Next Article in Journal
Formation of Diagenetic Minerals in the Carboniferous Rock Complex from the Fore-Sudetic Monocline (SW Poland): Fluid Inclusion, Isotopic and Raman Constraints
Next Article in Special Issue
A Fundamental Economic Assessment of Recovering Rare Earth Elements and Critical Minerals from Acid Mine Drainage Using a Network Sourcing Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Pre-Pegmatite Stage in Peralkaline Magmatic Process: Insights from Poikilitic Syenites from the Lovozero Massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Provenance of Coastal Sands from Greece: New Insights on the REE Content of Black Coastal Sands from Aggelochori Area, N.-Greece
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/min11090975
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Potential for REE and Associated Critical Metals in Karstic Bauxites and Bauxite Residue of Montenegro

by
Slobodan Radusinović
1,* and
Argyrios Papadopoulos
2
1
Geological Survey of Montenegro, Naselje Kruševac bb, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
2
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(9), 975; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090975
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 31 August 2021 / Accepted: 1 September 2021 / Published: 7 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Potential and Characteristics of REE Deposits and Other Critical Raw Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Research for critical raw materials is of special interest, due to their increasing demand, opulence of applications and shortage of supply. Bauxites, or bauxite residue after alumina extraction can be sources of critical raw materials (CRMs) due to their content of rare earth elements and other critical elements. Montenegrin bauxites and bauxite residue (red mud) are investigated for their mineralogy and geochemistry. The study of the CRM’s potential of the Montenegrin bauxite residue after the application of Bayer process, is performed for the first time. Montenegrin bauxites, (Jurassic bauxites from the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions from the Early Jurassic, Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian and Late Triassic paleorelief) are promising for their REE’s content (around 1000 ppm of ΣREE’s). More specifically, they are especially enriched in LREEs compared to HREEs. Regarding other CRMs and other elements, Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Sr and Ga could also be promising. In bauxite residue, the contents of Zr, Sr, V, Sc, La, Ce, Y, Ti and Nb are higher than those in bauxites. However, raw bauxites and bauxite residue as a secondary raw material can be considered as possible sources of CRMs.

1. Introduction

From economical point of view, red karstic bauxites can be considered as a potential mineral raw material for obtaining the REEs. World demand for rare earth elements has been on the rise for years, due to their usage in high-tech applications. REE supply in global market is limited, as China is almost the exclusive global supplier. Significant attention is paid to REE’s resources of the United States, when it comes to domestic deposits, a global perspective and world production [1,2], as well as in European and other countries.
Apart from REEs, other trace elements such as vanadium, scandium, gallium, lithium, molybdenum, etc., are important for the exploration of karstic bauxites, as they can be found in considerable amounts and are of economic value. European Commission regularly publishes a list of critical mineral resources (CRM) in the European Union. The last published list of CRM (2020) contains 30 different mineral resources [3]. Some of them, such as: titanium, rare earth elements (light and heavy), vanadium, scandium and gallium are found in karst bauxites deposits in Montenegro and/or in secondary resources red mud—bauxite residue. The bauxite as CRM is included in the list for the first time.
The presence of rare earth elements in significant contents, in the explored deposits and occurrences of Jurassic bauxite in the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions, as well as in bauxites of other bauxite formations in Montenegro has been confirmed by recent studies [4,5,6]. In this way, a basis has been created for more detailed research for CRMs in Montenegro.
The possibility of extraction of rare earth elements and other critical elements from bauxite residue from the Aluminium Plant Podgorica which is about 7.5 million tons is under investigation. According to Montenegrin legislation, bauxite residue is classified as a technogenic mineral raw material [7].

Rare Earth Elements (REE) in Karstic Bauxites

Bauxites represent residual deposits formed mostly in humid tropical to sub-tropical climates (e.g., [8,9]) and can be subdivided, according to bedrock lithology, into karstic and lateritic types [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Similar to bauxites, Ni laterites and karstic nickel deposits can be considered as potential resources for critical metals (CM), REEs, Sc and platinum group elements (PGE) exploration [17,18,19,20]. Moreover, REE resources on Gran Canaria are significant, especially in Miocene alkaline felsic magmatic rocks and their associated paleosols [21].
Karstic bauxites are enriched in V, Co, Ni, Cr, Zr and occasionally in REE [4,10,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. For example, the Las Mercedes karstic bauxites in the Dominican Republic contain extremely high contents of REEs [47]. The most abundant hydrated alumina oxide minerals in karstic bauxite are böhmite and diaspore [8,9,48]. The vertical distribution of trace elements and REEs in Montenegrin karstic bauxite deposits, particularly those of Jurassic age, show that REE were mobile during deposit formation [49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. The REEs generally occur in association with bastnäsite group as the most abundant authigenic REE minerals [14,56,57,58], while REE phosphates such as monazite-(Nd), monazite-(La) and Nd-rich goyazite are less abundant [52,53,59]. There is a great variety of authigenic REE minerals among the deposits. Their composition depends on fluorine contents. High content of bastnäsite and hydroxylbastnäsite minerals group in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Greece karstic bauxite were connected with fluorine-poor environment [52,53,54]. The formation of authigenic REE minerals in the deeper part of karstic bauxite deposits, depends on the REE content of the weathered parent rock, the intensity of leaching by surface water and the behaviour of basement limestone as an efficient geochemical barrier [19]. High contents of light REE relative to the heavy REE have been detected in the basal part of the Montenegrin Jurassic bauxites, with very low silica content. By studying REEs in Jurassic bauxite deposits Zagrad from Montenegro, it is determined that the deeper parts of the deposit with authigenic minerals exhibit very strong enrichment in all REEs, especially LREEs [4]. The major carriers of REE and the presence of residual and authigenic monazite and xenotime, clearly indicate that part of REE minerals were redeposited from primary sources, and the rest are formed during an early diagenetic stage, under oxidizing conditions.
This review paper focuses on the presentation of Montenegrin bauxite formations, their mineral composition and geochemical characteristics, principally based on previously published data, as well as an assessment of the potential for REE and associated critical metals exploitation. Moreover, a preliminary attempt to assess the CRM’s potential of Montenegrin bauxite residue after the application of Bayer’s process is made for the first time.

2. Geological Setting

2.1. Karstic Bauxites of Montenegro

All deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites in Montenegro belong to the Dinaric metallogenetic province [60,61,62]. They are located in the metallogenetic units of High Karst, in the Adriatic zone in the coastal area, as well as in the area of the Durmitor metallogenetic subzone, in the area of Sinjavina [15] (Figure 1).
The territory of Montenegro is built of different types of sedimentary, igneous and metamorphic rocks. Most of the terrain is built by Mesozoic formations of carbonate composition. They are developed in the northern, central and coastal part of Montenegro. Magmatic and clastic aluminosilicate rocks are much less presented. Paleozoic geological formations are presented by sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. They are located mainly in the north-eastern part of Montenegro. Cenozoic rocks of carbonate and clastic composition occur here and there in all regions of Montenegro [64] (Figure 1).
The red karstic bauxites occur in three stratigraphic levels in the Middle Triassic, Jurassic and Paleogene, while the white karst bauxites are of Cretaceous age [16,64,65,66].
Triassic bauxites were discovered in the wider area of Nikšićka župa, in Gornje polje near Nikšić and in Piva (Piva, Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica bauxite-bearing regions, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The underlying bed of the Triassic bauxite is formed by Anisian limestones, reef Ladinian limestones or Ladinian volcanogenic-sedimentary formation. In their immediate hanging wall, there are terrigenous Raibel sediments, and then early diagenetic dolomites of the Carnian stage.
Jurassic bauxites in Montenegro are widespread in the area of the High karst zone, and are present on the terrains of Sinjavina and Durmitor—in the Durmitor tectonic unit. During the Jurassic, the High karst zone was differentiated into two complex anticline forms: the subzone of Kučiin the northeast and the Old Montenegrin subzone in the southwest [67]. Jurassic bauxite deposits and occurrences belong to Vojnik-Maganik, Prekornica, Western Montenegro, Orjen and Čevo bauxite-bearing regions, (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The paleorelief of Jurassic bauxite in Montenegro consists of karstified limestones and rare dolomites of the LateTriassic, Liassic and Dogger-Oxfordian age. Their hanging wall of Kimmeridgian-Titon age, is represented by different types of limestone and rarely present dolomites.
Cretaceous, white bauxites were formed during the Early Cretaceous on a karst paleorelief built of limestone, dolomitic limestones and dolomite of Liassic, Doggerian, Tithonian and Berriasian-Barremian age. Over the white bauxite, limestones of the Late Cenomanian were deposited. They were discovered in the Western Montenegro and Čevobauxite-bearing regions (Figure 2), in the domain of the Old Montenegrin subzone.
Paleogene bauxites were formed in the coastal part of Montenegro within the Adriatic zone. They are known mainly as of Eocene age, and less frequently as Lutetic bauxites in the literature. Deposits and occurrences of Paleogene bauxites in the area of Luštica and Grbalj and between Bar and Ulcinj (Figure 4) are located on a paleorelief built of Late Cretaceous limestones and dolomites, while their hanging wall is made up of Middle Eocene limestones.
Triassic bauxites have been poorly explored, primarily due to their high SiO2 content. On the contrary, Montenegrin Jurassic bauxites in general have been thoroughly investigated. Some Cretaceous bauxite deposits, especially in the area of Bijele poljane and Trubjela, have been investigated in more detail. Paleogene bauxites have not been thoroughly evaluated as a potential economic resource.
According to previous explorations, Montenegrin bauxites are characterised by variable geological characteristics and chemical composition, as well as a complex mineral composition. Detailed information on the geological setting, mineralogy and geochemistry can be found in [15,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75] and references therein.
Most researchers agree that laterite bauxites are formed ‘in situ’, from alumosilicate igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks, on land, in humid tropical and subtropical climates. The genesis of karstic bauxite is still controversial in terms of: the place and conditions of bauxitisation, the origin of the parent material and its transport to karstic areas. When it comes to the origin of the parent material from which bauxites originated in Montenegro, interpretations are also different [61,68,71,72,76].
The content and mode of occurrences of REEs and other trace elements in the bauxite deposit of Montenegro are directly related to the composition and origin of the parent material, as well as the conditions and duration of bauxitisation and the other factors. The source material for the Triassic bauxites originates from the products of the Middle Triassic volcanism, the volcanic ashes and/or the weathering crust formed on the rocks of igneous origin, while Jurassic red bauxites are originated from the volcanic ashes, related to the igneous-tectonic processes and the volcanoes to follow during the ‘opening’ and ‘closing’ of the Jurassic ophiolitic trough. A smaller quantity of the source material can come from the weathering crusts of mainly basic rocks [15,16]. The value of Eu/Eu* versus TiO2/Al2O3 ratios indicates shales, UCC and andesitic rocks as possible source rocks, or protolith of the Zagrad deposit Jurassic bauxite [4]. The binary plot of Eu/Eu* vs. Sm/Nd indicates that the parental material for the bauxite was derived from a combination of a clastic material derived from shales and/or upper continental crust and, probably, distant andesitic volcanic source. Jurassic paleo-geographical and paleo-tectonic processes in the Mediterranean indicate that the source material most likely originates from ophiolites complexes, which are suprasubduction oceanic island-arc type ophiolites, with intensive extrusive volcanism [5,77]. It is possible that the volcanic ash or/and material from weathered crust of this complex are parent materials from which Jurassic karstic bauxites in Montenegro were formed. The source material of white Cretaceous bauxites mainly comes from the weathering crusts on the igneous basic rocks, and in rare cases, form the volcanic ashes. Origination of the white bauxite facies is related to the circulating, lacustrine, oxygen-rich environments, while the pyritised bauxites originated in a reducing environment. In the region of Bijele Poljane, however, the deposits of white bauxites were formed by mixing of various colored clays with redeposited sandy-gravelly material which originates from the deposits of the red Jurassic bauxites in the same region. That is why such deposits are rightfully called ‘complex’ deposits of the white bauxites [15,65]. The source material of the Paleogene bauxites probably comes from the volcanic ashes and/or the weathering crusts of basic rocks, and to a smaller extent also form the weathering crusts of ultra-basic rocks [15].

2.2. Rare Earth Elements (REE) in Montenegrin Karstic Bauxites

Previous researchers have investigated the REE content of Montenegrin bauxites including [15,49,50,53,57,68,74,76,78,79,80]. These studies have focused on the study of geological structure and structural characteristics of bauxite-bearing terrains, as well as geological, structural morphological, chemical and geochemical characteristics of karstic bauxite deposits. The deposits of red and less white bauxites from which this raw material was or is being exploited have been investigated in detail.
Recent national exploration projects include the following: Metallogenetic-prognostic map of the bauxite-bearing region Vojnik-Maganik, 1:50,000 (MPMVM), ‘Metallogenetic-prognostic map of the bauxite-bearing region Western Montenegro’, 1:50,000 (MPMWM) and ‘Exploration of rare earth elements in ore regions Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica (REEVMP)’, as well as the international project ‘REEBAUX-Prospects of REE recovery from bauxite and bauxite residue in the ESEE region’. A summary of the occurrences of the samples is given in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

3. Sampling and Analytical Methods

3.1. Sampling

At 37 locations along 47 profiles, the recording and sampling of bauxite bodies formed on a karstificated paleorelief made of carbonates of Late Triassic, Early Jurassic and Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian age, were performed, and 252 representative channel bauxite samples with identical intervals (1 m), were collected during the REEVMP project implementation [5]. The samples were prepared for different investigation methods by using standard methods. Mineralogical examinations included tests of 64 samples by using XRD method and 34 samples by using SEM-EDS method (JEOL Ltd., Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). Geochemical examinations were done by using inductively coupled plasma method ICP-ES/MS (Bureau Veritas, Vancouver, Canada) on a total number of 252 bauxite samples.
During the REEBAUX project implementation, surveying and sampling of bauxite bodies in Montenegro was performed at 37 sites, on open bauxite outcrops, as well as in the open pits and underground bauxite mines [6]. Sixty representative channel bauxite samples were collected mainly at intervals of 1-m length. From individual samples, 23 composite samples were formed to determine the medium content of REE and other components in selected deposits/occurrences, ore regions (Boka Kotorska and Ulcinj). Different stratigraphic levels, 37 individual samples were formed from five selected deposits. Geochemical examinations were done by using inductively coupled plasma method ICP-ES/MS on a total number of 60 bauxite samples. Mineralogical examinations were performed on 14 samples by using the XRD method.
During the implementation of the MPMVM project, the recorded geological sections of bauxite bodies at 32 sites in total were 232 individual representative channel bauxite samples, collected and prepared for chemical analysis. Moreover, during the realisation of the MPMWM project, 94 samples of white Cretaceous bauxite from 17 localities and 25 samples of red Jurassic bauxites from 7 localities were sampled.
The red sludge samples originate from six vertical exploration drill holes with an average length of 12 m, three from each basin. A total amount of 20 analytical samples were formed from three to four individual samples. Samples were prepared by standard methods, while geochemical tests of 20 bauxite residue samples were performed by ICP-AES/ICP-MS. All exploration activities were done in the frame of the REEBAUX project implementation.

3.2. Mineralogical Analyses

The mineralogy of 64 bauxite samples was determined by optical microscopic observation and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade, Serbia, during the REEVMP project implementation. XRD analysis was performed on a Philips PW 1710 powder diffractometer with CuKα1,2 = 1.54178 Å radiation (despite the known limitations for Fe-rich minerals) and a 40 kV, 30 mA. The XRD pattern was recorded over a 2θ interval of 4–70°, with a step size of 0.02° and the fixed counting time of 1 s per step. Some samples with high contents of REE were studied by reflected light optical investigations, scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS) and micro-Raman spectroscopy.
The SEM-EDS analyses were carried out at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, on polished bauxite samples, under high vacuum conditions on a scanning electron microscope (SEM) type JEOL JSM-6610LV. Mineral images were obtained using back-scattered electrons (BSE) detectors, and tungsten fibre was used as the electron source. The samples were evaporated with carbon on a steamer type BALTEC-SCD-005, and quantitative chemical analyses of individual minerals in the samples were performed on an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) type X-Max Large Area Analytical Silicon Drift. An acceleration voltage of 20 kV was used for analyses. Detection limits are estimated as 2σ~0.2 wt.%. This method was applied for mineral identification and obtaining REE mineral compositions. According to very fine mineral intergrowths in the studied bauxite and regular presence of sub-microscopic mineral inclusions in REE minerals it was not possible to achieve accurate composition of REE minerals using external standards. Thus, compositions of these minerals were obtained using internal standards and normalisation. However, this mode of the analysis quite well shows differences in the composition of various types of the REE minerals.
In addition, the mineralogy of 14 bauxite samples, collected and selected during the REEBAUX project implementation, was determined by optical microscopic observation and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) at the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Geology, Zagreb, Croatia. Diffraction data were collected using Philips X’Pert PRO powder diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Ǻ) at 40 kV and 40 mA with divergent slit of ¼° and antiscatter slit of ½°. Diffracted radiation was monochromatized using graphite monochromator.

3.3. Chemical Analyses

Ore samples were crushed to 200-mesh size particles using an agate mill. All samples (REEVMP and REEBAUX projects) were prepared for chemical analyses in the laboratories of AcmeLabs (now Bureau Veritas), Vancouver, Canada. Prepared sample is mixed with LiBO2/Li2B4O7 flux. Crucibles are fused in a furnace. The cooled bead is dissolved in ACS grade nitric acid and analysed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and/or inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Loss on ignition (LOI) is determined by igniting a sample split, while the measuring of weight loss was done after. Quantitative values of major and minor elements, trace elements, and REEs were determined by using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysing methods, respectively. Total loss on ignition (LOI) values were gravimetrically estimated after overnight heating at 950 °C for 90 min. Detection limits for major oxides, such as Fe2O3 and K2O were 0.04%; SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, MgO, Na2O, MnO, TiO2 and P2O5 were 0.01%; for LOI 0.1%; and for Cr2O3, 0.002%. Detection limits for trace elements were: for Ni and Co 20 ppm; for V 8 ppm; for Ba 5 ppm; for Be, Sc and Zn 1 ppm; for Ga, Sr, W, As, La and Ce, 0.5 ppm; for Co and Th, 0.2 ppm; for Ce, Cs, Hf, La, Nb, Rb, Ta, U and Y 0.1 ppm; for Dy, Gd, Sm, Yb, 0.05 ppm; for Er 0.03 ppm; for Eu, Ho and Pr, 0.02 ppm; Lu, Tb and Tm, 0.01 ppm.
Total carbon (C) and sulphur (S) content were analysed on a LECO Elemental Analyser in the laboratories of AcmeLabs (now Bureau Veritas), Vancouver, Canada. Induction flux was added to the prepared sample and it was ignited in an induction furnace after. A carrier gas sweeps up released carbon to be measured by adsorption in an infrared spectrometric cell. Results are total and attributed to the presence of carbon and sulphur in all forms.
Apart from the above mentioned, the results of geochemical analysis of bauxite samples from the MPMVM project are presented in order to compare these older data with newer ones, as well as the content of some elements that were not examined later, primarily lithium (due to the applied sample dissolution method-Li-borate fusion). Classical methods were used for the analysis of major oxides and LOI, while analyses were performed in the Chemical Laboratory of the Geological Survey of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro. Trace elements were analysed by ICP-MS method (4 Acid digestion) in AcmeLabs, Vancouver, Canada. Moreover, the results of the geochemical tests of the MPMWM project are presented with the same goal. For geochemical analyses, a combination of ICP-AES methods for major oxides (Li-borate fusion) and ICP-MS for trace elements (4 Acid digestion) was used. The research were performed in AcmeLabs, Vancouver, Canada.

4. Results and Discussion

According to shape and size of the structural elements of the bauxite structure, the following textures can be found: aphanitic or pelitomorphic, pisolitic-oolitic, complex conglomeratic and brecciated structure [74]. Extremely rarely, striped, parallel and schistose textures were detected [68].
In general, Triassic deposits and occurrences are formed by dark red pisolitic bauxites over which are bright red pisolitic and oolithic bauxites, and gray partially pisolitic bauxite on the top.
In almost all studied Jurassic bauxite deposits, especially the larger ones from the Vojnik-Maganik ore region [75], red pisolitic bauxite was developed at the top of the bauxite deposits, just below the overlying clays that were formed in the first phase of transgression. These deposits are classified into the group of primary deposits with a developed profile [15]. Beneath the pisolitic, red massive ‘granular’ detrital or aphanitic bauxites are most common, usually with tiny oolites and irregular pisolite accumulations—which form the middle part of the bauxite deposits. At the base of the deposit massive bauxites with or without oolites and pisolites can be found. The transitions in texture mentioned above are gradual and irregular. At the contact place with the bedrock limestones, there are so-called ‘bedrock breccias’, while at some localities there are also bedrock clays in which pieces of bedrock limestones can be found.
Cretaceous white bauxites, especially those in the area of Bijele Poljane, are characterised by a very complex geological structure. Lateral and vertical transitions of red bauxites with white bauxites, white and gray bauxite clays and gray pyritic clays.
Paleogene bauxites are characterised by a pisolitic-oolithic, pisolitic and conglomerate structure, gray, yellow and red colour. The characteristic geological sections of the studied bauxite deposits presented in this paper, from different bauxite formations are shown in Figure 5.

4.1. Mineralogy

As it is mentioned above, Montenegrin bauxites have a complex mineralogical composition, which was confirmed in this study as well. The red Triassic bauxites samples of the Gorenjepoljski vir deposits are characterised by the presence of the minerals: kaolinite, böhmite and gibbsite, also goethite, anatase and dolomite, as well as vermiculite in one sample from the middle part of the deposit (Figure 6).
The red Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions have complex mineral composition as well. The mineral böhmite is the main carrier of aluminium, while gibbsite is the minor Al-carrier. Regarding other major minerals the following are presented: Fe-oxides/hydroxides (hematite and goethite); clay minerals (kaolinite) and titanium minerals (mainly anatase) (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
The major-, trace- and rare earth element average compositions of the analysed samples are given in Table 4 [5,6].
By using SEM-EDS the following minerals in 34 selected samples from 15 locations (Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12 [5]), were detected: zircon, ilmenite, magnetite, biotite, K-feldspars, mottramite, REE phosphates-monazite and xenotime as well as REE carbonates-Ce and Nd.
It is important to emphasise that among the detected phases, the major REE-carriers are phosphates, as indicated by the very strong positive correlation between REEs, P and Sr.
The presence of residual and authigenic monazite and xenotime clearly indicates that the first REE minerals originate from primary sources, while additional are formed in the first phases of bauxitisation, in oxidation conditions [4,5,77]. SEM-EDS analyses of minerals can be found in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8 [5].
All deposits and occurrences of red Jurassic bauxites from the ore regions of Western Montenegro and Orjen and Čevo were formed on the carbonate paleorelief of the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian age. They are often characterised by the presence of redeposited bauxites, especially in the upper parts of the deposits. The presence of the following minerals was detected in samples from Bajov do deposits: böhmite, hematite, kaolinite, anatase and goethite (Figure 13a). The following minerals were determined: böhmite, gibbsite, hematite, kaolinite, anatase and rutile (Figure 13b), in white bauxite samples from Bijele poljane deposit - Dionica site, by XRD analyses. Paleogene bauxite occurrence Velika gorana are characterised by the presence of: böhmite, goethite, kaolinite and anatase (Figure 13c).

4.2. Major Elements Geochemistry

Bauxites of Triassic age were studied at two localities: occurrence Rudinice in Piva and the Gornjepoljskivir deposit, which belongs to the bauxite-bearing region of Vojnik-Maganik. According to the results of the composite sample formed from six individual bauxite samples from the occurrence of Rudinice, it can be seen that these bauxites are characterised by high Al2O3 (62.5%), low Fe2O3 content (12.85%), relatively low SiO2 content. (6.83%) and TiO2 (2.31%) (Table 4). On the contrary, the bauxites of the Gornjepoljski vir deposit contain low contents of Al2O3 (43.18%) and Fe2O3 (7.55%), a high average content of SiO2 (30.42%) and relatively low content of TiO2 (1.20%). MgO, Na2O, K2O, MnO and P2O5 contents are very low and significantly higher in the bauxites of the Gornjepoljski vir deposit.
According to the analysis of statistical parameters of the analysed oxides in bauxites of the ore regions Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica (Table 4 and Table 9 VMP-III&IV/1), it can be seen that in bauxites formed on the Late Triassic underlying bed, the SiO2 range in individual samples is from 1% to 27.44%, with an average content of 11.9%; while on the Early Jurassic underlying bed, the range is from 11.61% to 27.44%, with a average content of 19.89%; and at Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian range is 11.90% to 27.13%, with an average content of 18.04%. Regarding the bauxite formed on Late Triassic, Al2O3 has an average content of 51.18% and a range from 33.5–69.73%; on Early Jurassic average 43.67% and range 36.9–52.44%; at Middle Jurassic average 46.48% and range 41.59–50.26%. Fe2O3 contents in bauxites formed on the Late Triassic are in average 19.44%, with a range from 2.56% to 26.15%; on Early Jurassic average 18.20% and range 9.36–21.91%; at Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian average 18.33% and range 10.84–24.11%.
Triassic bauxites have the highest Al2O3 average content and the lowest SiO2. The Fe2O3 content is uniform and averagely slightly higher in bauxites from the upper parts of the primary bauxites geological sections. Samples from the middle and upper parts, compared to samples from the lower parts of bauxite ore bodies have elevated SiO2 contents and slightly lower Al2O3 contents.
TiO2 shows a uniform presence in the tested samples, averagely 2.36% in the range from 1.53% to 3.50%.
The CaO content in individual samples of these bauxites is characterised by a range from 0.03% to 11.14%. Bauxites formed on the Late Triassic carbonate sediments have elevated contents of CaO, especially those from the middle and upper parts of ore bodies. MgO is characterised by a range from 0.07% to 2.05% in all individual samples. The increased content of MgO in bauxites from Middle Jurassic-Oxford palorelief (0.86%) in comparison to other bauxites is clearly expressed. Elevated contents of Na2O and especially K2O in individual samples are characteristic of bauxites from the Early Jurassic and Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian paleorelief. K2O shows on average higher contents at higher upper parts of ore bodies in all bauxite formations.
The P2O5 content varies in a wide range from 0.01% to 0.53%. Regarding bauxite deposits and occurrences formed on the Late Triassic (95 samples above the detection limit) the range is from 0.01% to 0.53% and the average content 0.047%; while on the Early Jurassic (33 samples) the range is from 0.01 to 0.71% and the average content is 0.071%. In Middle Jurassic–Oxfordian bauxites, contents of P2O5 are detected in individual samples (10 samples) ranging from 0.01% to 0.05%, with an average of 0.028%. P2O5 shows the highest contents in bauxites from the lower part of bauxite bodies from the Early Jurassic (0.156%) and Late Triassic paleorelief (0.085%).
The average LOI, in bauxites from all three underlying beds and from different parts of the ore bodies, is uniform. The sulphur content in 96% of the samples was below the detection limit of 0.02%. Slightly higher content of C is shown by bauxites from the lower part of deposits formed on the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian palorelief and the middle and upper parts of ore bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian.
The contents of the main oxides from the detailed database of the REE VMP project, correspond to the exploration results of the most significant and largest deposits and characteristic bauxite occurrences of Montenegro, from the REEBAUX project (VM-III/2, P-IV/1 and P-IV/2). Slightly higher on average Al2O3 content and slightly lower on average SiO2 content are shown by samples from the REEBAUX project database, when it comes to bauxites formed on the underlying beds of all three ages. It should be noted that the samples from the Zagrad and Biočki stan deposits originate from underground mines and bauxites from these parts of the deposit were tested for the first time. Furthermore, the results of chemical and geochemical explorations of bauxite obtained through the project MPM VM (VM-III/3, VM-III/4) are in accordance with the presented data.
Deposits and occurrences of red Jurassic bauxites in the bauxite-bearing regions of Western Montenegro and Orjen (REEBAUX, WMO-V&VII/1) which are formed on the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian age paleorelief, are characterised by a high average SiO2 content (13.28%), low Al2O3 content (40,97%), slightly lower content of Fe2O3 (16.67%) and TiO2 (1.78%) and extremely high average content of CaO (7.96%). It was previously emphasised that these bauxites are characterised by redeposition, which may explain the high CaO contents. It should be considered, compared to the results of the MPM WM project that sampling was performed by different methods, so it is not surprising that the average CaO content and the slightly higher Al2O3 content are significantly lower (Table 4).
Cretaceous white bauxites, due to their genetic specificities, show an elevated average content of SiO2 (22.60%) and lower content of Fe2O3 (13.32%) in comparison to red Jurassic bauxites of bauxite-bearing regions of Western Montenegro and Čevo (Table 2 and Table 4—REEBAUX, WMC-V&IV/1). The average contents of Al2O3 (43.82%), TiO2 (2.22%), as well as CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O, MnO and P2O5, mainly correspond to the earlier data, as well as to MPM WM project data (Table 4-WMC-V&IV/2).
Paleogene bauxites in Boka Kotorska and Ulcinj regions showed relatively uniform average contents of SiO2 (13.07% and 9.48%), Al2O3 (47.37% and 48.31%), Fe2O3 (19.10% and 21.49%) and TiO2 (2.77% and 2.79%). The first have slightly more CaO (1.1%) and K2O (0.74%) on average. The average contents of other oxides were uniform: MgO, MnO and P2O5, while Na2O remained below the detection limit (0.01%).
Based on the mineralogical classification [81], the Triassic bauxites of Piva (Rudinice), as well as the bauxites of a number of Jurassic deposits formed on the paleorelief of the Late Triassic age, are classified as ferritic bauxites. The Triassic bauxites of Gornjepoljski vir and the Cretaceous bauxites of Međeđe deposit belong to the group of kaolinite bauxites. All other bauxites from the Jurassic, Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits belong to the bauxite group. All Jurassic formations formed on the paleorelief of different ages, as well as the Cretaceous and Paleogene bauxite formations are classified in the bauxite group (Figure 14).
The enriched Fe2O3 contents in some deposits are due to the presence of iron minerals like hematite, which is most likely formed under suitable Eh-pH conditions during bauxitisation processes. It should be emphasised that white Cretaceous bauxites, as well as deposits and occurrences formed on the younger underlying beds of the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous age are generally less enriched in Fe2O3.

4.3. Trace Elements Geochemistry

Some trace elements such as Sc, Li, Cr, Zr, Nb, V and Ni occur in considerable amounts in the bauxitic deposits of Montenegro (Table 4). For example, Triassic bauxites contain on average 749.6 and 488.45 ppm Zr, Jurassic from different ore regions and from palorelief of different ages from 354.59 to 475.71 ppm, Cretaceous 431.1 ppm, while Paleogene contains 573 and 558.1 ppm Zr. Interesting are the data on Ni content, whose average content in Triassic bauxites is only 69 and 47.38 ppm, in Jurassic bauxites formed on the paleorelief of the Late Triassic age 178.43 ppm, Early Jurassic age, 219.91 ppm and Middle Jurassic-Osfordian age 237.32 ppm and 209.13 ppm. Paleogene bauxites averagely contain the most of Ni, 289 those from the Boka Kotorska region, and 348 ppm from Ulcinj region. From these data, it is clear that the Ni content increases from older to younger bauxites, which was previously determined by studying bauxites from the Triassic to the Eocene age in Yugoslavia and Greece [50]. The situation is similar to the average contents of Cr, which is present in the Triassic bauxites with 71 and 123 ppm, in the Jurassic from 232 to 334 ppm, in the Cretaceous 341 ppm, while in the Paleogene it reaches a high 637 and 835 ppm. Similar to Cr, the most of V has averagely in Paleogene bauxites 652 and 728 ppm in the bauxites of BokaKotorska and Ulcinj, also in the Cretaceous 576 ppm, Jurassic from 215.16 to 303.62 ppm, and the least in Triassic bauxites, only 93.12 ppm in Gornjepoljski vir, and 132 ppm as was detected in Rudinice in Piva.
Jurassic bauxites from the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions were studied in the most detail [5]. In these bauxites Zr was detected in individual samples ranging from 328.7 to 641 ppm. In bauxites formed on the Late Triassic, Zr has an average content of 475.71 ppm, on the Early Jurassic 420.62 ppm and on the Middle Jurassic–Oxfordian 397.56 ppm (Table 10). Ni is determined in all individual samples in the range of 51 to 678 ppm. Bauxites formed on the Late Triassic paleorelief have a range from 51 to 456 ppm, on the Early Jurassic a range is from 144 to 678 ppm, and on the Middle Jurassic-Oxford from 152 to 307 ppm. Bauxites formed on the Late Triassic have a range of V content from 177 to 850 ppm and an average content higher than average—303.62 ppm, on the Early Jurassic a range from 204 to 466 ppm, a average content of 286.6 ppm, and on the Middle Jurassic-Oxford from 179 to 346 ppm, average content 246.68 ppm.
The average Nb contents in the studied bauxite formations are relatively uniform, with the exception of Paleogene bauxites from Boka Kotorska and Ulcinj bauxite-bearing regions, which contain more Nb—89.8 ppm and 91.4 ppm, respectively. However, Sr is characterised by an uneven distribution. Triassic bauxites averagely contain Sr at least, 16.4 and 47.11 ppm, Jurassic bauxites formed on the Middle Jurassic Oxford underlying bed 48.31 and 48.43 ppm, on the Late Triassic 87.30 ppm, and those formed on the underlying bed of the Early Jurassic age significantly more than 131.83 ppm. Paleogene bauxites are the most enriched in Sr, especially those from the Ulcinj region with an average of 332.5 ppm. When it comes to Sc, the average contents of this economically valuable element are relatively uniform in bauxites of different formations from 28 ppm in Paleogene bauxites of BokaKotorska region up to 58.41 ppm in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions formed on the carbonate underlying bed of Late Triassic age.
In the Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions, Nb was determined in individual samples ranging from 31.2 to 65.5 ppm (Table 9). The lowest and highest individual values belong to bauxite samples from the Late Triassic underlying bed, which have an average content of 48.7 ppm. The average in bauxites formed on Early Jurassic is 41.96 ppm, and on Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian the average value is 36.65 ppm. These bauxites are characterised by elevated contents of Sr compared to the average, in the ore bodies formed on the Early Jurassic underlying bed. The anomalous Sr contents in the samples stand out, especially from lower, but also the middle part of the Borovabrda deposit.
According to the bauxite explorations during the production of metallogenetic prognostic maps (MPMVM and MPMWM), the average Li content in Jurassic bauxites in the Vojnik-Maganik region formed on the Late Triassic paleorelief is 256.83 ppm, while that formed on the Middle Jurassic-Oxford age paleorelief is significantly higher and is 484.96 ppm. Jurassic bauxites in the region of Čevo and Western Montenegro contain on average 316.76 ppm, while Cretaceous bauxites contain 421.03 ppm Li in average.

4.4. Rare Earth Elements Geochemistry

Bauxite formations in Montenegro have significantly different ΣREE average contents. The highest contents were detected in the Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions from the Early Jurassic, Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian and Late Triassic underlying bed, and are 1057.11, 1019.43 and 994.92 ppm respectively. The Triassic bauxites of Gornjepoljski vir have an average total content of 732.27 ppm and of Rudinice 541.68 ppm. Jurassic bauxites from the ore regions of Western Montenegro and Orjen have a 515.96 ppm ΣREE content, while Paleogene bauxites from Ulcinj region and Boka Kotorska have average values of 515.76 and 414.7 ppm respectively. The lowest average total content, of 309.15 ppm, was shown by Cretaceous bauxites of the ore regions of Western Montenegro and Čevo (Figure 15, Table 4). Bauxite formations have ΣLREE contents (236.24–840.99 ppm), ΣHREE contents (7291–27,081 ppm) and ΣLREE/ΣHREE ratios (3.07–5.33) (Table 4).
On average, the highest contents of ΣREE + Sc (more than 1000 ppm) are presented in Biočki stan, Zagrad, Liverovići and Borova brda deposits, as well as the occurrence of Crveno prlo from the bauxite-bearing regions Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica [6]. Other studied deposits of these regions also have elevated contents, as well as the Velja Dubova glava deposit from Orjen ore region and the Triassic deposit Gonjepoljski vir. The lowest average contents are presented by Cretaceous bauxite deposits and occurrences (all below 400 ppm, except Paklarica) (Figure 16).
The average La content in bauxite samples from the Late Triassic underlying bed was 199.49 ppm ranging from 87.7 to 1799.1 ppm; from Early Jurassic 288.89 ppm, range from 111.4 to 1648 ppm and in samples from the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian underlying bed 244.63 ppm, and range from 136.9 to 570.9 ppm (Table 11).
Exceptionally high La contents in individual samples (>1000 ppm) were found in the lower part of the bauxite geological sections in Liverovići, Zagrad 3 and Borova brda deposits, and elevated (>300 ppm) in Crvene ornice, Biočki stan, Štitovo II, Crveno katunište, Crvenjaci, Alina lokva, Crveno prlo and Smrekova glavica, in other words in all bauxites formed on palorelief of different age. Elevated contents of La are exclusively characteristic for the lower parts of bauxite bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, while bauxite from the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian underlying bed is characterised by a uniform vertical distribution of this element. The Ce content varies from 159.5 to 908.3 ppm, in individual samples. Triassic bauxites are characterised by an average Ce content of 365.01 ppm. More specifically, on the Early Jurassic bauxites 355.26 ppm with a range from 208.3 to 663.9 ppm and on Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian bauxites 342.69 ppm in the range from 168.4 to 598.7 ppm. High contents in individual samples (>500 ppm) were found in Zagrad 1, Liverovići 2, Palež, Lokve, Đurakov do 2, Bršno, Buavice, Borova brda, Međugorje, Alina lokva, Javorak, Crveno prlo, Smrekova glavica and Crvena glavica. It can be stated that the average contents of Ce in bauxites from all three underlying beds and from different parts of the geological sections are uniform. The Pr content in individual samples is in the range from 13 to 421 ppm. The average content in bauxite samples from the Late Triassic paleorelief was 38.51 ppm; from the Early Jurassic 38.23 ppm; and from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian 33.39 ppm. In the samples from the lower part of bauxite deposits from the Late Triassic geological sections, the average is significantly higher—67 ppm compared to the samples from the middle and upper part—only 24 ppm. The same case for Pr is present with the samples from Early Jurassic underlying bed (65 ppm and 30 ppm), while in the samples from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian palorelief, uniform contents of 31 ppm in the lower and 34 ppm in the middle and upper part of the geological sections were observed. Elevated contents in individual samples (>100 ppm) are characteristic mainly for the lower parts of bauxite bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic (Liverovići, Zagrad 3, Biočki stan, Štitovo II and Borova brda), while bauxites from the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian underlying bed are characterised by mostly uniform Pr contents in all parts of the geological sections, with the highest in the Smrekova glavica occurrence (75 and 83 ppm). The range of Nd content is from 44 to 1797 ppm. The average content in bauxite samples from the Late Triassic palorelief is 142 ppm, from the Early Jurassic 136 ppm and in the samples from the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian paleorelief 123 ppm. Bauxites from the Late Triassic underlying bed from the lower part of the geological sections have an average Nd content of 251 ppm, and from the middle and upper part 88 ppm; bauxites from the Early Jurassic underlying bed 226 and 109 ppm; and from the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian underlying bed 112 and 127 ppm. Exceptionally high contents in individual samples (>1000 ppm) were found in the lower part of the bauxite geological sections in Zagrad 3, and elevated (>300 ppm) in Liverovići 2, Zagrad 1 and 3, Biočki stan, Štitovo II, Borova brda, Plačnik (Međugorje) and Smrekova glavica. Elevated Nd contents are characteristic exclusively for the lower parts of bauxite bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic, while bauxites from the Middle Jurassic–Oxfordian underlying bed are characterised by a uniform vertical distribution of this element.
The Y content in the individual samples ranged from 62 to 1226 ppm. The average content in the samples from the Triassic underlying bed is 131.62 ppm, in the samples from the Early Jurassic 128.34 ppm, while in the samples of bauxite from Middle Jurassic–Oxfordian it has the highest value and amounts 161.14 ppm. In the samples from the lower part of deposits formed on the Late Triassic carbonate sediments the average Y content is 202 ppm, while from the middle and upper part is 96.5 ppm; from Early Jurassic 177.6 and 116.8 ppm; and from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian 158.2 and 162.4 ppm. Exceptionally high contents in individual samples (>1200 ppm) were found in the lower part of the geological sections in Zagrad 3, and elevated (>300 ppm) in Borova brda, Biočki stan and Smrekova glavica. It is clear that elevated contents are characteristic of the lower parts of bauxite bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic palorelief, while bauxites from the Middle Jurassic–Oxfordian underlying bed, are characterised by mostly uniform Y contents, and slightly higher contents in samples from the middle and lower bauxite bodies. Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy and Ho belong to the yttrium subgroup. High contents in individual samples of all elements characterise the samples from the lower part of the geological sections, especially in Zagrad 3, also in Liverovići 2, Biočki stan, Štitovo II, Borova brda and Smrekova glavica. Therefore, elevated values characterise mainly the lower parts of bauxite bodies formed on the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic palorelief. However, for bauxites from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian palorelief, average higher contents of Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy and Ho were found in the middle and upper part of the ore bodies and outcrops.
The range of scandium content is from 38 to 159 ppm. The average content in bauxite samples from the Early Triassic underlying bed was 58.41 ppm; from the Early Jurassic 58 ppm; and in the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian underlying bed samples 51.84 ppm. In the first group of bauxite samples, from the lower part of the geological sections, the average Sc content is 60.6 ppm and from the middle and upper part 57.3 ppm; from Early Jurassic palorelief 69.4 and 54.9 ppm; and in samples from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian paleorelief 51.3 and 52.1 ppm. Elevated Sc content in individual samples (>70 ppm) was found in the lower part of the geological sections in bauxites on Late Triassic and Early Jurassic paleorelief, in Zagrad 1, Crveneornice, Biočki stan and especially in Zagrad 3 and Borova brda deposits (>100 ppm). Uniform contents of Sc are shown by bauxites from Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian palorelief. According to geochemical characteristics Er, Tm, Yb and Lu belong to the Sc subgroup and have elevated contents in the same bauxite samples as Sc. As with the elements from the yttrium subgroup, higher average contents of Er, Tm, Yb and Lu in the middle and upper parts of bauxite bodies formed on Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian paleorelief are characteristic. High contents in individual samples of all elements characterise the samples mainly from the lower part of the geological sections, especially in deposits an occurrences: Zagrad 3 and Borova brda, also in Liverovići 2, Crvene ornice, Biočki stan, Štitovo II and Smrekova glavica.
When the contents of rare earth elements in bauxites of different formations in Montenegro [5,6] and Mesozoic Mediterranean deposits and bauxite formations of: Croatia [23], Turkey [28], Greece [26], Italy [22,37,39], France [82] and Spain [40] are compared, fairly clear uniformity of average REE contents in bauxites of similar or the same age can be observed.
Significant deviations and variations are observed in Jurassic bauxites formed on carbonates of Early and Late Jurassic age. Based on Figure 17, Greek bauxites formed on the Late Jurassic paleorelief from the Parnassos-Ghiona geotectonic zone show the highest REE average content (about 1280 ppm), followed by the Jurassic bauxites of Montenegro bauxite-bearing regions Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica (about 1000 ppm), as well as Turkish bauxites from Namtun tectonic unit (about 950 ppm). Slightly lower contents are shown by the Triassic bauxites (from 540 to 740 ppm). The lowest average content was found in Jurassic bauxite of the bauxite-bearing regions of Western Montenegro and Čevo in Montenegro, around 550 ppm, as well as in the Greek bauxites of the Parnassos-Ghiona geotectonic zone formed on the Liassic palorelief, only around 390 ppm. When it comes to Cretaceous bauxites, the average REE contents in the shown regions are fairly uniform. The highest contents (more than 700 ppm) belong to Italian bauxites from the Caserta district and French bauxites from Provence and Languedoc, while the lowest belong to Montenegrin (about 310 ppm), Greek (about 420 ppm) and Spanish bauxites from the Catalon Coastal Range (about 440 ppm).
Despite the fact that bauxite formations were studied at an uneven level of exploration and that average values were derived based on analyses of different numbers of samples, according to the average REE contents, it can be concluded that Jurassic bauxite formations have the highest perspective.

4.5. Rare Earth Elements in Bauxite Residue

Aluminium factory—Podgorica (KAP) from the beginning of its operation in 1972, up to the closure of the Alumina Production Factory in 2009, was continuously supplied by the company Bauxite mines—Niksic (RBN). The Aluminium Factory—Podgorica exclusively used bauxite from Montenegrin deposits for the production of alumina. During this period 20.5 Mt of bauxite was produced of which 16.6 Mt, that is to say, about 81% was delivered to the Aluminium factory—Podgorica, in which factory 6.8 Mt of alumina and 3.1 Mt of aluminium were produced (Figure 18; Data from: RBN database and KAP database).
The total quantities of bauxite residue amount to about 7.5 million tons in basins A and B in the Aluminium Factory Podgorica. The calculation of the average content of main and other oxides, trace elements and rare earth elements of 19 composite samples are given in Table 12.
An average content of REE was determined in basin A of red mud in Podgorica with an average of 1535.3 ppm and a range from 1343.76 to 1704.81 ppm, while the average determined content in basin B was 1646.42 ppm, ranging from 1121.61 to 1903.65 ppm in individual samples. On average, the highest contents were detected in drillholes B5 and B6 in basin B [6].
It is clear that there is a change in the geochemical and mineralogical composition in relation to the primary bauxite in the bauxite residue after the alumina production process (Figure 19).
The content of Al2O3 decreases significantly (22.47%), while the contents of SiO2, iron oxide and titanium increase significantly. The high average contents of calcium oxide (6.5%) and sodium oxide (6.07%) in the bauxite residue are a consequence of the nature of the alumina production technological process. The increase in average contents in bauxite residue compared to the bauxite is also shown by other tested oxides of chromium, manganese, phosphorus and potassium (from 1.1 to 1.9 times). Trace elements: Be, Cs, Ga, Ta and Co exhibit from 1.1 to 5 times lower contents in bauxite residue compared to bauxite, while all others have higher, especially: Zr (2 times), Sr (1.9 times), V and Th (1.8 times), Rb (1.7), and so on.
According to the presented data, the total average content of rare earth elements (∑Sc, Y, La-Lu) in the bauxite residue in basins A and B is 1.4 times higher than the average content in bauxites. The largest increase in average content is shown by Sc—1.68 times, La and Ce 1.42, that is to say, 1.4 times, while the smallest is by Y, only 1.28 times.
In almost all samples the following minerals have been identified: hematite, gibbsite, calcite, cancrinite, less common but also present are: böhmite, goethite, quartz, rutile, anatase, perovskite, garnet and nordstrandite (Figure 20).
Finally, until the completion of more detailed exploration it can be noted that the presented results should be considered as preliminary and indicative.

5. Conclusions

Jurassic bauxites are of the greatest economic importance in Montenegro, especially high-quality deposits of the bauxite-bearing region Vojnik-Maganik, in the wider area of Nikšićka Župa.
The implementation of recent national and international exploration projects has collected new data, especially in the part of geochemical and mineralogical characterisation of bauxites, which complements the previous knowledge about Montenegrin bauxites. This enabled a better assessment of the potentiality of bauxite formations and individual bauxite deposits for REE and associated critical metals.
Mineralogical explorations have confirmed the complexity of the mineral composition of bauxite, when it comes to the main and less represented minerals, as well as accessory minerals. The studied red Triassic bauxites are characterised by the presence of böhmite and gibbsite, followed by hematite, goethite, kaolinite and anatase, as well as vermiculite. The main carrier of aluminium with red bauxite from the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions is the mineral böhmite, partly gibbsite. Regarding other major minerals the following are presented: Fe-oxides/hydroxides (hematite and goethite), clay minerals (kaolinite) and titanium minerals (mainly anatase). In the previously mentioned bauxites, the presence of the following minerals was also detected: zircon, ilmenite, magnetite, biotite, K-feldspars, mottramite, REE phosphates-monazite and xenotime and REE carbonates-Ce and Nd. Studied Cretaceous bauxites are consisted by major minerals: böhmite, gibbsite, hematite, kaolinite, anatase and rutile, while Paleogenic: böhmite, goethite, kaolinite and anatase. The Triassic bauxites of Piva (Rudinice) belong to the ferritic bauxite, as well as the bauxites of a number of Jurassic deposits formed on the paleorelief of the Late Triassic age. The Triassic bauxites of Gornjepoljski vir and the Cretaceous bauxites of Međeđe deposit belong to the group of kaolinite bauxites. All other bauxites from the Jurassic, Cretaceous and Paleogene deposits are classified in the bauxite group.
The content of major oxides in bauxites corresponds to the mineral composition and varies significantly, both in the case of different bauxite formations, and in individual deposits belonging to the same formation, the same or different ore regions. Based on the content of useful and main components, red bauxite which can be used for the production of alumina, are divided as follows: high-quality bauxite with Al2O3 content from 55% to 61% and SiO2 from 0.5% to 6%; low-quality bauxite with Al2O3 content from 49% to 55% and SiO2 from 6% to 15% and poor-quality bauxite with Al2O3 content from 43% to 50% and SiO2 from 15% to 25%.
Due to their genetic specificities and mineral composition, cretaceous white bauxites in the samples from the studied deposits, show a high average content of SiO2 and lower contents of Fe2O3. These bauxites, that is to say parts of deposits with low Fe2O3 content and satisfactory Al2O3 and SiO2 content, were mainly used as raw material for the refractory materials industry.
Bauxite formations in Montenegro have significantly different ΣREE average contents. The highest contents were detected in Jurassic bauxites from the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions from the Early Jurassic, Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian and Late Triassic paleorelief—around 1000 ppm on average, which makes them the most interesting in terms of possible future use for REE extraction. It is important to emphasise that in this sense, low-quality deposits with a high content of SiO2 are also interesting, from which it is not possible to use bauxite for the production of alumina and aluminium. Jurassic bauxites of these regions are characterised by elevated contents of mainly light lanthanides (LREE), but also Y and Sc. Heavy lanthanides (HREE) are significantly less presented.
Based on preliminary data, at the moment, Jurassic bauxites of the Orjen ore region, which were also formed on underlying bed of the Middle Jurassic-Oxfordian age, can be considered promising, almost like the bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions. This cannot be said for the Jurassic bauxites of the Western Montenegro ore region, where REE contents are significantly lower, and for which explanations should be sought through furthermore detailed explorations.
The Cretaceous white bauxites of the exploited deposits are characterised by the lowest average REE contents in comparison to the bauxites of other formations, especially Jurassic, which places them in the group of the least potential in terms of obtaining REE. However, these bauxites are significantly richer in lithium compared to Jurassic, especially those from the largest and highest quality deposits formed on the Late Triassic paleorelief.
Although at this moment we have a small amount of data, we can preliminary conclude that Triassic bauxites are much less promising in terms of their REE content, but also due to the fact that their proven reserves are small.
Paleogene bauxites, similar to the Triassic ones, cannot have economic significance, because they occur only in the form of occurrences and there are no proven significant amounts of bauxites at any of the investigated locations, although they contain certain contents of REE.
Regarding other critical mineral raw materials (CRM) and other elements, Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Sr and Ga could also be promising in bauxites.
Bauxite residue from Podgorica in decreasing abundance, the following minerals have been identified: hematite, gibbsite, calcite, cancrinite, less frequently but also presented are: böhmite, goethite, quartz, rutile, anatase, perovskite, garnet and nordstrandite.
According to the determined contents of REE and other macro and trace elements in bauxite residue, it can be concluded that this secondary resource is very promising. Compared to the bauxites from which it originates, the contents of individual elements are significantly higher, such as: Zr (2 times), Sr (1.9 times), V (1.8 times), Sc (1.68 times), La (1.42 times), Ce (1.4 times), Y (1.28 times), as well as all other elements from the lanthanide group. In much higher contents in bauxite residue compared to bauxite, Ti, V, Zr, Nb, Sr and other elements, are also present and may be interesting for extraction and exploitation. On the other hand, the contents of Be, Cs, Ga, Ta and Co, in bauxite residue are lower than their contents in bauxites.
Further development of economically and environmentally sustainable technologies for extracting REE from bauxite residue and, why not from bauxite may allow in the future the exploitation of Montenegrin bauxites as sources of CRMs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R. and A.P.; methodology, S.R.; software, S.R.; validation, S.R.; formal analysis, S.R.; investigation, S.R.; resources, S.R.; data curation, S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, S.R. and A.P.; visualization, S.R.; supervision, S.R. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

National research projects: ‘Metallogenetic-prognostic map of the bauxite-bearing region Vojnik–Maganik, 1:50,000’, ‘Metallogenetic-prognostic map of the bauxite-bearing region Zapadna Crna Gora, 1:50,000’ and ‘Exploration of the rare earth elements in ore regions Vojnik–Maganik i Prekornica’ were financed by Ministry of Economy of Montenegro, now Ministry of Capital Investments of Montenegro trough the Programs of geological exploration in Montenegro, which is kindly acknowledged. Our special gratitude goes to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) for funding the project ‘REEBAUX—Prospects of REE recovery from bauxite and bauxite residue in the ESEE region’. This body of the European Union receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. We also express our gratitude to colleagues from the Geological Survey of Montenegro and from the Croatian Geological Institute, as well as professors from the Faculty of Mining and Geology—University of Belgrade and from the Faculty of Science, Department of Geology—University of Zagreb, for their contribution to research during the implementation of mentioned basic projects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Long, K.R.; Van Gosen, B.S.; Foley, N.K.; Cordier, D. The Principal Rare Earth Elements Deposits of the United States—A Summary of Domestic Deposits and a Global Perspective; Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5220; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–104.
  2. Gambogi, J. Rare Earths; Mineral Commodity Summaries; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; pp. 134–135.
  3. European Commision. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards Greater Security and Sustainability; COM/2020/474 final; European Commision: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Radusinović, S.; Jelenković, R.; Pačevski, A.; Simić, V.; Božović, D.; Holclajtner-Antunović, I.; Životić, D. Content and mode of occurrences of rare earth elements in the Zagrad karstic bauxite deposit (Nikšić area, Montenegro). Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 80, 406–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Radusinović, S. Metallogeny of Jurassic Karstic Bauxites of Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica Mining Areas, Montenegro. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade, Serbia, 2017; pp. 1–349. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tomašić, N.; Gielisch, H.; Grbeš, A.; Gawlick, H.J.; Mindszenty, A.; Mladenovič, A.; Bedeković, G.; Sobota, I.; Ivić, I.; Lowicki, F.; et al. Bauxite and Bauxite Residue as a Potential Resource of REE in the ESEE Region—Booklet. In KAVA REEBAUX—Prospects of REE Recovery from Bauxite and Bauxite Residue in the ESEE Region—EIT RM; Tomašić, N., Ed.; University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of geology: Zagreb, Croatia, 2020; pp. 1–86. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gomilanović, M.; Blečić, N.; Kaluđerović, M.; Manojlović, M.; Pajović, M.; Radulović, V.; Simić, R.; Kalezić, M.; Kovačević, V.; Ostojić, M.; et al. Mineralne Sirovine i Rudarska Proizvodnja u Crnoj Gori; Ministarstvo Industrije, Energetike i Rudarstva: Podgorica, Montenegro, 1999; pp. 1–804. ISBN 86-83229-01. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Bárdossy, G.; Aleva, G.J.J. Lateritic bauxite. Dev. Econ. Geol. 1990, 27, 1–552. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bogatyrev, B.A.; Zhukov, V.V. Bauxite provinces of the world. Geol. Ore Depos. 2009, 51, 339–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bárdossy, G. Karst bauxites, bauxite deposits on carbonate rocks. Dev. Econ. Geol. 1982, 14, 1–441. [Google Scholar]
  11. Calagari, A.A.; Abedini, A. Geochemical investigations on Permo–Triassic bauxite horizon at Kanisheeteh, east of Bukan, West-Azarbaidjan, Iran. J. Geochem. Explor. 2007, 94, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deng, J.; Wang, Q.F.; Yang, S.J.; Liu, X.F.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Yang, L.Q.; Yang, Y.H. Genetic relationship between the Emeishan plume and the bauxite deposits in western Guangxi, China: Constraints from U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopes of the detrital zircons in bauxite ores. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2010, 37, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. MacLean, W.H.; Bonavia, F.F.; Sanna, G. Argillite debris converted to bauxite during karst weathering: Evidence from immobile element geochemistry at the Olmedo Deposit, Sardinia. Miner. Depos. 1997, 32, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mameli, P.; Mongelli, G.; Oggiano, G.; Dinelli, E. Geological, geochemical and mineralogical features of some bauxite deposits from Nurra (Western Sardinia, Italy): Insights on conditions of formation and parental affinity. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2007, 96, 887–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pajović, M. Geology and Genesis of Red Bauxites of Montenegro. In Geological Survey of Montenegro, Separate Issues of Geological Bulletin; Geological Survey of Montenegro: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2000; Volume XVII, pp. 1–242. ISSN 1450-8257. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Pajović, M. Genesis and genetic types of karst bauxites. Iran. J. Earth Sci. 2009, 1, 44–56. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aiglsperger, T.; Proenza, J.A.; Proenza, J.F.; Labrador, M.; Svojtka, M.; Rojas-Purón, A.; Longo, F.; Durišová, J. Critical metals (REE, Sc, PGE) in Ni laterites from Cuba and the Dominican Republic. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 73, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Eliopoulos, D.G.; Economou-Eliopoulos, M. Geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of Fe-Ni- and bauxitic-laterite deposits of Greece. Ore Geol. Rev. 2000, 16, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maksimović, Z.; Pantó, G. Authigenic rare earth minerals in karst-bauxites and karstic nickel deposits. In Rare Earth Minerals, Chemistry, Origin and Ore Deposits; Jones, A.P., Wall, F., Williams, C.T., Eds.; Mineralogical Society Series; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1996; Chapter 10; pp. 199–220. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maksimović, Z.; Skarpelis, N.; Pantó, G. Mineralogy and geochemical of the rare earth elements in the karstic nickel deposits of Lokris area, Greece. Acta Geol. Hung. 1993, 36, 331–342. [Google Scholar]
  21. Menéndez, I.; Campeny, M.; Quevedo-González, L.; Mangas, J.; Llovet, X.; Tauler, E.; Barrón, V.; Torrent, J.; Méndez-Ramos, J. Distribution of REE-bearing minerals in felsic magmatic rocks and paleosols from Gran Canaria, Spain: Intraplate oceanic islands as a new example of potential, non-conventional sources of rare-earth elements. J. Geochem. Explor. 2019, 204, 270–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boni, M.; Rollinson, G.; Mondillo, N.; Balassone, G.; Santoro, L. Quantitative mineralogical characterization of karst bauxite deposits in the Southern Apennines, Italy. Econ. Geol. 2013, 108, 813–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Crnički, J. Raspodjela Lantanida u Boksitima Hrvatske i Njihovo Značenje za Genezu Boksita. Ph.D. Thesis, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Croatia, 1987; p. 157. (In Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  24. Chai, D.H.; Qu, Z.M.; Chen, H.C.; Chai, F. New discovery and industrial significance of rare and rare-earth elements in Shanxi bauxite. Light Met. 2001, 6, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dai, T.G.; Long, Y.Z.; Zhang, Q.Z.; Hu, B. REE geochemistry of some bauxite deposits in the Western Guangxi district. Geol. Prospect. 2003, 39, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deady, D.; Mochos, E.; Goodenough, K.; Williamson, B.; Wall, F. Rare earth elements in karst-bauxites: A novel untapped European resource? In Proceedings of the ERES2014: 1st European Rare Earth Resources Conference, Milos, Greece, 4–7 September 2014; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gamaletsos, P.N.; Godelitsas, A.; Filippidis, A.; Pontikes, Y. The Rare Earth Elements Potential of Greek Bauxite Active Mines in the Light of a Sustainable REE Demand. J. Sustain. Met. 2018, 5, 20–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hanilçi, N. Geological and geochemical evolution of the Bolkardaği bauxite deposits, Karaman, Turkey: Transformation from shale to bauxite. J. Geochem. Explor. 2013, 133, 118–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karadağ, M.M.; Küpeli, S.; Arýk, F.; Ayhan, A.; Zedef, V.; Döyen, A. Rare earth element (REE) geochemistry and genetic implications of the Mortaş bauxite deposit (Seydişehir/Konya—Southern Turkey). Chem. Erde Geochem. 2009, 69, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Laskou, M.; Andreou, G. Rare earth elements distribution and REE-minerals from the Parnassos–Ghiona bauxite deposits, Greece. Mineral Exploration and Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 7th Biennial SGA Meeting, Athens, Greece, 24–28 August 2003; pp. 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, H.J.; Wang, L.F.; Chai, F.; Luo, S.Q. Mechanism and rules of formation of comprehensive bauxite–rare–rare earth minerals in Shanxi Province. Light Met 2002, 10, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, S.J.; Wang, Q.C.; Li, Z. Characteristics of Mesozoic and Cenozoic heavy minerals from Kuche River section in Kuche depression and their geological implications. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2005, 24, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Z.M.; Zhao, J.M.; Feng, H.; Li, W.; Jiao, Z.C.; Yue, G.L. First discovery of palaeo-weathering crust type REE deposit in Yushan area of Henan province and its significance. Miner. Resour. Geol. 2007, 21, 117–180. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, P. Geochemical characteristics of Carboniferous bauxite deposits in central Guizhou–Southern Sichuan. Reg. Geol. China 1999, 18, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. Genesis of REE minerals in the karstic bauxite in western Guangxi, China, and its constraints on the deposit formation conditions. Ore Geol. Rev. 2016, 75, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mongelli, G. Ce-anomalies in the textural components of Upper Cretaceous karst bauxites from the Apulian Carbonate Platform (Southern Italy). Chem. Geol. 1997, 140, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mongelli, G.; Boni, M.; Buccione, R.; Sinisi, R. Geochemistry of the Apulian karstbauxites (Southern Italy): Chemical fractionation and parental affinities. Ore Geol. Rev. 2014, 63, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mordberg, L.E. Patterns of distribution and behaviour of trace elements in bauxites. Geochem. Isot. Rec. Cont. Weather. 1993, 107, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Putzolu, F.; Piccolo Papa, A.; Mondillo, N.; Boni, M.; Balassone, G.; Mormone, A. Geochemical Characterization of Bauxite Deposits from the Abruzzi Mining District (Italy). Minerals 2018, 8, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Reinhardt, N.; Proenza, J.A.; Villanova-de-Benavent, C.; Aiglsperger, T.; Bover-Arnal, T.; Torró, L.; Salas, R.; Dziggel, A. Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Rare Earth Elements (REE) in Bauxitic Ores of the Catalan Coastal Range, NE Spain. Minerals 2018, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, Y.X.; Li, H.M.; Yang, J.D.; Qiu, L.W.; Chai, D.H.; Chen, P. Discovery of palaeoweathering type rare and rare earth element deposits in Northern China and its significance. Geol. J. China Univ. 2000, 6, 605–607. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Y.X.; Li, H.M.; Yang, J.D.; Shen, Y.Q.; Chai, D.H.; Chen, P.; Qiu, L.W.; Chen, X.M.; Zhao, L.X.; Zhu, C.; et al. Palaeoweathering type rare earth element deposit in Shanxi determined by solid isotope mass spectrometry. J. Chin. Mass Spectrom. Soc. 2013, 24, 394–397. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Q.; Deng, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, S.; Jiang, C.; Zhou, F. Discovery of the REE minerals and its geological significance in the Quyang bauxite deposit, West Guangxi, China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2010, 39, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, J.C.; Wang, F.L.; Li, D.S.; Fei, Y.C.; Wang, L. Investigation on occurrence and trend of rare and rare-earth elements associated in bauxite. Min. Metall. 2004, 13, 89–92. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ye, L.; Cheng, Z.T.; Pan, Z.P. The REE geochemical characteristics of the Xiaoshanba bauxite deposit, Guizhou. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2007, 26, 228–233. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zarasvandi, A.; Charchi, A.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Alizadeh, B. Karst bauxite deposits in the Zagros Mountain Belt, Iran. Ore Geol. Rev. 2008, 34, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, K.Y.; Su, H.M.; Jiang, S.Y. Mineralogical control and characteristics of rare earth elements occurrence in Carboniferous bauxites from western Henan Province, north China: A XRD, SEM-EDS and LA-ICP-MS analysis. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 114, 103–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Torró, L.; Proenza, J.A.; Aiglsperger, T.; Bover-Arnal, T.; Villanova-de-Benavent, C.; Rodrigez, D.; Ramírez, A.; Rodrigez, J.; Mosquea, L.A.; Salas, R. Geological, geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of REE-bearing Las Mercedes bauxite deposit, Dominican Republic. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 89, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mongelli, G.; Acquafredda, P. Ferruginous concretions in a late Cretaceous karst bauxite: Composition and conditions of formation. Chem. Geol. 1999, 158, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maksimović, Z. Distribution of trace elements in bauxite deposits of Hercegovina, Yugoslavia. Travaux ICSOBA 1968, 5, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  51. Maksimović, Z. Genesis of some Mediterranean karstic bauxite deposits. Travaux ICSOBA 1976, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  52. Maksimović, Z. Geochemical study of the Marmara bauxite deposit: Implication for the genesis of brindleyite. Travaux ICSOBA 1979, 15, 31–121. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maksimović, Z.; Pantó, G. Mineralogy of yttrium and lanthanide elements in karstic bauxite deposits. Travaux ICSOBA 1983, 18, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  54. Maksimović, Z.; Pantó, G. Hydroxy-bastnaesite-(Nd), a new mineral from Montenegro, Yugoslavia. Mineral. Mag. 1985, 49, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Maksimović, Z.; Pantó, G. Contribution to the Geochemistry of the rare earth elements in the karst–bauxite deposits of Yugoslavia and Greece. Geoderma 1991, 51, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vukotić, P.; Dragović, D. Rare earth elements distribution patterns in red bauxites of Crna Gora. Travaux ICSOBA 1981, 16, 367–381. [Google Scholar]
  57. Maksimović, Z.; Pantó, G. Minerals of the rare earth elements in karstic bauxites: Synchisite-(Nd), a new mineral from Gebnik deposit. In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress for the Study of Bauxites, Alumina and Aluminium (ISCOBA), Athens, Greece, 9–12 October 1978; pp. 540–552. [Google Scholar]
  58. Maksimović, Z. Mineralogija Itrijuma i Lantanida u Mediteranskim Karstnim Boksitima. X Jubilarni Kongres Geologa Jugoslavije, Zbornik Radova, Knjiga I. Organizacioni Odbor X Jubilarnog Kongresa Geologa Jugoslavije, Budva, Montenegro, SFRJ. 1982, pp. 309–318. Available online: https://sgd.rs/posebna-izdanja/ (accessed on 2 February 2011).
  59. Bárdossy, G.; Panto, G. Trace mineral and element investigation on bauxites by electron probe. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress, ICSOBA (International Committee for Study of Bauxite, Alumina and Aluminium), Nice, France, 17–21 September 1973; pp. 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  60. Maksimović, Z.; Roaldset, E. Lanthanide elements in some Mediterranean karstic bauxite deposits. Travaux ICSOBA 1976, 13, 199–220. [Google Scholar]
  61. Janković, S. Metalogenetske provincije Jugoslavije u prostoru i vremenu (opšti pregled). In Savetovanje “Metalogenija i Koncepcija Geotektonskog Razvoja Jugoslavije”; Rudarsko-Geološki Fakultet: Beograd, Srbija, 1974; pp. 31–52. [Google Scholar]
  62. Grubić, A. Geologija jugoslovenskih boksita. In Srpska Akademija Nauka i Umetnosti, Posebna Izdanja, Knjiga CDLXXXIII, Odeljenje Prirodno-Matematičkih Nauka; SANU: Beograd, Srbija, 1975; pp. 1–181, (In Serbian with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  63. Janković, S.; Jelenković, R.; Vujić, S. Mineralni Resursi i Prognoza Potenvijalnosti Metaličnih i Nemetaličnih Mineralnih Sirovina Srbije i Crne Gore na Kraju XX veka, 2nd ed.; Inženjerska Akademija Srbije i Crne Gore, Odeljenje Rudarskih i Geoloških Nauka: Beograd, Serbia, 2003; pp. 1–875. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mirković, M.; Živaljević, M.; Đokić, V.; Perović, Z.; Kalezić, M.; Pajović, M. Geological map of SR Montenegro, 1:200,000; Geological Survey of Montenegro, Department for regional geology and mineral resources, The Republic self-managing community of interest for geological exploration SR Montenegro: Titograd, Montenegro, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pajović, M.; Radusinović, S. Genesis of white (Lower Cretaceous) bauxites. In Proceedings of the 14th Congress of Geologists of Serbia and Montenegro with International Participation, Novi Sad, Serbia, 18–20 October 2005; pp. 469–476. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pajović, M.; Radusinović, S. Mineral resources of Montenegro. In: Montenegro in the XXI century—In the Era of Competitiveness. In The Living Environment and Sustainable Development; Special Editions (Monographies and Studies), Tom 2, CANU; Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2010; Volume 73, pp. 237–282. [Google Scholar]
  67. Pajović, M.; Radusinović, S. Stratigraphy of bauxites in Montenegro; Geological Survey of Montenegro, Podgorica. Geol. Bull. 2015, 16, 27–57. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bešić, Z. Geotectonic structure of the North Montenegro. Bull. Nat. Mus. Serb. Land A 1948, 1, 100–109. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  69. Burić, P. Geology of Bauxite Deposits in Montenegro. Spec. Ed. Geol. J. 1966, 8, 242, (In Serbian with French summary). [Google Scholar]
  70. Dragović, D. Geološke karakteristike ležišta bijelog boksita Paprati (Katunska nahija). Republički Zavod za zaštitu prirode i prirodnjačke zbirke. Glasnik Republičkog Zavoda za zaštitu prirode i prirodnjačke zbirke u Titogradu, N0 = 2, Titograd, Crna Gora. SFRJ 1969, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  71. Dragović, D. Geološke karakteristike bijelog boksita Paklarice (Crna Gora). Republički Zavod za zaštitu prirode i Prirodnjačkog muzeja. Glasnik Republičkog Zavoda za zaštitu prirode i Prirodnjačkog muzeja, No = 4, Titograd, Crna Gora. SFRJ 1971, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
  72. Dragović, D. Crveni Boksiti Matični Materijal za Stvaranje Bijelih Boksita. X Jubilarni Kongres Geologa Jugoslavije, Zbornik Radova Knjiga II. Organizacioni Odbor X Jubilarnog Kongresa Geologa Jugoslavije, Budva, Montenegro, SFRJ. 1982, pp. 81–90. Available online: https://sgd.rs/posebna-izdanja/ (accessed on 2 February 2011).
  73. Dragović, D. Uslovi stvaranja ležišta i litoloških tipova bijelih boksita Crne Gore. In Proceedings of the VI Jugoslovenski Simpozijum o Istraživanju i Eksploataciji Boksita, Zbornik Radova, Herceg Novi, Montenegro, 10–15 October 1988; pp. 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  74. Dragović, D. Bijeli boksiti Crne Gore; Univerzitet Veljko Vlahović u Titogradu, Institut za tehnička istraživanja Titograd, NIO Univerzitetska Riječ: Niksic, Montenegro, 1988; pp. 1–88, (In Serbo-Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  75. Cicmil, S. Metalogenija Mezozojskih Ležišta Crvenih Boksita Jugozapadne Crne Gore; Rudnici Boksita: Niksic, Montenegro, 1984; pp. 1–134, (In Serbo-Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  76. Pajović, M.; Mirković, M.; Svrkota, R.; Ilić, D.; Radusinović, S. Geology of Vojnik-Maganik Bauxite-Bearing Region (Montenegro); Geological survey of Montenegro: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2017; pp. 1–339. ISSN 0435-4249. (In Serbian with English Summary). [Google Scholar]
  77. Vukotić, P.; Dragović, D. The contribution of intermediate igneous rocks to the source material of Montenegrin red bauxites. Travaux ICSOBA 1982, 12, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  78. Radusinović, S. Rare Earth Elements in Jurassic Karstic Bauxites of Montenegro. In Proceedings of the 17th Serbian Geological Congress with International Participation, Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia, 17–20 May 2018; Serbian Geological Society: Belgrade, Serbia, 2018; pp. 309–314. [Google Scholar]
  79. Maksimović, Z.; Jović, V.; Napijalo, M. Elementi retkih zemalja u boksitima Nikšićke Župe, Crna Gora i njihov značaj. In Proceedings of the 13 Kongres Geologa Jugoslavije, Zbornik Radova, Knj. IV, Herceg Novi, Montenegro, 6–9 October 1998; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jović, V.; Radusinović, S. Rare earth elements in karstic bauxites of Zagrad (Niksicka Zupa, Montenegro). In Proceedings of the 15th Congress of Geologists of Serbia with International Participation, Belgrade, Serbia, 26–29 May 2010; Serbian Geological Society: Belgrade, Serbia, 2010; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  81. Aleva, G.J.J. Laterites: Concepts, Geology, Morphology and Chemistry; International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC): Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1994; 169p. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mondillo, N.; Balassone, G.; Boni, M.; Chelle-Michou, C.; Cretella, S.; Mormone, A.; Putzolu, F.; Santoro, L.; Scognamiglio, G.; Tarallo, M. Rare Earth Elements (REE) in Al- and Fe-(Oxy)-Hydroxides in Bauxites of Provence and Languedoc (Southern France): Implications for the Potential Recovery of REEs as By-Products of Bauxite Mining. Minerals 2019, 9, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Minerals 11 00975 g001 550
Figure 1. Geological map of Montenegro (after Mirković, et al., modified [63]), with bauxite-bearing regions, bauxite formations, deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites (after Pajović [15]).
Figure 1. Geological map of Montenegro (after Mirković, et al., modified [63]), with bauxite-bearing regions, bauxite formations, deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites (after Pajović [15]).
Minerals 11 00975 g001
Minerals 11 00975 g002 550
Figure 2. Deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Piva, Western Montenegro and part of Čevo bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified). The legend is the same for Figure 3 and Figure 4. The list of deposits (capital letters) and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Montenegro shown on Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, (according to Pajović [15], supplemented): I—Red Bauxites. (a) Triassic ore deposits and occurrences:106 Goransko, 107 Seljani, 108 Rudinice, 109 Crvena stijena, 110 Dubljevići, 111 Rudinički brijeg, 112 Bezujačke strane, 113 Bukove strane, 114 GORNJOPOLJSKI VIR, 115 Seoca, 116 Žljebovi, 117 Ploče; (b) Jurassic ore deposits and occurrences:118 Ćurilo, 118a G. Srijede, 119 Provalija, 120 Konate I, 121 Konate II, 122 Crvena šuma, 123 Macavare, 124 Selina, 125 Lastva (Morišta), 126 Crveni do, 127 Milovići, 128 Dugi do, 129 Zaljuta (Pandurica), 130 Štrpca (Tupan), 131 Mrkajići (Kapić), 132 Savina gradina, 133 Grepca (Viluski Broćanac), 134 Trebjesa, 135 Raskrsnice, 136 Lokva Milankovac, 137 Strašnica (Gornje Vučje), 137a Ivankovac, 138 Javorak, 139 Rozin vrh I, 140 Rozin vrh II, 140a Saladžakova greda, 140b Krnja jela, 140c Meteris, 141 Laz, 142 LIVEROVIĆI, 142a Bunić, 142b Dubrava, 143 ZAGRAD, 144 Lokva, 145 KUTSKO BRDO, 146 PODPLANINIK, 147 ĐURAKOV DO, 148 BIOČKI STAN, 149 SILJEVAC, 150 Velja Lazba, 151 Maočići, 152 Bajov do, 153 Đelovi do II, 154 Đelovi do I, 155 CRVENA KITA, 156 Vrage, 157 Kovačev do, 158 Čukin do, 159 M. DUBOVA GLAVA, 160 V. DUBOVA GLAVA, 161 GNJILAVI DO, 162 Vukova Lazina, 163 Budoški do, 164 Nuga Borkovića, 165 Danave, 166 Ranjeva vlaka, 167 Jasen, 168 Lastva (Dobra gora), 169 Bojanje brdo (Nerim), 170 Bebin do, 171 Jama Vojvodina, 172 Ćukovac, 173 Lipa, 174 Proseni do, 175 Dobra voda, 176 Pejovići, 177 Alužice, 178 Prediš, 179 Lješev stup, 180 Malošin do, 181 ŠTITOVO I, 182 ŠTITOVO II, 183 Repište I, 184 Repište II (Branik), 184a Vodni do, 185 BOROVNIK, 186 Raline (Bršno), 187 BRŠNO, 188 Buavice, 189 Seoca (kod Crvenjaka), 190 CRVENJACI, 191 Đelova glava, 192 BOROVA BRDA, 193 Matijaševića pod, 194 Čukar II, 195 Čukar I, 196 Smrekova glavica, 197 Prolom, 198 Međugorje, 199 Javorje, 200 Alina lokva, 201 Mrkalj do, 202 Tijesno ždrijelo, 203 Javorak, 204 Košuća glava, 205 Željeva duga, 206 Pino selo, 207 Đevič bor, 208 Zamršten, 209 Crveno katunište, 210 Crvena rupa, 211 Bijela stijena, 2011a Osojnik, 212 Kamenik, 213 Barni do, 214 Crveni ugao, 215 Crvena glavica, 216 Jelenak, 217 Strana (Crnač do), 218 Crveno prlo, 219 Crnač do, 220 Podgrabovlje, 221 Brotnjik, 222 Smrekova glavica, 223 Vranja ulica, 224 Pantelijev vrh, 225 Seoca, 226 Kosača, 227 Dužički krš, 228 Stavor, 229 Oštra glava, 230 Grabova glavica, 231 Češljari I, 232 Češljari II, 233 Veliki Vezac, 234 Benkani, 235 Kovioc, 236 Ružica, 237 Kovači; c) Paleogene occurrences: 238 Žvinje, 239 Klinci, 240 Petrovići, 241 Krtola, 242 Kovači, 242a Ukropci, 242b Lješevići, 243 Komina, 243a Kurtina, 244 Kunje, 245 Duškići, 246 Povara, 247 Mala Gorana, 248 Velika Gorana, 249 Krute, 249a Kruče, 250 Mavrijan, 251Mali Kručiš, 252 Bijela gora, 253 Kolonza, 253a Lišnjani, 254 Klezna, 255 Briska gora, 255a Ambula, 256 Zoganje, 257 Darza, 257a Sv. Đorđe. II—White Bauxites: 258 Korito, 259 Zaljutnica, 260 Biteljica, 261 Stolovan, 262 Javljen, 263 Goslić, 264 Prisoje, 265 Vita Stijena, 266 Suvo polje, 267 Krnja jela, 268 Kovači, 269 Brekovac, 270 Bucari, 271 Vagani, 272 Kaluđerska glavica, 273 Baljački do, 274 Koprivice, 275 Smrdelj, 276 Stražnica, 277 D. Dubočke, 278 Brezov do, 279 ČISTA VLAKA, 280 Miljanići, 281 Prigradina, 282 Grebnice, 283 ĆALOVE KOSE (METERIZ), 284 Dolovi, (Liverovo polje), 285 Razvršje, 286 Tupanska ravan I, 287 Tupanska ravan II, 288 DUBRAVČEV DO, 289 Raškovo brdo, 290 Gornje Srijede, 291 Žgurlini, 292 Grabova glava, 293 Kita, 294 Bukarov do, 295 Trnovac, 296 Cerovi do, 297 Zukva (Trepča), 298 Mujova glavica, 299 Pasji brijeg, 300 Pobijen kamen, 301 Studena, 302 PODKITA, 302a Rujnova glava, 303. Krstac, 304. Ranjeva vlaka, 305. Kruščice I, 306. KRUŠČICE II, 307. Slano, 308. Vonjin do (Ponikvica), 309. Orlina (Čelinski do), 310. Božurevo brdo, 311.ĐELOVI DO, 312 Goslić (Katunište), 313 Lipova glavica (Osoje), 314 Golubinje, 315 Stražnik (Veliki ćoš), 316 Lazine (Brestica), 317 Gradac (Brestica), 318 PLITKI DO (BRESTICA), 319 ŠIROKA ULICA, 320 Spavade, 320a. Krivodo, 321 Zanovetna glavica, 322 Svinji doli, 323 SZ od Medjedjeg, 324 Carev most, 325 Pandurica, 326 Srni do, 327 Maletin do, 328 MEĐEĐE, 329 Riđa Lokva, 330 Bijeli do, 331 Pusti Lisac, 332 Pusti Lisac II, 333 Lola, 334 Borova brda, 335 Padnurica II, 336 Crveno razdolje, 337 DIONICE (Bijele poljane), 338 Lazine, 339 Aluga, 340 DOBRI POD, 341 Ljeskovi doli I, 342 Ljeskovi doli II, 343 JELINA PEĆINA, 344 Trebovinjski pod, 345 STUDENAC, 346 PAPRAT, 347 Dobrogled, 348 Gola glava, 349 PAKLARICA, 350 Katunište, 351 Čumovica, 352 Vujkovo ždrijelo, 353 Šumova greda, 354 Stražnik, 355 Dolovska korita.
Figure 2. Deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Piva, Western Montenegro and part of Čevo bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified). The legend is the same for Figure 3 and Figure 4. The list of deposits (capital letters) and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Montenegro shown on Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, (according to Pajović [15], supplemented): I—Red Bauxites. (a) Triassic ore deposits and occurrences:106 Goransko, 107 Seljani, 108 Rudinice, 109 Crvena stijena, 110 Dubljevići, 111 Rudinički brijeg, 112 Bezujačke strane, 113 Bukove strane, 114 GORNJOPOLJSKI VIR, 115 Seoca, 116 Žljebovi, 117 Ploče; (b) Jurassic ore deposits and occurrences:118 Ćurilo, 118a G. Srijede, 119 Provalija, 120 Konate I, 121 Konate II, 122 Crvena šuma, 123 Macavare, 124 Selina, 125 Lastva (Morišta), 126 Crveni do, 127 Milovići, 128 Dugi do, 129 Zaljuta (Pandurica), 130 Štrpca (Tupan), 131 Mrkajići (Kapić), 132 Savina gradina, 133 Grepca (Viluski Broćanac), 134 Trebjesa, 135 Raskrsnice, 136 Lokva Milankovac, 137 Strašnica (Gornje Vučje), 137a Ivankovac, 138 Javorak, 139 Rozin vrh I, 140 Rozin vrh II, 140a Saladžakova greda, 140b Krnja jela, 140c Meteris, 141 Laz, 142 LIVEROVIĆI, 142a Bunić, 142b Dubrava, 143 ZAGRAD, 144 Lokva, 145 KUTSKO BRDO, 146 PODPLANINIK, 147 ĐURAKOV DO, 148 BIOČKI STAN, 149 SILJEVAC, 150 Velja Lazba, 151 Maočići, 152 Bajov do, 153 Đelovi do II, 154 Đelovi do I, 155 CRVENA KITA, 156 Vrage, 157 Kovačev do, 158 Čukin do, 159 M. DUBOVA GLAVA, 160 V. DUBOVA GLAVA, 161 GNJILAVI DO, 162 Vukova Lazina, 163 Budoški do, 164 Nuga Borkovića, 165 Danave, 166 Ranjeva vlaka, 167 Jasen, 168 Lastva (Dobra gora), 169 Bojanje brdo (Nerim), 170 Bebin do, 171 Jama Vojvodina, 172 Ćukovac, 173 Lipa, 174 Proseni do, 175 Dobra voda, 176 Pejovići, 177 Alužice, 178 Prediš, 179 Lješev stup, 180 Malošin do, 181 ŠTITOVO I, 182 ŠTITOVO II, 183 Repište I, 184 Repište II (Branik), 184a Vodni do, 185 BOROVNIK, 186 Raline (Bršno), 187 BRŠNO, 188 Buavice, 189 Seoca (kod Crvenjaka), 190 CRVENJACI, 191 Đelova glava, 192 BOROVA BRDA, 193 Matijaševića pod, 194 Čukar II, 195 Čukar I, 196 Smrekova glavica, 197 Prolom, 198 Međugorje, 199 Javorje, 200 Alina lokva, 201 Mrkalj do, 202 Tijesno ždrijelo, 203 Javorak, 204 Košuća glava, 205 Željeva duga, 206 Pino selo, 207 Đevič bor, 208 Zamršten, 209 Crveno katunište, 210 Crvena rupa, 211 Bijela stijena, 2011a Osojnik, 212 Kamenik, 213 Barni do, 214 Crveni ugao, 215 Crvena glavica, 216 Jelenak, 217 Strana (Crnač do), 218 Crveno prlo, 219 Crnač do, 220 Podgrabovlje, 221 Brotnjik, 222 Smrekova glavica, 223 Vranja ulica, 224 Pantelijev vrh, 225 Seoca, 226 Kosača, 227 Dužički krš, 228 Stavor, 229 Oštra glava, 230 Grabova glavica, 231 Češljari I, 232 Češljari II, 233 Veliki Vezac, 234 Benkani, 235 Kovioc, 236 Ružica, 237 Kovači; c) Paleogene occurrences: 238 Žvinje, 239 Klinci, 240 Petrovići, 241 Krtola, 242 Kovači, 242a Ukropci, 242b Lješevići, 243 Komina, 243a Kurtina, 244 Kunje, 245 Duškići, 246 Povara, 247 Mala Gorana, 248 Velika Gorana, 249 Krute, 249a Kruče, 250 Mavrijan, 251Mali Kručiš, 252 Bijela gora, 253 Kolonza, 253a Lišnjani, 254 Klezna, 255 Briska gora, 255a Ambula, 256 Zoganje, 257 Darza, 257a Sv. Đorđe. II—White Bauxites: 258 Korito, 259 Zaljutnica, 260 Biteljica, 261 Stolovan, 262 Javljen, 263 Goslić, 264 Prisoje, 265 Vita Stijena, 266 Suvo polje, 267 Krnja jela, 268 Kovači, 269 Brekovac, 270 Bucari, 271 Vagani, 272 Kaluđerska glavica, 273 Baljački do, 274 Koprivice, 275 Smrdelj, 276 Stražnica, 277 D. Dubočke, 278 Brezov do, 279 ČISTA VLAKA, 280 Miljanići, 281 Prigradina, 282 Grebnice, 283 ĆALOVE KOSE (METERIZ), 284 Dolovi, (Liverovo polje), 285 Razvršje, 286 Tupanska ravan I, 287 Tupanska ravan II, 288 DUBRAVČEV DO, 289 Raškovo brdo, 290 Gornje Srijede, 291 Žgurlini, 292 Grabova glava, 293 Kita, 294 Bukarov do, 295 Trnovac, 296 Cerovi do, 297 Zukva (Trepča), 298 Mujova glavica, 299 Pasji brijeg, 300 Pobijen kamen, 301 Studena, 302 PODKITA, 302a Rujnova glava, 303. Krstac, 304. Ranjeva vlaka, 305. Kruščice I, 306. KRUŠČICE II, 307. Slano, 308. Vonjin do (Ponikvica), 309. Orlina (Čelinski do), 310. Božurevo brdo, 311.ĐELOVI DO, 312 Goslić (Katunište), 313 Lipova glavica (Osoje), 314 Golubinje, 315 Stražnik (Veliki ćoš), 316 Lazine (Brestica), 317 Gradac (Brestica), 318 PLITKI DO (BRESTICA), 319 ŠIROKA ULICA, 320 Spavade, 320a. Krivodo, 321 Zanovetna glavica, 322 Svinji doli, 323 SZ od Medjedjeg, 324 Carev most, 325 Pandurica, 326 Srni do, 327 Maletin do, 328 MEĐEĐE, 329 Riđa Lokva, 330 Bijeli do, 331 Pusti Lisac, 332 Pusti Lisac II, 333 Lola, 334 Borova brda, 335 Padnurica II, 336 Crveno razdolje, 337 DIONICE (Bijele poljane), 338 Lazine, 339 Aluga, 340 DOBRI POD, 341 Ljeskovi doli I, 342 Ljeskovi doli II, 343 JELINA PEĆINA, 344 Trebovinjski pod, 345 STUDENAC, 346 PAPRAT, 347 Dobrogled, 348 Gola glava, 349 PAKLARICA, 350 Katunište, 351 Čumovica, 352 Vujkovo ždrijelo, 353 Šumova greda, 354 Stražnik, 355 Dolovska korita.
Minerals 11 00975 g002
Minerals 11 00975 g003 550
Figure 3. Deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified).
Figure 3. Deposits and occurrences of karstic bauxites of Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified).
Minerals 11 00975 g003
Minerals 11 00975 g004 550
Figure 4. Occurrences of karstic bauxites of Boka Kotorska and Ulcinj bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified).
Figure 4. Occurrences of karstic bauxites of Boka Kotorska and Ulcinj bauxite-bearing regions (after Pajović [15], modified).
Minerals 11 00975 g004
Minerals 11 00975 g005 550
Figure 5. The geological sections of characteristic bauxite deposits/occurrences from different bauxite formations of Montenegro (after Radusinović [5] and REEBAUX project documentation, Radusinović [6]).
Figure 5. The geological sections of characteristic bauxite deposits/occurrences from different bauxite formations of Montenegro (after Radusinović [5] and REEBAUX project documentation, Radusinović [6]).
Minerals 11 00975 g005
Minerals 11 00975 g006 550
Figure 6. XRD patterns of two typical analysed samples from Gernjepoljski vir deposit: (a) upper part and (b) middle part of deposit (B—böhmite, G—gibbsite, D—dolomite, A—anatase, Gt—goethite, K—kaolinite, V—vermiculite, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Figure 6. XRD patterns of two typical analysed samples from Gernjepoljski vir deposit: (a) upper part and (b) middle part of deposit (B—böhmite, G—gibbsite, D—dolomite, A—anatase, Gt—goethite, K—kaolinite, V—vermiculite, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Minerals 11 00975 g006
Minerals 11 00975 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD patterns of typical analysed sample from Štitovo II deposit (B—böhmite, A—anatase, H—hematite, K—kaolinite, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Figure 7. XRD patterns of typical analysed sample from Štitovo II deposit (B—böhmite, A—anatase, H—hematite, K—kaolinite, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Minerals 11 00975 g007
Minerals 11 00975 g008 550
Figure 8. XRD patterns of four typical analysed sample from Zagrad deposit, ore body 3 (B—böhmite; H—hematite; K—kaolinite; A—anatase; R—rutile; Q—quartz) (Radusinović et al. [4]).
Figure 8. XRD patterns of four typical analysed sample from Zagrad deposit, ore body 3 (B—böhmite; H—hematite; K—kaolinite; A—anatase; R—rutile; Q—quartz) (Radusinović et al. [4]).
Minerals 11 00975 g008
Minerals 11 00975 g009 550
Figure 9. Bauxite deposit Štitovo II. Analysed field 1—sample 099, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1,2—Zircon; Spectrum 3—Anatase; Spectrum 4—Fe-hydroxides; Spectrum 5—Hematite; Spectrum 6—Al–hydroxides; Spectrum 7—Xenotime; Spectrum 8—Al + Fe–hydroxides; Spectrum 9—Zircon + Al–hydroxides.
Figure 9. Bauxite deposit Štitovo II. Analysed field 1—sample 099, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1,2—Zircon; Spectrum 3—Anatase; Spectrum 4—Fe-hydroxides; Spectrum 5—Hematite; Spectrum 6—Al–hydroxides; Spectrum 7—Xenotime; Spectrum 8—Al + Fe–hydroxides; Spectrum 9—Zircon + Al–hydroxides.
Minerals 11 00975 g009
Minerals 11 00975 g010 550
Figure 10. Bauxite deposit Borova brda. Analysed field 1—sample 180, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1, 4, 6—Hematite; Spectrum 2, 5; Spectrum 3, 7, 8—Monazite; Al + Fe–hydroxides; REE—carbonate; Spectrum 7–8—Monazite; Spectrum 9—Clay + Fe–hydroxides.
Figure 10. Bauxite deposit Borova brda. Analysed field 1—sample 180, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1, 4, 6—Hematite; Spectrum 2, 5; Spectrum 3, 7, 8—Monazite; Al + Fe–hydroxides; REE—carbonate; Spectrum 7–8—Monazite; Spectrum 9—Clay + Fe–hydroxides.
Minerals 11 00975 g010
Minerals 11 00975 g011 550
Figure 11. Bauxite deposit Borova brda. Analysed field 3—sample 180, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1–6—REE–carbonate; Spectrum 7–8—Monazite; Spectrum 9—Xenotime.
Figure 11. Bauxite deposit Borova brda. Analysed field 3—sample 180, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1–6—REE–carbonate; Spectrum 7–8—Monazite; Spectrum 9—Xenotime.
Minerals 11 00975 g011
Minerals 11 00975 g012 550
Figure 12. Bauxite occurrence Crvena glavica. Analysed field 3—sample 243, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1—Xenotime; Spectrum 2, 5—Hematite + Al–hidroksid; Spectrum 3—Clay + Fe–hydroxides; Spectrum 4—Monazite; Spectrum 6–9—Zircon.
Figure 12. Bauxite occurrence Crvena glavica. Analysed field 3—sample 243, with details and analysed points. Spectrum 1—Xenotime; Spectrum 2, 5—Hematite + Al–hidroksid; Spectrum 3—Clay + Fe–hydroxides; Spectrum 4—Monazite; Spectrum 6–9—Zircon.
Minerals 11 00975 g012
Minerals 11 00975 g013 550
Figure 13. XRD patterns of typical analysed sample from bauxite deposits and occurrences: Bajov do (a), Bijele poljane (b) and Velika Gorana (c). (B—böhmite, G—gibbsite, A—anatase, H—hematite, Gt—goethite, K—kaolinite, R—rutile, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Figure 13. XRD patterns of typical analysed sample from bauxite deposits and occurrences: Bajov do (a), Bijele poljane (b) and Velika Gorana (c). (B—böhmite, G—gibbsite, A—anatase, H—hematite, Gt—goethite, K—kaolinite, R—rutile, *—Al-sample holder) (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Minerals 11 00975 g013
Minerals 11 00975 g014 550
Figure 14. Triangular diagram of SiO2-Al2O3-Fe2O3 of the bauxite formations and deposits, after Aleva [81].
Figure 14. Triangular diagram of SiO2-Al2O3-Fe2O3 of the bauxite formations and deposits, after Aleva [81].
Minerals 11 00975 g014
Minerals 11 00975 g015 550
Figure 15. Content of ΣREE in the studied bauxite formations in Montenegro, (after Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]), (ppm).
Figure 15. Content of ΣREE in the studied bauxite formations in Montenegro, (after Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]), (ppm).
Minerals 11 00975 g015
Minerals 11 00975 g016 550
Figure 16. Content of ΣREE + Sc in the studied deposits and occurrences of different bauxite formations in Montenegro, (after REEBAUX [6]), (ppm).
Figure 16. Content of ΣREE + Sc in the studied deposits and occurrences of different bauxite formations in Montenegro, (after REEBAUX [6]), (ppm).
Minerals 11 00975 g016
Minerals 11 00975 g017 550
Figure 17. Content comparation of ΣREE + Sc in the bauxite formations in Montenegro and some Mesozoik Mediterranean bauxite formations, (ppm).
Figure 17. Content comparation of ΣREE + Sc in the bauxite formations in Montenegro and some Mesozoik Mediterranean bauxite formations, (ppm).
Minerals 11 00975 g017
Minerals 11 00975 g018 550
Figure 18. Bauxite production and consumption, alumina and aluminium production in Montenegro, 1972–2009, (t).
Figure 18. Bauxite production and consumption, alumina and aluminium production in Montenegro, 1972–2009, (t).
Minerals 11 00975 g018
Minerals 11 00975 g019 550
Figure 19. Content comparison of analysed oxides, microelements and rare earth elements in bauxites and bauxite residue. Based on data: (Radusinović [5] and REEBAUX [6]); Bauxite mines—Nikšić and Aluminium factory—Podgorica (KAP).
Figure 19. Content comparison of analysed oxides, microelements and rare earth elements in bauxites and bauxite residue. Based on data: (Radusinović [5] and REEBAUX [6]); Bauxite mines—Nikšić and Aluminium factory—Podgorica (KAP).
Minerals 11 00975 g019
Minerals 11 00975 g020 550
Figure 20. Mineral composition of the red mud samples from the KAP- Podgorica red mud landfill: Basin A (a), basin B (b). H—hematite, C—calcite, Cn—cancrinite, G—gibbsite, R—rutile, N—nordstrandite, Gt—goethite, P—perovskite, A—anatase, B—böhmite, *—Al-sample holder (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Figure 20. Mineral composition of the red mud samples from the KAP- Podgorica red mud landfill: Basin A (a), basin B (b). H—hematite, C—calcite, Cn—cancrinite, G—gibbsite, R—rutile, N—nordstrandite, Gt—goethite, P—perovskite, A—anatase, B—böhmite, *—Al-sample holder (REEBAUX project documentation, Tomašić [6]).
Minerals 11 00975 g020
Table
Table 1. Origin and information of bauxite samples from Montenegro (Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]).
Table 1. Origin and information of bauxite samples from Montenegro (Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]).
Bauxite FormationsPaleorelief AgeData from ProjectBauxite-Bearing Region/LabelNumber of Deposits/OccurrencesSample ID/Sample SequenceType of SampleNumber of Samples
TriassicMiddle TriassicREEBAUX *Piva (PI-II/1)1CGBX 01composite1 (6 i.s.)
Vojnik-Maganik (VM-III/1)1CGBX 24-CGBX 29individual6 (av.)
JurassicLate TriassicREEBAUX *Vojnik-Maganik (VM-III/2)7CGBX 02-CGBX 07; CGBX 30-CGBX 36composite; individual6 (56 i.s.) +
7 i.s. (av.)
REE VMP *Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP-III&IV/1)24004-160individual157 (av.)
MPM VM **Vojnik-Maganik (VM- III/3)27G 001-G 206individual206
LiassicREEBAUX *Prekornica (P-IV/1)2CGBX 08; CGBX 09composite2 (18 i.s.)
REE VMP *Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP- III&IV/2)7001-003; 161-215individual58 (av.)
Dogger-OxfordianREEBAUX *Prekornica (P-IV/2)1CGBX 10composite1 (4 i.s.)
REE VMP *Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP III&IV/3)6216-252individual37 (av.)
MPM VM **Vojnik-Maganik (VM - III/4)4G 210-G 232individual23 (av.)
REEBAUX *Western Montenegro & Orjen (WMO-V&VII/1)5CGBX 11-CGBX 14; CGBX 37-CGBX 45composite; individual4 (25 i.s.) +
9 i.s. (av.)
MPM WM **Western Montenegro (WM-V/1)72-23, 32-74, 84-112, 122, 213individual94 (av.)
CretaceousLiassic, Doggerian, Oxfordian, Early CretaceousREEBAUX *Western Montenegro & Čevo (WMC-VI/1)8CGBX 15-CGBX 21; CGBX 46-CGBX 55composite; individual7 (61 i.s.) +
10 i.s. (av.)
MPM WM **Western Montenegro & Čevo (WMC-VI/2)171,25-28, 75-83, 113-121,124individual25 (av.)
PaleogeneLate CretaceousREEBAUX *Boka Kotorska (BK-VIII/1)4CGBX 22composite1 (9 i.s.)
Ulcinj (U-IX/1)8CGBX 22composite1 (18 i.s.)
Research projects: REEBAUX—Prospects of REE recovery from bauxite and bauxite residue in the ESEE region (data from 2019); REE VMP—REE exploration in bauxites of Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica bauxite-bearing regions (data from 2014–2016); MPM VM—Metallogenetic-prognostic map of Vojnik-Maganik bauxite-bearing region, 1:50,000 (data from 2000); MPM WM—Metallogenetic-prognostic map of Western Montenegro bauxite-bearing region, 1:50,000 (data from 2015). Analytical method: * ICP ES/MS, Li-borate fusion; ** ICP-ES/MS, Multi-acid digestion; i.s.—individual sample; av.—average content.
Table
Table 2. Sampled bauxite deposits and occurrences.
Table 2. Sampled bauxite deposits and occurrences.
Bauxite-Bearing Region/
Label		Data from
Project		Label and Name of Deposits/Occurrences
Piva (PI-II/1)REEBAUX108 Rudinice
Vojnik-Maganik (VM-III/1) 114 GORNJEPOLJSKI VIR
Vojnik-Maganik (VM-III/2)REEBAUX142 LIVEROVIĆI, 143 ZAGRAD 3, 147 ĐURAKOV DO, 148 BIOČKI STAN, 182 ŠTITOVO II, 187 BRŠNO
Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP-III & IV/1)REE VMP137 Strašnica (Gornje Vučje), 137a Ivankovac, 138 Javorak, 140 Rozin vrh II, 140a Meteris, 141 Laz, 142 LIVEROVIĆI, 143 ZAGRAD 1&3, 145 KUTSKO BRDO (Palež, Lokve, Šunčeva dolina, Crvene ornice) 147 ĐURAKOV DO 2, 148 BIOČKI STAN, 181 ŠTITOVO I, 182 ŠTITOVO II, 187 BRŠNO, 207 Đevič bor, 208 Gornji i Donji Zamršten, 209 Crveno katunište, 210 Crvena rupa, 187 BRŠNO, 188 Buavice
Vojnik-Maganik (VM- III/3)MPM VM 137 Strašnica (Gornje Vučje), 137a Ivankovac, 138 Javorak, 139 Rozin vrh I, 140 Rozin vrh II, 140a Meteris, 140b Saladžakova greda, 140c Krnja jela, 141 Laz, 142 LIVEROVIĆI, 143 ZAGRAD 2, 145 KUTSKO BRDO, 146 PODPLANINIK, 147 ĐURAKOV DO 2, 148 BIOČKI STAN, 149 SILJEVAC, 181 ŠTITOVO I, 182 ŠTITOVO II, 183 Repište I, 184 Repište II, 184 a Branik, 184b Vodni do, 186 Raline (Bršno), 187 BRŠNO, 207 Đevič bor, 208 Donji i Gornji Zamršten, 209 Crveno katunište, 210 Crvena rupa
Prekornica (P-IV/1)REEBAUX190 CRVENJACI, 192 BOROVA BRDA
Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP- III & IV/2)REE VMP136 Lokva Milankovac, 190 CRVENJACI, 192 BOROVA BRDA, 198 Međugorje, 198a Plačnik (Međugorje) 199 Javorje, 200 Alina lokva,
Prekornica (P-IV/2)REEBAUX218 Crveno prlo
Vojnik-Maganik & Prekornica (VMP III&IV/3)REE VMP213 Barni do, 215 Crvena glavica, 216 Jelenak, 218 Crveno prlo, 220 Podgrabovlje, 222 Smrekova glavica,
Vojnik-Maganik (VM - III/4)MPM VM150 Velja Lazba, 206 Pino selo, 211 Bijela stijena, 2011 a Osojnik,
Western Montenegro & Orjen (WMO-V&VII/1)REEBAUX127 Milovići, 132 Savina gradina, 152 Bajov do, 154 Đelovi do I, 160 V. DUBOVA GLAVA
Western Montenegro (WM-V/1)MPM WM124 Selina, 125 Lastva (Morišta), 127 Milovići, 132 Savina gradina, 152 Bajov do, 154 Đelovi do I, 155 CRVENA KITA
Western Montenegro & Čevo (WMC-VI/1)REEBAUX306. KRUŠČICE II, 328 MEĐEĐE, 337 DIONICE -Bijele poljane, 338 Lazine, 343 JELINA PEĆINA, 344 Trebovinjski pod, 345 STUDENAC, 349 PAKLARICA
Western Montenegro & Čevo (WMC-VI/2)MPM WM274 Koprivice, 297 Zukva, 302 Podkita, 306 Kruščica, 308 Vonjin do, 313 Lipova glava, 316 Lazine-Brestica, 317 Gradac Brestica, 318 Brestica - Plitki do, 330 Bijeli do, 332, Pusti Lisac, 337 Dionice (Bijele poljane), 341 Ljeskovi doli I, 342 Ljeskovi doli II, 343 Jelina pećina, 349 Paklarica, 350 Katunište (Šašovica)
Boka Kotorska (BK-VIII/1)REEBAUX240 Petrovići 242 Kovači-Glavati, 242a Ukropci, 242b Lješevići,
Ulcinj (U-IX/1)REEBAUX243a Kurtina, 244 Kunje, 245 Duškići, 248 Velika Gorana, 249 Krute, 250 Mavrijan (Bratica), 257a Sv. Đorđe
Table
Table 3. Bauxite samples data from characteristic deposits/occurrences.
Table 3. Bauxite samples data from characteristic deposits/occurrences.
Bauxite
for Mations		Paleorelief AgeProjectDeposit/OccurrenceBauxite-Bearing RegionSample SequenceNumber of Samples
TriassicMiddle TriassicREEBAUX114 GORNJEPOLJSKI VIRVojnik-Maganik (VM-III)CGBX 24-CGBX 296
JurassicLate TriassicREEVMP143 ZAGRAD 3Vojnik-Maganik (VM-III)034-04613
REEBAUX182 ŠTITOVO IIVojnik-Maganik (VM-III)CGBX 30-CGBX 367
LiassicREEVMP192 BOROVA BRDAPrekornica (P-IV)179-1879
Dogger-OxfordianREEVMP218 CRVENO PRLOPrekornica (P-IV)216-22510
REEBAUX152 Bajov DoWestern Montenegro
(WM-V)		CGBX 37-CGBX 459
REEBAUX160 VELJA DUBOVA GLAVAORJEN (O-VII)CGBX 121 (9 i.s.)
CretaceousLiassicREEBAUX337 BIJELE POLJANE
(Dionice)		Čevo (C-VI)CGBX 46-CGBX 5510
PaleogeneLate CretaceousREEBAUX248 Velika GoranaUlcinj (U-IX)CGBX 55-CGBX 605
Table
Table 4. Major-, trace- and rare earth element average compositions of the analysed samples (Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]).
Table 4. Major-, trace- and rare earth element average compositions of the analysed samples (Radusinović [5]; REEBAUX [6]).
Bauxite
Formations		TriassicJurassicCretaceousPaleogene
Paleorelief ageMiddle TriassicLate TriassicLiassicDogger-OxfordianLiassic, Doggerian, Oxfordian, Early CretaceousLate Cretaceous
Bauxite-bearing region/labelPI-II/1VM-III/1VM-III/2VMP-III&IV/1VM-III/3P-IV/1VMP-III&IV/2P-IV/2VMP-III&IV/3VM-III/4WMO-V&VII/1WM-V/1WMC-V&VI/1WMC-V&VI/2BK-VIII/1U-IX/1
Major oxides (wt.%)
SiO26.8330.428.8211.9014.1217.4019.8916.2218.0425.0613.2812.0022.6023.7013.079.48
Al2O362.543.1854.1051.1850.2847.6543.6747.9146.4841.5740.9744.1643.8242.2847.3748.31
Fe2O3 (T)12.857.5519.5319.4419.0818.0818.2018.2218.3316.7316.6722.9713.3214.7719.121.49
MgO0.130.240.340.460.350.490.480.970.860.510.460.460.440.390.370.3
CaO0.070.490.330.471.540.150.130.170.151.677.962.360.520.221.110.79
Na2O<0.010.03<0.010.050.050.020.070.030.070.09<0.010.030.020.05<0.01<0.01
K2O0.070.140.390.550.520.690.770.660.620.840.270.330.710.470.740.21
TiO22.311.202.632.511.982.212.172.122.031.441.782.012.222.222.772.79
P2O5<0.010.0190.0490.0470.0410.0450.0710.0200.0280.0490.0170.020.0400.030.0600.090
MnO0.070.090.190.170.130.140.130.140.140.080.100.110.010.020.080.09
LOI14.916.4013.1112.8412.9712.7012.2013.1012.8813.3418.1915.2315.9715.5414.815.9
Total99.7399.7599.5199.6199.8699.5597.7899.5699.6199.8699.7099.7099.6799.7099.4799.45
Total C0.180.190.170.19 0.130.120.210.18 1.88 0.32 0.410.37
Total S<0.02<0.02<0.020.026 <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 0.03 0.37 0.040.08
Trace elements (ppm)
Ba203069795293106787487393663455754
Be49665861167853393
Co241723242424447312840333217124450
Cs2167 111089 413164
Cr12371342334260240240267243222232294341335637835
Ga71425248 49455345 464455484050
Hf2014151391312131171071281416
Li 257 485 317 421
Nb58355548344542423729353642419091
Ni6947258178165169220209237201209239133139289348
Rb6532371561594443292052593311
Sc48325858255958535228394643412830
Sn131014161014151213991191199
Sr1647978745116132444861485610353142333
Ta4344633335323345
Th77565251245046494828391640153853
U66766565446715142415
V13293300304279236287223247288215312577661652728
W7577566775545476
Zr750488556476262456421435380194355397431431573618
Y731021281323211412817116145746544394447
La5410919419947241283313245711042257690108,
Ce3113133513651003843553653431111875212420164226
Pr10253839 3838.234233 1961121620
Nd3597139142 137136157123 69223675567
Sm8192726 25242621 135721011
Eu2365 6565 3110.422
Gd9182425 26252722 1247189
Tb2344 4444 2110.312
Dy12172223 22232623 1358289
Ho3355 4565 3120.522
Er10101314 13141716 835256
Tm2122 2222 2110.311
Yb1091313 12131515 835266
Lu2122 2222 1110.311
ΣREE542732966995 1030105711791019 516 309 415516
ΣLREE420567754776 831841908769 394 236 338434
ΣHREE122165212219 199216271250 122 73 7782
ΣLREE/ΣHREE3.453.433.563.55 4.173.893.353.07 3.24 3.24 4.395.33
ΣLREE = ΣREE (La − Eu) and ΣHREE = ΣREE (Gd − Lu + Y).
Table
Table 5. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 099, Figure 9).
Table 5. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 099, Figure 9).
Element (wt.%)Spec.1Spec.2Spec.3Spec.4Spec.5Spec.6Spec.7Spec.8Spec.9
O39.137.450.141.443.455.038.342.552.0
Al2.0 2.83.33.732.2 11.76.6
Si11.812.60.40.60.92.31.11.17.4
P 0.3 15.3
Ti0.2 35.91.01.01.0 1.50.7
Fe1.60.710.853.450.99.51.043.26.2
Ca 0.2
Co 0.8
Y 34.3
Gd 2.9
Dy 4.6
Yb 1.9
Zr45.248.0 26.9
Hf 1.3
Total100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100100.0100.0
Table
Table 6. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 180, Figure 10).
Table 6. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 180, Figure 10).
Element (wt.%)Spec.1Spec.2Spec.3Spec.4Spec.5Spec.6Spec.7Spec.8Spec.9
O37.742.440.439.848.444.033.943.340.5
Mg 0.7 1.3
Al4.110.29.43.728.61.27.111.911.7
Si0.20.5 0.7 1.2 4.9
P 10.5 0.3 6.39.4
Ti0.91.5 1.71.14.5 0.6
Mn 0.3 0.7 0.3
Fe56.844.74.253.520.948.93.45.042.1
Ca 2.40.2
Y 2.1
La 7.8 17.86.5
Ce 19.2 16.1
Nd 8.6 22.27.0
Th 0.7
Total100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100100100.0
Table
Table 7. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 180, Figure 11).
Table 7. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 180, Figure 11).
Element (wt.%)Spec.1Spec.2Spec.3Spec.4Spec.5Spec.6Spec.7Spec.8Spec.9
O45.338.834.241.139.945.733.533.735.2
F4.88.08.46.35.43.5
Al20.313.93.710.213.016.1
Si2.70.93.06.93.02.4 0.6
P 0.614.014.816.4
Ca1.21.22.01.91.80.70.40.6
Fe10.07.21.01.97.023.31.31.21.4
La4.48.713.98.78.23.512.812.4
Ce 2.0 27.125.6
Pr 2.52.3
Nd8.413.320.113.313.84.310.711.7
Sm1.52.63.52.42.8
Gd 2.94.42.92.9 2.0
Dy 4.6
Er 3.6
Yb 3.3
Y 32.9
Total100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Table
Table 8. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 243, Figure 12).
Table 8. Results of chemical analysis of points (sample 243, Figure 12).
Element (wt.%)Spec.1Spec.2Spec.3Spec.4Spec.5Spec.6Spec.7Spec.8Spec.9
O42.139.947.932.737.946.341.337.247.9
Al 3.512.90.61.03.21.1 4.1
Si1.21.46.1 0.910.611.912.610.0
P15.1 13.6
K 0.4
Ti 0.80.6 0.6
Mn 0.3
Fe3.054.532.11.459.43.71.01.11.5
Co1.2
Zr 36.244.747.936.5
Hf 1.3
La 15.1
Ce 29.8
Nd 6.8
Y31.2
Gd6.4
Total100100.0100.0100100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Table
Table 9. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of major oxides in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Table 9. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of major oxides in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Paleorelief AgeStatistical ParametersSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgOCaONa2OK2OTiO2P2O5MnOCr2O3LOITOT/CTOT/S
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Late Triassic
(n = 160)		MinimumMin1.0033.502.560.070.030.010.011.680.0100.020.02611.30.060.02
MaximumMax27.4469.7326.152.0511.140.082.023.500.5301.640.09620.22.370.03
Arithmetic meanẍ11.9051.1819.440.460.470.050.552.510.0470.170.04912.840.190.026
Standard deviationσ6.545.783.140.281.430.020.420.360.090.190.021.060.290.01
Coefficient of variationCv0.550.110.160.613.020.430.770.141.921.070.310.081.560.21
Liassic
(n = 51)		MinimumMin11.6136.909.360.150.070.040.241.530.0100.030.02311.80.05
MaximumMax30.1752.4421.910.810.430.091.882.660.7100.960.04314.50.420.02
Arithmetic meanẍ19.8943.6718.200.480.130.070.772.170.0710.130.03512.200.12
Standard deviationσ4.176.553.260.130.070.020.290.340.160.050.011.710.06
Coefficient of variationCv0.210.150.180.270.560.220.380.162.290.380.160.140.54
Dogger-Oxfordian
(n = 41)		MinimumMin11.9041.5910.840.460.080.050.131.620.0100.070.03011.60.07
MaximumMax24.1350.2624.111.360.240.101.302.240.0500.190.04815.100.420.02
Arithmetic meanẍ18.0446.4818.330.860.150.070.622.030.0280.140.03612.880.18
Standard deviationσ2.331.852.250.230.050.010.330.130.010.030.000.620.09
Coefficient of variationCv0.130.040.120.270.320.190.530.060.440.200.110.050.51
n—Total number of samples.
Table
Table 10. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of trace elements in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Table 10. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of trace elements in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Paleorelief AgeStatistical
Parameters		RbCsBeSrBaThUZrHfVNbTaWCoNiGaSn
ppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppm
Late Triassic
(n = 160)		MinimumMin0.40.1239.11729.13.1328.79.317731.22.34.311.95129.27
MaximumMax142.720.81577419070.018.1641.417.785068.55.09.7402.245657.843
Arithmetic meanẍ36.607.335.6387.3079.2450.936.03475.7113.45303.6248.073.656.5341.63178.4347.8815.61
Standard deviationσ34.385.312.6787.9447.397.212.0161.551.6084.066.100.470.9043.4371.244.145.05
Coefficient of variationCv0.940.720.471.010.600.140.330.130.120.280.130.130.141.040.400.090.32
Liassic
(n = 51)		MinimumMin10.61.8237.65238.63.0335.09.220434.62.64.618.914434.89
MaximumMax127.419.5151406.620465.924.3497.613.646651.94.09.8539.367854.437
Arithmetic meanẍ58.9410.435.50131.83106.1546.355.80420.6211.65286.6041.963.135.7646.94219.9145.3415.20
Standard deviationσ24.213.312.92246.9033.048.173.3871.921.9070.166.890.511.1474.4686.177.525.65
Coefficient of variationCv0.410.320.531.870.310.180.580.170.160.240.160.160.201.590.390.170.37
Dogger-Oxfordian
(n = 41)		MinimumMin8.52.4227.72738.63.3331.310.217932.72.65.015.015240.18
MaximumMax87.716.31385.814559.87.9417.811.834639.53.89.978.530751.424
Arithmetic meanẍ42.579.216.2448.3174.3548.174.22379.5611.09246.6836.653.066.6528.34237.3245.4512.57
Standard deviationσ24.014.382.3516.3932.585.040.8916.050.4348.071.940.281.0211.2637.232.393.78
Coefficient of variationCv0.560.480.380.340.440.100.210.040.040.190.050.090.150.400.160.050.30
n—Total number of samples.
Table
Table 11. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of rare earth elements, Y and Sc in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Table 11. Statistical parameters of geochemical analyses of rare earth elements, Y and Sc in Jurassic bauxites of the Vojnik-Maganik and Prekornica ore regions (after Radusinović [5]).
Paleorelief AgeStatistical ParametersScYLaCePrNdSmEuGdTbDyHoErTmYbLu
ppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppmppm
Late Triassic
(n = 160)		MinimumMin3862.687.7159.513.0244.38.361.858.691.6510.592.266.581.006.400.98
MaximumMax1111266.21799.1908.3421.421797.4327.4668.08309.5640.49206.2637.79105.0115.3094.7514.40
Arithmetic meanẍ58.41131.62199.49365.0138.51141.9425.995.4424.493.8722.854.6813.592.0613.352.06
Standard deviationσ9.11165.04245.96111.0653.65210.2237.297.7735.825.0427.355.3014.202.0012.141.84
Coefficient of variationCv0.161.251.230.301.391.481.431.431.461.301.201.131.050.970.910.90
Liassic
(n = 51)		MinimumMin4377.7111.4208.316.8054.410.152.2210.301.9012.742.878.781.378.991.36
MaximumMax159597.71648663.9184.52616.2101.5923.92125.4022.18137.9327.6770.4510.0362.159.31
Arithmetic meanẍ58.00128.34282.89355.2638.23135.5523.825.2424.543.9323.354.8013.582.0813.462.03
Standard deviationσ18.4677.03330.47109.0834.55120.1619.464.5823.313.3918.983.648.941.257.681.15
Coefficient of variationCv0.320.601.170.310.900.890.820.870.950.860.810.760.660.600.570.56
Dogger-Oxfordian
(n = 41)		MinimumMin4584.3136.9168.415.6752.99.232.1910.522.0814.833.6111.161.6410.621.64
MaximumMax57.00323.9570.9598.782.84329.353.2011.2553.077.2941.038.7025.383.5121.763.18
Arithmetic meanẍ51.84161.14244.63342.6933.39122.8820.854.5522.023.6222.975.2815.832.3614.952.28
Standard deviationσ3.1852.60120.03111.6917.5771.3111.622.4711.431.387.041.363.710.492.790.40
Coefficient of variationCv0.060.330.490.330.530.580.560.540.520.380.310.260.230.210.190.18
n—Total number of samples.
Table
Table 12. The average content of major oxides and trace elements in bauxite residue from basins A and B in Aluminium factory—Podgorica (KAP). REEBAUX [6].
Table 12. The average content of major oxides and trace elements in bauxite residue from basins A and B in Aluminium factory—Podgorica (KAP). REEBAUX [6].
BAUXITE
RESIDUE
(Number of
Samples)		Basin A
(9)		Basin B
(10)		Average
Major oxides (%)
Al2O324.4420.7022.47
SiO210.7211.9711.37
Fe2O333.0234.2933.68
TiO24.584.644.61
CaO6.036.926.50
LOI13.4813.0713.26
MgO0.600.630.61
Na2O5.806.316.07
K2O0.320.350.34
P2O50.090.140.12
MnO0.250.260.25
Cr2O30.100.100.10
Trace elements (ppm)
Ni238233235.37
Ba768379.32
Be665.79
Co605959.06
Cs666.14
Ga362430.04
Hf262826.88
Nb939493.56
Rb232725.13
Sn192119.95
Sr180189184.89
Ta676.66
Th889290.03
U111111.12
V461516490.21
W8109.27
Zr9591000980.38
Sc103107104.68
Y173186179.51
La287318303.20
Ce545569558.02
Pr556158.11
Nd204225214.96
Sm394240.39
Eu898.32
Gd343835.96
Tb565.59
Dy313432.67
Ho676.75
Er192019.89
Tm332.95
Yb192019.78
Lu333.02
ΣREE153516461593.79
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radusinović, S.; Papadopoulos, A. The Potential for REE and Associated Critical Metals in Karstic Bauxites and Bauxite Residue of Montenegro. Minerals 2021, 11, 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090975

AMA Style

Radusinović S, Papadopoulos A. The Potential for REE and Associated Critical Metals in Karstic Bauxites and Bauxite Residue of Montenegro. Minerals. 2021; 11(9):975. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radusinović, Slobodan, and Argyrios Papadopoulos. 2021. "The Potential for REE and Associated Critical Metals in Karstic Bauxites and Bauxite Residue of Montenegro" Minerals 11, no. 9: 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop