Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review of Assessing Storm Surge Disasters: From Traditional Statistical Methods to Artificial Intelligence-Based Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Trend Projections of Potential Evapotranspiration in Yangtze River Delta and the Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variations in Maximum and Minimum Temperature in Mount Qomolangma during 1971–2020

1
Sichuan Provincial Climate Centre, Chengdu 610072, China
2
Institute of Plateau Meteorological, China Meteorological Administration, Chengdu 610072, China
3
Heavy Rain and Drought-Flood Disasters in Plateau and Basin Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610072, China
Atmosphere 2024, 15(3), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030358
Submission received: 21 February 2024 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 13 March 2024 / Published: 15 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Dynamics and Variability Over the Tibetan Plateau)

Abstract

:
Based on the daily maximum and minimum temperature observational data during 1971–2020, the variabilities of the maximum and minimum temperature of Mount Qomolangma are analyzed. The daily maximum temperature is 25.8 °C and the daily minimum temperature is −31.4 °C during the study period in Mount Qomolangma. Overall, there has been an upward trend with decadal laps for both maximum and minimum temperature. On monthly, seasonal, and annual scales, neither maximum temperature nor minimum temperature time series exhibit an increasing trend from 1971 to 2020. The increasing trends in monthly minimum temperature are even more pronounced than those in maximum temperature. Abrupt changes are noted in both monthly, seasonal, and annual maximum and minimum temperature time series. Specifically, an abrupt change in annual maximum temperature occurred in the 1980s, while an abrupt change in annual minimum temperature occurred in the 1990s. Differences between the north and south slope of Mount Qomolangma are evident, with temperature fluctuations of the north slope being more extreme than those of south slope. The seasonal and annual maximum temperature of the north slope is higher than that of the south slope, except for winter, and the seasonal and annual minimum temperatures of the north slope are all lower than those of the south slope. The tendences of maximum and minimum temperatures in the north slope are more dominant than those in the south slope. The findings are beneficial for understanding the characteristics of local climate change on the Tibetan plateau and to underscore the significant role of Mount Qomolangma in the context of global warming.

1. Introduction

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that the global mean surface temperature increased by 0.85 °C between 1880 and 2012 [1]. Based on the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), the global mean surface temperature increased by 1 °C between 1850 and 1900 at present [2]. The year 2021 was the sixth global warmest year since 1880 [3]. The China Meteorology Administration (CMA) issued that the annual average temperature was 1.0 °C above the climatology of 1981–2010 in 2021 around China, and its warming broke the historical record since 1951 [4]. In 2022, the annual mean temperature was 10.51 °C over China, which was 0.62 °C above the climatology of 1991–2020 and was the second highest annual mean temperature in history. Despite the low temperatures in winter, the temperatures in spring, summer, and autumn broke the historical record in China [5]. Thus, global warming is a certain fact for concern, which reveals a potential hazard for human socio-economic systems and lifestyle [6].
Global warming and its impacts have become a significant subject within the field of climate change. The variation in extreme temperature, including maximum and minimum temperature, constitutes one of the important contents for climate study. Karl et al. [7] found the dependency of global warming on the difference between maximum and minimum temperature. Easterling et al. [8] and Vose et al. [9] revealed the space distribution of maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Navarro-Serrano et al. [10] assessed the maximum and minimum temperature lapse rates in the Andean region of Ecuador and Peru for the first time. Bubathi et al. [11] found the worsening situation of accelerated climate change on the maximum temperature differences in western Sydney compared with coastal Sydney. Curado et al. [12] studied the annual behavior of the maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures for all regions of Brazil. Yaya et al. [13] found that the understanding of trend changes for the annual mean, maximum, and minimum temperature was very important for predicting and mitigating the impacts of climate change in Africa. In China, studies on the maximum and minimum temperature are also highlight issues and attract widespread attention. For example, Zhai and Ren [14] revealed the spatiotemporal changes of China’s maximum and minimum temperatures. Ma [15] analyzed the asymmetric characteristics of maximum and minimum temperatures in northwest China. Du [16] analyzed the asymmetric change in maximum and minimum temperatures in the Tibetan Plateau (TP). Wang et al. [17] studied the variation and its impact of maximum and minimum temperatures in northern China. Zhou et al. [18] studied the changes of minimum temperature in different climatic zones of east China in winter. Dong and Huang [19] studied the relations between elevation and variation in maximum and minimum temperatures in China.
The TP, known as the third pole, is one of the most sensitive regions to global climate change [20,21]. The increasing of temperature over TP is the most obvious of global warming, and the study on the temperature change in TP has become one of the more attentive hotspots under the background of global warming [22,23]. Mount Qomolangma (MQ), as the most important part of TP and the highest peak on Earth, exhibits unique climatic variations distinct from other regions worldwide. For example, the increasing temperature rate in MQ is higher than that of the global mean temperature change, and the time of onset of warming in MQ is earlier than that of the other places around the word [24]. The response to temperature change in MQ from global warming has become a significant scientific interest [24,25]. Yang et al. [24] analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of the mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures in MQ region from 1971 to 2004. According to the extreme temperature indices recommended by the World Meteorological Organization, Du et al. [26] and Wang [27] studied the spatiotemporal changes of extreme temperature events in MQ during 1971–2012 and 1971–2020, respectively.
However, there is little research on the variation in maximum and minimum temperature of MQ up to now. The results of the existing literatures included some studies focused on the mean, maximum, and minimum temperature [24], while others used the extreme temperature indices method to study the extreme temperature events [26,27]. In this study, according to the new daily maximum and minimum temperature observational data during 1971–2020 in MQ, using the Mann–Kendall (MK) test, linear trend test and the departure accumulation method, the variabilities of maximum and minimum temperature are analyzed, including the general characteristics, trend test, and abrupt diagnosis for the first time, which is beneficial for the comprehending of the temperature change features in MQ under the background of global warming.

2. Data and Methodology

In this study, the two national meteorological stations, Nielamu station (hereinafter referred to as Nielamu) and Dingri station (hereinafter referred to as Dingri), are the nearest meteorological stations with long-term observations and available data around MQ. So, the observed daily maximum and minimum temperature data from the two stations from 1971 to 2020 are selected to study the variations in the maximum and minimum temperature in MQ. Nielamu, located at 28°11′ N and 85°58′ E, being in south slope of MQ, is at an elevation of 3810.0 m. It lies in the main water vapor transport path of the southwest monsoon. Dingri, located at 28°38′ N and 87°05′ E, being in north slope of MQ, is at an elevation of 4301.7 m. It sits between the Himalayas and the Gangdis Mountains [27,28,29,30]. Figure 1 shows the location of Nielamu, Dingri, and MQ.
The observed daily maximum and minimum temperature of Nielamu and Dingri is obtained by CMA, which has been checked by the primary quality control. In this research, the daily maximum and minimum temperature (hereinafter referred to as T m a x and T m i n for short) in the course of a continuous time interval of 24 h, are the highest and lowest temperatures of a day. That is to say, monthly, seasonal, and annual T m a x or T m i n indicate the monthly, seasonal, and annual daily highest or lowest temperature in the period from 1971 to 2020.
This research uses the meteorological season and year, namely, spring (March to May), summer (June to August), autumn (September to November), and winter (December through February of the following year).
The MK test is adopted to detect the time series trend, and a positive or negative value of the trend estimator ( Z ) indicates an increasing or decreasing trend for the test time series [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. When the absolute value of Z is greater than 1.96 or 2.576, the test time series can be regarded as a statistically significant trend at 95% or 99% confidence level [33,38,39]. The Sen’s slope ( β ) is used to denote the rate of trend change [31,40]. The time series abrupt change is identified by using departure accumulation [27] and the MK–Sneyers test [41].

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics

During 1971–2020, at Nielamu, the T m a x of 22.4 °C was recorded on 31 July 1983, while the T m i n of −21.7 °C occurred on 29 January 2019. At Dingri, the T m a x of 25.8 °C occurred on 25 July 2009, and the T m i n of −31.4 °C occurred on 21 December 2018.
Table 1 shows that the monthly occurrences of T m a x and T m i n were in July and January at Nielamu, while occurring in July and December at Dingri. Notably, the range (the difference between T m a x and T m i n ) of Dingri was greater than that of Nielamu every month. The biggest or smallest range was 38.2 °C or 18.5 °C in January or July at Nielamu, which was 46.0 °C or 24.0 °C in December or August at Dingri. This indicates that the monthly temperature fluctuations in Dingri were more prominent than those in Nielamu.
According to Table 1, the seasonal and annual T m a x of Dingri were higher than those of Nielamu except for in winter, while the seasonal and annual T m i n of Dingri were obviously lower than those of Nielamu. The seasonal and annual temperature fluctuations in Dingri were also more prominent than those of Nielamu based on the range values, and the biggest seasonal fluctuating amplitude took place during winter. At Dingri, the monthly T m a x appeared in summer, principally in June and July. At Nielamu, the monthly T m a x mainly occurred in summer, but it occurred once in April in 1985 and November in 2011, respectively, as well as five times in September and seven times in May. At Dingri, the monthly T m i n appeared in winter, principally in January. At Nielamu, the monthly T m i n also mainly occurred in winter, while it occurred twice in spring, namely during May in 1971 and 1990.
Table 2 and Table 3 show the decadal variation for the monthly, seasonal, and annual temperature. On the whole, there was an upward trend in monthly T m a x and T m i n into the 21st century, but there are exceptions to this. For instance, the monthly T m a x occurred in June, July, August, and October in the 1980s at Nielamu, and the monthly T m i n occurred in December in the 2010s at Dingri.
According to Table 2 and Table 3, there was increase for the seasonal T m a x into 21st century in all locations, but the summer T m a x showed a fluctuant decrease at Nielamu from the 1980s to 2010s. On the other hand, the changes in seasonal T m i n are more complex. They exhibit an increasing trend with the decadal lapse at Nielamu in spring and autumn. However, the winter T m i n occurred during 2011–2020 at both Nielamu and Dingri, with the rest showing an increase with the decadal lapse.

3.2. Trends Analysis

The trend results of the MK test for the monthly, seasonal, and annual temperatures are shown in Table 4. Neither T m a x nor T m i n has a positive trend. Although some series show nonsignificant increases, the positive Sen’s slope also exhibits an increasing change. It is consistent with that of extreme temperature events in MQ [26,27]. The increasing trends for monthly T m i n are even more marked than those of T m a x overall. Yang et al. [29] also indicated the increasing rates of temperature were larger in winter and spring than those in other seasons.
At Nielamu, the monthly T m a x in March and December has a statistically significant increasing trend at a confidence level of 95%, and the monthly T m a x in August and September have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 99% confidence level. The monthly T m i n in February, June, and September have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, and the monthly T m i n in April, July, August, and November have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 99% confidence level. The top three of the Sen’s slopes for T m a x are in March (0.057 °C per year), February (0.056 °C per year), and December (0.056 °C per year), and the top three of the Sen’s slopes for T m i n are in November (0.058 °C per year), April (0.056 °C per year), and February (0.047 °C per year).
At Dingri, the monthly T m a x in March and July have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, and the monthly T m a x in August, September, October, and December have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 99% confidence level. The monthly T m i n in September and December have a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, and the monthly T m i n in February, March, Aprile, June, July, August, and November have a statistically significant increasing trend at a confidence level of 99%. The top three of the Sen’s slopes for T m a x are in December (0.063 °C per year), January (0.044 °C per year), and March (0.042 °C per year), and the top three of the Sen’s slopes for T m i n are in March (0.056 °C per year), February (0.055 °C per year), and November (0.047 °C per year).
On the seasonal scale, T m a x and T m i n are increasing during the period of 1971–2020, but different patterns of change are found at Nielamu and Dingri (Table 4). At Nielamu, the T m a x in autumn and winter show a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, and the trends increase at the rates of 0.063 and 0.023 °C per year, respectively. There is a slight increase with the rates of 0.032 and 0.017 °C per year in spring and summer (not statistically significant at the level of 95%). T m i n has a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level in summer and autumn with the rates of 0.032 and 0.043 °C per year, while an insignificant increasing trend is detected in spring and winter by 0.034 and 0.048 °C per year, respectively. On the other side, the seasonal T m a x series at Dingri exhibit a statistically significant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, except for spring, showing a slight and insignificant increasing trend, and increasing trends with a significance at a 99% confidence level are detected in autumn and winter. At Dingri, the seasonal T m a x have increased by 0.014, 0.023, 0.038, and 0.067 °C per year, for spring, summer, autumn and winter, respectively. The seasonal T m i n series at Dingri have experienced a statistically significant increasing trend at the level of 99% in spring, summer, and autumn by 0.056, 0.039, and 0.047 °C per year. There is only a winter T m i n at Dingri showing a slight and insignificant increasing trend with the estimated rates of 0.056 °C per year. The greatest magnitude of the increase for seasonal T m a x occurred in winter at Nielamu and Dingri, while that for T m i n occurred in winter at Nielamu and in spring at Dingri. The seasonal increasing trends of Dingri seem more dominant than those of Nielamu, so it is for the increasing magnitudes, which are consistent with the existing research [24].
Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the monthly, seasonal, and annual variations with time for T m a x and T m i n . The annual T m a x and T m i n time series are the same as those of summer and winter at Dingri; however, the annual T m a x and T m i n time series show slightly different variations from the summer and winter at Nielamu. A visual analysis can also evidence the increasing trends for the T m a x and T m i n series based on the linear trend (see the dash line in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

3.3. Abrupt Diagnosis

The abrupt diagnosis results using an MK test for T m a x and T m i n are shown in Table 5. The abrupt changes of monthly T m a x and T m i n mainly take place during 1980s–2020s, and the abrupt points occur 2 times in 1970s, 16 times in 1980s, 16 times in 1990s, 13 times in 2000s and 3 times in 2010s, respectively. On the seasonal scale, abrupt changes of T m a x and T m i n mainly take place in 1980s and 1990s, with only one change each in 1970s, 2000s, and 2010s for the T m a x . The annual T m a x abrupt changes take place in 1980s, while the annual abrupt change for the T m i n take place in 1990s. Du et al. [26] also found that the maximum value of the daily maximum temperature had an abrupt change in 1980.
The cumulative departure curves of the T m a x and T m i n time series are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, which also evidences the abrupt points for the temperature time series.

4. Discussions and Conclusions

Based on the observational daily temperature data from Nielamu and Dingri, this study conducts a general characteristic analysis, trend test, and abrupt diagnosis for the T m a x and T m i n in MQ during the last five decades. The results would be beneficial to understand the variations in extreme temperature in MQ.
The maximum T m a x was 25.8 °C and the minimum T m i n was −31.4 °C in MQ, which all occurred in Dingri. The maximum T m a x appeared in summer, and the minimum T m i n appeared in winter. The maximum T m a x or minimum T m i n occurred in August or January at Nielamu, while occurring in July or December at Dingri. The decadal variations for T m a x and T m i n had upward trend on the whole, but the winter minimum T m i n occurred during 2011–2020 at both Nielamu and Dingri.
On monthly, seasonal, and annual scales, neither T m a x nor T m i n time series exhibits a discernible increasing trend. Although some series show a slight and insignificant increasing trend at a 95% confidence level, the positive Sen’s slopes also exhibit an increasing change during the study period. The increasing trends for monthly T m i n are even more marked than those of T m a x overall. On the seasonal scale, the greatest increasing magnitude for T m a x occurred in winter at Nielamu and Dingri, while that for T m i n occurred in winter at Nielamu and in spring at Dingri. The seasonal increasing trends at Dingri seem more dominant than those at Nielamu, so it is for the increasing magnitudes.
The monthly T m a x and T m i n abrupt change mainly took place during 1980s–2020s. The seasonal T m a x or T m i n abrupt change mainly took place in 1980s or 1990s, and only the T m a x in winter at Nielamu and in autumn at Dingri had an abrupt change that took place in 2000s and 2010s, respectively. The annual T m a x abrupt change took place in 1980s, while the annual T m i n abrupt change took place in 1990s.
This study found the differences between the north slope (Dingri) and the south slope (Nielamu) of MQ. For example, the fluctuations in the T m a x and T m i n in the north slope are more extreme than those of the south slope. On the seasonal and annual scale, the T m a x in the north slope were higher than those in the south slope, except for in winter. The seasonal and annual T m i n in the north slope were all lower than those in the south slope. The tendence of T m a x and T m i n in the north slope was more dominant than those in the south slope.
The differences in T m a x and T m i n between the south and north slope of MQ are found in this research, which is consistent with those of existing results. Yang et al. [24] found the increasing trend for temperature at Dingri is most significant in MQ. Yang et al. [29] indicates the temperature increasing rate at Dingri is larger than that at Nielamu. Qi et al. [42] points out the increasing annual mean temperature is mainly due to the increasing maximum temperature in MQ, while the annual mean temperature increase in the north slope of MQ is mainly owing to the minimum temperature rise [42]. On the other hand, studies show the Himalayas barrier is the major contributor to the climate difference between the north and south slope of MQ [43,44]. Because of the Himalayas barrier, the Mongolia–Siberia cold air cannot access the south slope, and the warm moisture influence from the Indian Ocean is waned in north slope. So, the south slope temperature is higher than that of north slope [27]. It further demonstrates that climate change shows obvious regional or local difference, which is not neglectable in practice research.
This research shows the spatiotemporal variations in the T m a x and T m i n trend and abrupt change in MQ on the basis of observation data. However, only two stations with long-term observations are used. Further analysis is needed to determine whether we can comprehensively reveal the characteristics of T m a x and T m i n over MQ. It is also necessary that the conclusion in this study be verified by using other methods and data. At the same time, the results in this study need further research to reveal the influencing mechanism.

Funding

This research was funded by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (2019QZKK0105).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the author. The data are not publicly available due to the sensitive nature of the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou, T.J.; Zhang, W.X.; Zhang, L.X.; Clark, R.; Qian, C.; Zhang, Q.H.; Qiu, H.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, X. 2021: A year of unprecedented climate extremes in eastern Asia, north America, and Europe. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2022, 39, 1598–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. CMA. 2021 China Climate Bulletin. Available online: https://www.cma.gov.cn/zfxxgk/gknr/qxbg/202203/t20220308_4568477.html (accessed on 8 March 2022). (In Chinese)
  5. CMA. 2022 China Climate Bulletin. Available online: https://www.cma.gov.cn/zfxxgk/gknr/qxbg/202303/t20230324_5396394.html (accessed on 24 March 2023). (In Chinese)
  6. Kocsis, T.; Kovács-Székely, I.; Anda, A. Homogeneity tests and non-parametric analyses of tendencies in precipitation time series in Keszthely, western Hungary. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2020, 139, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karl, T.R.; Kukla, G.; Razuvayev, V.N.; Changery, M.J.; Quayle, R.G.; Heim, R.R., Jr.; Easterling, D.R.; Fu, C.B. Global warming: Evidence for asymmetric diurnal temperature change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1991, 18, 2253–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Easterling, D.R.; Horton, B.; Jones, P.D.; Peterson, T.C.; Karl, T.R.; Parker, D.E.; James Salinger, M.; Razuvayev, V.; Plummer, N.; Jamason, P.; et al. Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe. Science 1997, 277, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vose, R.S.; Easterling, D.R.; Gleason, B. Maximum and minimum temperature trends for the globe: An update through 2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, L23822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Navarro-Serrano, F.; López-Moreno, J.I.; Domínguez-Castro, F.; Alonso-González, E.; Azorin-Molina, C.; El-Kenawy, A.; Vicente-Serrano, S.M. Maximum and minimum air temperature lapse rates in the Andean region of Ecuador and Peru. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 40, 6150–6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bubathi, V.; Leslie, L.; Speer, M.; Hartigan, J.; Wang, J.; Gupta, A. Impact of Accelerated Climate Change on Maximum Temperature Differences between Western and Coastal Sydney. Climate 2023, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Curado, L.F.A.; de Paulo, S.R.; de Paulo, I.J.C.; de Oliveira Maionchi, D.; da Silva, H.J.A.; de Oliveira Costa, R.; da Silva, I.M.C.B.; Marques, J.B.; de Souza Lima, A.M.; Rodrigues, T.R. Trends and patterns of daily maximum, minimum and mean temperature in Brazil from 2000 to 2020. Climate 2023, 11, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yaya, O.S.; Adesina, O.A.; Olayinka, H.A.; Ogunsola, O.E.; Gil-Alana, L.A. Long memory cointegration in the analysis of maximum, minimum and range temperatures in Africa: Implications for climate change. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhai, P.M.; Ren, F.M. On changes of China’s maximum and minimum temperature in the recent 40 years. Acta Meteor. Sin. 1997, 55, 418–429. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma, X.B. The asymmetric change of maximum and minimum temperature in the northwest China. Acta Meteor. Sin. 1999, 57, 613–621. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Du, J. Asymmetric change of maximum and minimum temperature in Tibetan plateau. J. Appl. Meteor. Sci. 2003, 14, 437–444. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, L.; Xie, X.Q.; Su, W.; Guo, X.B. Changes of maximum and minimum temperature and their impacts in northern China over the second half of the 20th century. J. Nat. Resour. 2004, 19, 337–343. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, W.D.; Sun, G.W.; Dong, G.T.; Liang, P. Changes of minimum temperature in different climatic zones of east China and its relation with atmospheric circulation in winter of recent 60 years. Plateau Meteor. 2010, 29, 680–687. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Dong, D.H.; Huang, G. Relationship between altitude and variation characteristics of the maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and diurnal temperature range in China. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci. 2015, 39, 1011–1024. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, D.; Yao, T. Uplifting of Tibetan plateau with its environmental effects. Adv. Earth Sci. 2006, 21, 451–458. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, S.; Wang, G.X.; Hu, Z.Y.; Huang, K.W.; Sun, X.Y.; Sun, J.Y.; Luo, M.; Xiao, X. Dynamics of evapotranspiration and variations in different land-cover regions over the Tibetan plateau during 1961–2014. J. Hydrometeorol. 2021, 22, 955–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, Y.M.; Hu, Z.Y.; Tian, L.D.; Zhang, F.; Duan, A.M.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yang, Y.P. Study progresses of the Tibet plateau climate system change and mechanism of its impact on East Asia. Adv. Earth Sci. 2014, 29, 207–215. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Yao, T.D. TPE international program: A program for coping with major future environmental challenges of the third Pole region. Prog. Geogr. 2014, 33, 884–892. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, X.C.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhang, W.; Yan, Y.P.; Wang, Z.F.; Ding, M.J.; Chu, D. Climate Change in Mt. Qomolangma Region in China during the Last 34 Years. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2006, 61, 687–696. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, M.S.; Dai, Y.X.; Ma, Y.M.; Zhong, L.; Lv, S.H. Analysis on structure of atmospheric boundary layer and energy exchange of surface layer over Mount Qomolangma region. Plateau Meteor. 2006, 25, 807–813. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, J.; Lu, H.Y.; Yuan, L.; Jian, J. Spatio-temporal change of extreme temperature events in Mt. Qomolangma region of Tibet from 1971 to 2012. Arid Zone Res. 2016, 33, 20–27. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, S.J. Variations of extreme temperature in the Mount Qomolangma region in China during 1971–2020. J. Mt. Sci. 2023, 20, 3488–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Ding, M.J.; Yang, X.C.; Lin, X.D.; Liu, L.S. Vegetation change in the Mt. Qomolangma Nature Reserve from 1981 to 2001. J. Geogr. Sci. 2007, 17, 152–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.H.; Zhuo, G.; Luo, B.; Wang, W. Characteristics of weather and climate change around Mt. Qomolangma. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2012, 34, 336–347. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, F.; Peng, P.H. Spatial-temporal dynamics of alpine grassland coverage and its response to climate warming in Mt. Qomolangma Nature Preserve during 2000–2019. J. Mt. Sci. 2022, 19, 2297–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sen, P.K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1968, 63, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hirsch, R.M.; Slack, J.R.; Smith, R.A. Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gan, T.Y. Hydroclimatic trends and possible climatic warming in the Canadian prairies. Water Resour. Res. 1998, 34, 3009–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.J.; Zhang, X.L. Long-term trends analysis for temperature in the Jinsha river basin in China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2012, 109, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, S.J.; Zhang, X.L.; Liu, Z.G.; Wang, D.M. Trend analysis of precipitation in the Jinsha river basin in China. J. Hydrometeorol. 2013, 14, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, S.J. Spatiotemporal variability of temperature trends on the southeast Tibetan plateau, China. Int. J. Climatol. 2018, 38, 1953–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.L.; Wang, S.J. Long-term trend of precipitation days for southeast Tibetan plateau, China. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2020, 76, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, G.B.; Charles, S.P.; Yu, J.J.; Liu, C.M. Decadal climatic variability, trends and future scenarios for the north China plain. J. Clim. 2009, 22, 2111–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, C.J.; Fan, K.X.; Xiao, T.G. Runoff characteristics and variation tendency of Jinsha river basin. Yangtze River 2010, 41, 10–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Helsel, D.R.; Hirsch, R.M. Statistical Methods in Water Resources; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sneyers, R. Sur L’Analyse Estatistique des Series D’Observations, WMO Note Technique, No. 143; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1975. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  42. Qi, W.; Zhang, Y.L.; Gao, J.G.; Yang, X.H.; Liu, L.S.; Narendra, R.K. Climate change on southern slope of Mt. Qomolangma region in Nepal from 1971 to 2009. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2013, 68, 82–94. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Ye, D.Z. Meteorology of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tao, S.Y.; Ding, Y.H. Observational evidence of the influence of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau on the occurrence of heavy rain and severe convective storms in China. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1981, 62, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Nielamu station, Dingri station, and Mount Qomolangma.
Figure 1. Location of Nielamu station, Dingri station, and Mount Qomolangma.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g001
Figure 2. Time series of monthly T m a x and dash line indicates linear trend.
Figure 2. Time series of monthly T m a x and dash line indicates linear trend.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g002
Figure 3. Time series of monthly T m i n and dash line indicates linear trend.
Figure 3. Time series of monthly T m i n and dash line indicates linear trend.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g003
Figure 4. Time series of seasonal and annual T m a x (left) and T m i n (right) and Dash line indicates linear trend.
Figure 4. Time series of seasonal and annual T m a x (left) and T m i n (right) and Dash line indicates linear trend.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g004
Figure 5. Cumulative departure curve for monthly Tmax.
Figure 5. Cumulative departure curve for monthly Tmax.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g005aAtmosphere 15 00358 g005b
Figure 6. Cumulative departure curve for monthly Tmin.
Figure 6. Cumulative departure curve for monthly Tmin.
Atmosphere 15 00358 g006aAtmosphere 15 00358 g006b
Figure 7. Cumulative departure curve for seasonal and annual Tmax (left) and Tmin (right).
Figure 7. Cumulative departure curve for seasonal and annual Tmax (left) and Tmin (right).
Atmosphere 15 00358 g007aAtmosphere 15 00358 g007b
Table 1. Statistics of monthly, seasonal and annual temperature (°C).
Table 1. Statistics of monthly, seasonal and annual temperature (°C).
StationJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberSpringSummerAutumnWinterAnnual
TmaxNielamu16.517.717.619.220.621.622.421.719.218.418.618.120.622.419.218.122.4
Dingri14.715.318.720.823.825.125.823.422.920.217.314.623.825.822.915.325.8
TminNielamu−21.7−17.8−16.8−12.0−5.5−1.33.92.8−2.3−8.9−14.8−19.0−16.8−1.3−2.3−21.7−21.7
Dingri−27.7−25.3−19.0−14.3−8.4−4.00.7−0.6−4.4−12.3−19.0−31.4−19.0−4.0−19.0−31.4−31.4
RangeNielamu38.235.534.431.226.122.918.518.921.527.333.437.137.423.721.539.844.1
Dingri42.440.637.735.132.229.125.124.027.332.536.346.042.829.841.946.757.2
Table 2. Decadal variation for monthly, seasonal, and annual T m a x (°C).
Table 2. Decadal variation for monthly, seasonal, and annual T m a x (°C).
1971–19801981–19901991–20002001–20102011–2020
NielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingri
January11.711.316.313.512.214.015.714.716.514.7
February11.313.916.414.617.715.015.714.014.415.3
March13.414.715.216.714.317.417.618.715.916.9
April16.418.717.817.918.020.817.118.619.218.5
May18.822.019.922.120.623.519.423.820.023.0
June19.924.021.624.617.524.920.325.120.824.8
July19.924.522.424.822.124.119.225.818.325.2
August18.121.521.723.419.222.520.322.720.423.3
September15.920.618.921.618.120.519.222.817.822.9
October16.219.118.418.415.818.015.919.318.120.2
November15.315.815.017.214.414.316.115.218.617.3
December16.512.415.111.913.713.415.913.018.114.6
Spring18.822.019.922.120.623.519.423.820.023.0
Summer19.924.522.424.822.124.920.325.820.825.2
Autumn16.220.618.921.618.120.519.222.818.622.9
Winter16.513.916.414.617.715.015.914.718.115.3
Annual19.924.522.424.822.124.920.325.820.825.2
Table 3. Decadal variation for monthly, seasonal, and annual T m i n (°C).
Table 3. Decadal variation for monthly, seasonal, and annual T m i n (°C).
1971–19801981–19901991–20002001–20102011–2020
NielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingri
January−20.6−24.4−19.1−27.7−19.1−24.1−17.1−24.5−21.7−23.1
February−17.3−24.8−17.0−25.3−17.8−23.5−17.1−20.8−14.4−22.9
March−16.8−18.8−14.3−18.2−11.9−19.0−10.9−16.7−13.4−18.5
April−9.7−14.3−9.5−13.3−12.0−14.0−9.2−12.2−7.8−11.6
May−4.7−8.4−5.3−8.3−5.3−8.0−4.0−8.0−5.5−8.2
June−0.8−3.0−0.5−2.8−1.3−4.00.5−0.41.5−0.4
July4.50.74.41.43.92.85.33.25.13.4
August2.8−0.63.00.44.30.25.20.34.43.0
September−2.3−4.4−2.2−4.1−0.4−2.50.5−2.90.1−2.7
October−8.9−11.9−8.3−11.9−8.6−12.3−6.8−11.6−8.3−11.5
November−14.8−17.4−11.6−19.0−10.5−17.1−9.3−16.4−9.5−15.7
December−19.0−22.5−18.2−27.5−14.1−26.5−11.6−20.5−13.7−31.4
Spring−16.8−18.8−14.3−18.2−12.0−19.0−10.9−16.7−13.4−18.5
Summer−0.8−3.0−0.5−2.8−1.3−4.00.5−0.41.5−0.4
Autumn−2.3−17.4−2.2−19.0−0.4−17.10.5−16.40.1−15.7
Winter−20.6−24.8−19.1−27.7−19.1−26.5−17.1−24.5−21.7−31.4
Annual−20.6−24.8−19.1−27.7−19.1−26.5−17.1−24.5−21.7−31.4
Table 4. MK trend test results for monthly, seasonal, and annual temperature.
Table 4. MK trend test results for monthly, seasonal, and annual temperature.
TmaxTmin
Zβ (°C/Year)Zβ (°C/Year)
NielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingriNielamuDingri
January1.631.910.0500.0440.451.720.0090.024
February1.921.030.0560.0202.01 *2.63 **0.0470.055
March2.51 *2.09 *0.0570.0421.473.40 **0.0330.056
April0.120.810.0000.0122.58 **3.06 **0.0560.045
May0.680.670.0160.0140.050.650.0000.011
June0.451.730.0050.0162.20 *2.79 **0.0310.040
July0.462.38 *0.0050.0304.74 **4.02 **0.0380.044
August2.70 **2.64 **0.0290.0293.43 **2.63 **0.0410.045
September3.10 **3.12 **0.0300.0382.51 *2.00 *0.0430.025
October0.233.15 **0.0030.0391.561.060.0210.013
November1.551.610.0330.0343.01 **3.11 **0.0580.047
December2.33 *2.90 **0.0560.0631.092.10 *0.0210.035
Spring1.770.670.0320.0141.73.40 **0.0340.056
Summer1.172.36 *0.0170.0232.24 *3.18 **0.0320.039
Autumn2.50 *3.12 **0.0230.0382.51 *3.11 **0.0430.047
Winter2.30 *3.06 **0.0630.0671.791.750.0480.024
Annual1.442.36 *0.0220.0252.54 *1.750.0650.024
Notes: * 95% confidence level, ** 99% confidence level.
Table 5. MK abrupt year of temperature.
Table 5. MK abrupt year of temperature.
StationJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberSpringSummerAutumnWinterAnnual
TmaxNielamu19982013200420161982198119821982197819982004199919861980197920021980
Dingri19881997198219881987198920001982201320012000199819871982201319921982
TminNielamu19802001198020031987198819861977199019941996199519811986199019971997
Dingri20001988199920032000199319942002199719931997199819991997199719981998
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S. Variations in Maximum and Minimum Temperature in Mount Qomolangma during 1971–2020. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030358

AMA Style

Wang S. Variations in Maximum and Minimum Temperature in Mount Qomolangma during 1971–2020. Atmosphere. 2024; 15(3):358. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shunjiu. 2024. "Variations in Maximum and Minimum Temperature in Mount Qomolangma during 1971–2020" Atmosphere 15, no. 3: 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15030358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop