Recent Advances in Polymer-Based Biosensors for Food Safety Detection
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Polymer-Based Biosensors for Detection of Heavy Metals
3. Polymer-Based Biosensors for Detection of Pesticide Residues
4. Polymer-Based Biosensors for Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria
5. Polymer-Based Biosensors for Detection of Allergens
6. Polymer-Based Biosensors for Detection of Antibiotics
7. Conclusions and Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mali, H.; Shah, C.; Patel, D.H.; Trivedi, U.; Subramanian, R.B. Bio-Catalytic System of Metallohydrolases for Remediation of Neurotoxin Organophosphates and Applications with a Future Vision. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2022, 231, 111771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renz, H.; Allen, K.J.; Sicherer, S.H.; Sampson, H.A.; Lack, G.; Beyer, K.; Oettgen, H.C. Food Allergy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 17098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kulawik, P.; Rathod, N.B.; Ozogul, Y.; Ozogul, F.; Zhang, W. Recent Developments in the Use of Cold Plasma, High Hydrostatic Pressure, and Pulsed Electric Fields on Microorganisms and Viruses in Seafood. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dawar, K.; Asif, M.; Irfan, M.; Mian, I.A.; Khan, B.; Gul, N.; Fahad, S.; Jalal, A.; Danish, S.; Syed, A.; et al. Evaluating the Efficacy of Activated Carbon in Minimizing the Risk of Heavy Metals Contamination in Spinach for Safe Consumption. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 24323–24331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pan, M.; Yin, Z.; Liu, K.; Du, X.; Liu, H.; Wang, S. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Sensors for Food Safety. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Viswanathan, S.; Radecka, H.; Radecki, J. Electrochemical Biosensors for Food Analysis. Monatsh. Chem. 2009, 140, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Khan, I.M.; Wang, Z. Research Progress of Optical Aptasensors Based on Aunps in Food Safety. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 2136–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, X.; Neethirajan, S. Ensuring Food Safety: Quality Monitoring Using Microfluidics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 65, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, S.; Sutham, P.; Wu, K.; Mallikarjunan, K.; Wang, J.P. Giant Magnetoresistance Biosensors for Food Safety Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulkarni, M.B.; Ayachit, N.H.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Biosensors and Microfluidic Biosensors: From Fabrication to Application. Biosensors 2022, 12, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vigneshvar, S.; Sudhakumari, C.C.; Senthilkumaran, B.; Prakash, H. Recent Advances in Biosensor Technology for Potential Applications–An Overview. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoo, H.; Jo, H.; Oh, S.S. Detection and Beyond: Challenges and Advances in Aptamer-Based Biosensors. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 2663–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrera-Dominguez, M.; Morales-Luna, G.; Mahlknecht, J.; Cheng, Q.; Aguilar-Hernandez, I.; Ornelas-Soto, N. Optical Biosensors and Their Applications for the Detection of Water Pollutants. Biosensors 2023, 13, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barhoum, A.; Hamimed, S.; Slimi, H.; Othmani, A.; Abdel-Haleem, F.M.; Bechelany, M. Modern Designs of Electrochemical Sensor Platforms for Environmental Analyses: Principles, Nanofabrication Opportunities, and Challenges. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2023, 38, e00199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramesh, M.; Janani, R.; Deepa, C.; Rajeshkumar, L. Nanotechnology-Enabled Biosensors: A Review of Fundamentals, Design Principles, Materials, and Applications. Biosensors 2022, 13, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, N.; Qin, C.; Li, Y.; Tan, T.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y.; Yao, B.; Rao, Y. Graphene-Fiber Biochemical Sensors: Principles, Implementations, and Advances. Photonic Sens. 2021, 11, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frutiger, A.; Blickenstorfer, Y.; Bischof, S.; Forró, C.; Lauer, M.; Gatterdam, V.; Fattinger, C.; Vörös, J. Principles for Sensitive and Robust Biomolecular Interaction Analysis: The Limits of Detection and Resolution of Diffraction-Limited Focal Molography. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 014056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, L.; Pagett, M.; Zhang, W. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer (Mip) Based Electrochemical Sensors and Their Recent Advances in Health Applications. Sens. Actuators Rep. 2023, 5, 100153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Z.; Dou, X.; Wu, G.; Wang, C.; Xie, J. Nanoscale Semiconducting Polymer Dots with Rhodamine Spirolactam as Fluorescent Sensor for Mercury Ions in Living Systems. Talanta 2023, 259, 124494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, V.V.; Lee, K.; Nguyen, T.N.; Lee, D. Recent Advances and Progress of Conducting Polymer-Based Hydrogels in Strain Sensor Applications. Gels 2022, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, F.; Jin, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Huang, Y. Wearable Pressure Sensor Using Porous Natural Polymer Hydrogel Elastomers with High Sensitivity over a Wide Sensing Range. Polymers 2023, 15, 2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarker, A.; Kim, J.E.; Islam, A.; Bilal, M.; Rakib, M.R.J.; Nandi, R.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, T. Heavy Metals Contamination and Associated Health Risks in Food Webs-a Review Focuses on Food Safety and Environmental Sustainability in Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 3230–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.; Dissanayake, K.; Asokan, S.; Sun, T.; Rahman, B.M.A.; Grattan, K.T.V. Lead (Pb2+) Ion Sensor Development Using Optical Fiber Gratings and Nanocomposite Materials. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 364, 131818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshmukh, M.A.; Bodkhe, G.A.; Shirsat, S.; Ramanavicius, A.; Shirsat, M.D. Nanocomposite Platform Based on Edta Modified Ppy/Swnts for the Sensing of Pb(Ii) Ions by Electrochemical Method. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sadani, K.; Nag, P.; Mukherji, S. Lspr Based Optical Fiber Sensor with Chitosan Capped Gold Nanoparticles on Bsa for Trace Detection of Hg (Ii) in Water, Soil and Food Samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 134, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Kang, M.; Fang, S.; Wang, M.; He, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z. Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Three-Dimensional Reduced Graphene Oxide and Polyaniline Nanocomposite for Selective Detection of Mercury Ions. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 214, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raril, C.; Manjunatha, J.G. Fabrication of Novel Polymer-Modified Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for the Determination of Mercury and Lead Ions in Water and Biological Samples. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, L.S.; Wong, C.S. A New Method for Heavy Metals and Aluminium Detection Using Biopolymer-Based Optical Biosensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alizadeh, T.; Rafiei, F.; Hamidi, N.; Ganjali, M.R. A New Electrochemical Sensing Platform for Cr(Iii) Determination Based on Nano-Structured Cr(Iii)-Imprinted Polymer-Modified Carbon Composite Electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 247, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Yu, G.; Wei, X.; Zhan, C.; Jeon, J.-W.; Wang, X.; Jeffryes, C.; Guo, Z.; Wei, S.; Wujcik, E.K. Fabric/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Sensor for Portable on-Site Copper Detection in Water. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2019, 2, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarlak, Z.; Rouhi, M.; Mirza Alizadeh, A.; Sadeghi, E.; Hosseini, H.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Pb Exposure from Plant Foods in Iran: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2021, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.H.; Kabir, E.; Jahan, S.A. A Review on the Distribution of Hg in the Environment and Its Human Health Impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 306, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewer, G.J. Copper Toxicity in Alzheimer’s Disease: Cognitive Loss from Ingestion of Inorganic Copper. J. Trace. Elem. Med. Biol. 2012, 26, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, R.R. Adverse Hematological Effects of Hexavalent Chromium: An Overview. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2016, 9, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Natasha, N.; Shahid, M.; Bibi, I.; Iqbal, J.; Khalid, S.; Murtaza, B.; Bakhat, H.F.; Farooq, A.B.U.; Amjad, M.; Hammad, H.M.; et al. Zinc in Soil-Plant-Human System: A Data-Analysis Review. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 808, 152024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mali, H.; Shah, C.; Raghunandan, B.H.; Prajapati, A.S.; Patel, D.H.; Trivedi, U.; Subramanian, R.B. Organophosphate Pesticides an Emerging Environmental Contaminant: Pollution, Toxicity, Bioremediation Progress, and Remaining Challenges. J. Environ. Sci 2023, 127, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garcia-Vara, M.; Postigo, C.; Palma, P.; Lopez de Alda, M. Development of Quechers-Based Multiresidue Analytical Methods to Determine Pesticides in Corn, Grapes and Alfalfa. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Shi, H.; Sun, J.; Xu, J.; Yang, M.; Yu, J. Hollow-Channel Paper Analytical Devices Supported Biofuel Cell-Based Self-Powered Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor for Pesticide Detection. Biosensors 2022, 12, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sok, V.; Fragoso, A. Carbon Nano-Onion Peroxidase Composite Biosensor for Electrochemical Detection of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, H.; Soylemez, S. An Electrochemical Acetylcholinesterase Biosensor Based on Fluorene (Bisthiophene) Comprising Polymer for Paraoxon Detection. Electroanalysis 2022, 35, 2200271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshmi, G.B.V.S.; Poddar, M.; Dhiman, T.K.; Singh, A.K.; Solanki, P.R. Gold-Ceria Nanocomposite Based Highly Sensitive and Selective Aptasensing Platform for the Detection of the Chlorpyrifos in Solanum Tuberosum. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 653, 129819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, L. Highly Stable Acetylcholinesterase Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Polymerized Ionic Liquids Microgel for Pesticides Detection. Mikrochim. Acta 2022, 189, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Da Silva, W.; Ghica, M.E.; Brett, C.M.A. Choline Oxidase Inhibition Biosensor Based on Poly(Brilliant Cresyl Blue)–Deep Eutectic Solvent/Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrode for Dichlorvos Organophosphorus Pesticide. Sens. Actuators B 2019, 298, 126862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Lü, H.; Zhang, D.; Xu, K.; Hui, N.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Biosensors Based on Conducting Polymer Composite and Pamam Dendrimer for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Acetamiprid in Vegetables. Microchem. J. 2023, 185, 108284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Lang, X.; Hui, N.; Wang, J. Dual-Mode Electrochemical Biosensors Based on Chondroitin Sulfate Functionalized Polypyrrole Nanowires for Ultrafast and Ultratrace Detection of Acetamiprid Pesticide. Microchem. J. 2022, 179, 107530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, S.; Nath, A.; Singh, L.R.; Gogoi, M.; Pradhan, B.; Mahato, M. Sensing of Alphacypermethrin Pesticide Using Modified Electrode of Chitosan-Silver Nanowire Nanocomposite Langmuir Blodgett Film. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehtab, S.; Zaidi, M.G.H.; Bhatt, P.; Joshi, P.; Agarwal, T. Isoproturon (Ipu) Electrochemical Sensing Based on a Polymethylmethacrylate Ferrite (Pmma/M(Fexoy)) Nanocomposite Modified Electrode. Port. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 40, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanjani, H.R.A.; Zarei, K. Fabrication of DNA/Poly L-Methionine-Silver Nanoparticles/Pencil Graphite Electrode and Its Application to the Determination of Carboxin. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2021, 18, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasa, M.; Deniz, A.; Forough, M.; Yildirim, E.; Persil Cetinkol, O.; Udum, Y.A.; Toppare, L. Construction of Amperometric Biosensor Modified with Conducting Polymer/Carbon Dots for the Analysis of Catechol. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 3336–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erkmen, C.; Kurbanoglu, S.; Uslu, B. Fabrication of Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene)-Iridium Oxide Nanocomposite Based Tyrosinase Biosensor for the Dual Detection of Catechol and Azinphos Methyl. Sens. Actuators B 2020, 316, 128121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Jiang, P.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Guo, T. Molecularly Imprinted Self-Buffering Double Network Hydrogel Containing Bi-Amidoxime Functional Groups for the Rapid Hydrolysis of Organophosphates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 444, 130332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bronner, C.; Wenger, O.S. Long-Range Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Phenol-Ru(2,2’-Bipyrazine)3(2+) Dyads. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 3617–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Medendorp, J.; Yedluri, J.; Hammell, D.C.; Ji, T.; Lodder, R.A.; Stinchcomb, A.L. Near-Infrared Spectrometry for the Quantification of Dermal Absorption of Econazole Nitrate and 4-Cyanophenol. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panigrahy, N.; Priyadarshini, A.; Sahoo, M.M.; Verma, A.K.; Daverey, A.; Sahoo, N.K. A Comprehensive Review on Eco-Toxicity and Biodegradation of Phenolics: Recent Progress and Future Outlook. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 27, 102423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Li, X.; Fan, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, K.; Wen, H.; Ren, J. Recent Advances of Fluorescent Sensors for Bacteria Detection—A Review. Talanta 2023, 254, 124133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.; Shi, S.; Sun, H.; Dan, J.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Su, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W. Magnetic Nanoseparation Technology for Efficient Control of Microorganisms and Toxins in Foods: A Review. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2022, 70, 16050–16068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikhzadeh, E.; Chamsaz, M.; Turner, A.P.F.; Jager, E.W.H.; Beni, V. Label-Free Impedimetric Biosensor for Salmonella Typhimurium Detection Based on Poly [Pyrrole-Co-3-Carboxyl-Pyrrole] Copolymer Supported Aptamer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 80, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ding, S.; Hu, H.; Yue, X.; Feng, K.; Gao, X.; Dong, Q.; Yang, M.; Tamer, U.; Huang, G.; Zhang, J. A Fluorescent Biosensor Based on Quantum Dot-Labeled Streptavidin and Poly-L-Lysine for the Rapid Detection of Salmonella in Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 2895–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Tang, F.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Liu, C. Rapid Screening and Quantitative Detection of Salmonella Using a Quantum Dot Nanobead-Based Biosensor. Analyst 2020, 145, 2184–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F.; Wang, B.; Yan, L.; Wang, B.; Niu, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, W. In-Situ Growth of Nitrogen-Doped Carbonized Polymer Dots on Black Phosphorus for Electrochemical DNA Biosensor of Escherichia Coli O157: H7. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 148, 108226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Jian, X.; Zhao, J.; Song, Y.Y. Development of a Pulse-Induced Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Gluconamide for Gram-Negative Bacteria Detection. Mikrochim. Acta 2021, 188, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jo, H.J.; Robby, A.I.; Kim, S.G.; Lee, G.; Lee, B.C.; Park, S.Y. Reusable Biosensor-Based Polymer Dot-Coated Electrode Surface for Wireless Detection of Bacterial Contamination. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 346, 130503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatema, K.N.; Biswas, M.R.U.D.; Bang, S.H.; Cho, K.Y.; Oh, W.-C. Electroanalytical Characteristic of a Novel Biosensor Designed with Graphene–Polymer-Based Quaternary and Mesoporous Nanomaterials. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2020, 43, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Gao, R.; Chen, Q.; Jia, L. Dual-Aptamers Labeled Polydopamine-Polyethyleneimine Copolymer Dots Assisted Engineering a Fluorescence Biosensor for Sensitive Detection of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Food Samples. Spectrochim. Acta A 2020, 224, 117417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarabaegi, M.; Roushani, M. Rapid and Sensitive Determination of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa by Using a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Gold Nanoparticles and Aptamer-Imprinted Polydopamine. Microchem. J. 2021, 168, 106388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jubair, H.H.; Al-Buhamrah, N.A.R.; Al-Fatlawi, S.G. Molecular Characterization of Quinolones Resistant Salmonella Typhi Isolates from Patients Infected with Typhoid Fever in Al-Najaf Province, Iraq. J. Popul. Ther. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023, 30, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Kislichkina, A.A.; Kartsev, N.N.; Skryabin, Y.P.; Sizova, A.A.; Kanashenko, M.E.; Teymurazov, M.G.; Kuzina, E.S.; Bogun, A.G.; Fursova, N.K.; Svetoch, E.A.; et al. Genomic Analysis of a Hybrid Enteroaggregative Hemorrhagic Escherichia Coli O181:H4 Strain Causing Colitis with Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.K.; Kazmierczak, B.I. Inflammation: A Double-Edged Sword in the Response to Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection. J. Innate. Immun. 2017, 9, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalita, J.J.; Sharma, P.; Bora, U. Recent Developments in Application of Nucleic Acid Aptamer in Food Safety. Food Control 2023, 145, 109406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahim, M.H.A.; Hazrin-Chong, N.H.; Harith, H.H.; Wan-Mohtar, W.A.A.Q.I.; Sukor, R. Roles of Fermented Plant-, Dairy- and Meat-Based Foods in the Modulation of Allergic Responses. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamad, A.; Rizwan, M.; Keasberry, N.A.; Nguyen, A.S.; Lam, T.D.; Ahmed, M.U. Gold-Microrods/Pd-Nanoparticles/Polyaniline-Nanocomposite-Interface as a Peroxidase-Mimic for Sensitive Detection of Tropomyosin. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 155, 112108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Peng, Y.; Fu, L. A Fluorometric Sandwich Biosensor Based on Rationally Imprinted Magnetic Particles and Aptamer Modified Carbon Dots for the Detection of Tropomyosin in Seafood Products. Food Control 2022, 132, 130332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.P.; Mohd-Naim, N.F.; Keasberry, N.A.; Ahmed, M.U. Electrochemical Detection of Β-Lactoglobulin Allergen Using Titanium Dioxide/Carbon Nanochips/Gold Nanocomposite-Based Biosensor. Electroanalysis 2021, 34, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Hong, J.; Liu, C.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, L. An Electrochemical Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor for Rapid Beta-Lactoglobulin Detection. Sensors 2021, 21, 8240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amor-Gutierrez, O.; Selvolini, G.; Fernandez-Abedul, M.T.; De la Escosura-Muniz, A.; Marrazza, G. Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of Beta-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes. Sensors 2020, 20, 2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azureen, M.M.R.; Keasberry, N.A.; Ahmed, M.U. Fabrication of Label-Free Electrochemical Food Biosensor for the Sensitive Detection of Ovalbumin on Nanocomposite-Modified Graphene Electrode. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019, 9, 4655–4662. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, H.; Bai, Z.; Li, P.; Feng, X.; Hu, X.; Song, X.; Chen, L. Molecular Imprinted Electrochemical Sensor for Ovalbumin Detection Based on Boronate Affinity and Signal Amplification Approach. Food Chem. 2023, 409, 135292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, D.; Jiang, H.; Wang, L. A Novel Paper-Based Capacitance Mast Cell Sensor for Evaluating Peanut Allergen Protein Ara H 2. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1993–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Jia, M.; Ji, J.; Guan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, L.; Li, Z. Enzymatic Amplification Detection of Peanut Allergen Ara H1 Using a Stem-Loop DNA Biosensor Modified with a Chitosan-Mutiwalled Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite and Spongy Gold Film. Talanta 2015, 131, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamath, S.D.; Abdel Rahman, A.M.; Komoda, T.; Lopata, A.L. Impact of Heat Processing on the Detection of the Major Shellfish Allergen Tropomyosin in Crustaceans and Molluscs Using Specific Monoclonal Antibodies. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 4031–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Li, K.; Hong, C.; Zhang, K.; Chen, Q. Highly Sensitive Beta-Lactoglobulin Fluorescent Aptamer Biosensors Based on Tungsten Disulfide Nanosheets and Dnase I-Assisted Signal Amplification. Molecules 2023, 28, 3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Ma, R.; Xu, Y.; Chi, L.; Li, Y.; Mu, G.; Zhu, X. Investigation of the Structure and Allergic Potential of Whey Protein by Both Heating Sterilization and Simulation with Molecular Dynamics. Foods 2022, 11, 4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, S.; Zhou, P. Antigen Presentation Induced Variation in Ovalbumin Sensitization between Chicken and Duck Species. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, P.; Liu, T.; Zhang, M.; Mo, R.; Zhou, W.; Li, D.; Wu, Y. Effects of Avenanthramide on the Small Intestinal Damage through Hsp70-Nf-Kappab Signaling in an Ovalbumin-Induced Food Allergy Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gezer, P.G.; Liu, G.L.; Kokini, J.L. Development of a Biodegradable Sensor Platform from Gold Coated Zein Nanophotonic Films to Detect Peanut Allergen, Ara H1, Using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Talanta 2016, 150, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Freitas, M.; Carvalho, A.; Nouws, H.P.A.; Delerue-Matos, C. Tracking Arachis Hypogaea Allergen in Pre-Packaged Foodstuff: A Nanodiamond-Based Electrochemical Biosensing Approach. Biosensors 2022, 12, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hou, T.; An, B.; Guo, H.; Li, F. Target-Activated Dual-Amplified Photothermal Aptasensing Platform for Highly Sensitive Monitoring Antibiotic Residue in Foods. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 367, 132089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evtugyn, G.; Porfireva, A.; Tsekenis, G.; Oravczova, V.; Hianik, T. Electrochemical Aptasensors for Antibiotics Detection: Recent Achievements and Applications for Monitoring Food Safety. Sensors 2022, 22, 3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, O.; Saylan, Y.; Gokturk, I.; Yilmaz, F.; Denizli, A. A Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with Synthetic Receptors Decorated on Graphene Oxide for Selective Detection of Benzylpenicillin. Talanta 2023, 253, 123939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalili, R.; Khataee, A.; Rashidi, M.R.; Razmjou, A. Detection of Penicillin G Residues in Milk Based on Dual-Emission Carbon Dots and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Food Chem. 2020, 314, 126172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Luo, L.; Yao, S. Imprinted Sol-Gel Electrochemical Sensor for the Determination of Benzylpenicillin Based on Fe3o4@Sio2/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes-Chitosans Nanocomposite Film Modified Carbon Electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 698, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riswana Barveen, N.; Wang, T.-J.; Chang, Y.-H. Photochemical Synthesis of Au Nanostars on Pmma Films by Ethanol Action as Flexible Sers Substrates for in-Situ Detection of Antibiotics on Curved Surfaces. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaheen, A.; Taj, A.; Jameel, F.; Tahir, M.A.; Mujahid, A.; Butt, F.K.; Khan, W.S.; Bajwa, S.Z. Synthesis of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets-Layered Imprinted Polymer System as a Nanointerface for Detection of Chloramphenicol. Appl. Nanosci. 2022, 12, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, T.-X.; Vu, V.-P.; Tran, H.-T.; Tran, T.-L.; Tran, Q.-T.; Le Manh, T. Molecularly Imprinted Polyaniline Nanowire-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Chloramphenicol Detection: A Kinetic Study of Aniline Electropolymerization. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 027527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roushani, M.; Rahmati, Z.; Hoseini, S.J.; Hashemi Fath, R. Impedimetric Ultrasensitive Detection of Chloramphenicol Based on Aptamer Mip Using a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified by 3-Ampy-Rgo and Silver Nanoparticle. Colloids Surf. B 2019, 183, 110451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, A.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ding, L.; Duan, P.; Yang, W.; Pan, Q. A Zinc Coordination Polymer Sensor for Selective and Sensitive Detection of Doxycycline Based on Fluorescence Enhancement. Crystal. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 4971–4978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashley, J.; Feng, X.; Sun, Y. A Multifunctional Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Biosensor for Direct Detection of Doxycycline in Food Samples. Talanta 2018, 182, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shinde, G.P.; Kumar, R.; Reddy, K.R.; Nadanasabhapathi, S.; Semwal, A.D. Impact of Pulsed Electric Field Processing on Reduction of Benzylpenicillin Residue in Milk. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2021, 19, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Qiao, X.; Xiao, J.; Xu, Z. Determination of Chloramphenicol in Food Using Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical and Optical Sensors-a Review. Food Chem. 2023, 410, 135434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajda, A.; Nowacka-Kozak, E.; Gbylik-Sikorska, M.; Posyniak, A. Feather Analysis as a Non-Invasive Alternative to Tissue Sampling for Surveillance of Doxycycline Use on Poultry Farms. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5971–5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, N.; Li, M.; Chou, W.C.; Lin, Z. A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Doxycycline for Predicting Tissue Residues and Withdrawal Intervals in Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon Idella). Food Chem. Toxicol 2020, 137, 111127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Category | Polymeric Material | Biosensor Type | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pb | Chitosan | Optical biosensor | 0.5 nM | nonlinear | [23] |
Pb | Polypyrrole | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.07 µM | 0.15–800 µM | [24] |
Hg | Chitosan | Optical biosensor | 0.1 ppb | 0.1–540 ppb | [25] |
Hg | Polyaniline | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.035 nM | 0.1–100 nM | [26] |
Hg | Poly-glycine | Electrochemical biosensor | 6.6 µM | 1.5 × 10−4–1.5 × 10−3 M | [27] |
Al Cu Pb Zn | Polyurethane | Optical biosensor | - | 0.10–10.00 ppm 0.10–10.00 ppm 0.01–10.00 ppm 0.01–1.00 ppm | [28] |
Cr | Methylene succinic acid Crosslink ethylene glycol dimethacrylate | Electrochemical biosensor | 17.6 nM | 0.1–10 mmol/L | [29] |
Cu | Nylon6 | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.65 ppm | 0.65–39 ppm | [30] |
Category | Polymeric Material | Biosensor Type | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,4-D | Polypyrrole | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.53 pM | 1.0 pM–50.0 µM | [38] |
2,4-D | Cyclodextrin | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.023 μM | - | [39] |
Organophosphorus | Poly-2,2′-(9,9-dioctyl-9H-fluorene-2,7-diyl) bistiophene | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.033 μg/L | 0.025–4 mM | [40] |
Chlorpyrifos | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.12 pM | 10 pM–500 nM | [41] |
Carbaryl Dichlorvos | Polymeric ionic liquid particles | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.05 ng/mL 0.039 ng/mL | 0.063–880 ng/mL 0.13–1400 ng/mL | [42] |
Dichlorvos | Poly-brilliant cresyl blue | Electrochemical biosensor | 1.6 nM | 2.5–60 nM | [43] |
Acetamiprid | Poly (3,4-ethyloxythiophene) | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.0355 fg/mL | 0.1–1 pg/mL | [44] |
Acetamiprid | Polypyrrole | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.065 fg/mL | 1 fg/mL–0.1 ng/mL | [45] |
Alphacypermethrin | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 14 nM | 10–100 nM | [46] |
Isoproturon | Polymethylmethacrylate | Electrochemical biosensor | 5 pM | 6.5 × 10−8 M | [47] |
Carboxin | Poly L-methionine | Electrochemical biosensor | 5 pM | 8 pM–1µM | [48] |
Catechol | Poly-thienopyrrole | Electrochemical biosensor | 1.23 μM | 1.25–175 µM | [49] |
Catechol | Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.017 μM | 0.05–10.65 µM | [50] |
Category | Polymeric Material | Biosensor Type | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. typhimurium | Poly(pyrrole-co-3-carboxyl-pyrrole) | Electrochemical biosensor | 3 CFU/mL | 102–108 CFU/mL | [57] |
S. typhimurium | Poly-L-lysine | Optical biosensor | 4.9 × 103 CFU/mL | 4.9 × 103–4.9 × 107 CFU/mL | [58] |
S. typhimurium | Poly(styrene/acrylamide) | Optical biosensor | 5 × 103 CFU/mL | 5 × 104–5 × 107 CFU/mL | [59] |
E. coli | N-methyl-2-pyrro-lidone carbonized polymer | Electrochemical biosensor | 3.33 × 10−20 mol/L | 1.0 × 10−19–1.0 × 10–6 mol/L | [60] |
E. coli | Polypyrrole | Electrochemical biosensor | 1 CFU/mL | 1 × 100–1 × 106 CFU/mL | [61] |
E. coli | Poly(polyvinyl pyrrolidone) | Electrochemical biosensor | 100.8 CFU/mL | 101–107 CFU/mL | [62] |
E. coli | Graphene–polymer | Electrochemical biosensor | 1 CFU/μL | 103–105 CFU/mL | [63] |
P. aeruginosa | Polydopamine-polyethyleneimine | Optical biosensor | 1 CFU/mL | 101–107 CFU/mL | [64] |
P. aeruginosa | Poly-dopamine | Electrochemical biosensor | 1 CFU/mL | 101–107 CFU/mL | [65] |
Category | Polymeric Material | Biosensor Type | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tropomyosin | Polyaniline | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.01 pg/mL | 0.01–100 pg/mL | [71] |
Tropomyosin | Poly-dopamine | Optical biosensor | 30.76 ng/mL | 0.1–2.5 μg/mL | [72] |
β-lactoglobulin | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.01 pg/mL | 0.01–500 pg/mL | [73] |
β-lactoglobulin | Polyethyleneimine | Electrochemical biosensor | 10−9 mg/mL | 10−9–10−4 mg/mL | [74] |
β-lactoglobulin | Poly-lysine | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.09 ng/mL | 0.1–10 ng/mL | [75] |
Ovalbumin | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.01 pg/mL | 0.01 pg/mL–1 µg/mL | [76] |
Ovalbumin | Poly-dopamine | Electrochemical biosensor | 3.0 fg/mL | 1.0 × 10−7–1.0 × 10–4 mg/mL | [77] |
Ara h2 | Polyvinyl alcohol | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.028 ng/mL | 0.1–100 ng/mL | [78] |
Ara h1 | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.013 fmol/L | 3.91 × 10−17–1.25 × 10–15 mol/L | [79] |
Category | Polymeric Material | Biosensor Type | Limit of Detection | Linear Range | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benzylpenicillin | Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate-graphene oxide-N-methacryloyl-L-phenylalanine) | Optical biosensor | 0.021 ppb | 1–100 ppb | [89] |
Benzylpenicillin | Poly-tetraethoxysilane | Optical biosensor | 0.34 nM | 1–32 nM | [90] |
Benzylpenicillin | Chitosan | Electrochemical biosensor | 1.5 × 10−9 M | 5.0 × 10−8–1.0 × 10−3 M | [91] |
Chloramphenicol | Poly(methyl methacrylate) | Optical biosensor | 3.67 × 10−9 M | 10−1−10−9 M | [92] |
Chloramphenicol | Poly-methacrylic | Optical biosensor | 177 µM | - | [93] |
Chloramphenicol | Poly-aniline | Electrochemical biosensor | 1.24 × 10−9 M | 10−8–10−3 M | [94] |
Chloramphenicol | Resorcinol polymerization | Electrochemical biosensor | 0.3 pM | 1.0 pM–1.0 nM | [95] |
Doxycycline | HNU-55 | Optical biosensor | 3.7 nM | 0–30 μM | [96] |
Doxycycline | Poly-methacrylic | Optical biosensor | 117 nM | 0.2–6 μM | [97] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, B.; Huang, D.; Weng, Z. Recent Advances in Polymer-Based Biosensors for Food Safety Detection. Polymers 2023, 15, 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153253
Wang B, Huang D, Weng Z. Recent Advances in Polymer-Based Biosensors for Food Safety Detection. Polymers. 2023; 15(15):3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153253
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Binhui, Da Huang, and Zuquan Weng. 2023. "Recent Advances in Polymer-Based Biosensors for Food Safety Detection" Polymers 15, no. 15: 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153253