Next Article in Journal
Composites Based on Natural Polymers and Microbial Biomass for Biosorption of Brilliant Red HE-3B Reactive Dye from Aqueous Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
New Copolymers of Vinylphosphonic Acid with Hydrophilic Monomers and Their Eu3+ Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
Dielectric Elastomer Fiber Actuators with Aqueous Electrode
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances on Cellulose Nanocrystals and Their Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Preparation, Characterization and Application of Amorphized Cellulose—A Review

by
Michael Ioelovich
Designer Energy, 2, Bergman St., Rehovot 7670504, Israel
Polymers 2021, 13(24), 4313; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244313
Submission received: 17 November 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 6 December 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Natural Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
This review describes the methods of cellulose amorphization, such as dry grinding, mercerization, treatment with liquid ammonia, swelling in solvents, regeneration from solutions, etc. In addition, the main characteristics and applications of amorphized celluloses are discussed. An optimal method for preparing completely amorphous cellulose (CAC) via the treatment of original cellulose material with a cold NaOH/Urea-solvent at the solvent to cellulose ratio R ≥ 5 is proposed. Structural studies show that amorphous cellulose contains mesomorphous clusters with a size of 1.85 nm and specific gravity of 1.49 g/cm3. Furthermore, each such cluster consists of about five glucopyranose layers with an average interlayer spacing of 0.45 nm. Amorphous cellulose is characterized by increased hydrophilicity, reactivity, and enzymatic digestibility. Due to its amorphous structure, the CAC can be used as a promising substrate for enzymatic hydrolysis to produce glucose, which can be applied in biotechnology for growing various microorganisms. In addition, the application of CAC in agriculture is described. A waste-free method for producing amorphous nanocellulose is considered, and the main applications of nanosized amorphous cellulose are discussed.

1. Introduction

Natural polysaccharides constitute a wide class of natural biopolymers that comprise cellulose, starch, dextran, agar, xanthan, xylanes, mannanes, galactans, alginates, carrageenans, etc. Most of these polysaccharides are low crystalline or amorphous and readily soluble in water [1]. A pronounced exception to this rule is natural cellulose, a highly crystalline and water-insoluble polysaccharide. As is known, cellulose is the most widespread natural biopolymer [2]. Natural cellulose is a structural constituent of all land plants and many algae [3]. In addition, cellulose occurs in shells (tunicates) of certain marine creatures [4], and this biopolymer is also produced by some microorganisms, e.g., Gluconacetobacter xylinus [5].
To isolate a pure biopolymer, the cellulose-containing raw material is treated with solutions of various chemicals, such as caustic soda, a mixture of sodium hydroxide with sodium sulfide, and sulfurous acid or its salts [6]. Some other pulping methods are also used on a small scale. The pulping process is followed by multi-stage bleaching.
Studies have shown that macromolecules of natural cellulose may contain 2000 to 30,000 repeating anhydroglucose units (AGU), which are linked by chemical β-1,4-glycosidic bonds [7,8]. In nature, cellulose chains are connected in the transverse direction by hydrogen and Van der Waals bonds and form nanofibrils, which contain crystallites and non-crystalline (amorphous) domains.
Crystallites of natural celluloses may exist in two different crystal forms, triclinic CIα and monoclinic CIβ. Crystallites of algae and bacterial cellulose have CIα allomorph, while crystallites in the cellulose of land plants and tunicates have CIβ allomorph [9,10]. After specific physicochemical treatments of natural cellulose, other crystalline allomorphs, CII, CIII, or CIV can be obtained [11].
Cellulose crystallites are stable constituents and therefore they are inaccessible to common organic solvents, water, and diluted water solutions of acids, alkalis, and salts [12]. The crystallinity, i.e., mass fraction of crystallites in natural cellulose, ranges from 0.53–0.55 (cellulose of herbaceous plants) to 0.77–0.80 (tunicate cellulose) [12,13]. Due to increased crystallinity, natural cellulose exhibits low accessibility to reagents. In particular, it gives a small yield of glucose after acidic [14] or enzymatic hydrolysis [15,16]. In addition, the high crystallinity of natural cellulose hampers dyeing, diffusion, and sorption of water vapor [17], which negatively affects its use in textile materials.
To increase the accessibility, reactivity, and sorption ability of natural cellulose, it is necessary to destroy the crystalline structure of this biopolymer to obtain amorphized or completely amorphous cellulose.
A literature search on this problem showed that there are only research articles devoted to preparation methods of amorphized cellulose by grinding [18] or processing with various solvents [19,20]. In addition, there are articles where some properties of amorphized cellulose are considered, e.g., acid hydrolyzability, thermal stability, etc. [21]. However, no reviews were found on amorphized cellulose. Therefore, it was necessary to collect and analyze the appropriate literature, including the author’s own results, and then summarize them in a special review.
The main purpose of this review article was to discuss the main methods of cellulose amorphization, to describe methods for determining the structural characteristics of initial and amorphized cellulose, as well as to study the effect of structural changes in cellulosic materials after amorphization on various properties, including sorption, hydrolyzability, and enzymatic digestibility.

2. Characterization Methods of Original and Amorphized Celluloses

Various methods can be used to study the structure and properties of cellulose materials and their structural changes during and after amorphization, as follows.

2.1. Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS)

The WAXS method is designed to determine the position, intensity, shape, and width of the diffraction peaks of diverse materials, and to study features of crystalline structure, such as crystallinity, sizes of crystallites, type and content of crystalline allomorph, interplanar spacings, parameters of unit crystalline cells, lattice distortion degree, etc. X-ray diffractograms are recorded by a standard X-ray diffractometer using the CuKα-radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). This diffractometer consists of X-ray tube, monochromator, slits to adjust the beam, goniometer, and detector. After recording the diffractograms, it is necessary to subtract the incoherent background and then correct the peak intensities. Corrections include the coefficient of X-ray absorption, LP coefficient, and Rietveld refinement. Corrected diffraction patterns are used to determine various structural characteristics of cellulose samples [22,23,24].

2.1.1. Determination of the Angular Positions of the Main Diffraction Peaks

Parameters of crystalline structure of different allomorphs were shown in Table 1.
To calculate the interplanar spacings (d) in the crystalline lattice, Bragg’s equation is used:
d = λ/(2sin θhkl),

2.1.2. Determination of Crystallinity and Amorphicity Degree

The term “actual degree of crystallinity” means the mass fraction of the crystalline phase in the sample including fraction of paracrystalline layers of crystallites. To find the degree of crystallinity, mostly the X-ray method is used. This method requires the fulfillment of certain conditions: (1). The sample must be untextured; (2). The corrected X-ray diffractogram should be used, from which the scattering areas of crystalline (cr) and non-crystalline domains (nc) should be separated (Figure 1).
To calculate the actual degree of crystallinity (X), the area of crystalline scattering is divided by the full scattering area of the sample:
X = ( Jc   d φ ) / ( Jo   d φ ) ,
where Jc and Jo are the corrected and normalized intensities of X-ray diffraction of crystallites only and whole sample, respectively; φ = 2θ°.
The degree of amorphicity (Y) is calculated, as follows:
Y = 1 − X,

2.1.3. Determination of Crystallite Sizes

To find an average size of small crystallites from X-ray patterns, Scherrer’s equation is usually used:
Dsh = K λ/(B cos θhkl),
where B is the width of the peak at the half of the maximum of peak height (in radians); θhkl is Bragg’s angle at the peak maximum; shape coefficient K is usually taken close to 1.
However, Scherrer’s equation has limitations. First, this equation is not reliable if the crystallite size in any crystallographic direction reaches 100 nm, and secondly, it does not take into account the contribution of instrumental (b) and distortion (Δ) factors in the experimental width (B) of the peak [25,26,27]. Thus, to calculate the corrected width of the crystalline peak, the following equation should be used:
Bo = (B2 − b2 − Δ2)1/2,
The instrumental factor, b, can be measured using a crystalline standard, e.g., D-cellobiose. The contribution of the distortions in the width of the peak can be calculated as follows:
Δ = 4δ tgθhkl,
where δ is distortion degree; d is interplanar spacings in the direction perpendicular to (hkl) planes of crystallites.
Thus, to calculate the actual size of crystallites, Dcr, the updated equation should be used:
Dcr = λ/(cos θhkl) ((B2 − b2 − Δ2))1/2,
For example, using the broadening of (200) peak of CIβ crystallites, the distortion factor, Δ, can be calculated by the following empirical equation [28]:
Δ = 2.083d − 0.7997,
where d (nm) is interplanar spacings in the direction perpendicular to 200-planes.
In this case, one can find the actual lateral size of the crystallites, Dcr, in the direction perpendicular to the 200-planes.
The WAXS method can be also used to study the structural characteristics of completely amorphous cellulose. The X-ray diffraction pattern of such cellulose has a wide diffuse scattering with one maximum at 2θm ≈ 19.8°, which is typical for amorphous polymers having local ordering in the arrangement of repeating units. Based on the obtained diffraction pattern, the following structural characteristics of amorphous cellulose can be found. First, the average interplanar spacings (dm) in a distorted mesomorphous lattice can be calculated by Bragg’s Equation (1).
dm = λ/(2sin θm),
where θm ≈ 9.9°.
Second, the average size (Dm) of the mesomorphous cluster can be calculated using Warren’s equation for 2D structures [29].
Dm = k λ/(Bo cos θm),
where coefficient k = 1.84 and Bo is the corrected width of the diffuse peak.
Third, the electron and atomic density radial distribution functions can be calculated to study the near order in an amorphous matter [30].

2.2. Method of CP/MAS 13C NMR

The abbreviation CP/MAS 13C NMR denotes “Solid-state cross-polarization magic angle spinning 13C NMR spectroscopy”. The CP/MAS 13C-NMR spectra are recorded by spectrometers operating at 50–75 MHz 13C resonance frequency. A zirconium oxide rotor is used. The MAS rate is 4–5 kHz. The acquisition is made with a CP pulse sequence using a 3–4 μs proton 90° pulses; 0.8–1 ms contact pulse and a 2.5–3 s delay between repetitions. Accumulation numbers of the pulses are >2000 to provide the total acquisition time ≥2 h. Glycine can be used as an external standard for the calibration of the chemical shift scale relative to tetramethylsilane. The data point of maximum intensity in the glycine carbonyl line is assigned a chemical shift of 176.03 ppm.
The CP/MAS 13C NMR method generates peaks (signals) from carbon atoms of anhydroglucose unit of cellulose [31,32]. Atoms C1 give a peak in the range of chemical shift (δ) of 100–110 ppm, atoms C4-in the range of 82–90 ppm, C2, C3, and C5 in the range of 70–80 ppm, and atoms C6 in the range of 60–68 ppm (Figure 2).
To estimate the index of crystallinity (CrI), the “crystalline” and “non-crystalline” peaks of C4 atoms are usually used. The peak at 88–89 ppm is attributed to C4 atoms of crystallites, while the peak at 83–84 ppm to C4 atoms of non-crystalline domains. Indeed, after amorphization of the crystalline cellulose, the “crystalline” peak at 88–89 ppm disappears. A problem is that the C4 peaks at 83–84 ppm and 88–89 ppm are overlapping. To separate these “crystalline” and “non-crystalline” peaks, a special deconvolution procedure was performed. Then, the CrI was calculated by the equation:
CrI = Fcr/(Fcr + Fnc),
where Fcr and Fnc are areas of peaks (signals) attributed to C4-atoms of crystallites and non-crystalline domains, respectively.

2.3. Sorption of Water Vapor

Sorption isotherms of water vapor by cellulosic materials have a sigmoidal shape, similar to multilayer adsorption isotherms. However, the BET equation cannot be used for the calculation of sorption characteristics of cellulose, because the sorption mechanism of water vapor in this biopolymer is no adsorption of the sorbate on the surface of pores, but absorption of the vapor molecules into non-crystalline domains (NCD) of cellulose. In this case, a thermodynamic Equation (12) is used to describe the sorption isotherms [33]:
S = So Y/(1 − K lnα),
where S is the sorption value at a temperature of 25 °C and certain relative vapor pressure, α = p/po; So = 0.507 is the maximum sorption value for completely amorphous cellulose at α = 1; K = 2.7 is coefficient; Y is the degree of amorphicity.
Thus, at constant α-value, the sorption of water vapor is directly proportional to a fraction (Y) of NCD in the cellulose sample.

2.4. Heat of Wetting

Calorimetry is a thermodynamic method that provides the determination heat effect of the interaction of cellulose samples with various liquids. For this study, various types of calorimeters and microcalorimeters can be used [34]. The standard heat effect of interaction is measured at 25 °C and pressure of 1 atm. The experiments show that the interaction of dry cellulose samples with water at standard conditions is accompanied by the exothermic heat of wetting (Q). Because the interaction with water is carried out in non-crystalline domains (NCD) of cellulose, the heat of wetting is directly proportional to a fraction (Y) of NCD in the cellulose sample:
Q = Qo Y,
where Qo = 168 J/g is the maximum heat of wetting for completely amorphous cellulose in a dry state and Y is the degree of amorphicity.

3. Methods of Cellulose Amorphization

Various physical and physicochemical methods can be used to destroy the crystalline structure of cellulose. Among physical methods, dry grinding of cellulose in ball mills is most widespread [18,35,36]. For this purpose, cellulose sheets are dried, cut into small pieces, and subjected to preliminary disintegration in a knife mill. The resulting dry fibers are ground for 24 h, at least, in a ball mill using porcelain balls. The main problem of using ball milling for the amorphization of cellulose is the high cost of this process, estimated at $10–15 per kg. In addition, the obtained amorphized cellulose has an unstable phase state and recrystallizes in a humid atmosphere or aqueous medium [36].
Mercerization is the treatment of cellulose with a concentrated (18–20%) solution of sodium hydroxide. This treatment is accompanied by partial decrystallization, as well as a transformation of crystalline allomorph CI into allomorph CII [37]. Due to these structural changes, mercerization is widely used in physicochemistry and chemistry of cellulose to improve the dyeing, for determining the content of alpha-fraction, and for the preliminary activation of cellulose structure before etherification.
The treatment of cellulose with liquid ammonia, primary amines, and ethylenediamine (EDA) causes both partial decrystallization and transformation of crystalline allomorph CI into allomorph CIII [7,38,39]. However, neither treatment with alkali, nor treatment with liquid ammonia, amines, or EDA leads to complete amorphization of cellulose.
It is also known that after the regeneration of cellulose from solutions, its structure is amorphized. For this purpose, you can use various cellulose solvents, such as ionic liquids (IL), NMMO, LiCl/DMAA, DMSO/PFA, DMSO/DEA/SO2, H3PO4, etc. [40,41,42,43,44,45]. However, the application of these solvents for the amorphization of cellulose has a significant shortcoming, the quite high cost of such solvents. So, according to the Alibaba catalog, the average price of DMSO, DEA, DMAA, and H3PO4 is $1.5–2 per kg, NMMO $10–20 per kg, and IL $100–150 per kg. In addition, the mentioned organic solvents are toxic substances, while H3PO4 is an inorganic acid irritating the skin and eyes. The traditional cellulose solvents, CS2/NaOH system, and Cuproxam, used in the 20th century for the production of artificial cellulose fibers and films, are currently prohibited due to their toxicity and environmental hazard.
The cheapest cellulose solvent is probably an aqueous solution of 7% NaOH/12% Urea [46,47] denoted as N/U, which has a cost of $0.05 per kg due to the low price of commercial chemicals. Urea is a harmless substance and sodium hydroxide is a non-toxic but irritating substance that nevertheless is widely used in compliance with safety rules. The problem is that only the dilute cellulose solution in this solvent can be obtained, which complicates the regeneration process and reduces the productivity of amorphized cellulose (AC). To overcome this shortcoming, the use of the cellulose swelling process in the N/U solvent instead of dissolution was proposed [48].
The initial cellulosic pulp was placed in a glass beaker cooled with an ice/salt mixture to a temperature of −15 °C. Then, a cold N/U solvent was added at the ratio of the solvent to cellulose material (R) from 3 to 10 (v/w) while periodically stirred for 1 h, and after which left overnight in a freezer at −15 °C. The treated samples were removed from the freezer and mixed with a 10-fold volume of tap water. The swollen, gel-like samples were separated from a liquid medium on a vacuum glass filter, washed with water, neutralized with 1% HCl to pH 6–7, and then again washed with water. To study the structural characteristics and some physicochemical properties, the wet samples were rinsed with ethanol and dried at 60 °C to constant weight.
Along with the direct methods of obtaining amorphized cellulose, there are also indirect methods, e.g., by saponification of cellulose acetate in non-aqueous media [49]. The resulting amorphous cellulose has an unstable phase state and crystallizes in a humid atmosphere or aqueous medium.
A special type of amorphous cellulose is amorphous nanocellulose (ANC) dispersed to nanosized particles. It is usually obtained through acid hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose with subsequent ultrasound or mechanical disintegration in an aqueous medium [50]. This method comprises stages of cellulose dissolution, regeneration from solution to obtain amorphized cellulose (AC), partial acid hydrolysis of AC, washing of depolymerized AC, dilution with water, and comminuting in an aqueous media using ultrasound disintegrator, high-pressure homogenizer, microfluidizer, and some other apparatus. The main shortcomings of the common ANC production method are the loss of the solvent and part of cellulose, high consumption of chemicals and energy, as well as low productivity.
To overcome these shortcomings, a novel waste-free technology must be used [51]. This technology includes dissolving cellulose in sulfuric acid at low temperatures, holding for partial hydrolysis and reducing the degree of polymerization, regeneration of AC by dilution with water, separation of AC from the acid solution, washing and disintegration of AC in aqueous media to obtain nanoparticles, use of dilute acid for the production of by-products, and return of used water to the production cycle.
The general technology can be detailed by the following specific example. The initial pulp was mixed in a beaker with the predetermined amount of water. Then, 80 wt. % sulfuric acid was slowly added while cooling in an ice-water bath and stirring to obtain the required final acid concentration of 66% and acid/cellulose ratio of 10. The beaker was placed into the ice-water bath and stirred for 60 min. After acidic treatment, the contents of the beaker were poured out into a threefold volume of cold water while stirring to regenerate flocs of amorphous cellulose (AC). The flocs were separated from the dilute acid by centrifugation at 5000× g for 10–15 min; washed with distilled water to a pH of about 5, separating them from water by centrifugation. The separated flocs of AC were diluted with distilled water to a concentration of 1% and disintegrated by an ultrasound disperser “Branson S450CE” at 20 kHz for 10–15 min. The 1 wt. % water dispersion of ANC was evaporated under vacuum at 50 °C in order to obtain a hydrogel with a solids content of 10 wt. %.
The dilute acid and acidic washing water were collected together and neutralized with cheap Ca-containing compounds, e.g., calcium hydroxide, to precipitate calcium sulfate (CaSO4) [51]:
H2SO4 + Ca(OH)2 → CaSO4 + 2H2O
This by-product is widely used as a white pigment for paints, filler for polymers and paper compositions, as well as an inorganic binder for the production of putties, plasters, and drywall. Another cheap Ca-containing compound can be mineral-hydroxylapatite, Ca5(PO4)3OH. As a result of treatment of the dilute acid and acidic washing water with hydroxylapatite, the sulfuric acid is almost completely utilized and turns into such valuable by-product as superphosphate fertilizer:
7H2SO4 + 2Ca5(PO4)3OH → 3Ca(H2PO4)2 × 7CaSO4 + 2H2O
The wastewater was purified and returned to the technological cycle. Thus, the proposed waste-free technology ensures the production of ANC and complete utilization of solvent and reagent-sulfuric acid, by its conversion into valuable by-products, the sale of which can significantly reduce the cost of ANC. Studies have shown that ANC can be obtained with a yield of 60–65%. Particles of ANC have a round shape and average diameter of about 100 nm [50] (Figure 3).
The isolated ANC is characterized by a high amorphicity degree and decreased degree of polymerization, DP (Table 2). Moreover, the ANC contains sulfonic and reducing aldehyde groups.

4. Characterization of Amorphized and Amorphous Cellulose

4.1. Structural and Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Amorphized Cellulose

Some structural characteristics of AC samples are shown in Table 3.
The obtained results showed that after dry milling, mercerization, or treatment with liquid ammonia, the complete amorphization of cellulose does not occur.
After cellulose processing with a cold N/U solvent at R = 3, the CI allomorph of the initial cellulose is transformed into a CII allomorph with a low crystallinity degree. However, when the initial cellulose is treated with the cold solvent at R ≥ 5, completely amorphous cellulose (CAC) is formed (Figure 4).
Thus, the minimum R-value required to prepare the CAC is about 5. The same minimum R-value is required to obtain CAC by the treatment of mixed waste paper (MWP) containing waste paper towels, paper wipes, and blotting/absorbent paper. The structural changes of cellulose after various treatments were also analyzed using physicochemical methods (Table 4).
As follows from the obtained results (Table 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6), the most amorphized samples (Y = 1) are also the most hydrophilic.

4.2. Structural Features of Completely Amorphous Cellulose

The X-ray scattering of completely amorphous cellulose (CAC) has a wide reflex with a maximum at 2θ ≈ 19.8° (Figure 4), which is typical for amorphous polymers having local ordering in the arrangement of repeating units [52]. Such structural organization can be called “mesomorphous” because its order is intermediate between highly ordered crystalline and completely disordered amorphous structures [53].
Structural studies showed that amorphous cellulose contains mesomorphous clusters [54]. The average spacing between planes in such clusters, dm ≈ 0.45 nm, was calculated by Bragg’s Equation (1), taking into account that θ ≈ 9.9°. In addition, using the Warren equation for 2D structures, the average size of the mesomorphous cluster was calculated, Dm ≈ 1.85 nm. These nano-sized mesomorphous clusters can serve as local dots for the subsequent growth of crystallite nuclei.
Further, the function of radial distribution of electron density (F) was also calculated to refine the cluster structure of CAC [55]:
F = 2r/π ∫ si(s) sin (rs) ds
where i(s) is corrected reduced intensity and s = (4π/λ) sin θ.
With increasing radius r, the cyclic F-function gradually fades. Nevertheless, the graph of this function until completely fading has five maximums of electron density at r-values of 0.1, 0.45, 0.9, 1.4, and 1.9 nm (Figure 7).
The first maximum of F-function at 0.1 nm is intramolecular and relates to the superposition of bond lengths between atoms in repeating anhydroglucose units (AGU) of amorphous cellulose. The second maximum of electron density is intermolecular and corresponds to average spacing dm = 0.45 nm between planes in the mesomorphous cluster, whereas the third and fourth maximums correspond to the doubled and tripled dm -value. The radius of electron density at 1.9 nm correlates with the average size of the mesomorphous cluster, Dm. As is follows from calculations, the cluster of CAC can consist of about five layers formed by AGU.
Based on the results of structural studies, a model of the mesomorphous unit cell of the cluster in AC was proposed (Figure 8).
Such a model has angle γ of about 120° and parameters a and b of about 0.9 nm. Average interlayer distance, dm, can be calculated, as follows:
dm = b sin[(180 − γ)/2] = 0.45 (nm),
In this model of the mesomorphous cluster of CAC, the layers formed by AGU are oriented along 110-directions. Only one distance (dm) between 110 -planes in all cells is constant: dm = 0.45 nm. Consequently, only one maximum can be present on the X-ray pattern of amorphous cellulose, at 2θ ≈ 19.8°, corresponding to interlayer spacing, dm.
Interplanar distances in other directions for different cells are not constant and can vary in limited range owing to the irregular shifting of layers, which hinder the appearance of other diffraction maximums for amorphous cellulose. Furthermore, the specific gravity of the mesomorphous clusters (ρm) was evaluated from the known equation for rhombic unit cell:
ρm = C/(a b c sin γ),
where C = 1.076 is the coefficient of dimension, a = b = 0.9 nm, c = 1.03 nm, and γ = 120°.
The calculated specific gravity of the mesomorphous clusters, ρm ≈ 1.49 g/cm3, is slightly higher than the average specific gravity of amorphous cellulose, ρa ≈ 1.44–1.45 g/cm3 [12] (see also Appendix A).

5. Acidic Hydrolyzability and Enzymatic Digestibility

Cellulose samples can be hydrolyzed by acids and cellulolytic enzymes. To evaluate the hydrolyzability of cellulose, the cellulose samples were treated with 2.5 M sulfuric acid at 100 °C for 4 h using acid to sample ratio of 40 [54]. The hydrolyzate was separated from residue by centrifugation, and the acid was neutralized with calcium carbonate. The formed precipitate of calcium sulfate was separated from the aqueous phase by centrifugation, after which the liquid was analyzed to determine the concentration of glucose.
To study enzymatic digestibility, the cellulose samples were treated with a commercial cellulolytic enzyme Cellic CTec-3 (Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) [48]. The dose of the enzyme was 30 mg per 1 g of solid sample. Hydrolysis of the samples was carried out in 50-mL polypropylene tubes. The samples containing 1 g of solid matter and 1 mL of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH = 4.8) were put into the tubes. Then, the needed amount of the enzyme was added. Further, an additional amount of the buffer was supplemented to obtain a concentration of the cellulose substrate from 50 to 150 g/L. The tubes closed with covers were placed in a shaker incubator at 50 °C and shaken for 48 h. The hydrolyzate was separated from residue by centrifugation, after which the liquid was analyzed to determine the concentration of glucose.
The concentration of glucose in hydrolyzate after acidic or enzymatic hydrolysis was determined by the HPLC-apparatus of Agilent Technologies 1200 Infinity Series. The Amines HPX-87H column was used. The main conditions of the analysis were temperature 45 °C; mobile phase 0.005 M sulfuric acid; flow rate 0.6 mL/min. The hydrolyzate was preliminarily filtered through a 0.45 μm Nylon filter. The yield of glucose (YG, %) after hydrolysis was calculated by the equation:
YG = 100% (Cg/Co),
where Cg is the final concentration of glucose in hydrolyzate (g/L) and Co is the initial cellulose content (g/L).
The following samples were used to test the acidic hydrolyzability and enzymatic digestibility:
  • Original chemical-grade cotton cellulose (ORC) having 98% α-fraction and DP = 2700
  • Mercerized cellulose (MRC)
  • Ammonia treated cellulose (AMC)
  • Ball-milled cellulose (BMC)
  • Cellulose materials treated with N/U-solvent at R = 5 and 10, which are completely amorphous cellulose samples (CAC)
The study of acidic hydrolyzability showed (Figure 9) that after the amorphization of original cellulose by different methods, a significant increase in the glucose yield is observed, especially for completely amorphous cellulose samples (CAC). This phenomenon can be explained by a directly proportional relationship between the hydrolyzability and the amorphicity degree of cellulose (Figure 10).
An exception is observed for two samples, AMC and BMC, which have an unstable phase state and partly crystallize under relatively mild reaction conditions (processing in an aqueous medium at 100 °C), and thereby their acidic hydrolyzability is reduced. In contrast to these two samples, the rest of the studied samples, including CAC and other amorphous samples obtained by regeneration from cellulose solutions, do not crystallize under the said mild reaction conditions [49]. To crystallize CAC samples via processing in the aqueous medium, a higher temperature is required.
Since the method of cellulose swelling in N/U solvent proved to be the most effective to increase its acidic hydrolyzability, this method was also applied for pretreatment of cellulose samples intended for enzymatic hydrolysis. For such pretreatment, samples of original cotton cellulose (ORC), microcrystalline cellulose Avicel PH-101 (MCC), and mixed waste paper (MWP) were used as initial materials.
Without solvent pretreatment, the initial materials have a moderate enzymatic digestibility at Co = 50 g/L with YG 44–48%. However, after swelling in a cold N/U-solvent at the solvent to cellulose ratio R ≥ 5, the obtained samples are hydrolyzed almost completely (Figure 11) due to the amorphous structure of these samples (Table 3).
Despite the high enzymatic digestibility at the content of CAC, Co = 50 g/L, the glucose concentration in hydrolyzate does not exceed 55 g/L (5.5%), which is too low for further fermentation. To increase the concentration of glucose, the initial content of the CAC substrate should be enhanced. If Co is increased to 150 g/L, then glucose concentration in the hydrolyzate increases to 147 g/L (Figure 12).

6. Potential Applications of Amorphized Cellulose

Currently, amorphized cellulose (AC) is used only in laboratory research. For example, AC obtained by ball-grinding is used as an amorphous standard for structural studies of cellulose [16]. Another example is AC regenerated from a solution in o-phosphoric acid, which is used as an amorphous standard in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and plant biomass [45].
There are two main reasons that hinder the commercialization of amorphized cellulose. The first is the high cost of the original cellulose. So, the market price of bleached pulp is $600–800 per ton, whereas the price of cotton cellulose is even higher and reaches $1000 per ton. Therefore, it is not profitable to use them to produce cheap amorphous cellulose on a pilot or industrial scale.
The second reason is the high consumption of chemicals and energy for most of the methods of AC production. The only exception is the amortization method by swelling of the starting material in a cold N/U solvent [48]. This process is the cheapest of all known due to the low cost of chemicals and low energy consumption.
For commercial production of amorphous cellulose, it is most advisable to use cheap raw materials such as mixed waste paper (MWP), which can be supplied for $50 per ton. Studies have shown that if the content of MWP-based AC substrate in the reaction system reaches Co = 150 g/L, then after 48 h of hydrolysis at the enzyme dose of 3%, a quite high glucose concentration Cg = 141 g/L can be achieved [48]. As a result, quite cheap glucose can be released. This technical-grade product can find diverse applications in biotechnology to produce ethanol [56]; acetic, lactic, and citric acids [57]; proteins, yeasts, and enzymes [58,59,60]; bacterial cellulose [61], polyhydroxyalkanoates [62], and other valuable bioproducts.
If MWP, after swelling in a cold N/U solvent, is washed with water, but not dried, then the resulting technical AC takes the form of a hydrogel. As is known, hydrogels are capable of holding large amounts of water in their three-dimensional networks [63,64]. The hydrogels can be used in biology, chemistry, physical chemistry, chromatography, medicine, hygiene, pharmaceutics, food processing, and other areas [65,66].
Recently, much attention has been paid to the use of hydrogels in agriculture and soil technology [67,68,69,70,71,72]. However, agricultural applications are limited by the high cost of synthetic polymeric hydrogels, their low production volume, and biostability.
To solve these problems, it is necessary to use cheap, available, and biodegradable natural material, such as MWP, for the production of hydrogels. Such hydrogels can be produced by the swelling of MWP in a cold N/U-solvent at R ≥ 5 followed by washing [73]. Another technology of hydrogel aimed especially for growing plants was the following: after MWP swelling in the cold N/U solvent, the swollen sample was treated with phosphoric acid to obtain a hydrogel containing phosphate salt and urea serving as PN fertilizer. This hydrogel enriched with PN fertilizer is highly effective in seed germination, and after usage, it can be completely decomposed under the action of microorganisms present in the soil [73].
Undried amorphous nanocellulose (ANC) can also form a hydrogel. It was found that the hydrogel of ANC can be used as an effective thickener. Therefore, a small addition of this hydrogel significantly increases the phase stability of aqueous dispersions of some drugs, e.g., “Maalox” (Figure 13).
Particles of ANC can also find application in medicine and cosmetics as a carrier of therapeutically active substances (TAS). Due to the increased content of acidic sulfonic and reducing functional groups (Table 2), ANC can serve as a nano-carrier of various TAS. For example, sulfonic groups of ANC can attach some bactericides, e.g., Ag-cations and ZnO [74]:
ANC-SO3H + Ag+ → ANC-SO3Ag + H+
ANC-SO3H + ZnO → ANC-SO3ZnOH
In addition, acidic functional groups of ANC contribute to the ion binding of amino acids containing basic amino groups, e.g., arginine, lysine, or histidine, by the following scheme:
ANC-SO3H + H2N-A → ANC-SO3− +H3N-A
In particular, the obtained ANC-Arginine conjugate can be used for the effective treatment and regeneration of damaged skin tissues, cure of herpes simplex virus, and in other arginine-therapy areas [75,76].
The presence in ANC reducing groups provides additional opportunities for attaching TAS. For example, the joining of a proteolytic enzyme like trypsin to nanoparticles of ANC can be expressed by the scheme:
ANC-HC=O + H2N-R → ANC-CHOH-NH-R
Along with trypsin, some others enzymes, such as chymotrypsin, papain, collagenases, lysoamidases, lysozymes, etc., can be attached to ANC–nanocarrier and used for the treatment of wounds and burns [77].

7. Conclusions

Cellulose is the most abundant and widely used crystalline biopolymer. However, due to increased crystallinity, cellulose exhibits low accessibility to reagents. In particular, it gives a small yield of glucose after acidic or enzymatic hydrolysis. To increase the accessibility and reactivity of natural cellulose, it is necessary to destroy the crystalline structure of this biopolymer. Various physical and physicochemical methods can be used for the amorphization of cellulose structure, such as dry grinding, mercerization, treatment with liquid ammonia, primary amines, EDA, and diverse solvents, etc. The problem is that most of these methods are quite expensive and cannot be used for cellulose decrystallization on a large scale.
The exception is a quite cheap solvent that is an aqueous system of 7% NaOH/12% Urea (N/U). It has been found that after cellulose treatment with cold N/U-solvent at the solvent to cellulose ratio R ≥ 5, a completely amorphous sample (CAC) can be obtained. Structural studies showed that amorphous cellulose contains mesomorphous clusters with an average size of 1.85 nm and specific gravity of 1.49 g/cm3. Furthermore, each cluster consists of about five glucopyranose layers with an average interlayer spacing of 0.45 nm.
Amorphous cellulose is characterized by increased hydrophilicity, accessibility, reactivity, and enzymatic digestibility. Due to its amorphous structure, the CAC is converted to glucose almost completely in a short time under the action of a relatively small dose of cellulolytic enzymes. Such a CAC sample can be used as an amorphous standard, and as a substrate for the commercial production of glucose, which can find application in biotechnology as a promising nutrient for various microorganisms. In addition, the hydrogel of amorphous cellulose can be applied in agriculture.
The amorphous nanocellulose (ANC) having round particles with an average diameter of about 100 nm can be prepared using waste-free technology. The hydrogel of ANC can be used as a thickener. Moreover, due to the presence of acidic sulfonic and reducing functional groups, ANC can serve as a nano-carrier of various therapeutically active substances.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. Determination of Specific Gravity of Amorphous Cellulose

Here are two methods for finding the specific gravity (SG) of amorphous cellulose. The first method is based on the experimental measurement of SG of cellulose samples with different crystallinity degrees. As is known, the dependence of SG (ρ) on the crystallinity degree (X) of semi-crystalline polymers can be expressed by the following equation [78]:
1/ρ = 1/ρa − X [(1/ρa) − (1/ρc)],
where ρc is the SG of the crystalline fraction and ρa is the SG of the amorphous fraction of a semi-crystalline polymer. The dependence (A1) is the equation of a straight line:
V = Va − KX,
where V = 1/ρ is a specific volume of the semi-crystalline sample, Va = 1/ρa is a specific volume of the amorphous fraction, and coefficient K = (1/ρa) − (1/ρc).
To obtain such a straight line, it is necessary to determine the SG and X of a few samples of the semi-crystalline polymer. This method was verified using the following cellulose samples:
  • Pure chemical-grade cotton cellulose (CC) of Hercules Inc. (97% α-cellulose, DP = 2700)
  • Bleached Kraft chemical pulp (KP) of Weyerhaeuser (93% α-cellulose; DP = 1100)
  • Mercerized KP (MKP) (99% α-cellulose, DP = 1800) was prepared using treatment of KP with 20% NaOH at 25 °C for 1 h followed by washing and drying
  • Regenerated cellulose-rayon fibers (RF) of Rayonier Inc (DP = 370)
The values of crystallinity degree (X) of the cellulose samples were determined by the calorimetric method, measuring their wetting heat (Q, J/g) [79]:
X = 1 − KQ,
where coefficient K = 0.006 (g/J).
The values of specific gravity (SG) of the dry samples were tested at 25 °C by the pycnometry method in a hexane medium. The testing results are shown in Table A1.
Table A1. Characteristics of cellulose samples.
Table A1. Characteristics of cellulose samples.
SampleXSG, g/cm3
CC0.691.561
KP0.631.550
MKP0.531.532
RF0.381.507
Using these results, a linear graph of Equation (A2) was built (Figure A1), from which the specific volume of amorphous cellulose, Va = 0.693 (cm3/g), was found, and then the SG of amorphous cellulose, ρa = 1/Va = 1.443 (g/cm3), was calculated.
Figure A1. Dependence of specific volume (V) on crystallinity degree (X) of cellulose samples.
Figure A1. Dependence of specific volume (V) on crystallinity degree (X) of cellulose samples.
Polymers 13 04313 g0a1
The second way is to use a calculation method based on the group contributions to the molar volume of glassy amorphous polymers such as cellulose [80]. According to this method, the contributions of structural groups to the molar volume of the repeating unit of amorphous cellulose are as follows (Table A2).
Table A2. Contributions of structural groups to molar volume of the repeating unit of amorphous cellulose *.
Table A2. Contributions of structural groups to molar volume of the repeating unit of amorphous cellulose *.
GroupVi (cm3/Mole)NN × Vi (cm3/Mole)
CH215.85115.85
CH9.45547.25
OH9.7329.1
O10.0220.0
Total Vm:112.2
* Note: Vi is an increment of the group; N is the number of groups in repeating unit.
The calculated molar volume of amorphous cellulose, Vm, is 112.2 cm3/mole, and its specific volume, Va, is 0.6926 cm3/g, whereas the SG of amorphous cellulose is ρa = 1/Va = 1.443 g/cm3.
Thus, two independent methods gave the same specific gravity value of completely amorphous cellulose, ρa = 1.443 g/cm3.

References

  1. Torres, F.G.; Troncoso, O.P.; Pisani, A.; Gatto, F.; Bardi, G. Natural polysaccharide nanomaterials: An overview of their immunological properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Khandelwal, M.; Windle, A. Hierarchical Organisation in the Most Abundant Biopolymer—Cellulose; MRS Proceedings; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wahlström, N.; Edlund, U.; Pavia, H.; Toth, G.; Jaworski, A.; Pell, A.J.; Choong, F.X.; Shirani, H.; Nilsson, K.P.R.; Richter-Dahlfors, A. Cellulose from the green macroalgae Ulva lactuca: Isolation, characterization, optotracing, and production of cellulose nanofibrils. Cellulose 2020, 27, 3707–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhao, Y.; Li, J. Excellent chemical and material cellulose from tunicates: Diversity in cellulose production yield and chemical and morphological structures from different tunicate species. Cellulose 2014, 21, 3427–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keshk, S. Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J. Bioprocess. Biotech. 2015, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sjöström, E. Wood Chemistry, Fundamentals and Applications; Academic Press: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krässig, H.A. Cellulose, Structure, Accessibility and Reactivity; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Langhorne, PA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  8. Eliza, M.Y.; Shahruddin, M.; Noormaziah, J.; Wan Rosli, W.D. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) from oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) in the new solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 622, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sugiyama, J.; Vuong, R.; Chanzy, H. Electron diffraction study on the two crystalline phases occurring in native cellulose from an algal cell wall. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 4168–4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zugenmaier, P. Conformation and packing of various crystalline cellulose fibers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1341–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zugenmaier, P. Crystalline Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Characterization and Structures; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ioelovich, M. Models of supramolecular structure and properties of cellulose. J. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2016, 58, 925–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ioelovich, M. Cellulose: Nanostructured Natural Polymer; LAP: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ioelovich, M. Accessibility and crystallinity of cellulose. Bioresources 2009, 4, 1168–1177. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall, M.; Bansal, P.; Lee, J.H.; Realff, M.J.; Bommarius, A.S. Cellulose crystallinity—A key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.; Baker, J.O.; Himmel, M.E.; Parilla, P.A.; Johnson, D.K. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2010, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Grunin, Y.B.; Grunin, L.Y.; Schiraya, V.Y.; Ivanova, M.S.; Masas, D.S. Cellulose–water system’s state analysis by proton nuclear magnetic resonance and sorption measurements. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2020, 7, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maier, G.; Zipper, P.; Stubičar, M.; Schurz, J. Amorphization of different cellulose samples by ball milling. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2005, 39, 167–177. [Google Scholar]
  19. Glas, D.; Paesen, R.; Depuydt, D.; Binnemans, K.; Ameloot, M.; De Vos, D.E.; Ameloot, R. Cellulose amorphization by swelling in ionic liquid/water mixtures: A combined macroscopic and second-harmonic microscopy study. ChemSushem 2015, 8, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burger, D.; Winter, A.; Subbiahdoss, G.; Oberlerchner, J.T.; Beaumont, M.; Tamada, Y.; Rosenau, T. Partial amorphization of cellulose through Zinc Chloride treatment: A facile and sustainable pathway to functional cellulose nanofibers with flame-retardant and catalytic properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13576–13582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paajanen, A.; Rinta-Paavola, A.; Vaari, J. High-temperature decomposition of amorphous and crystalline cellulose: Reactive molecular simulations. Cellulose 2021, 28, 8987–9005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ioelovich, M. Adjustment of hydrophobic properties of cellulose materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rongpipi, S.; Ye, D.; Gomez, E.D.; Gomez, E.W. Progress and opportunities in the characterization of cellulose—An important regulator of cell wall growth and mechanics. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Momzakova, K.S.; Shinkarev, A.A.; Deberdeev, M.R.; Valishina, Z.T.; Berlin, A.A.; Deberdeev, R.Y. Comparative X-ray structural analysis of cotton celluloses and herbaceous plants. Chem. Plant Mater. 2021, 3, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, K. Advanced X-ray Techniques in Research and Industries; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mote, V.; Purushotham, Y.; Dole, B. Williamson-Hall analysis in estimation of lattice strain in nanometer-sized ZnO particles. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2012, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Danilchenko, S.N.; Kukharenko, O.G.; Moseke, C.; Protsenko, I.Y.; Sukhodub, L.F.; Sulkio-Cleff, B.J.C.R. Determination of bone mineral crystallite size and lattice strain from diffraction line broadening. Res. Technol. Crystallogr. 2002, 37, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ioelovich, M. Practical WAXS method for determination of distortions and sizes of cellulose crystallites. SITA 2018, 20, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Shu, K.; Jiang, D.; Ma, W. Structural characterization of coal components of late Permian coals from southern China by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. J. Biochem. Anal. Stud. 2016, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mariedahl, D.; Perakis, F.; Späh, A.; Pathak, H.; Kim, K.H.; Camisasca, G.; Schlesinger, D.; Benmore, C.; Pettersson, L.G.M.; Nilsson, A.; et al. X-ray scattering and O−O pair-distribution functions of amorphous ices. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 7616–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Atalla, R.H.; Vanderhart, D.L. The role of solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy in studies of the nature of native cellulose. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1999, 15, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zuckerstätter, G.; Schild, G.; Wollboldt, P.; Röder, T.; Weber, H.K.; Sixta, H. The elucidation of cellulose supramolecular structure by 13C CP-MAS NMR. Lenzing. Ber. 2009, 87, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ioelovich, M.; Leykin, A. Study of sorption properties of cellulose and its derivatives. Bioresources 2011, 6, 178–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wadső, I.; Goldberg, R. Standards in isothermal microcalorimetry. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 1625–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kuznetsov, B.N.; Yatsenkova, O.V.; Chudina, A.I.; Skripnikov, A.M.; Kozlova, S.A.; Garyntseva, N.V.; Chesnokov, N.V. Effect of mechanical and chemical activation microcrystalline cellulose on its structure and reactivity in hydrolysis with solid acid catalyst. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2014, 7, 122–133. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ago, M.; Endo, T.; Hirotsu, T. Crystalline transformation of native cellulose from cellulose I to cellulose II polymorph by a ball-milling method with a specific amount of water. Cellulose 2004, 11, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Halonen, H.; Larsson, P.T.; Iversen, T. Mercerized cellulose biocomposites: A study of influence of mercerization on cellulose supramolecular structure, water retention value and tensile properties. Cellulose 2013, 20, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mittal, A.; Katahira, R.; Himmel, M.E.; Johnson, D.K. Effects of alkaline or liquid ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: Changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, H.; Wu, T.; Wang, X.; Cheng, X.; Chen, N.; Li, D. Effect of ethylenediamine treatment on cellulose nanofibers and the formation of high-strength hydrogels. Bioresources 2019, 14, 1141–1156. [Google Scholar]
  40. Anantharam, P.D.; Sasidhar, V.; Constange, A.S. Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95, 904–910. [Google Scholar]
  41. Roseneau, T.; Potthast, A.; Sixta, H.; Kosma, P. The chemistry of side reactions and by-product formation in the system NMMO/cellulose (Lyocell process). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1763–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schroder, L.R.; Gentile, V.M.; Attala, R.H. Non-Degradative Preparation of Amorphous Cellulose; IPC Technical Paper Series, No 152; The Institute of Paper Chemistry: Appleton, WI, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ciolacu, D.; Ciolacu, F.; Popa, V.I. Amorphous cellulose—Structure and characterization. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2011, 45, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, C.; Liu, R.; Xiang, J.; Kang, H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y. Dissolution mechanism of cellulose in N,N-Dimethylacetamide/Lithium Chloride: Revisiting through molecular interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 9507–9514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.H.P.; Cui, J.; Lynd, L.R.; Kuang, L.R. A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: Evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Egal, M.; Budtova, T.; Navard, P. The dissolution of microcrystalline cellulose in sodium hydroxide-urea aqueous solutions. Cellulose 2008, 15, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duchemin, B.; Le Corre, D.; Leray, N.; Dufresne, A.; Staiger, M.P. All-cellulose composites based on microfibrillated cellulose and filter paper via a NaOH-Urea solvent system. Cellulose 2016, 23, 593–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ioelovich, M. Optimal method for production of amorphous cellulose with increased enzymatic digestibility. Org. Polym. Mater. Res. 2019, 1, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Togawa, E.; Kondo, T. Unique structural characteristics of nematic ordered cellulose—Stability in water and its facile transformation. J. Polym. Sci. B 2007, 45, 2850–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ioelovich, M. Peculiarities of cellulose nanoparticles. TAPPI J. 2014, 13, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ioelovich, M. Waste-free technologies for production of nanocrystalline cellulose and its composites. Adv. Environ. Waste Manag. Recycl. 2020, 3, 128–132. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lipatov, Y.S.; Shilov, V.V.; Gomza, Y.P.; Kruglak, N.E. X-ray Methods for Studying of Polymer Systems; Science: Kiev, Ukraine, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuzmina, L.G.; Konstantinov, I.I.; Churakov, A.V.; Lermontova, E.K. X-ray structure and DSC of mesomorphous 4-n-butyloxyphenyl-4′-methacryloyloxybenzoate. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 708, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hutomo, G.S.; Rahim, A.; Kadir, S. The Effect of sulfuric and hydrochloric acid on cellulose degradation from pod husk cacao. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015, 4, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ioelovich, M. Isophase and phase transitions of cellulose: A short review. SITA 2016, 18, 14–34. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kang, A.; Lee, T.S. Converting sugars to biofuels: Ethanol and beyond. Bioengineering 2015, 2, 184–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Muratova, E.I.; Susina, O.V.; Shunaeva, O.B. Biotechnology of Organic Acids and Proteins; University Press: Tambov, Russia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bekatorou, A.; Psarianos, C.; Koutinas, A.A. Production of food grade yeasts. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 44, 407–415. [Google Scholar]
  59. Anderson, C.; Longton, J.; Maddix, C.; Scammell, G.W.; Solomons, G.L. The Growth of Microfungi on Carbohydrates. In Single Cell Protein; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  60. Junker, B.H.; Mann, Z.; Seeley, A.; Zhang, J.; Greasham, R. Use of glucose feeding to produce concentrated yeast cells. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 97, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Molina-Ramírez, C.; Castro, M.; Osorio, M.; Torres-Taborda, M.; Gómez, B.; Zuluaga, R.; Gómez, C.; Gañán, P.; Rojas, O.J.; Castro, C. Effect of different carbon sources on bacterial nanocellulose production and structure using the low pH resistant strain Komagataeibacter Medellinensis. Materials 2017, 10, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Reddy, C.S.K.; Ghai, R.; Kalia, V.C. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahmed, E.M.; Aggor, F.S.; Awad, A.M.; El-Aref, A.T. An innovative method for preparation of nanometal hydroxide superabsorbent hydrogel. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Buchholz, F.L.; Graham, A.T. Modern Superabsorbent Polymer Technology; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  65. Li, Y.; Huang, G.; Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Chen, Y.; Lu, T.; Lu, T.J.; Xu, F. Magnetic hydrogels and their potential biomedical applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 660–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ahmed, E.M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Raju, K.M.; Raju, M.P. Synthesis of novel superabsorbing copolymers for agricultural and horticultural applications. Polym. Int. 2001, 50, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shaviv, A. Advances in controlled release of fertilizers. Adv. Agron. 2001, 71, 1–49. [Google Scholar]
  69. Davidson, D.W.; Verma, M.S.; Gu, F.X. Controlled root targeted delivery of fertilizer using an ionically crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel matrix. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Demitri, C.; Scalera, F.; Madaghiele, M.; Sannino, A.; Maffezzoli, A. Potential of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels as water reservoir in agriculture. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2013, 2013, 435073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, Z.; Liu, J.; Bai, Y.; Wei, J.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Kanungo, D.P.; Qian, W. Laboratory and field experiments on the effect of vinyl acetate polymer-reinforced soil. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Liu, S.; Wu, Q.; Sun, X.; Yue, Y.; Tubana, B.; Yang, R.; Cheng, H.N. Novel alginate-cellulose nanofiber-poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for carrying and delivering nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium chemicals. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 172, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ioelovich, M. Utilization of paper waste to manufacture of hydrogels. Adv. Environ. Waste Manag. Recycl. 2021, 4, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ioelovich, M. Chapter 9—Nanocellulose: Fabrication, Structure, Properties and Application in the Area of Care and Cure. In Fabrication and Self-Assembly of Nanobiomaterials: Applications of Nanobiomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  75. Witte, M.B.; Barbul, A. Arginine physiology and its implication for wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2003, 11, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stechmiller, J.K. Arginine supplementation and wound healing. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2005, 20, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Filatov, V.N.; Ioelovich, M.; Medusheva, E.O.; Kulagina, A.S.; Riltsev, V.B.; Belov, A.A. Production of Nanoparticles of Cellulose for Medicine Materials; Dipak: Moscow, Russia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ioelovich, M.; Leykin, A.; Figovsky, O. Study of cellulose paracrystallinity. Bioresources 2010, 5, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ioelovich, M. Physicochemical methods for determination of cellulose crystallinity. ChemXpress 2016, 9, 245–251. [Google Scholar]
  80. Van Krevelen, D.W. Properties of Polymers: Correlations with Chemical Structure; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Illustration of method for separation of scattering regions related to crystalline (cr) and non-crystalline (nc) domains.
Figure 1. Illustration of method for separation of scattering regions related to crystalline (cr) and non-crystalline (nc) domains.
Polymers 13 04313 g001
Figure 2. Solid-state 13C NMR spectrum of crystalline (A) and amorphous (B) cellulose.
Figure 2. Solid-state 13C NMR spectrum of crystalline (A) and amorphous (B) cellulose.
Polymers 13 04313 g002
Figure 3. SEM image of nanoparticles of ANC.
Figure 3. SEM image of nanoparticles of ANC.
Polymers 13 04313 g003
Figure 4. Illustration of X-ray diffractogram of completely amorphous cellulose.
Figure 4. Illustration of X-ray diffractogram of completely amorphous cellulose.
Polymers 13 04313 g004
Figure 5. Dependence of water vapor sorption (S) at α = 0.7 on amorphicity degree (Y) of cellulose samples.
Figure 5. Dependence of water vapor sorption (S) at α = 0.7 on amorphicity degree (Y) of cellulose samples.
Polymers 13 04313 g005
Figure 6. Dependence heat of wetting (Q) on amorphicity degree (Y) of cellulose samples.
Figure 6. Dependence heat of wetting (Q) on amorphicity degree (Y) of cellulose samples.
Polymers 13 04313 g006
Figure 7. Reduced function of radial distribution of electron density.
Figure 7. Reduced function of radial distribution of electron density.
Polymers 13 04313 g007
Figure 8. Model of mesomorphous unit cell of cluster in CAC.
Figure 8. Model of mesomorphous unit cell of cluster in CAC.
Polymers 13 04313 g008
Figure 9. Glucose yield after acidic hydrolysis of cellulose samples.
Figure 9. Glucose yield after acidic hydrolysis of cellulose samples.
Polymers 13 04313 g009
Figure 10. Dependence of glucose yield (YG) after acidic hydrolysis of cellulose samples on their amorphicity degree (Y) (Two dots relate to AMC and BMC samples).
Figure 10. Dependence of glucose yield (YG) after acidic hydrolysis of cellulose samples on their amorphicity degree (Y) (Two dots relate to AMC and BMC samples).
Polymers 13 04313 g010
Figure 11. Enzymatic digestibility at Co = 50 g/L of cellulose samples pretreated with cold N/U-solvent at various R-values.
Figure 11. Enzymatic digestibility at Co = 50 g/L of cellulose samples pretreated with cold N/U-solvent at various R-values.
Polymers 13 04313 g011
Figure 12. Dependence of glucose concentration (Cg) formed after enzymatic hydrolysis on initial content of CAC substrate (Co).
Figure 12. Dependence of glucose concentration (Cg) formed after enzymatic hydrolysis on initial content of CAC substrate (Co).
Polymers 13 04313 g012
Figure 13. Phase separated original drug “Maalox” (1) and phase stable “Maalox ”containing 2% of ANC (2).
Figure 13. Phase separated original drug “Maalox” (1) and phase stable “Maalox ”containing 2% of ANC (2).
Polymers 13 04313 g013
Table 1. Angular positions (2θ°hkl) of the main diffraction peaks and interplanar spacings (d) for different crystalline allomorphs (CA) of cellulose.
Table 1. Angular positions (2θ°hkl) of the main diffraction peaks and interplanar spacings (d) for different crystalline allomorphs (CA) of cellulose.
CAMiller’s Indices2θ°hkld, nm
CIβ1–1014.5–14.70.6
11016.0–16.40.54
20022.4–22.60.393
00434.4–34.80.259
CII1–1012.0–12.20.73
11019.8–20.20.443
20021.8–22.20.4
00434.4–34.80.258
CIII1–1011.8–12.00.743
110 & 20019.8–21.20.423
00434.4–34.80.258
CIV1–10 & 11015.5–16.00.57
20022.0–22.40.4
00434.4–34.80.259
Table 2. Main features of nanoparticles of ANC.
Table 2. Main features of nanoparticles of ANC.
FeatureValue
Phase stateAmorphous
Average diameter of nanoparticles, nmcca 100
Average DP70
Content of sulfonic groups, meq/kg210
Content of reducing groups, meq/kg84
Table 3. Structural characteristics of cellulose samples.
Table 3. Structural characteristics of cellulose samples.
Amorphization Method* ALCrIXYDcr, nm
Initial sampleCI0.660.70.38.3
Ball-grindingCI0.30.320.683.6
Treatment with liquid NH3CIII0.340.360.644.1
MercerizationCII0.510.540.465.5
Treatment with N/U solvent at
R = 3CII0.230.260.743.4
R = 5-0010
R = 10-0010
* Note: AL is type of crystalline allomorph.
Table 4. Physico-chemical characteristics of cellulose samples.
Table 4. Physico-chemical characteristics of cellulose samples.
Amorphization MethodsYS at α = 0.7Q, J/g
Initial sample0.300.0850
Ball-grinding0.680.16106
Treatment with liquid NH30.640.15100
Mercerization0.460.1277
Treatment with N/U solvent at
R = 30.740.19123
R = 51.00.24166
R = 101.00.25167
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ioelovich, M. Preparation, Characterization and Application of Amorphized Cellulose—A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244313

AMA Style

Ioelovich M. Preparation, Characterization and Application of Amorphized Cellulose—A Review. Polymers. 2021; 13(24):4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ioelovich, Michael. 2021. "Preparation, Characterization and Application of Amorphized Cellulose—A Review" Polymers 13, no. 24: 4313. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop