Next Article in Journal
Effect of Post-Cure on the Static and Viscoelastic Properties of a Polyester Resin
Next Article in Special Issue
Construction and Transition Metal Oxide Loading of Hierarchically Porous Carbon Aerogels
Previous Article in Journal
Accelerated Ageing Procedures to Assess the Stability of an Unconventional Acrylic-Wax Polymeric Emulsion for Contemporary Art
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nickel-Graphene Nanoplatelet Deposited on Carbon Fiber as Binder-Free Electrode for Electrochemical Supercapacitor Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Antibacterial Gelatin/Sodium Alginate Sponges and Their Antibacterial Activity

1
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(9), 1926; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091926
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 19 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 26 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hybrid Aerogels and Their Composites with Polymers)

Abstract

:
In the present study, sponges with the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) loaded into alginate incorporated with gelatin (G/SA) were fabricated. The G/SA sponges were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. G/SA sponges show a three-dimensional network structure with high porosity. An excellent swelling behavior and a controlled TCH release performance are observed from G/SA sponges. Moreover, they exhibit good antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

1. Introduction

As the largest organ, the skin acts as a barrier against the invasion of the human body by pathogens [1]. Once it is injured, however, it becomes particularly susceptible to bacterial infections. It was reported that mortality in burn patients associated with bacterial infections is up to 75% [2]. Therefore, wound dressing materials with infection prevention, elimination of excess exudates, air permeation and hemostasis are in high demand for the treatment of damaged skin [3,4,5].
Natural biopolymers including chitosan, alginate, cellulose, collagen, hyaluronic acid and gelatin in the form of films, sponges and fibers have been applied in wound dressing applications [6,7,8]. Among these biopolymers, sodium alginate (SA) extracted from brown seaweeds is one of the most commonly used biomaterials owing to its nontoxicity, facile production, biodegradability, low cost and biocompatibility. Therefore, SA has many applications such as biomedical, food packaging, pharmaceutical and cosmetic fields [9,10]. However, SA has some limitations in the process of non-spherical forms due to its rigid and fragile nature. Blending SA with another biopolymer is considered to be an ideal solution to overcome this drawback. SA blended with chitosan loaded with gentamicin was fabricated via the electrospinning method to be used as a wound dressing nanofibrous material with good antibacterial property and enhanced skin regeneration [6]. Chitin/chitosan and fucoidan were added to SA to develop a functional wound dressing for the repair of healing-impaired wounds [11]. A SA/aloe vera/cellulose nanocrystals composite film was prepared by a solvent casting technique and it was demonstrated to effectively inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus bacterial colonies, thus showing potential for wound dressing applications [12].
Gelatin is a water-soluble denatured protein derived from skin, tendons or bones [13]. It possesses many advantages such as abundance, low cost, renewability, excellent film-forming ability, good absorption capacity and great biocompatibility [14]. Therefore, it finds wide application in various fields such as the food industry, water treatment, pharmaceuticals, drug delivery, scaffolds and wound dressings [15]. Gelatin-based composites exhibit great potential in wound dressings and tissue engineering since they can provide an essential microenvironment for tissue growth and excellent water absorbance capacity [16]. Gelatin/dextran–maleic anhydride composite fibers were prepared via electrospinning and photocrosslinking methods and the resulting composite fibers could support cell proliferation and adhesion, showing potential in tissue engineering [17]. A bilayered human amniotic epithelial cells and Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells-laden alginate/gelatin composite hydrogel was fabricated by a 3D bioprinting method. This represents a potential preparation method for skin substitutes [18]. Konjac/gelatin hydrogel was fabricated by alkali processing and thermal treatment and it showed excellent matrine encapsulation efficiency. Moreover, matrine-loaded konjac/gelatin hydrogel could not only maintain a physiological environment beneficial to wound healing, but also inhibit the growth of bacteria on the wound surface [19]. A novel multifunctional poly(γ-glutamic acid)/gelatin hydrogel was fabricated and confirmed to be a promising wound dressing material for the wound healing [20]. Dialdehyde carboxymethylcellulose crosslinked gelatin/polyethylene glycol composite hydrogel fiber was prepared and shown to be well-suited for wound dressing applications with low cytotoxicity [21].
In this work, gelatin was incorporated into SA to enhance the shape forming properties and tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) was then loaded to fabricate antibacterial gelatin/SA (G/SA) composite sponges. TCH is one of the most widely applied cationic antibiotics and it is effective for various bacterial infection treatments, such as periodontal, skin and bone, urinary and acnes [22,23]. The morphologies of the prepared G/SA sponges were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and they were further characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, porosity and swelling behavior determinations. The TCH release profile was revealed by an in vitro release study in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) buffer solution at pH 7.4. Antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative E. coli ATCC 25,922 and B. subtilis ATCC 9372, Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC 6538 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 was determined by measuring the zone of inhibition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Gelatin from porcine skin (type A, gel strength ~300 g Bloom) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH, >98%) was purchased from EKEAR Bio@Tech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). SA was purchased from Aladdin Chemical Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The other chemicals used in the tests were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All reagents were analytical grade and used as received without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of G/SA Composite Sponges

Firstly, a 2% SA solution, 1% gelatin solution and 2% CaCl2 solution were prepared, respectively. SA solution and gelatin solution were mixed with a weight ratio of 1:1 to prepare G/SA mixture. Then 10 g G/SA mixture was poured onto a glass plate with the diameter of 60 mm, and cross-linked by CaCl2 solution for 24 h. TCH was dissolved in de-ionized (DI) water to achieve different concentrations of 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL, respectively. The obtained G/SA hydrogels were placed to 40 mL TCH solutions for 24 h in the dark. Then the TCH-loaded G/SA hydrogels were taken out and rinsed with DI water to remove any unloaded TCH and the excessive CaCl2, and freeze-dried at −40 °C for 24 h. The obtained TCH loaded sponges obtained from immersing them in different concentrations of TCH solutions are marked as G/SA1, G/SA2, G/SA3, G/SA4 and G/SA5.

2.3. Characterization

A JSM-7600F SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the surface morphologies of G/SA and G/SA5 sponges. FTIR spectra were recorded on a Spectrum Two Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Akron, OH, USA). TG analysis was carried out using a model Q5000 TGA (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.

2.4. Swelling Assays and Porosity Determination

The swelling behaviors of the sponges were determined through a gravimetric method. First, the sponges were cut into round pieces with the diameter of 10 mm and their dry weights (W0) were accurately measured. Each sample was immersed in DI water at room temperature. The swollen sponges were withdrawn from the water and their wet weights of the swollen sponges (W1) was measured after the removal of excess surface water by gently blotting with a filter paper. The swelling ratio of the sponges was calculated as follows:
Swelling   ratio = W 1 W 0 W 0 × 100 %
The porosity was determined using an immersing method in the ethanol until saturation. The samples with the diameter of 10 mm were weighed before and after immersion into the ethanol. All testing was proceeded in triplicate. The porosity was calculated according to Equation (2):
Porosity = W 2 W 1 ρ V × 100 %
where W1 and W2 are the weights of tested sponges before and after immersion in the ethanol, ρ is the density of ethanol and V is the volume of the sponge.

2.5. TCH Loading Calculation

TCH loadings were calculated according to the original concentration of TCH (C0) and the concentration of unloaded TCH (C1) determined by a Spectrum Two Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Akron, OH, USA) at the monitoring wavelength of 356 nm. TCH loadings (W) in the G/SA sponges were calculated using the following equation:
W = C 0 C 1 A × V
where V is the volume of total TCH solution, A is the area of the G/SA sponge.

2.6. TCH Release Behaviors

The TCH release behaviors were studied in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (PBS) buffers with pH 7.4. The sponges were cut into round pieces with the diameter of 10 mm. The tested samples were fully immersed in a beaker containing 50 mL PBS at 37 °C and placed in a dark place. At specific time points, an aliquot of 3.5 mL was collected from each solution and the absorbance was then measured at 356 nm on a Spectrum Two Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Akron, OH, USA). An equivalent volume of fresh PBS buffer was replaced into the system after each sampling to maintain constant medium volume. Thus, the concentrations of released TCH obtained at different times can be calculated. As a result, the cumulative released TCH amounts can be calculated accordingly. The experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.7. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activities of G/SA sponges were investigated against Gram-negative E. coli ATCC 25,922 and B. subtilis ATCC 9372, Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC 6538 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 by disk diffusion method. G/SA sponges were cut into round shapes with 10 mm diameter and sterilized by ultraviolet lamp for 60 min. Lawns of test bacteria (about 1 × 105 CFU/plate) were prepared on TSA. The sterilized samples were then carefully placed upon the lawns. The plates were placed in a 37 °C incubator for 24 h. Then inhibitory action was determined by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zones.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The obtained data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Statistical differences were evaluated using a Student’s t-test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology

The exudate absorption capacity is directly affected by the surface morphology and porosity of polymer-based wound dressings, so the morphologies of G/SA and TCH-loaded G/SA (G/SA5) sponges were studied using SEM (Figure 1). Figure 1A,B show the cross-sectional morphologies of G/SA sponge with different magnifications. It can be clearly seen that G/SA sponge exhibits a highly porous three-dimensional network structure with interconnected pores throughout the hybrid sponge. After TCH was loaded into the sponge, small difference in pores shape and size can be found although G/SA5 sponge still keeps its 3D structure, as shown in Figure 1C,D.
Figure 2 shows the porosities of G/SA and TCH loaded G/SA sponges. The G/SA sponge shows a relatively high porosity of 90.2%. After TCH was loaded into G/SA sponges, a slight decrease in porosity to a range of 87.1–88.5% can be observed. TCH loadings of G/SA composite sponges are listed in Table 1. It can be clearly found that TCH loading increases with the increase of initial TCH concentration. These high porosities benefit for exudates absorbing, making the fabricated sponges show great potentials in wound dressings application.

3.2. Thermal Properties

The TG and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) curves of SA, gelatin and G/SA5 are shown in Figure 3. Three weight loss stages were found in the TG curve of SA (curve a in Figure 3A). The first weight loss stage occurs below 120 °C, which is attributed to the evaporation of absorbed water. The second weight loss occurred in the range of 200–350 °C involving the degradation of main backbone of SA and the formation of sodium carbonate. The third weight loss stage starting from 350 °C to 730 °C is the decomposition of both SA and sodium carbonate [24,25]. The residue of SA is 30.8%, corresponding to the formed carbon dioxide and calcium oxide [26]. Thermal degradation of gelatin occurs in two stages (curve b in Figure 3A). The first stage occurs from room temperature up to 180 °C and the second stage occurs between 180 °C and 370 °C corresponding to the degradation of protein [27].
In the case of G/SA5 sponge (curve c in Figure 3A), two weight loss stages were shown. The first one is the loss of adsorbed water which occurs below 200 °C. The second one is the complex decomposition of SA, gelatin, sodium carbonate and TCH in the range of 200–780 °C. The residue of G/SA5 is 31.2%, which is higher than those of SA and gelatin (21.1%) due to the existence of TCH. Therefore, TCH are demonstrated successfully to be incorporated into G/SA sponges.

3.3. FTIR Analysis

FTIR spectra of G/SA, G/SA1, G/SA2, G/SA3, G/SA4, G/SA5 and TCH are given in Figure 4. In the case of G/SA (curve a), characteristic bands located at 3328 cm−1, 1559 cm−1 correspond to the stretching of -NH and -OH groups, and the N-H deformation (amide II) of gelatin [28]. Moreover, the peak at 1624 cm−1 is assigned to the C=O stretching (amide I) of gelatin and the asymmetric COO stretching vibration of SA. The absorption band at 1419 cm−1 corresponds to the symmetric COO stretching vibration of SA [13,29]. The asymmetric and symmetric COO stretching vibrations of the reported SA without any cross-linking are located at 1612 and 1417 cm−1, respectively [30]. They show a blue shift due to the formation of ionic bonding between -COO- and Ca2+ in this study. In the FTIR spectrum of TCH (curve g), the peaks located at 1665 cm−1, 1617 cm−1, 1590 cm−1, 1545 cm−1 and 1440 cm−1 are assigned to the C=O vibration of amide I, the C=O vibration of A-ring, the C=O vibration of C-ring, the N-H deformation of amide II and the C=C vibration of aromatic ring, respectively [31]. For TCH-loaded G/SA sponges (curves b–f), the intensity of peak at 1545 cm−1 increases with TCH loading raising although most characteristic peaks of TCH overlaps with the peaks of G/SA. Thus, the existence of TCH in the G/SA sponges is verified.

3.4. Swelling Behaviors In Vitro

The water absorbing and holding abilities are essential characteristics for polymer-based wound dressings which facilitate the adsorption of exudates, body fluids or metabolites. Figure 5 shows the dynamic swelling performance of G/SA composite sponges. The swelling ratio of G/SA sponge is 2190% after 24 h, which is the highest swelling ratio among the tested sponges. SA has many hydrophilic groups including carboxylic and hydroxyl groups, and gelatin also contains carboxylic and hydroxyl groups as well as amino groups, leading to a high swelling performance. Meanwhile, TCH loaded G/SA sponges show slightly reduced swelling performance with the swelling ratios ranging from 1780 to 1960% after 24 h. This phenomenon could be due to the fact that the porosities of sponges were slightly decreased after being loaded with TCH.

3.5. TCH Release Behavior

The TCH release behaviors were determined in 0.1 M PBS buffer at pH 7.4 and the result is shown in Figure 6A. A burst release behavior was displayed in the first 1 h for the TCH-loaded G/SA sponges and this behavior could be probably due to the accumulation of TCH on the surface of G/SA sponges. Then a gradual increased release behavior for the G/SA composite sponges was shown and the release behavior lasts for 12 h. Moreover, the released amount is positively related to the TCH loadings in the G/SA sponges.
Thus, G/SA composite sponge is considered to be a good TCH carrier with controlled release performance, demonstrating its potential wound dressing application in the treatment of infections and inflammation.
Four mathematical models, including zero order, first order, Higuchi and Korsmeyer-Peppas models were used to fit the TCH release profiles. The obtained results are shown in Table 2. The best fitting mathematical model for the TCH release mechanism was determined by the calculated correlation coefficient (R2). It can be found that the Korsmeyer-Peppas model is the best fitting one, which is a semi-experimental exponential function equation considering diffusion of drug and erosion of polymer matrix [16]. The plots of ln(Mt/M) versus ln(t) using Korsmeyer-Peppas model are displayed in Figure 6B. The diffusional constant n indicates the drug release mechanism. In this study, n values lie between 0.45 and 0.89, suggesting the TCH release behavior follows non-Fickian diffusion, which corresponds to the combined effects of the drug releases by dissolution, diffusion and erosion of matrix.

3.6. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activities of G/SA composite sponges towards Gram-negative E. coli ATCC 25,922 and B. subtilis ATCC 9372, Gram-positive S. aureus ATCC 6538 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 were investigated by the disc diffusion method. The antibacterial activity is determined by measuring the clear zone of inhibition around the samples after 24 h incubation (Figure 7). For G/SA without any TCH loading, no inhibition zones were observed around the tested four strains, implying that G/SA sponge does not have any antibacterial activities. While, G/SA composite sponges have different levels of antibacterial activities. The measured average diameters of inhibition zones are shown in Figure 8. It can be clearly seen that the inhibition zone increases with the increase of TCH loading in the G/SA sponge. Moreover, G/SA composite sponges show a good antibacterial activity against E. coli, S. aureus and B. subtilis. However, little antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa was shown. The differences in the antibacterial activity could be due to the susceptibility difference against different strains of the loaded TCH. Therefore, G/SA composite sponges show good antibacterial activities, which makes them have great potentials in the antibacterial wound dressing materials applications.

4. Conclusions

In summary, TCH-loaded G/SA sponges were successfully synthesized and they display good swelling behavior and high porosity. G/SA composite sponges exhibit three-dimensional network structures, which help the G/SA sponges to facilitate TCH loading. The TCH-loaded G/SA sponges show controlled release performance and good antibacterial effects against E. coli ATCC 25,922 and B. subtilis ATCC 9372 and S. aureus ATCC 6538. Thus, the fabricated G/SA sponges show potential as promising substrates for drug delivery applications in wound dressing and other biomedical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.S.; methodology, B.Y. and Z.Z.; investigation, Z.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province, the National College Students’ Practice and Innovation Training Project (201910298013Z, 2020NFUSPITP0077) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank for Advanced Analysis and Testing Center of Nanjing Forestry University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Kanikireddy, V.; Toro, C.; Sadiku, E.R. Alginate-based composite materials for wound dressing application:A mini review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 236, 116025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huebinger, R.M.; Stones, D.H.; de Souza, S.M.; Carlson, D.L.; Song, J.; Vaz, D.P.; Keen, E.; Wolf, S.E.; Orth, K.; Krachler, A.M. Targeting bacterial adherence inhibits multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection following burn injury. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, S.; Yan, F.; Ren, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Fang, X.; Chen, F.; Wang, C. Incorporation of metal-organic frameworks into electrospun chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibrous membrane with enhanced antibacterial activity for wound dressing application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jamaledin, R.; Yiu, C.K.Y.; Zare, E.N.; Niu, L.N.; Vecchione, R.; Chen, G.; Gu, Z.; Tay, F.R.; Makvandi, P. Advances in Antimicrobial Microneedle Patches for Combating Infections. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, C.Y.; Makvandi, P.; Zare, E.N.; Tay, F.R.; Niu, L.N. Advances in Antimicrobial Organic and Inorganic Nanocompounds in Biomedicine. Adv. Ther. 2020, 3, 2000024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Hadisi, Z.; Ismail, A.F.; Aziz, M.; Akbari, M.; Berto, F.; Chen, X.B. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of chitosan-alginate/gentamicin wound dressing nanofibrous with high antibacterial performance. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, F.; Li, J.R.; Tang, X.Y.; Huang, K.X.; Chen, L. Polyelectrolyte three layer nanoparticles of chitosan/dextran sulfate/chitosan for dual drug delivery. Colloid Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 190, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Makvandi, P.; Ali, G.W.; Della Sala, F.; Abdel-Fattah, W.I.; Borzacchiello, A. Biosynthesis and characterization of antibacterial thermosensitive hydrogels based on corn silk extract, hyaluronic acid and nanosilver for potential wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gholizadeh, B.S.; Buazar, F.; Hosseini, S.M.; Mousavi, S.M. Enhanced antibacterial activity, mechanical and physical properties of alginate/hydroxyapatite bionanocomposite film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, W.; Liu, T.; He, H.; Wu, X.; Cao, X.; Jin, J.; Sun, Q.; Roy, V.A.L.; Li, R.K.Y. Rhelogical and antibacterial performance of sodium alginate/zinc oxide composite coating for cellulosic paper. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 167, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murakami, K.; Aoki, H.; Nakamura, S.; Nakamura, S.-I.; Takikawa, M.; Hanzawa, M.; Kishimoto, S.; Hattori, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Kiyosawa, T.; et al. Hydrogel blends of chitin/chitosan, fucoidan and alginate as healing-impaired wound dressings. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thomas, D.; Nath, M.S.; Mathew, N.; Reshmi, R.; Philip, E.; Latha, M.S. Alginate film modified with aloevera gel and cellulose nanocrystals for wound dressing application: Preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 59, 101894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Preparation of antimicrobial and antioxidant gelatin/curcumin composite films for active food packaging application. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 188, 110761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mishra, R.; Varshney, R.; Das, N.; Sircar, D.; Roy, P. Synthesis and characterization of gelatin-PVP polymer composite scaffold for potential application in bone tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 119, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kirdponpattara, S.; Phisalaphong, M.; Kongruang, S. Gelatin-bacterial cellulose composite sponges thermally cross-linked with glucose for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 177, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ye, S.; Jiang, L.; Su, C.; Zhu, Z.; Wen, Y.; Shao, W. Development of gelatin/bacterial cellulose composite sponges as potential natural wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, X.; Yang, D.; Zhu, X.; Nie, J.; Ma, G. Electrospun and photocrosslinked gelatin/dextran–maleic anhydride composite fibers for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 113, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, P.; Shen, H.; Zhi, Y.; Si, J.; Shi, J.; Guo, L.; Shen, S.G. 3D bioprinting and in vitro study of bilayered membranous construct with human cells-laden alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 181, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, L.; Xu, T.; Yan, J.; Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Chen, H. Fabrication and characterization of matrine-loaded konjac glucomannan/fish gelatin composite hydrogel as antimicrobial wound dressing. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 104, 105702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, W.-C.; Wang, H.-Y.; Lee, T.-H.; Chung, R.-J. Gamma-poly glutamate/gelatin composite hydrogels crosslinked by proanthocyanidins for wound healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 101, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, D.; Ye, Y.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Mu, C. Biological properties of dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose crosslinked gelatin–PEG composite hydrogel fibers for wound dressings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alavarse, A.C.; de Oliveira Silva, F.W.; Colque, J.T.; da Silva, V.M.; Prieto, T.; Venancio, E.C.; Bonvent, J.-J. Tetracycline hydrochloride-loaded electrospun nanofibers mats based on PVA and chitosan for wound dressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 77, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Karuppuswamy, P.; Reddy Venugopal, J.; Navaneethan, B.; Luwang Laiva, A.; Ramakrishna, S. Polycaprolactone nanofibers for the controlled release of tetracycline hydrochloride. Mater. Lett. 2015, 141, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, M.; Li, L.; Yu, S.; Liu, J.; Shi, J. High performance of alginate/polyvinyl alcohol composite film based on natural original melanin nanoparticles used as food thermal insulating and UV–vis block. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 233, 115884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. da Silva Fernandes, R.; de Moura, M.R.; Glenn, G.M.; Aouada, F.A. Thermal, microstructural, and spectroscopic analysis of Ca2+ alginate/clay nanocomposite hydrogel beads. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 265, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Németh, B.; Németh, Á.S.; Ujhidy, A.; Tóth, J.; Trif, L.; Gyenis, J.; Feczkó, T. Fully bio-originated latent heat storing calcium alginate microcapsules with high coconut oil loading. Sol. Energy 2018, 170, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Correia, D.M.; Padrão, J.; Rodrigues, L.R.; Dourado, F.; Lanceros-Méndez, S.; Sencadas, V. Thermal and hydrolytic degradation of electrospun fish gelatin membranes. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Deng, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, H. Characterization and physical properties of electrospun gelatin nanofibrous films by incorporation of nano-hydroxyapatite. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 103, 105640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xiao, Q.; Gu, X.; Tan, S. Drying process of sodium alginate films studied by two-dimensional correlation ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hua, S.; Ma, H.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, A. pH-sensitive sodium alginate/poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel beads prepared by combined Ca2+ crosslinking and freeze-thawing cycles for controlled release of diclofenac sodium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 46, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shao, W.; Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, J.; Zhang, R.; Min, H.; Huang, M. Tetracycline hydrochloride loaded regenerated cellulose composite membranes with controlled release and efficient antibacterial performance. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 3068–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of G/SA (A,B) and G/SA5 (C,D) sponges.
Figure 1. SEM images of G/SA (A,B) and G/SA5 (C,D) sponges.
Polymers 12 01926 g001
Figure 2. Porosities of G/SA and TCH loaded G/SA sponges (a:G/SA, b:G/SA1, c:G/SA2, d:G/SA3, e:G/SA4 and f:G/SA5).
Figure 2. Porosities of G/SA and TCH loaded G/SA sponges (a:G/SA, b:G/SA1, c:G/SA2, d:G/SA3, e:G/SA4 and f:G/SA5).
Polymers 12 01926 g002
Figure 3. TG (A) and DTG (B) curves of SA (a), gelatin (b) and G/SA5 (c).
Figure 3. TG (A) and DTG (B) curves of SA (a), gelatin (b) and G/SA5 (c).
Polymers 12 01926 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of G/SA (a), G/SA1 (b), G/SA2 (c), G/SA3 (d), G/SA4 (e), G/SA5 (f) sponges and TCH (g).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of G/SA (a), G/SA1 (b), G/SA2 (c), G/SA3 (d), G/SA4 (e), G/SA5 (f) sponges and TCH (g).
Polymers 12 01926 g004
Figure 5. Swelling behaviors of G/SA composite sponges.
Figure 5. Swelling behaviors of G/SA composite sponges.
Polymers 12 01926 g005
Figure 6. TCH release behavior of G/SA sponges (A) and plots of ln(Mt/M) versus ln(t) (B). (a:G/SA1, b:G/SA2, c:G/SA3, d:G/SA4, e:G/SA5).
Figure 6. TCH release behavior of G/SA sponges (A) and plots of ln(Mt/M) versus ln(t) (B). (a:G/SA1, b:G/SA2, c:G/SA3, d:G/SA4, e:G/SA5).
Polymers 12 01926 g006
Figure 7. Inhibition zone pictures of G/SA composite sponges: G/SA (a), G/SA1 (b), G/SA2 (c), G/SA3 (d), G/SA4 (e), G/SA5 (f) sponges.
Figure 7. Inhibition zone pictures of G/SA composite sponges: G/SA (a), G/SA1 (b), G/SA2 (c), G/SA3 (d), G/SA4 (e), G/SA5 (f) sponges.
Polymers 12 01926 g007
Figure 8. Diameters of inhibition zone of G/SA composite sponges against different strains. (* p < 0.05).
Figure 8. Diameters of inhibition zone of G/SA composite sponges against different strains. (* p < 0.05).
Polymers 12 01926 g008
Table 1. TCH loadings of G/SA composite sponges.
Table 1. TCH loadings of G/SA composite sponges.
Initial TCH
Concentration (mg/mL)
TCH Loading
(mg/cm2)
G/SA10.0050.081
G/SA20.010.100
G/SA30.050.516
G/SA40.10.873
G/SA50.21.463
Table 2. K, n and R2 values obtained from the mathematical modeling.
Table 2. K, n and R2 values obtained from the mathematical modeling.
Type of ModelName of SamplesFitting Parameters
KnR2
Korsmeyer-Peppas
Mt/M = Ktn
G/SA10.128360.543980.99805
G/SA20.2001180.534550.99986
G/SA30.2418370.493820.9987
G/SA40.2835690.473730.99919
G/SA50.3259830.4520.99866
Zero-order
Mt/M = Kt
G/SA10.06694/0.91416
G/SA20.06119/0.69879
G/SA30.07117/0.97968
G/SA40.04232/0.94553
G/SA50.04489/0.87162
First-order
Mt/M = 1 − e−Kt
G/SA10.24059/0.98953
G/SA20.31313/0.92621
G/SA30.41652/0.90066
G/SA40.7134/0.88187
G/SA50.91565/0.8789
Higuchi
Mt/M = Kt1/2
G/SA10.2986/0.9315
G/SA20.36825/0.87818
G/SA30.2243/0.96647
G/SA40.22741/0.94
G/SA50.20267/0.90434

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, Y.; Yu, B.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Shao, W. Synthesis of Antibacterial Gelatin/Sodium Alginate Sponges and Their Antibacterial Activity. Polymers 2020, 12, 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091926

AMA Style

Wen Y, Yu B, Zhu Z, Yang Z, Shao W. Synthesis of Antibacterial Gelatin/Sodium Alginate Sponges and Their Antibacterial Activity. Polymers. 2020; 12(9):1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091926

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Yanyi, Bing Yu, Zhongjie Zhu, Zhuoran Yang, and Wei Shao. 2020. "Synthesis of Antibacterial Gelatin/Sodium Alginate Sponges and Their Antibacterial Activity" Polymers 12, no. 9: 1926. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12091926

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop