Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness
AbstractThe notion that the formal titling and individualization of land rights in developing countries lead to higher investments in land and agricultural productivity holds sway in academic and development circles. In this paper, this notion is analyzed based on a comparative study of land reform programs and their implications for access to land, credit, and agricultural investments in Ghana, Kenya, and Vietnam. It focuses on how different access routes to land influence access to credit, and the transaction costs of land reform programs for agricultural investments. The paper concludes that in developing countries, the transaction costs of land reforms for investments can significantly increase if the influence of power is not addressed in order to reduce unequal access to land. The practical implementation of land reform is influenced by many factors, including the control on political power. Thus, measures must accompany implementation to check the use of power to derail land reform objectives. Moreover, the paper supports the argument that land reforms should be implemented in their local contexts so as to have positive effects on agriculture. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Narh, P.; Lambini, C.K.; Sabbi, M.; Pham, V.D.; Nguyen, T.T. Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness. Land 2016, 5, 8.
Narh P, Lambini CK, Sabbi M, Pham VD, Nguyen TT. Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness. Land. 2016; 5(2):8.Chicago/Turabian Style
Narh, Peter; Lambini, Cosmas K.; Sabbi, Matthew; Pham, Van D.; Nguyen, Trung T. 2016. "Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness." Land 5, no. 2: 8.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.