Symmetry and Evidential Support
AbstractThis article proves that formal theories of evidential favoring must fail because they are inevitably language dependent. I begin by describing Carnap’s early confirmation theories to show how language dependence problems (like Goodman’s grue problem) arise. I then generalize to showthat any formal favoring theory satisfying minimal plausible conditions will yield different judgments about the same evidence and hypothesis when they are expressed in alternate languages. This does not just indict formal theories of favoring; it also shows that something beyond our evidence must be invoked to substantively favor one hypothesis over another.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Titelbaum, M.G. Symmetry and Evidential Support. Symmetry 2011, 3, 680-698.
Titelbaum MG. Symmetry and Evidential Support. Symmetry. 2011; 3(3):680-698.Chicago/Turabian Style
Titelbaum, Michael G. 2011. "Symmetry and Evidential Support." Symmetry 3, no. 3: 680-698.