Next Article in Journal
Estate Crops More Attractive than Community Forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Next Article in Special Issue
Toward a Global Classification of Coastal Anthromes
Previous Article in Journal
Fire and the Distribution and Uncertainty of Carbon Sequestered as Aboveground Tree Biomass in Yosemite and Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Historical and Current Niche Construction in an Anthropogenic Biome: Old Cultural Landscapes in Southern Scandinavia
Article Menu
Issue 1 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Land 2017, 6(1), 11; doi:10.3390/land6010011

Late Neolithic Agriculture in Temperate Europe—A Long-Term Experimental Approach

1
Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Fischersteig 9, 78343 Gaienhofen-Hemmenhofen, Germany
2
TU Braunschweig, Abt. Umweltgeochemie, Institut für Geoökologie, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
3
Institut für Biologie/Geobotanik, Universität Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg i. Br., Germany
4
Department für Geographie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Luisenstraße 37, 80333 Munich, Germany
5
Büro für Bodenmikromorphologie und Bodenbiologie, Münster 12, 97993 Creglingen, Germany
6
Geographisches Institut Universität Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, D-50923 Köln, Germany
7
Forstamt Hohenlohekreis, Stuttgarter Str. 21, 74653 Künzelsau, Germany
8
Geologischer Dienst Nordrhein-Westfalen, Postfach 100763, 47707 Krefeld, Germany
9
Institut für Bodenkunde und Standortslehre, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 27, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
10
Arkeologisk Museum i Stavanger, Peder Klows gate 30A, 4010 Stavanger, Norway
11
Institut für prähistorische Archäologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 23-25, 14195 Berlin, Germany
12
Institut für Geographie und Geologie, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Erle C. Ellis, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Navin Ramankutty and Laura Martin
Received: 14 November 2016 / Revised: 20 January 2017 / Accepted: 24 January 2017 / Published: 7 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anthropogenic Biomes)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [9132 KB, uploaded 8 February 2017]   |  

Abstract

Long-term slash-and-burn experiments, when compared with intensive tillage without manuring, resulted in a huge data set relating to potential crop yields, depending on soil quality, crop type, and agricultural measures. Cultivation without manuring or fallow phases did not produce satisfying yields, and mono-season cropping on freshly cleared and burned plots resulted in rather high yields, comparable to those produced during modern industrial agriculture - at least ten-fold the ones estimated for the medieval period. Continuous cultivation on the same plot, using imported wood from adjacent areas as fuel, causes decreasing yields over several years. The high yield of the first harvest of a slash-and-burn agriculture is caused by nutrient input through the ash produced and mobilization from the organic matter of the topsoil, due to high soil temperatures during the burning process and higher topsoil temperatures due to the soil’s black surface. The harvested crops are pure, without contamination of any weeds. Considering the amount of work required to fight weeds without burning, the slash-and-burn technique yields much better results than any other tested agricultural approach. Therefore, in dense woodland, without optimal soils and climate, slash-and-burn agriculture seems to be the best, if not the only, feasible method to start agriculture, for example, during the Late Neolithic, when agriculture expanded from the loess belt into landscapes less suitable for agriculture. Extensive and cultivation with manuring is more practical in an already-open landscape and with a denser population, but its efficiency in terms of the ratio of the manpower input to food output, is worse. Slash-and-burn agriculture is not only a phenomenon of temperate European agriculture during the Neolithic, but played a major role in land-use in forested regions worldwide, creating anthromes on a huge spatial scale. View Full-Text
Keywords: Neolithic agriculture; experimental archaeology; slash-and-burn; temperate Europe Neolithic agriculture; experimental archaeology; slash-and-burn; temperate Europe
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rösch, M.; Biester, H.; Bogenrieder, A.; Eckmeier, E.; Ehrmann, O.; Gerlach, R.; Hall, M.; Hartkopf-Fröder, C.; Herrmann, L.; Kury, B.; Lechterbeck, J.; Schier, W.; Schulz, E. Late Neolithic Agriculture in Temperate Europe—A Long-Term Experimental Approach. Land 2017, 6, 11.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top