Next Article in Journal
Is the Notion of Time Really Fundamental?
Next Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Image Complexity Explains Aesthetic Preference for Symmetry
Previous Article in Journal
Polyominoes and Polyiamonds as Fundamental Domains for Isohedral Tilings of Crystal Class D2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Similar Symmetries: The Role of Wallpaper Groups in Perceptual Texture Similarity
Article Menu

Article Versions

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Symmetry 2011, 3(2), 365-388; doi:10.3390/sym3020365

Any Pair of 2D Curves Is Consistent with a 3D Symmetric Interpretation

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 February 2011 / Revised: 27 May 2011 / Accepted: 30 May 2011 / Published: 10 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry Processing in Perception and Art)
Download PDF [473 KB, 14 June 2011; original version 10 June 2011]   |  

Abstract

Symmetry has been shown to be a very effective a priori constraint in solving a 3D shape recovery problem. Symmetry is useful in 3D recovery because it is a form of redundancy. There are, however, some fundamental limits to the effectiveness of symmetry. Specifically, given two arbitrary curves in a single 2D image, one can always find a 3D mirror-symmetric interpretation of these curves under quite general assumptions. The symmetric interpretation is unique under a perspective projection and there is a one parameter family of symmetric interpretations under an orthographic projection. We formally state and prove this observation for the case of one-to-one and many-to-many point correspondences. We conclude by discussing the role of degenerate views, higher-order features in determining the point correspondences, as well as the role of the planarity constraint. When the correspondence of features is known and/or curves can be assumed to be planar, 3D symmetry becomes non-accidental in the sense that a 2D image of a 3D asymmetric shape obtained from a random viewing direction will not allow for 3D symmetric interpretations.
Keywords: 3D symmetry; 3D recovery; 3D shape; degenerate views; human perception 3D symmetry; 3D recovery; 3D shape; degenerate views; human perception
Figures

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sawada, T.; Li, Y.; Pizlo, Z. Any Pair of 2D Curves Is Consistent with a 3D Symmetric Interpretation. Symmetry 2011, 3, 365-388.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Symmetry EISSN 2073-8994 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top