Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Aerosol Type Selection for the Retrieval of Shortwave Ground Net Radiation: Case Study Using Landsat 8 Data
Previous Article in Journal
Intercomparison of Carbon Dioxide Products Retrieved from GOSAT Short-Wavelength Infrared Spectra for Three Years (2010–2012)
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Atmosphere 2016, 7(9), 110;

Importance of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Fluxes in Western Maryland

Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532, USA
Gas Technology Institute, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Robert W. Talbot
Received: 15 July 2016 / Revised: 17 August 2016 / Accepted: 19 August 2016 / Published: 23 August 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1278 KB, uploaded 23 August 2016]   |  


The purpose of this study was to increase our understanding of the gaseous elemental mercury (GEM, Hg°) fluxes between the atmosphere and soils. Moreover, we wanted to quantify the annual GEM flux, identify the controls, and compare the GEM flux to annual rates of gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) dry deposition and wet deposition of total mercury. We measured GEM fluxes using the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) technique from 6 July 2009 to 6 July 2010 in western Maryland. The annual hourly mean (±std. dev.) GEM flux was −0.63 ± 31.0 ng·m−2·h−1. Hourly mean GEM fluxes were not strongly correlated with atmospheric trace gases, aerosols, or meteorology. However, hourly mean GEM emissions (15.3 ± 27.9 ng·m−2·h−1) and deposition (−14.6 ± 26.6 ng·m−2·h−1) were correlated with ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B), wind speed (WS), ozone (O3), and relative humidity (RH). The annual net GEM flux was −3.33 µg· m−2·year−1 and was similar to the annual dry deposition rate of GOM (2.5 to 3.2 µg·m−2·year−1), and 40% less than the annual mean wet deposition (8 µg·m−2·year−1) of total mercury. Thus, dry deposition of GEM accounted for approximately 25% of the total annual mercury deposition (~14 ug·m−2·year−1) measured at our study site. View Full-Text
Keywords: gaseous elemental mercury; atmospheric mercury; dry deposition; atmospheric fluxes; background soils; annual fluxes gaseous elemental mercury; atmospheric mercury; dry deposition; atmospheric fluxes; background soils; annual fluxes

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro, M.S.; Moore, C.W. Importance of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Fluxes in Western Maryland. Atmosphere 2016, 7, 110.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Atmosphere EISSN 2073-4433 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top