show that the absorption peaks of 2123 cm−1 and 1990 cm−1 disappeared after heat treatment in both samples (MS-1, MD-1), caused by diaspore or other inclusions, as the structure of Al-O (OH) is destroyed by heating [24]. Therefore, the twin peak of 2123 cm−1 and 1990 cm−1 is a typical characteristic of untreated ruby [25].
The change in the IR spectra of heat-treated rubies can be seen in those with inclusions. It is worth noting that not all natural rubies have characteristic inclusions. Rubies without inclusions such as samples of MD-5, MD-6, MS-4 and MS-8 do not have these absorption peaks and the IR spectra of heat-treated rubies without inclusions are similar to natural rubies—other methods need to be used to determine whether they have been heat treated.

3.5. Raman Spectra

Rubies containing inclusions were then selected to identify the characteristics of the inclusions themselves. For example, focusing the incident light on the inclusions in the ruby samples of MD-2 and MS-1, Raman peaks at 138 cm−1, 244 cm−1, 432 cm−1 and 609 cm−1 can be observed in Figure 4a, indicating that the black inclusion in the samples of MD-2 and MS-1 is rutile [26,27]. In addition, diaspore inclusion is found in the ruby samples of MD-3 and MS-3 [28] (Figure 4b). The characteristic Raman peaks of feldspar at 199 cm−1, 285 cm−1, 505 cm−1, 557 cm−1 and 976 cm−1 [29] (Figure 4c), and amphibole at 209 cm−1, 673 cm−1 and 1018 cm−1 [30] (Figure 4d) are detected in MS-2, which is consistent with the previous conclusion that ruby from Mozambique belongs to amphibole metamorphic rock.
The Raman spectra of untreated and treated ruby samples that were measured at room temperature are shown in Figure 5. Since ruby has strong fluorescence, all Raman spectra are subjected to baseline correction to make the results more accurate. The typical peaks of 378 cm−1, 416 cm−1, 575 cm−1 and 747 cm−1 are observed due to Al-O vibrations of corundum [30,31]. Compared with the Raman spectra of the untreated (MD-1, MS-1) and heat-treated samples (MD-H-1, MS-H-1), the Raman band positions and peak intensities remain unchanged after heat treatment.

3.6. UV-Visible Spectra

Optical absorption in the UV–visible region for the untreated and heat-treated ruby, recorded at room temperature, is reported in Figure 6. Since the transparency of the samples is poor (slightly transparent or opaque), the UV-VIS spectra are measured by the reflection method. The untreated MD-2 and MS-2 samples both have a strong absorption band at 560 nm, while the absorption band gradually moves to 555 nm for the heat-treated samples (MD-H-2, MS-H-2), which is formed by Cr3+, due to its spin-allowed transition from the ground state 4A2g4T1g [25,32], and the absorption intensity decreases evidently after heat treatment. Combined with the color change of the samples, the red hue increases in the heat-treated samples from both areas.
The absorption peak at 400 nm shifts to the purple area and the peak intensity also decreases significantly, which is caused by Fe3+ [33,34,35,36]. Combined with the chemical composition of the samples, the reaction of Fe2+ → Fe3+ increases along with the heat treatment, while the charge transfer between Fe2+ and Ti4+ decreases. Moreover, Fe2+ is oxidized to Fe3+ after heat treatment, and the charge transfer between Fe2+ and Ti4+ is reduced [33], so the blue tone of the samples is reduced and the red hue is increased. Therefore, the absorption peak shifts to the purple area, the blue-purple tone of the ruby decreases, and the red hue increases, which is the main reason for the formation of the absorption band and the absorption peak moving to 385 nm and 388 nm, respectively. Such similar absorption bands due to both Cr and Fe have been reported for different rubies by previous research [20,25,37]. It has been observed that there is a decrease in the intensity of the band after heat treatment. This may be due to richer Fe3+ on the surface after the heat treatment than untreated rubies. The obvious emission of Cr3+ luminescent centers at 693 nm (MD) and 694 nm (MS) is shown in Figure 6, which also reveals a tremendous increase in the intensity of the 694 nm emission peak for the heat-treated samples.

4. Discussion

According to the results of the EPMA and LA-ICP-MS analyses, after heating, the FeO and TiO2 contents of the rubies both decrease, and the Cr2O3 content increases, so the red hue of the treated rubies is stronger than the untreated ones, and the blue color band is reduced, which is due to the heat treatment in an oxidizing atmosphere. The increasing red hue enhances the value of rubies. This is consistent with previous research [38,39]. It is proved that low-temperature heating is documented as effective for improving the color and removing the blue color band of rubies. Therefore, the optimum temperature of heat treatment depends on the different quality and origin of the ruby samples.
Moreover, the color of the ruby samples changes from purplish red to bright red, with the blue band disappearing and the yellow appearing in the cracks of some samples. This coincides with the change in chemical composition. Such a change is also reflected in the spectra between the unheated and heat-treated samples. Natural rubies usually have inclusions such as boehmite and diaspore [24], which have the characteristic absorption peak of 3310 cm−1, related to the inclusions [7,8,22]. After heating, the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 decreases significantly, and the existence of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 absorption is a characteristic of heat-treated ruby. Furthermore, the twin peak of 2123 cm−1 and 1990 cm−1 is a typical characteristic of untreated ruby.
Heat-treated and untreated rubies have similar Raman spectra. As the rubies are heat-treated at a low temperature (900 °C), the chemical composition changes a little, but it shows no obvious difference in the UV-VIS spectra concerning the bands. However, the absorption peak of 400 nm shifts to the blue area in the heat-treated rubies for the decrease in Fe2+ and Ti4+.
In addition, rubies have an obvious emission of Cr3+ luminescent centers in both areas. Since they have a certain amount of iron ions, the fluorescence of all ruby samples is weak. The change in heat-treated rubies with a high temperature will be (above 1000 °C) studied in further work.

5. Conclusions

Due to the different trace elements and inclusions, rubies from Madagascar belong to alkaline basalt deposit and have the characteristic inclusions of rutile and diaspore, while rubies from Mozambican belong to amphibole metamorphic rock and have the inclusions of diaspore, amphibole and feldspar. The ruby samples are heated at 900 °C under oxidizing conditions to change their color. After heating, the red color of the heat-treated rubies is brighter than the untreated ones, with the blue band disappearing and yellow appearing in the cracks of some samples. This change is also reflected in the chemical composition; the content of Cr increases, while the content of Fe and Ti decreases in heat-treated rubies. The IR spectra can be used to distinguish the heated rubies from the unheated ones, especially the rubies with inclusions. After heating, the absorption peak of 3310 cm−1 related inclusions decreases significantly and the new absorption peaks of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 appear. Therefore, the presence of 3236 cm−1 and 3186 cm−1 absorption is a characteristic of heat-treated ruby. After heating, the UV-visible absorption peak of the untreated samples at 400 nm shifts to purple due to increasing the reaction of Fe2+ → Fe3+ and the weakened charge transfer of Fe2+ and Ti4+.

Author Contributions

Q.L.: writing—original draft preparation and formal analysis; X.L.: investigation and taking pictures; L.S.: investigation and validation; B.Q.: resources and investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Innovation Experiment Program for University Students (X202211415189, S202111415127).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jiawei Chen from the School of Earth Sciences and Resources in China University of Geosciences (Beijing) for providing laboratory equipment. We are also grateful to all of the reviewers and editors for their constructive comments and efforts to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, D.; Zhu, Z.; Hui, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, G. Al2O3: Cr3+ microfibers by hydrothermal route: Luminescence properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2012, 47, 2332–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Achiwawanich, S.; Brack, N.; James, B.D.; Liesegang, J. Surface analysis of heat-treated Mong Hsu rubies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 252, 8646–8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McClure, S.F.; Smith, C.P.; Wang, W.; Hall, M. Identification and durability of lead glass-filled rubies. Gems Gemol. 2006, 42, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tengchaisri, T.; Bootkul, D.; Intarasiri, S.; Tippawan, U.; Kuznetsov, A.Y. Coloration changes in natural ruby induced by oxygen ion implants correlated with cathodoluminescence data. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2021, 502, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Achiwawanich, S.; James, B.D.; Liesegang, J. XPS and ToF-SIMS analysis of natural rubies and sapphires heated in an inert (N2) atmosphere. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 6883–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Swain, S.; Pradhan, S.K.; Jeevitha, M.; Acharya, P.; Debata, M.; Dash, T.; Nayak, B.B.; Mishra, B.K. Microwave heat treatment of natural ruby and its characterization. Appl. Phys. A 2016, 122, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wanthanachaisaeng, B.; Sripoonjan, T.; Lhuaamporn, T.; Nilhud, N.; Toaree, S.; Leelawatanasuk, T. Alteration of inclusion in heated Mozambique ruby. In Proceedings of the 5th GIT International Gem and Jewelry Conference (GIT 2016), Pattaya, Thailand, 9–13 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pardieu, V.; Saeseaw, S.; Detroyat, S.; Raynaud, V.; Sangsawong, S.; Bhusrisom, T.; Engniwat, S.; Muyal, J. “Low Temperature” Heat Treatment of Mozambique Ruby—Results Report; GIA: Carlsbad, CA, USA, 16 April 2015; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  9. Peretti, A.; Schmetzer, K.; Bernhardt, H.J.; Mouawad, F. Rubies from Mong Hsu. Gems Gemol. 1995, 31, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Emmett, J.L.; Scarratt, K.; McClure, S.F.; Moses, T.; Douthit, T.R.; Hughes, R.; Novak, S.; Shigley, J.E.; Wang, W.; Bordelon, O.; et al. Beryllium Diffusion of ruby and sapphire. Gems Gemol. 2003, 39, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Chulapakorn, T.; Intarasiri, S.; Bootkul, D.; Singkarat, S. Identification of deposit types of natural corundum by PIXE. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2014, 331, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Palke, A.C.; Saeseaw, S.; Renfro, N.D.; Sun, Z.; McClure, S.F. Geographic Origin Determination of Ruby. Gems Gemol. 2019, 55, 580–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sripoonjan, T.; Wanthanachaisaeng, B.; Leelawatanasuk, T. Phase transformation of epigenetic iron staining: Indication of low-temperature heat treatment in Mozambique ruby. J. Gemol. 2016, 35, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Monarumit, N.; Lhuaamporn, T.; Satitkune, S.; Wongkokua, W. Effect of Beryllium Heat Treatment in Synthetic Ruby. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2019, 86, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stone-Sundberg, J.; Thomas, T.; Sun, Z.; Guan, Y.; Cole, Z.; Equall, R.; Emmett, J.L. Accurate Reporting of Key Trace Elements in Ruby and Sapphire Using Matrix-Matched Standards. Gems Gemol. 2017, 53, 438–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Giuliani, G.; Groat, L.A.; Fallick, A.E.; Pignatelli, I.; Pardieu, V. Ruby Deposits: A review and geological classification. Minerals 2020, 10, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, G.H.; Zhou, H.Y.; Zhang, H.S.; Ling, H.F.; Ma, W.; Zhao, H.Q.; Chen, J.L.; Liu, J.H. New index of ferromanganese crusts reflecting oceanic environmental oxidation. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2007, 50, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Calligaro, T.; Poirot, J.P.; Querre, P. Trace element finger printing of jewelry rubies by external beam PIXE. Beam Interact. Mater. At. 1999, 150, 628–634. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, T.; Sun, X.; Shi, G.; Li, D.; Zhou, H. The genetic linkage between the Yuanjiang marble-hosted ruby deposit and Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Ailao Shan-Red River shear zone (Southwest China). J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 177, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giuliani, G.; Groat, L.A. Geology of corundum and emerald gem deposits: A review. Gems Gemol. 2019, 55, 464–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cartier, L.E. Ruby and sapphire from Marosely Madagascar. J. Gemol. 2009, 31, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saeseaw, S.; Kongsomart, B.; Atikarnsakul, U.; Khowpong, C.; Vertriest, W.; Soonthorntantikul, W. Update on “Low-Temperature” Heat Treatment of Mozambican Ruby: A Focus on Inclusions and FTIR Spectroscopy; GIA: Carlsbad, CA, USA, 30 April 2018; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pardiu, V.; Thanachakaphad, J. Rubies reportedly from Mozambique. Gems Gemol. 2012, 48, 149–150. [Google Scholar]
  24. Beran, A.; Rossman, G.R. OH in naturally occurring corundum. Eur. J. Miner. 2006, 18, 441–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sinha, J.K.; Mishra, P.K. Spectroscopic and microstructural studies of ruby gemstones of Sinapalli, Odisha. J. Geol. Soc. India 2015, 86, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hara, Y.; Nicol, M. Raman spectra and the structure of rutile at high pressures. Phys. Status Solidi 2010, 94, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, T.; Sun, X.; Shi, G.; Liu, Y. LA-ICP-MS U–Pb Dating of Cenozoic Rutile Inclusions in the Yuanjiang Marble-Hosted Ruby Deposit, Ailao Shan Complex, Southwest China. Minerals 2021, 11, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruan, H.D.; Frost, R.L.; Kloprogge, J.T. Comparison of Raman spectra in characterizing gibbsite, bayerite, diaspore and boehmite. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2001, 32, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mernagh, T.P. Use of the laser Raman microprobe for discrimination amongst feldspar minerals. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010, 22, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chopelas, A. Single crystal Raman spectra of forsterite, fayalite, and monticellite. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karampelas, S.; Wrle, M.; Hunger, K.; Lanz, H. Micro-Raman spectroscopy on two chalices from the Benedictine Abbey of Einsiedeln: Identification of gemstones. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 1833–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Raghavan, S.; Imbrie, P.K.; Crossley, W.A. Spectral Analysis of R-lines and Vibronic Sidebands in the Emission Spectrum of Ruby Using Genetic Algorithms. Appl. Spectrosc. 2008, 62, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gaudry, E.; Cabaret, D.; Sainctavit, P.; Brouder, C.; Mauri, F.; Goulon, J.; Rogalev, A. Structural relaxations around Ti, Cr and Fe impurities in Al2O3; Probed by X-ray absorption near-edge structure combined with first-principles calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2005, 17, 5467–5480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sorokina, E.S.; Litvinenko, A.K.; Hofmeister, W.; Häger, T.; Jacob, D.E.; Nasriddinov, Z.Z. Rubies and Sapphires from Snezhnoe, Tajikistan. Gems Gemol. 2015, 51, 160–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garnier, V.; Giuliani, G.; Ohnenstetter, D.; Fallick, A.E.; Dubessy, J.; Banks, D.; Vinh, H.Q.; Lhomme, T.; Maluski, H.; Pêcher, A.; et al. Marble hosted ruby deposits from Central and Southeast Asia: Towards a new genetic model. Ore Geol. Rev. 2008, 34, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Groat, L.A.; Giuliani, G.; Stone-Sundberg, J.; Renfro, N.D.; Sun, Z. A review of analytical methods used in geographic origin determination of gemstones. Gems Gemol. 2019, 55, 512–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Majumdar, A.S.; Mathew, G. Distinct Ruby Suite at Sardapur, Orissa: A spectroscopic investigation. J. Geol. Soc. India 2012, 80, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sorokina, E.S.; Hofmeister, W.; Häger, T.; Mertz-Kraus, R.; Buhre, S.; Saul, J.M. Morphological and chemical evolution of corundum (ruby and sapphire): Crystal ontogeny reconstructed by EPMA, LA-ICPMS, and Cr3+ Raman mapping. Am. Mineral. 2016, 101, 2716–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garnier, V.; Ohnenstetter, D.; Giuliani, G.; Blanc, P.; Schwarz, D. Trace-element contents and cathodoluminescence of “Trapiche” rubies from Mong Hsu (Myanmar): Geological significance. Miner. Petrol. 2002, 76, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Color and appearance of treated and untreated samples.
Figure 1. Color and appearance of treated and untreated samples.
Minerals 12 00894 g001
Figure 2. Position of treated and untreated samples for EPMA.
Figure 2. Position of treated and untreated samples for EPMA.
Minerals 12 00894 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of untreated and treated samples in the range of (a) 3400–3000 cm−1 and (b) 3000–1500 cm−1.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of untreated and treated samples in the range of (a) 3400–3000 cm−1 and (b) 3000–1500 cm−1.
Minerals 12 00894 g003
Figure 4. Raman spectra of inclusions in untreated samples: (a) rutile, (b) diaspore, (c) feldspar and (d) amphibole.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of inclusions in untreated samples: (a) rutile, (b) diaspore, (c) feldspar and (d) amphibole.
Minerals 12 00894 g004
Figure 5. Raman spectra of untreated and treated samples.
Figure 5. Raman spectra of untreated and treated samples.
Minerals 12 00894 g005
Figure 6. Optical absorption spectra of the untreated and treated samples (a) MD, (b) MS.
Figure 6. Optical absorption spectra of the untreated and treated samples (a) MD, (b) MS.
Minerals 12 00894 g006
Table 1. Gemological characteristics of ruby samples from Madagascar and Mozambique.
Table 1. Gemological characteristics of ruby samples from Madagascar and Mozambique.
LabelColorTransparencyWeight (ct) Specific Gravity (SG) Appearance
MD-1pinkslightly
transparent
15.273.98crack
MD-2pinkslightly
transparent
11.263.97cleavage, crack
MD-3pinkslightly
transparent
11.263.98cleavage, crack
MD-4pinkslightly
transparent
11.263.97cleavage, crack
MD-5pinkslightly
transparent
11.263.98cleavage, crack
MD-6pinkslightly
transparent
11.263.97cleavage, crack
MS-1purple redopaque18.543.97cleavage
MS-2purple redopaque14.353.98cleavage
MS-3purple redopaque10.023.96cleavage
MS-4purple redopaque8.143.97yellow
MS-5purple redopaque12.383.98cleavage
MS-6purple redopaque11.213.96cleavage
MS-7purple redopaque16.543.98crack
MS-8purple redopaque13.753.98crack
Table 2. Chemical composition of untreated and treated samples from different area (% W/W).
Table 2. Chemical composition of untreated and treated samples from different area (% W/W).
LabelAl2O3Na2OCr2O3SiO2TiO2MgOFeOMnONiO
MD-199.4890.010 0.156 0.021 1.0780.007 0.6640.012 0.041
MD-299.4240.033 0.174 0.032 0.5590.011 0.5670.019 0.010
MD-398.8090.079 0.2410.015 1.6750.009 0.5510.021 0.029
Average99.2410.0410.1900.0231.1040.0090.5940.0170.027
MD-H-198.3080.019 0.271 0.005 0.5590.012 0.6160.016 0.062
MD-H-299.2750.020 0.179 0.002 0.240.013 0.420 0.010 0.024
MD-H-398.6320.016 0.3760.010 1.3970.014 0.4810.019 0.029
Average98.7380.0180.2750.0060.7320.0130.5060.0150.038
MS-198.9250.026 0.080 0.012 1.6650.006 0.3640.009 0.017
MS-298.7820.0120.1020.0311.6780.0120.3920.0220.019
MS-398.2160.0240.0930.0212.4770.0160.3010.0210.018
Average98.6410.0210.0920.0211.9400.0110.3520.0170.018
MS-H-199.2010.0310.1170.0171.3970.0210.3490.0190.021
MS-H-298.9560.0210.1320.0291.5180.0090.3820.0150.025
MS-H-399.2510.0120.1210.0041.1990.0170.2470.0190.140
Average99.1360.0210.1230.0171.3710.0160.3260.0180.062
Table 3. Chemical composition of untreated and treated samples from different area.
Table 3. Chemical composition of untreated and treated samples from different area.
LabelCr (ppm)Fe (ppm)Ti (ppm)Mg (ppm)Ga (ppm)V (ppm)
MD-1842323071.846.189.715.4
MD-2880325066.144.991.116.9
MD-3838317865.043.580.316.0
Average853321967.644.887.016.1
MD-H-11083308038.024.587.814.7
MD-H-21142289436.023.580.314.0
MD-H-31047299236.524.281.513.8
Average1090298938.824.183.214.2
MS-1650176842.125.438.42.4
MS-2640170235.926.036.32.4
MS-3703168040.937.637.22.6
Average664171739.629.737.32.5
MS-H-1684145534.234.435.92.5
MS-H-2703150030.538.833.52.4
MS-H-3767174038.024.536.02.3
Average718156534.232.635.12.4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Q.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Qin, B. Chemical and Spectral Variations between Untreated and Heat-Treated Rubies from Mozambique and Madagascar. Minerals 2022, 12, 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070894

AMA Style

Lu Q, Li X, Sun L, Qin B. Chemical and Spectral Variations between Untreated and Heat-Treated Rubies from Mozambique and Madagascar. Minerals. 2022; 12(7):894. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Qi, Xinyi Li, Lihua Sun, and Binrong Qin. 2022. "Chemical and Spectral Variations between Untreated and Heat-Treated Rubies from Mozambique and Madagascar" Minerals 12, no. 7: 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12070894

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop