- freely available
- re-usable
Symmetry 2011, 3(3), 636-652; doi:10.3390/sym3030636
Article
Symmetry and the Brown-Freiling Refutation of the Continuum Hypothesis
Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
Received: 25 July 2011; in revised form: 27 August 2011 / Accepted: 1 September 2011 / Published: 6 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Probability and Inference)
Abstract: Freiling [1] and Brown [2] have put forward a probabilistic reductio argument intended to refute the Continuum Hypothesis. The argument relies heavily upon intuitions about symmetry in a particular scenario. This paper argues that the argument fails, but is still of interest for two reasons. First, the failure is unusual in that the symmetry intuitions are demonstrably coherent, even though other constraints make it impossible to find a probability model for the scenario. Second, the best probability models have properties analogous to non-conglomerability, motivating a proposed extension of that concept (and corresponding limits on Bayesian conditionalization).
Keywords: symmetry; probability; Continuum Hypothesis; conglomerability; finitely additive measures; paradoxical sets
Article Statistics
Click here to load and display the download statistics.Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Bartha, P. Symmetry and the Brown-Freiling Refutation of the Continuum Hypothesis. Symmetry 2011, 3, 636-652.
AMA StyleBartha P. Symmetry and the Brown-Freiling Refutation of the Continuum Hypothesis. Symmetry. 2011; 3(3):636-652.
Chicago/Turabian StyleBartha, Paul. 2011. "Symmetry and the Brown-Freiling Refutation of the Continuum Hypothesis." Symmetry 3, no. 3: 636-652.
Symmetry
EISSN 2073-8994
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
