Next Article in Journal
The Potential Role of Osteopontin and Furin in Worsening Disease Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Diabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
Gel-Free 3D Tumoroids with Stem Cell Properties Modeling Drug Resistance to Cisplatin and Imatinib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Cytokinin and Ethylene Cell Signaling Pathways from Prokaryotes to Eukaryotes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Choice of Differentiation Media Significantly Impacts Cell Lineage and Response to CFTR Modulators in Fully Differentiated Primary Cultures of Cystic Fibrosis Human Airway Epithelial Cells
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Ex Vivo Culture Models to Indicate Therapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cells 2020, 9(11), 2527; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112527
by Imke Demers 1, Johan Donkers 2, Bernd Kremer 2 and Ernst Jan Speel 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cells 2020, 9(11), 2527; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112527
Submission received: 23 October 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 20 November 2020 / Published: 23 November 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have made some suggestions in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This review article provides an in-depth and critical analysis of the available literature about the response to therapy prediction power of ex-vivo HNSCC culture. It is clearly organized, very well written and very significant to the field. Besides minor typos, I suggest the manuscript to be accepted for publication, and warmly congratulate the author for the quality of their work.

Author Response

We would like to thank this reviewer for the effort of reviewing this manuscript carefully and for the kind words.

Reviewer 3 Report

I have no edits to suggest.

The review is well-written, organized, and covers a timely topic very comprehensively. I think that the terminology was accurate, although perhaps not quite so accurate in the literature out there.

The authors are to be congratulated for such a thorough review.

Author Response

We would like to thank this reviewer for the effort of reviewing this manuscript carefully and for the kind words.

Back to TopTop