Next Article in Journal
An Examination of the Sensitivity of Sulfur Dioxide, Nitric Oxide, and Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations to the Important Factors Affecting Air Quality Inside a Public Transportation Bus
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) Trades: Current Market Impacts and Prospects for the Future
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Atmosphere 2012, 3(2), 246-265; doi:10.3390/atmos3020246

Estimation of the Interference in Multi-Gas Measurements Using Infrared Photoacoustic Analyzers

Air Quality Research Center, University of California- Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
Department of Animal Science, University of California- Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA
California Analytical Instruments, Inc., 1312 W. Grove Ave., Orange, CA 92865, USA
Current address: Rutherford Consulting Service, 5012 E Budlong Street, Anaheim, CA 92807, USA.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 February 2012 / Revised: 2 March 2012 / Accepted: 1 April 2012 / Published: 18 April 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [579 KB, uploaded 24 April 2012]   |  


Two methods were described to estimate interference in the measurements of infrared (IR) photoacoustic multi-gas analyzer (PAMGA). One is IR spectroscopic analysis (IRSA) and the other is mathematical simulation. An Innova 1412 analyzer (AirTech Instruments, Ballerup, Denmark) with two different filter configurations was used to provide examples that demonstrate the two methods. The filter configuration in Example #1 consists of methane (CH4), methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and water vapor (H2O), and in Example #2 of ammonia (NH3), MeOH, EtOH, N2O, CO2, and H2O. The interferences of NH3 as a non-target gas in Example #1 were measured to validate the two methods. The interferences of H2O and NH3 as target gases in Example #2 were also measured to evaluate the analyzer’s internal cross compensation algorithm. Both simulation and experimental results showed that the interference between the target gases could be eliminated by the internal cross compensation algorithm. But the interferences of non-target gases on target gases could not be addressed by the internal cross compensation, while they could be assessed by the IRSA and mathematical simulation methods. If the IR spectrum of a non-target gas overlaps with that of target gas A at filter A, it could affect not only gas A (primary interference), but also other target gases by secondary interference (because the IR spectrum of gas A overlaps with gas B at filter B and thus affects gas B measurements). The IRSA and mathematical simulation methods can be used to estimate the interference in IR PAMGA measurements prior to purchase or calibration of the unit. View Full-Text
Keywords: Innova; interference; infrared photoacoustic; agriculture; air emissions Innova; interference; infrared photoacoustic; agriculture; air emissions

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Rutherford, J.; Mitloehner, F.M. Estimation of the Interference in Multi-Gas Measurements Using Infrared Photoacoustic Analyzers. Atmosphere 2012, 3, 246-265.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Atmosphere EISSN 2073-4433 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top