Next Article in Journal
Uncovering Dominant Land-Cover Patterns of Quebec: Representative Landscapes, Spatial Clusters, and Fences
Previous Article in Journal
Designing an Index to Reveal the Potential of Multipurpose Landscapes in Southern Africa
Land 2013, 2(4), 726-755; doi:10.3390/land2040726
Article

Assessing the Sustainability of Different Small-Scale Livestock Production Systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia

1,* , 2
 and 3
Received: 18 September 2013; in revised form: 28 October 2013 / Accepted: 7 November 2013 / Published: 2 December 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1115 KB, updated 16 December 2013; original version uploaded 2 December 2013]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Livestock production is a key income source in eastern Africa, and 80% of the total agricultural land is used for livestock herding. Hence, ecological and socio-economically sustainable rangeland management is crucial. Our study aimed at selecting operational economic, environmental and social sustainability indicators for three main pastoral (P), agro-pastoral (AP), and landless intensive (LI) small scale livestock production systems for use in sustainability assessment in Ethiopia. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through grey literature and semi-structured interviews, assessing livestock and feed resources, production technology, land tenure, financial and gender issues. Our results suggested that feed shortages (FS) are directly related to grazing pressure (G) and inversely related to grass recovery rates (R). According to our indicators, AP was the most sustainable while P and LI were only conditionally sustainable production systems. 93% of 82 interviewees claimed that private land ownership was the best land tenure incentive for efficient rangeland management. Farmers perceived Prosopis juliflora expansion, sporadic rainfall, and disease infestation as the most significant causes for decreasing livestock productivity. Landless intensive farmers had the highest equality in income distribution (Gini Index: GI = 0.4), followed by P and AP (each with a GI = 0.5). Neither educational background nor income seemed to determine grazing species conservation efforts. We claimed that sustainability indicators are valuable tools to highlight shortcomings and strengths of the three main livestock production systems and help with future livestock management in Ethiopia. Selecting suitable indicators, however, is crucial as data requirements and availability can vary across livestock systems.
Keywords: agro-pastoralism; environment; indicators; landless intensive; pastoralism; sustainability agro-pastoralism; environment; indicators; landless intensive; pastoralism; sustainability
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Atanga, N.L.; Treydte, A.C.; Birner, R. Assessing the Sustainability of Different Small-Scale Livestock Production Systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. Land 2013, 2, 726-755.

AMA Style

Atanga NL, Treydte AC, Birner R. Assessing the Sustainability of Different Small-Scale Livestock Production Systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. Land. 2013; 2(4):726-755.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Atanga, Ngufor L.; Treydte, Anna C.; Birner, Regina. 2013. "Assessing the Sustainability of Different Small-Scale Livestock Production Systems in the Afar Region, Ethiopia." Land 2, no. 4: 726-755.


Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert