Next Article in Journal
New Methodology for Evaluating Surface Quality of Experimental Aerodynamic Models Manufactured by Polymer Jetting Additive Manufacturing
Next Article in Special Issue
Poly(β-hydroxyl amine)s: Valuable Building Blocks for Supramolecular Elastomers with Tunable Mechanical Performance and Superior Healing Capacity
Previous Article in Journal
Electrospun 5-Chloro-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline (Clioquinol)-Containing Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/Polyvinylpyrrolidone Antifungal Materials Prospective as Active Dressings against Esca
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epoxyorganosilane Finishing Compositions for Fibrous Fillers of Thermosetting and Thermoplastic Binders
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/polym14030370
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Porous Organic Polymers Derived from Ferrocene and Tetrahedral Silicon-Centered Monomers for Carbon Dioxide Sorption

by
Xingya Zhao
1,2,3,
Yipeng Qi
1,
Jianquan Li
1 and
Qingyu Ma
1,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2
College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(3), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030370
Submission received: 15 December 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organosilicon Materials for Emerging Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Herein, we present two novel ferrocene-containing porous organic polymers, FPOP-1 and FPOP-2, by the Heck reactions of 1,1′-divinylferrocene with two tetrahedral silicon-centered units, i.e., tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane and tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane. The resulting materials possess high thermal stability and moderate porosity with the Brunauer–Emmer–Teller (BET) surface areas of 499 m2 g−1 (FPOP-1) and 354 m2 g−1 (FPOP-2) and total pore volumes of 0.43 cm3 g−1 (FPOP-1) and 0.49 cm3 g−1 (FPOP-2). The porosity is comparable to previously reported ferrocene-containing porous polymers. These materials possess comparable CO2 capacities of 1.16 mmol g−1 (5.10 wt%) at 273 K and 1.0 bar, and 0.54 mmol g−1 (2.38 wt%) at 298 K and 1.0 bar (FPOP-1). The found capacities are comparable to, or higher than many porous polymers having similar or higher surface areas. They have high isosteric heats of up to 32.9 kJ mol−1, proving that the affinity between the polymer network and CO2 is high, which can be explained by the presence of ferrocene units in the porous networks. These results indicate that these materials can be promisingly utilized as candidates for the storage or capture of CO2. More ferrocene-containing porous polymers can be designed and synthesized by combining ferrocene units with various aromatic monomers under this strategy and their applications could be explored.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Porous organic polymers (POPs) are a specific class of covalently bonded functional materials containing permanent porosity and constructed from organic monomers through various synthetic methodologies. By virtue of their diversified functionality (e.g., porosity, fluorescence, ionic charges), POP materials have found extensively potential applications in gas separation, gas storage, capture of pollutants, optoelectronics, energy storage, catalysis, sensing, nanoreactors, and medical applications [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among various POP materials, the metal atoms containing POPs have gained particular interest as the incorporation of metal sites into the porous networks could impart the resultant materials new functions (e.g., catalytic activity and fluorescence), and thus extend/enhance their application performance (e.g., enhanced CO2 adsorption) [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. For example, Son et al., reported a mesoionic carbene-Rh species containing microporous organic polymer exhibiting high catalytic activity in the stereoselective polymerization of arylacetylenes by the functionalization of azide-alkyne click-based microporous polymer [9]. The vanadium-docked covalent organic frameworks have served as efficient heterogeneous catalysts for Mannich-type reactions [17]. By doping alkali-metal into POP networks, the CO2 and H2 uptakes could be efficiently improved due to the enhanced isosteric heat of gas adsorption values [8]. At present, most of them were prepared by post-synthetic modification, i.e., by post metalation treating with pre-synthesized POPs containing coordinated atoms (e.g., N, S) or functional groups [8,18,19,20,21,22]. However, the successful achievement of these materials requires at least two steps. In addition, the modification efficiency of metal sites or nanoparticles on the frameworks may be not very high due to the heterogeneous characteristic, and the metal sites may also aggregate in the networks. It could be expected that the direct synthetic strategy based on predesigned monomers containing metal sites is more convenient by selecting various polymerization reactions, including the Sonogashira–Hagihara reaction, Suzuki reaction, Yamamoto reaction, and Friedel–Crafts reaction, etc. [1,2,23]. Furthermore, this strategy can lead to regular and homogeneous dispersion of metal sites in the networks, thus allowing for enhanced interactions between the frameworks and guest analytes (e.g., gas) and higher performance [24].
Ferrocene as a typical metallocene has been widely introduced into polymers to construct novel functional materials and extend their applications, such as magnetism, sensors, electrocatalysis, and medicine, thanks to its unique sandwich structure with special functionality [10,25,26,27]. Recently, ferrocene was also incorporated into POP networks and endow them new applications or enhanced performance. For example, Liu et al., reported ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers with intrinsic magnetism and the saturation magnetization of the materials can be adjusted by combining ferrocene with monomers with different conjugated degree [28]. By taking advantage of abundant ferrocene with high electron density and strong interaction with iodine molecules, a ferrocene-containing porous network FcTz-POP exhibited a significantly higher iodine vapor capacity than a ferrocene-free POP [29]. FcTz-POP can also served as a photocatalyst for methylene blue degradation under visible light irradiation at neutral pH [30]. By virtue of the strong interaction between the iron sites and gas molecules, Fu et al., constructed ferrocene-functionalized microporous aromatic polymers with a moderate porosity (BET surface area, 875 m2 g−1) and good gas sorption performance by the Friedel–Crafts reaction of ferrocene and s-triazine monomers [24]. Liu et al., reported ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers exhibiting good gas storage capacity and excellent methyl violet adsorption by the Yamamoto reactions of 1,10-dibromoferrocene and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)porphyrin or tetra(p-bromophenyl)methane [31]. Although some ferrocene-based POPs have been reported, compared to the abundant porous materials, the construction novel ferrocene-containing POP materials and their applications are far from fully explored [32,33,34,35,36]. The design and construction of novel ferrocene-based POPs is still desirable.
In the present study, we synthesized two novel ferrocene-containing porous organic polymers (FPOPs) based on 1,1′-divinylferrocene and tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane or tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane by the Heck reaction. The resulting polymers show high thermal stability and moderate porosity. Moreover, the application in CO2 adsorption was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Characterization

Tetra(phosphorylation)palladium (Pd(PPh3)4) and potassium carbonate (K2CO3) were purchased from Energy Chemical. N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) was bought from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). DMF was dehydrated with CaH2 at 80 °C for 12 h, distilled under vacuum, and stored with 4 Ǻ molecule sieves prior to use. 1,1′-Divinylferrocene, tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane, and tetrakis(4-bromobiphenyl)silane were prepared based on the methods in previous reports [37,38,39].

2.2. Characterization

Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrophotometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). The solid-state 13C cross-polarization/magic-angle-spinning (CP/MAS) NMR and 29Si MAS NMR spectra were measured by a Bruker AVANCE-500 NMR Spectrometer, while the operating magnetic field strength is 9.4 T. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images was observed by a FEI QUANTA FEG250 Spectrometer (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Before observation, the samples were prepared by dropping the suspensions in ethanol on a copper grid and following air drying. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was determined by a MettlerToledo SDTA-854 TGA system (Greifensee, Switzerland). The samples were heated at a rate of 10 °C min−1 in the range of room temperature to 800 °C in an atmosphere of nitrogen.
Nitrogen sorption isotherms were measured at 77 K with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 (Norcross, GA, USA) volumetric adsorption analyzer. Prior to the measurement, the samples of ca. 100 mg were degassed in vacuum at 150 °C for 12 h. The specific surface areas were calculated based on the nitrogen adsorption data by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis in the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.01~0.20, whereas the pore size distribution was evaluated on the basis of nonlocal density functional theory (NL-DFT). The total pore volumes were calculated at P/P0 = 0.99, whereas the micropore surface area and micropore volume were calculated using the t-plot method. The carbon dioxide (CO2) adsorption isotherms were measured on a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 volumetric adsorption analyzer at 298 K and 273 K. Before the measurements, the samples were degassed in vacuum at 150 °C for at 12 h.

2.3. Synthesis of FPOP-1

In a three-necked bottle, 1,1′-divinylferrocene (0.24 g, 1 mmol), tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane (0.33 g, 0.5 mmol), K2CO3 (0.55 g, 4 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.12 g, 0.10 mmol), and 20 mL of freshly distilled DMF were added under an atmosphere of argon. The argon was bubbled into the mixture for at least 0.5 h to remove oxygen in the system. Then, the mixture was heated to 120 °C and kept for 72 h under argon. The resultant mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered with a vacuum equipment. The resultant precipitate was washed with various solvents, including water, methanol, chloroform, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and acetone to remove the residuals. The obtained crude product was further purified by Soxhlet extraction with methanol and THF for 24 h, respectively. Finally, the product, which was denoted as FPOP-1, was dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 24 h and appeared as a red-brown solid (213 mg, yield: 53.0%). Elemental analysis calc. (wt%) for SiC52H36Fe2: C 78.2, H 4.3; found C 72.5, H 4.0.

2.4. Synthesis of FPOP-2

The synthetic and post-treatment procedures of FPOP-2 were similar to those of FPOP-1 except that tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane (0.48 g, 0.5 mmol) was used as the starting material instead of tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane. FPOP-2 was obtained as a red-brown powder (324 mg, yield: 50.1%). Elemental analysis calc. (wt%) for SiC76H48Fe2: C 82.9, H 4.4; found C 80.7, H 4.5.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The synthetic routes of two novel ferrocene-based porous organic polymers are shown in Scheme 1. FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 were prepared by the Heck coupling reactions of 1,1′-divinylferrocene with two tetrahedral silanes, i.e., tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane and tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane. The reactions were conducted using Pd(PPh3)4 as the catalyst and K2CO3 as the acid absorbent in DMF at 120 °C for 72 h [40]. Upon the completion of the reaction, the crude products were filtrated and washed with various solvents to remove the residuals, including unreacted monomers, residual catalysts, and other impurities in the final products. Subsequently, the products were further purified by Soxhlet extraction and dried in a vacuum at 80 °C for 24 h. The final materials were afforded as red-brown powders. As expected, these polymers are insoluble in common solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, water, ethanol, and DMF.
To confirm the structures of these polymers, they were fully characterized by FT-IR, solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR, and 29Si NMR spectroscopy. FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 display similar spectra due to their similar chemical structures. For FT-IR spectra as shown in Figure 1, the multiple peaks from 1600 cm−1 to 1400 cm−1 are obviously attributed to the C=C stretching vibrations from phenyl and cyclopentadiene rings in tetrahedral silicon-centered units and ferrocene units. The peaks ranging from 3000 cm−1 to 3100 cm−1 are apparently associated to the unsaturated C–H stretching vibrations from phenyl and cyclopentadiene rings. In addition, two kinds of unexpected peaks were observed at ca. 3450 cm−1 and 2900–3000 cm−1. The former was attributed to –OH groups from water encapsulated in the samples, while the latter was aroused from saturated C–H groups, which are from the residual solvents (e.g., THF and methanol) in the network during the Soxhlet extraction process. Although the samples have been dried under vacuum, it is very difficult to completely remove all the residual solvents, including water, THF and methanol, because some of them may be embedded in the closed pores. This finding is consistent with our previous report [41].
Figure 2 shows the solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of these materials and the resonances were assigned. As expected, the peaks attributable to sp2 carbon atoms from ethenylene, phenylene and cyclopentadiene groups in ferrocene and silicon-centered units were observed with overlapping from 120 ppm to 150 ppm. For 29Si NMR spectra, both of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 display one peak at −15.5 ppm and −15.1 ppm, respectively (Figure 3), which are unambiguously derived from the Si atoms from tetrahedral Si(p-C6H4)4 or Si(p-C6H4-C6H4)4 units. This finding indicates that the tetrahedral silicon units are chemically stable and no Si-C bonds have been cleaved during the reaction, in contrary to the possible Si-C cleavage under base conditions (e.g., triethylamine or K2CO3 as the acid adsorbents) reported in previous literatures [38,42]. These results are in accordance with the 29Si NMR results found in silicon-centered POPs [43,44].

3.2. Morphology and Thermal Stability

Figure 4 shows the filed-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2. As expected, these polymers are amorphous and exhibit irregular spherical or bulk particles with the scale at the micrometer sizes.
Figure 5 shows the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) spectra of these two polymers and the analysis was conducted in an atmosphere of nitrogen at a heat rate of 10 °C min−1 ranging from room temperature to 800 °C. Similar to other POP materials [43,44], these polymers also have good thermal stability, while the decomposition temperatures at 5% mass loss (Td,5%) were found at 405 °C and 368 °C for FPOP-1 and FPOP-2, respectively. In addition, after the decomposition, the residual ratio of these polymers was higher than 65% at 800 °C. This finding is obviously attributed to their highly cross-linking networks.

3.3. Porous Properties

The porous properties of these polymers were evaluated by nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K (Figure 6a) and the data are summarized in Table 1. The isotherms of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 are similar. Both of them display both type I isotherm and type IV isotherm according to the IUPAC classification [45]. They give rise to a sharp capacity at relatively low pressure and a gradually increasing capacity at relatively higher pressure with hysteresis. This feature indicates that both micropores and mesopores exist within the network. On the basis of the N2 isotherm, FPOP-1 has a moderate porosity with the Brunauer–Emmer–Teller (BET) surface area (SBET) of 499 m2 g−1 and the total pore volume (Vtotal) of 0.43 m3 g−1. The micropore surface area (Smicro) and the micropore volume (Vmicro) were 308 m2 g−1 and 0.23 cm3 g−1, respectively, calculated using the t-plot method. The Vmicro/Vtotal ratio, which represents the contribution of microporosity in the framework, is 0.53, thereby indicating that mesopores and micropores provide nearly same contribution to the porous network. Compared with FPOP-1, FPOP-2 shows lower porosity with SBET of 354 m2 g−1 and Vtotal of 0.49 m3 g−1, and lower microporosity with Smicro of 175 m2 g−1 and Vmicro of 0.13 m3 g−1. As well, FPOP-2 possesses a much lower Vmicro/Vtotal ratio of 0.27, thereby indicating that the mesopores mainly contribute to the network. The pore size distributions (PSDs) were estimated by nonlocal density functional theory (NL-DFT). As expected, the PSD results are in accordance with the shape of nitrogen isotherms. FPOP-1 displays two main peaks in the region of micropores centered at ca. 1.4 nm and mesopores centered at ca. 2.1 nm (Figure 6b). The PSD curve of FPOP-2 is similar to that of FPOP-1 except that the mesopore region is broader and centered at 2.8 nm. These results further reveal the co-existence of micropores and mesopores in the porous networks.
Compared to previously reported ferrocene-containing porous polymers, the present polymers exhibit comparable porosity [28,29,46,47]. For example, Yamamoto reactions of 1,1′-dibromoferrocene and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)porphyrin or tetra(p-bromophenyl)methane resulted in two ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) with the SBET of 638 m2 g−1 and 422 m2 g−1 [31]. We prepared a ferrocene-based POP with the SBET of 542 m2 g−1 through the Sonogashira reaction of 1,1′-dibromoferrocene and tetrakis(4-ethynylphenyl)silane [48]. In addition, FPOP-1 exhibits higher porosity than FPOP-2. This finding may be due to the different structure length of these two silicon-centered monomers. It was known that longer monomer structure length could result in lower surface areas due to greater interpenetration and more efficient space filling in the network, which was induced by increased degree of conformational freedom [49]. In the present study, tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane has a longer structure length than tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane, thereby resulting in lower porosity.

3.4. Carbon Dioxide Sorption

One important application of the porous materials is gas sorption. Herein, carbon dioxide (CO2) was selected as a representative gas because CO2 emission has played an important role in global warming and become a major concern for environment [1,50]. Moreover, the capture of CO2 is important and highly beneficial to reach net-zero emissions in the second half of the century [51]. Various porous materials, including zeolites, porous carbon, and metal-organic frameworks, have been applied as adsorbents for the capture or storage of CO2 in addition to other efficient techniques, such as membrane separation, chemical adsorption, and gas hydrates [52,53,54]. Among various porous materials, POPs are particularly promising thanks to their high porosity and facile tunability of their pore surface functionality (e.g., ferrocene units in the networks), which can play an important role in improving the interactions with CO2. Therefore, the CO2 adsorption ability of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 was evaluated. The isotherms are shown in Figure 7 and the data are summarized in Table 1.
FPOP-1 possesses moderate CO2 capacities of 1.16 mmol g−1 (5.1 wt%) at 273 K and 1.0 bar, and 0.54 mmol g−1 (2.38 wt%) at 298 K and 1.0 bar. Compared to FPOP-1, FPOP-2 with a lower surface area expectedly displays lower CO2 capacity, which was found to be 1.06 mmol g−1 (4.66 wt%) at 273 K and 1.0 bar, and 0.52 mmol g−1 (2.29 wt%) at 298 K and 1.0 bar (Figure 7a). Although the values are not very high, they are comparable to some polymers having similar or much larger specific surface areas, such as triazine-containing CMP (TCMP-5, SBET: 494 m2 g−1, 1.22 mmol g−1 at 273 K/1 bar) [55], CMP-5 (SBET: 494 m2 g−1, 1.22 mmol g−1 at 273 K/1 bar) [55], CMP-1-(NH2) (SBET: 710 m2 g−1, 1.56 mmol g−1 at 273 K/1 bar), and COF-102 (SBET: 3620 m2 g−1, 1.56 mmol g−1 at 273 K/1 bar) [56]. The interactions between the polymer framework and CO2 molecules were further evaluated by calculating the isosteric heats (Qst) while employing the Clausius–Clapeyron equation from CO2 isotherms at 273 K and 298 K. The Qst values of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 are 32.9 kJ mol−1 and 32.5 kJ mol−1 at low CO2 coverage, and gradually decrease to ca. 30 kJ mol−1 and 25 kJ mol−1 with the adsorption increasing at higher coverage, respectively (Figure 7b). These findings reveal that the polymer frameworks possess strong binding ability with CO2 because of the presence of the ferrocene unit as a withdrawing electron group, which can strongly interact with electron-rich CO2 molecules [24]. In addition, the values of Qst are comparable or higher than previous ferrocene-based POPs [44,47,48]. These results reveal that these polymers can be applied as efficient adsorbents for CO2 capture and storage.

4. Conclusions

Two ferrocene-containing porous organic polymers (FPOPs) were synthesized based on 1,1′-divinylferrocene and tetrahedral silicon-based monomers, i.e., tetrakis(4-bromophenyl)silane and tetrakis(4′-bromo-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)silane via the Heck reaction. The resulting materials exhibit high thermal stability and comparable porosity with the highest BET surface area of 499 m2 g−1 and total pore volume of 0.49 cm3 g−1. The porosity is comparable to previous ferrocene-based POPs. For applications, these polymers display CO2 uptakes of 1.16 mmol g−1 (5.10 wt%) at 273 K and 1.0 bar, and 0.54 mmol g−1 (2.38 wt%) at 298 K and 1.0 bar (FPOP-1), which are comparable to many POP materials with similar or higher surface areas. Moreover, they both possess high isosteric heats of up to 32.9 kJ mol−1, indicating their high affinity towards CO2 due to the presence of ferrocene units in the porous networks. These results demonstrate that these materials can be promisingly used as adsorbents for the storage and capture of CO2. Further investigation will focus on the construction of ferrocene-based POPs with high surface areas by altering different aromatic monomers to react with 1,1′-divinylferrocene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.M.; methodology, X.Z., Y.Q., J.L. and Q.M.; formal analysis, X.Z., Y.Q. and J.L.; investigation, X.Z., Y.Q., J.L. and Q.M.; data curation, X.Z., Y.Q. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Z. and Y.Q.; writing—review and editing, Q.M.; supervision, Q.M.; project administration, Q.M.; funding acquisition, J.L. and Q.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, S.; Heasman, P.; Ben, T.; Qiu, S.L. Porous Organic Materials: Strategic Design and Structure-Function Correlation. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1515–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, J.-S.M.; Cooper, A.I. Advances in Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 2171–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Taylor, D.; Dalgarno, S.J.; Xu, Z.; Vilela, F. Conjugated porous polymers: Incredibly versatile materials with far-reaching applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3981–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tian, Y.; Zhu, G. Porous Aromatic Frameworks (PAFs). Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8934–8986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G.; Xu, P.; Chen, M.; Xiong, T.; Zhou, C.; Li, X.; et al. Covalent organic framework photocatalysts: Structures and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4135–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, R.; Tan, K.T.; Gong, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Xie, S.; He, T.; Lu, Z.; Yang, H.; Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: An ideal platform for designing ordered materials and advanced applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 120–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sun, Q.; Dai, Z.; Liu, X.; Sheng, N.; Deng, F.; Meng, X.; Xiao, F.-S. Highly Efficient Heterogeneous Hydroformylation over Rh-Metalated Porous Organic Polymers: Synergistic Effect of High Ligand Concentration and Flexible Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5204–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Konstas, K.; Taylor, J.W.; Thornton, A.W.; Doherty, C.M.; Lim, W.X.; Bastow, T.J.; Kennedy, D.F.; Wood, C.D.; Cox, B.J.; Hill, J.M.; et al. Lithiated Porous Aromatic Frameworks with Exceptional Gas Storage Capacity. Ang. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6639–6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cho, K.; Yang, H.-S.; Lee, I.-H.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.J.; Son, S.U. Valorization of Click-Based Microporous Organic Polymer: Generation of Mesoionic Carbene–Rh Species for the Stereoselective Synthesis of Poly(arylacetylene)s. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 4100–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Shipman, P.O.; Boden, B.N.; McNeil, W.S. Synthetic methodologies and properties of organometallic and coordination macromolecules. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 714–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Luo, N.; Xu, J.; Liu, K.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Q.; Huang, R.; Long, Z.; Tong, M.; Chen, G. Metalated-bipyridine-based porous hybrid polymers with POSS-derived Si–OH groups for synergistic catalytic CO2 fixation. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 11300–11309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Luo, R.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, X.; Ji, H. Metalloporphyrin Polymers with Intercalated Ionic Liquids for Synergistic CO2 Fixation via Cyclic Carbonate Production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, R.F.; Shi, J.L.; Ma, Y.; Lin, G.Q.; Lang, X.J.; Wang, C. Designed Synthesis of a 2D Porphyrin-Based sp(2) Carbon-Conjugated Covalent Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. Ang. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 6430–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chakraborty, D.; Nandi, S.; Mullangi, D.; Haldar, S.; Vinod, C.P.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Cu/Cu2O Nanoparticles Supported on a Phenol-Pyridyl COF as a Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Diynes via Glaser-Hay Coupling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 15670–15679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diercks, C.S.; Lin, S.; Kornienko, N.; Kapustin, E.A.; Nichols, E.M.; Zhu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, C.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Reticular Electronic Tuning of Porphyrin Active Sites in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ko, J.H.; Moon, J.H.; Kang, N.; Park, J.H.; Shin, H.-W.; Park, N.; Kang, S.; Lee, S.M.; Kim, H.J.; Ahn, T.K.; et al. Engineering of Sn-porphyrin networks on the silica surface: Sensing of nitrophenols in water. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8781–8784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vardhan, H.; Hou, L.X.; Yee, E.; Nafady, A.; Al-Abdrabalnabi, M.A.; Al-Enizi, A.M.; Pan, Y.X.; Yang, Z.Y.; Ma, S.Q. Vanadium Docked Covalent-Organic Frameworks: An Effective Heterogeneous Catalyst for Modified Mannich-Type Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 4878–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, A.; Lu, R.-F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Han, K.-L.; Deng, W.-Q. Lithium-Doped Conjugated Microporous Polymers for Reversible Hydrogen Storage. Ang. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3330–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xiang, Z.; Cao, D.; Wang, W.; Yang, W.; Han, B.; Lu, J. Postsynthetic Lithium Modification of Covalent-Organic Polymers for Enhancing Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide Storage. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 5974–5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, G.; Ding, H.; Chen, R.; Peng, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, C. 3D Porphyrin-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8705–8709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Segura, J.L.; Royuela, S.; Ramos, M.M. Post-synthetic modification of covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3903–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cai, R.; Ye, X.; Sun, Q.; He, Q.; He, Y.; Ma, S.; Shi, X. Anchoring Triazole-Gold(I) Complex into Porous Organic Polymer To Boost the Stability and Reactivity of Gold(I) Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yuan, Y.; Zhu, G. Porous Aromatic Frameworks as a Platform for Multifunctional Applications. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, G.; Pan, C.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y. Metal Microporous Aromatic Polymers with Improved Performance for Small Gas Storage. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 13357–13363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gu, H.; Ciganda, R.; Gatard, S.; Lu, F.; Zhao, P.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. On metallocene-containing macromolecules and their applications. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 813, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, H.; Xue, L.; Li, J.; Ma, Q. Hyperbranched Polycarbosiloxanes: Synthesis by Piers-Rubinsztajn Reaction and Application as Precursors to Magnetoceramics. Polymers 2020, 12, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Amer, W.A.; Wang, L.; Amin, A.M.; Ma, L.; Yu, H. Recent Progress in the Synthesis and Applications of Some Ferrocene Derivatives and Ferrocene-Based Polymers. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2010, 20, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, G.; Liu, Q.; Liao, B.; Chen, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Z.; Xia, B.; Huang, J.; Liu, B. Synthesis of novel ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers with intrinsic magnetism. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 93, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Tao, J.; Xiong, S.; Lu, P.; Tang, J.; He, J.; Javaid, M.U.; Pan, C.; Yu, G. Ferrocene-based porous organic polymers for high-affinity iodine capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Y.; Lai, Z. Ferrocene-based porous organic polymer for photodegradation of methylene blue and high iodine capture. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2021, 316, 110929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tan, Z.; Su, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Liao, B.; Amin, A.M.; Liu, Q. Ferrocene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymers Derived from Yamamoto Coupling for Gas Storage and Dye Removal. Polymers 2020, 12, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, D.; Gu, S.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, G.; Yu, G.; Pan, C. Tunable porosity of nanoporous organic polymers with hierarchical pores for enhanced CO2 capture. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 3416–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, G.; Liu, Q.; Xia, B.; Huang, J.; Li, S.; Guan, Y.; Zhou, H.; Liao, B.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, B. Synthesis of stable metal-containing porous organic polymers for gas storage. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 91, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Q.; Yao, L.; Hao, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Z. Ferrocene-based nanoporous organic polymer as solid-phase extraction sorbent for the extraction of chlorophenols from tap water, tea drink and peach juice samples. Food Chem. 2019, 297, 124962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cao, X.; Wang, R.; Peng, Q.; Zhao, H.; Fan, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, Q. Effect of pore structure on the adsorption capacities to different sizes of adsorbates by ferrocene-based conjugated microporous polymers. Polymer 2021, 233, 124192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, Q.; Fang, Y.; Yu, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, L. A ferrocene-linked metal-covalent organic polymer as a peroxidase-enzyme mimic for dual channel detection of hydrogen peroxide. Analyst 2021, 146, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, D.; Niu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Feng, S. Tetrahedral silicon-centered imidazolyl derivatives: Promising candidates for OLEDs and fluorescence response of Ag (I) ion. J. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 695, 2329–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, D.; Wang, L.; Xue, L.; Zhou, D.; Feng, S.; Zhao, X. Tetrahedral silicon-based luminescent molecules: Synthesis and comparison of thermal and photophysical properties by various effect factors. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 735, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gleixner, R.M.; Joly, K.M.; Tremayne, M.; Kariuki, B.M.; Male, L.; Coe, D.M.; Cox, L.R. Reaction of 1,1′-Divinyl Ferrocene with One-Electron Oxidants: Entry into Functionalised [4] Ferrocenophanes and Observation of an Isotope-Dependent Chemoselectivity Effect. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 5769–5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, R.; Feng, S.; Wang, D.; Liu, H. Fluorescence-Tuned Silicone Elastomers for Multicolored Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes: Realizing the Processability of Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane-Based Hybrid Porous Polymers. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6370–6376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, Q.Y.; Yang, B.X.; Li, J.Q. Porous organic polymers derived from tetrahedral silicon-centered monomers and a stereocontorted spirobifluorene-based precursor: Synthesis, porosity and carbon dioxide sorption. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 64163–64169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, R.; Feng, S.; Zhou, B.; Chen, Z.; Wang, D.; Liu, H. Flexible Cyclosiloxane-Linked Fluorescent Porous Polymers for Multifunctional Chemical Sensors. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, Q.; Yang, B.; Li, J. Silicon-containing porous organic polymers: Preparation, tunable porosity and carbon dioxide sorption. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 830, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, X.; Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, W.; Ma, Q.; Liang, J. Ferrocene-linked porous organic polymers for carbon dioxide and hydrogen sorption. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 859, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, H.; Li, L.; Liao, H. Facile synthesis of graphitic porous carbons with three-dimensional nanonetwork for high-rate supercapacitive energy storage. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 51, 5676–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Q.; Tang, Z.; Wu, M.; Liao, B.; Zhou, H.; Ou, B.; Yu, G.; Zhou, Z.; Li, X. Novel ferrocene-based nanoporous organic polymers for clean energy application. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8933–8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, Q.; Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, W.; Sun, X. A ferrocene-containing porous organic polymer linked by tetrahedral silicon-centered units for gas sorption. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, D.; Yang, W.; Feng, S.; Liu, H. Constructing hybrid porous polymers from cubic octavinylsilsequioxane and planar halogenated benzene. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3634–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, Y.; Jin, S.; Xu, H.; Nagai, A.; Jiang, D. Conjugated microporous polymers: Design, synthesis and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8012–8031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hassanpouryouzband, A.; Joonaki, E.; Edlmann, K.; Haszeldine, R.S. Offshore Geological Storage of Hydrogen: Is This Our Best Option to Achieve Net-Zero? ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 2181–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hassanpouryouzband, A.; Joonaki, E.; Vasheghani Farahani, M.; Takeya, S.; Ruppel, C.; Yang, J.; English, N.J.; Schicks, J.M.; Edlmann, K.; Mehrabian, H.; et al. Gas hydrates in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5225–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hepburn, C.; Adlen, E.; Beddington, J.; Carter, E.A.; Fuss, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Minx, J.C.; Smith, P.; Williams, C.K. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 2019, 575, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, Z.; Pan, S.-Y.; Li, H.; Cai, J.; Olabi, A.G.; Anthony, E.J.; Manovic, V. Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 125, 109799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ren, S.; Dawson, R.; Laybourn, A.; Jiang, J.-X.; Khimyak, Y.; Adams, D.J.; Cooper, A.I. Functional conjugated microporous polymers: From 1,3,5-benzene to 1,3,5-triazine. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 928–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Furukawa, H.; Yaghi, O.M. Storage of Hydrogen, Methane, and Carbon Dioxide in Highly Porous Covalent Organic Frameworks for Clean Energy Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8875–8883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 00370 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis routes of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2. Reaction condition: Pd(PPh3)4, DMF, and K2CO3, at 120 °C for 72 h. The fragments of FPOPs are shown as examples.
Scheme 1. Synthesis routes of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2. Reaction condition: Pd(PPh3)4, DMF, and K2CO3, at 120 °C for 72 h. The fragments of FPOPs are shown as examples.
Polymers 14 00370 sch001
Polymers 14 00370 g001 550
Figure 1. FT-IR of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2.
Figure 1. FT-IR of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2.
Polymers 14 00370 g001
Polymers 14 00370 g002 550
Figure 2. Solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b). The peak indicated by asterisk may be assigned to the carbon atom from residual methanol resulting from the Soxhlet extraction.
Figure 2. Solid-state 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b). The peak indicated by asterisk may be assigned to the carbon atom from residual methanol resulting from the Soxhlet extraction.
Polymers 14 00370 g002
Polymers 14 00370 g003 550
Figure 3. Solid-state 29Si NMR spectra of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b).
Figure 3. Solid-state 29Si NMR spectra of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b).
Polymers 14 00370 g003
Polymers 14 00370 g004 550
Figure 4. FE-SEM images of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b).
Figure 4. FE-SEM images of FPOP-1 (a) and FPOP-2 (b).
Polymers 14 00370 g004
Polymers 14 00370 g005 550
Figure 5. TGA curves of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 in nitrogen atmosphere.
Figure 5. TGA curves of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 in nitrogen atmosphere.
Polymers 14 00370 g005
Polymers 14 00370 g006 550
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption (close symbols) and desorption (open symbols) isotherms of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 measured at 77 K (a); pore size distribution curves of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 calculated by NL-DFT (b).
Figure 6. Nitrogen adsorption (close symbols) and desorption (open symbols) isotherms of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 measured at 77 K (a); pore size distribution curves of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 calculated by NL-DFT (b).
Polymers 14 00370 g006
Polymers 14 00370 g007 550
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption isotherms of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 at 273 and 298K (a); isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 (b).
Figure 7. CO2 adsorption isotherms of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 at 273 and 298K (a); isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2 (b).
Polymers 14 00370 g007
Table
Table 1. Porosity data of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2.
Table 1. Porosity data of FPOP-1 and FPOP-2.
SBET (a)/m2 g–1Smicro (b)/m2 g–1Vtotal (c)/cm3 g–1Vmicro (d)/cm3 g–1Vmicro/VtotalCO2 Uptake (wt%) (e)
FPOP-14993080.430.230.535.10
FPOP-23541750.490.130.274.66
(a) Surface areas calculated from N2 adsorption isotherm using the BET method; (b) microporous surface areas calculated from N2 adsorption isotherm using the t-plot method; (c) total pore volumes calculated at P/P0 = 0.90; (d) microspore volumes derived using the t-plot method based on the Halsey thickness equation; (e) carbon dioxide uptakes at 1.0 bar and 273 K.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, Q. Porous Organic Polymers Derived from Ferrocene and Tetrahedral Silicon-Centered Monomers for Carbon Dioxide Sorption. Polymers 2022, 14, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030370

AMA Style

Zhao X, Qi Y, Li J, Ma Q. Porous Organic Polymers Derived from Ferrocene and Tetrahedral Silicon-Centered Monomers for Carbon Dioxide Sorption. Polymers. 2022; 14(3):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xingya, Yipeng Qi, Jianquan Li, and Qingyu Ma. 2022. "Porous Organic Polymers Derived from Ferrocene and Tetrahedral Silicon-Centered Monomers for Carbon Dioxide Sorption" Polymers 14, no. 3: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop