Next Article in Journal
Deformation-Induced Crystallization Behavior of Isotactic Polypropylene Sheets Containing a β-Nucleating Agent under Solid-State Stretching
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing the Thermo-Mechanical Property of Polymer by Weaving and Mixing High Length–Diameter Ratio Filler
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/polym12061257
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Epoxidized Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubbers (ESSBRs) as Coupling Agents to Modify Silica without Volatile Organic Compounds

by
Chaohao Liu
1,2,
Mingming Guo
2,
Xiaobo Zhai
1,3,
Xin Ye
1,3,* and
Liqun Zhang
1,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, P.O. Box 57, Beisanhuan East Road, Beijing 100029, China
2
SINOPEC Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Industry, Beijing 100013, China
3
Engineering Research Center of Elastomer Materials on Energy Conservation and Resources, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(6), 1257; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061257
Submission received: 9 April 2020 / Revised: 21 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 30 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rubber used in tire is usually strengthened by nanofiller, and the most popular nanofiller for tire tread rubber is nano silica, which can not only strengthen rubber but also lower the tire rolling resistance to reduce fuel consumption. However, silica particles are difficult to disperse in the rubber matrix because of the abundant silicon hydroxyl on their surface. Silane coupling agents are always used to modify silica and improve their dispersion, but a large number of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted during the manufacturing of the nanosilica/rubber composites because of the condensation reaction between silane coupling agents and silicon hydroxyl on the surface of silica. Those VOCs will do great harm to the environment and the workers’ health. In this work, epoxidized solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers (ESSBR) with different epoxy degrees were prepared and used as macromolecular coupling agents aimed at fully eliminating VOCs. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses verified that the different ESSBRs were successfully synthesized from solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers (SSBR). With the help of the reaction between epoxy groups and silicon hydroxyl without any VOC emission, nanosilica can be well dispersed in the rubber matrix when SSBR partially replaced by ESSBR which was proved by Payne effect and TEM analysis. Dynamic and static mechanical testing demonstrated that silica/ESSBR/SSBR/BR nanocomposites have better performance and no VOC emission compared with Bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-disulfide (TESPD) modified silica/rubber nanocomposites. ESSBR is very hopeful to replace traditional coupling agent TESPD to get high properties silica/rubber nanocomposites with no VOCs emission.
Keywords:
SSBR; epoxidation; silica; VOCs

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the stricter requirements for tire performance, shortage of petroleum resources, and people’s attention to environmental protection, better wet-skid resistance property as well as lower rolling resistance are demanded when rubber is applied to tire tread [1,2,3]. In this context, the concept of “green tires” was proposed by Michelin in 1992, which refers to a compound composed of SSBR, silica and some other reinforcing agents [4,5].
However, there is a problem when silica is used to strengthen the rubber. Silica is a general term for fine powdery or superfine particle precipitated silica. There is a mass of activated silicon hydroxyl groups on the surface of silica [6,7,8] which makes it hard to infiltrate and disperse in the organic rubber phase and easy to aggregate by itself [9,10].
In the 1970s, it was found the silica ability to be modified by silane coupling agents such as bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-tetrasulfide (TESPT) or bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-disulfide (TESPD) which can improve the compatibility between silica and rubber [11,12,13]. In this process, the silane coupling agent reacts with the hydroxyl on the surface of silica and makes the silica turn from hydrophilic to hydrophobic [14,15]. It usually requires a high temperature (150 °C) for this reaction when the mixing of rubber compounds begins. Inevitably, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [16,17,18,19] like methanol and ethanol will be produced during this process [20,21], which is harmful to rubber performance and worker’s health [22,23].
To improve the performance of silica/rubber nanocomposites and lower the VOCs emission, as opposed to modifying the silica surface, the compatibility of silica and rubber can also be improved by the functionalization of the rubber molecular chain, e.g., introducing functional groups like carboxyl groups [24,25], hydroxyl groups [26,27,28,29,30], alkoxysilane groups, and epoxy groups [3,20,28] onto rubber chains during post-polymerization process. Additionally, these functional groups, especially alkoxysilane groups [31,32,33,34], can be introduced to the polymer chain during the polymerization process, copolymerization, or termination. These groups provide the rubber with polarity or more reactivity with silicon hydroxyl on silica surface. However, some of alkoxysilane groups are likely to emit VOCs because the processing temperature of rubber and silica is always high (150 °C) and the alcohol products with low molecular weight will turn into gases. Therefore, the other groups are more environmentally friendly. Jacobi et al [35,36] have synthesized ESSBR and elaborated the relationship of epoxy degree with double bond content, hydrogen peroxide concentration, reaction temperature and time. However, the reaction between epoxy groups and hydroxyl groups was rarely reported [20,37], which is a ring opening reaction without any VOCs. Therefore, we plan to use the ESSBR as macromolecule coupling agents to modify the performance of silica/rubber nanocomposites and eliminate the VOCs emission.
In this study, a series of ESSBR with different epoxy degrees (7%–25%) were prepared by using formic acid and hydrogen peroxide as oxidant, and silica/ESSBR/SSBR/BR nanocomposites were manufactured. SSBR matrix were partially replaced by ESSBR with different epoxy degrees (7%–25%) as macromolecule coupling agents. The performance of silica/ESSBR/SSBR/BR composites were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), rubber process analyzer (RPA), tension tester, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA).

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

Solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber 2557 (SSBR2557) was supplied by SINOPEC Lanzhou Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Lanzhou, China). Solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber 4526 (SSBR4526) and butadiene rubber (CB24) were purchased from LANXESS Corporation (Shanghai, China). Cyclohexane was obtained from Beijing Chemworks Company (Beijing, China). Hydrogen peroxide (30%) was obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Company (Shanghai, China). Formic acid was obtained from Beijing TG fine chemicals Company (Beijing, China). Tween-80 was obtained from Beijing Yili Fine Chemicals Company (Beijing, China). All of the rubber additives, including zinc oxide, stearic acid, N-Isopropyl-N’-phenyl-4-phenylenediamin (antioxidant 4010NA), wax, N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide (accelerator CZ), and sulfur, were industrial grade and commercially available.

2.2. Preparation of Epoxidized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (ESSBR)

Cyclohexane was added to a three-necked flask. The SSBR was then added at a mass-to-volume ratio of 10 g/100 mL. The mixture was stirred until the rubber was dissolved. The temperature was set at 40 °C. Hydrogen peroxide was used in excess of the polymers double bond content (H2O2/C=C 1.5/1), and formic acid was added at a ratio of the reactant mol (H2O2/HCOOH 3/1) to generate in situ performic acid. The mixing was done at 50 rpm rotor speed with a mechanical stirrer. Formic acid was all added one time, and hydrogen peroxide was added by the rate of 3 mL/min with an addition funnel. At the end of the reaction, the mixture was neutralized with a (5% w/v) Na2CO3 solution and washed with distilled water. After removing the aqueous phase, the organic phase was coagulated in ethanol and dried under vacuum to a constant weight. The reaction principle and flow of ESSBR preparation was described in Figure 1.
In order to prepare ESSBR with different epoxy degree, the amount of reactants were constant: SSBR 100 g, hydrogen peroxide (30%) 180 g, formic acid 24.4 g. And the reaction time changed: ESSBR7% (28 min), ESSBR10% (35 min), ESSBR15% (68 min), ESSBR20% (117 min), ESSBR25% (264 min).

2.3. Preparation of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

In our earlier research, we used pure ESSBR to replace SSBR. When the epoxy degree of pure ESSBR is more than about 7%, a crushing phenomenon of rubber compounds appears during the mixing process. When blends of SSBR and ESSBR are used, this issue can be solved. ESSBR with different epoxy degrees (7%–25%) were used as macromolecular coupling agents to modify the silica surface and improve its dispersion. Bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-disulfide (TESPD) shown in Figure 2, which is the most popular silane coupling agent used in tire factories, was selected for comparison. All the silica/SSBR/BR compounds are listed in Table 1. Firstly, silica, antioxidants, wax, zinc oxide, stearic acid, and TESPD or ESSBR were mixed with SSBR/BR in a Haake internal mixer at 50 °C by the standard adding sequence. Secondly, the compounds were masticated for 5 min at 150 °C, then the compounds were taken out, cooled down to room temperature, and mixed with the vulcanization accelerators and sulfur on a 6-inch two-roll mill for 5 min at room temperature. Finally, the compounds were cured under 15 MPa at 150 °C to yield the vulcanized nanocomposite.

2.4. Characterizations

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR, Bruker Tensor-27 FT-IR Spectrometer, Bruker Optik Gmbh Co., Ettlingen, Germany) measurement was used to identify the groups in ESSBR, using attenuated total reflection(ATR) mode under a wave ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1 with 32 scans.
The 1H NMR spectroscopy were recorded on a Bruker AV400 spectrometer and CDCl3 was the solvent, using a concentration of 7–20 mg polymer/mL.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were conducted using a STARe system DSC instrument from −100 to 100 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen.
The molecular weights of rubbers were obtained by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) on an Agilent 1260 Infinity instrument equipped with a G1362A refractive index detector. Toluene was the mobile phase (1.0 mL min−1), and polystyrene standards were used for calibration.
The curing behavior of silica/SSBR/BR composites were measured by a MR-C3 rotorless rubber vulcanizing machine at 150 °C and 1.67 Hz.
The silica dispersion was observed under a Tecnai G220 TEM (FEI Co., Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The thin sections of silica/SSBR/BR nanocomposites were cut for TEM observations using a microtome at −100 °C and collected on copper grids.
The bound rubber contents of the silica/SSBR/BR composites were measured based on the previously reported method [38].
A Bruker AVANCE III 400 WB solid-state NMR spectrometer was used to characterize the crosslink density of silica/SSBR/BR composites. The sample was packed into a 10 mm diameter NMR tube and then moved to the heating zone of the nuclear magnetic instrument with the same temperature as the oven. The sample was stabilized for 5 min and then scanned at 90 °C.
The dynamic rheological properties of the silica/SSBR/BR composites were analyzed by RPA 2000 (Alpha Technologies Co., Bellingham, WA, USA) at 60 °C and 1 Hz (mainly to get tanδ@60 °C). For compounds, the strain amplitude was varied from 0.1% to 450%. For cured composites, the strain amplitude was varied from 0.1% to 100%.
The thermo-mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were analyzed by a 01dB-Metravib VA 3000 dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA) at 10 Hz in the tension mode with a strain amplitude of 0.1%. The test temperature ranged from −80 to 80 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1. (mainly to get tanδ@0 °C).
The mechanical properties of the silica/SSBR/BR composites were investigated according to ASTM D638 specifications using a CMT4104 electrical tensile tester (Shenzhen SANS Test Machine Co., Shenzhen, China) at across head speed of 500 mm/min.
The abrasion loss properties of the silica/SSBR/BR composites were measured due to GB/1689–1998 with a MZ-4061 Akron abrasion machine (Jiangsu Mingzhu Experimental Machinery Co. LTD., Yangzhou, CN).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Structure of the Epoxidized Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (ESSBR)

Figure 3a shows the FT-IR spectra of the synthesized product. Peaks at 760 cm−1 are related to 1,4-cis, those at 966 cm−1 to 1,4-trans, and those at 911 cm−1 to 1,2-vinyl double bonds, respectively. The new peaks at 1260 and 801 cm−1, which refer to the symmetrical stretching deformation absorption peak of C–O–C and the asymmetric extension deformation vibration absorption peak of C–O–C, respectively, can be observed from the ESSBR curve, indicating that the epoxy groups have been introduced into the molecular chain of the SSBR.
As shown in Figure 3b, H atoms in SSBR and ESSBR are marked as a–k according to their local chemical environment. The peaks shown reasonably correspond to the protons of styrene, butadiene (including 1,4-addition and 1,2-addition), and the epoxy group. In the 1H NMR spectrum of SSBR2557, there are two peaks at 4.90 (f,l) and 5.25 (d.e)ppm, attributed to the protons of the double bonds 1,2 and 1,4 butadiene units (cis and trans) in the polymer. In the 1H-NMR spectrum of ESSBR, three new peaks appear at 2.55 (j,k), 2.80 (h,i), and 3.64 ppm (m,). The peaks at 2.55 (j,k) and 2.80 (h,i) ppm correspond to the methine resonance of the epoxy groups in trans and cis position, respectively, which demonstrate that SSBR was successfully epoxidized. The peaks at 3.64 (m,) derive from hydroxyl groups [29] which formed during ring-opening reactions after epoxidation and the wide bands in 3100–3600 cm−1 from FT-IR also indicates the presence of hydroxyl groups, but the amount of hydroxyl groups was few and the epoxy degree was little affected. As the reaction progresses, the epoxy degree increases, resulting in an increase of the signals at 2.55 (j,k) and 2.80 (h,i) ppm (trans and cis epoxy) and a decrease of the peak at 5.25 (d.e) ppm (unsaturated 1,4-polybutadiene protons). The peak at 4.9 (f,l) ppm (vinyl group) remains practically constant. These findings indicated that the reactivity of trans and cis 1,4 units is higher than that of vinyl 1,2 units. the epoxy degree, X, for SSBR has been calculated using the following Equation:
X % = ( A e p o x − A H e s t ( A e p o x − A H e s t ) + A 1 , 4 + A 1 , 2 ) × 100
where Aepox is the normalized proton area intensities for the epoxide peaks at 2.55 and 2.80 ppm, AHest is the normalized area intensities for methylene bonded to the styrene ring at 2.55 ppm, A1,4 and A1,2 are the normalized area for the unsaturated 1,4 polybutadiene peak at 5.25 ppm and unsaturated 1,2 polybutadiene peak at 4.9 ppm.
As shown in Figure 3c, when the epoxy degree increases, the polarity of macromolecules increases, and the Tg (glass transition temperature) increases which results in tanδ@0 °C. This is helpful for improving the wet-skid resistance of rubber composites below.
ESSBR with the epoxy degree from 7% to 25% were prepared and got ready to use as macromolecule coupling agents, because the epoxy groups can react with the silicon hydroxyl on silica surface, and ESSBR has good compatibility with the SSBR/BR matrix, the residual double bonds on ESSBR can also crosslink with SSBR/BR matrix by vulcanizing agent.

3.2. Compositions and Molecular Weights of Rubbers

From Table 2, it can be seen that the ESSBRs have a little increase about Mn and Mw and similar PDI (Polymer dispersity index) with SSBR2557 after epoxidation, which means they have consistent molecular weight distribution, the side reaction of epoxidation is less and the reaction is controllable.

3.3. Application of ESSBR in Rubber Composites

3.3.1. Payne Effect of Silica/SSBR/BR Compounds

The strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus (G’) of silica/SSBR/BR compounds are shown in Figure 4. The filler’s network and its situation of agglomeration make a great influence on the modulus of rubber compounds. The G’ decreases rapidly with the increase of strain amplitude, named the Payne effect [39,40], which is closely related to the breakdown of the filler network structure in rubber matrix when the deformation rate of specimen increases. The difference between the maximum and the minimum G’ in the curve names the ΔG’ value, which is usually negatively correlated to the dispersion of filler. The lower the ΔG’ value, the better the filler disperses.
As shown in Figure 4a, PS-SSBR/BR(A1) has a significant Payne effect because there is not any modifier for polar silica, therefore, silica particles couldn’t be well dispersed in the nonpolar rubber matrix and so the silica particles agglomerated by themselves. With part of the SSBR replaced by ESSBR, the epoxy groups on the macromolecular chains could react with silicon hydroxyl groups on the silica surface and reduce the polarity of silica particles, which could greatly improve the silica dispersion in rubber matrix [41,42]. That means that the silica–silica direct contact networks reduced and more silica–rubber networks were established and then the ΔG’ decreased. It is clear that the Payne effects of ESSBR-silica samples and TESPD-silica sample are significantly less than that of the pure silica sample. With the epoxy degree increase, the Payne effect of the composites decrease (B3 to F3). When the epoxy degree is fixed, ΔG’ decreased as the amount of ESSBR increased (F1 to F3). All the results show that the introduction of epoxy groups on SSBR is very beneficial to improve the silica dispersion. ΔG’ of E20-SSBR/BR (E3) and E25-SSBR/BR (F3) is even less than that of TS-SSBR/BR(A2). This result indicates that ESSBR used as a modifier has similar or even better effects on improving the dispersion of silica in silica/SSBR/BR compounds when comparing with TESPD, because the reaction between epoxy groups on ESSBR and silicon hydroxyl groups on the silica surface can reduce the hydrophilicity of silica and improve the compatibility between silica and rubber.

3.3.2. TEM Images of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

Figure 5 are the TEM images which show the dispersion of silica in rubber matrix. The darker phase represents the silica particles. Silica particles are obviously agglomerated in the PS-SSBR/BR composite and forms a lot of clumps. Moreover, the phase interface between silica particles and the rubber matrix looks obviously clear. As is known to all, there is a layer of silicon hydroxyl distributed evenly on the surface of silica particles leading to silica agglomerate. With part of the SSBR replaced by ESSBR, the dispersion of silica particles was obviously improved.
It can be seen from Figure 5 that the silica in E25-SSBR/BR (F3) has the best dispersion, even dispersing better than silica in TS-SSBR/BR(A2). The dispersion of silica in E15-SSBR/BR (D3) and E20-SSBR/BR (E3) is comparable to that of TS-SSBR/BR(A2). Previous studies [43,44,45] have indicated that the chemical interaction between silica and rubber can make its dispersion in the rubber matrix more stable, as silica is not easy to aggregate again because of the stability of the chemical interaction between silica and rubber. TESPD has the ability to create the chemical interaction between the silica surface and rubber. On the one hand, ESSBR can make chemical interactions with silica, on the other hand, it can be well mixed with rubber matrix. Similar to TESPD, ESSBR can also improve the dispersion of silica in the rubber matrix by forming a chemical interaction between silica and rubber.
As shown in Figure 5, when the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40% (B3,C3,D3,D3,F3), the dispersion of silica improves with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR. Additionally, when the epoxy degree of ESSBR used remains at 25% (F1,F2,F3), the dispersion of silica improved with the increase of the ratio of ESSBR/SSBR.

3.3.3. Bound Rubber of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

Bound rubber, which is the adsorbed rubber on the filler surface, is influenced by the interfacial interaction between the filler and rubber. The bound rubber contents of the silica/SSBR/BR compounds were measured, as shown in Figure 6. When the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%, it can be seen that the bound rubber content increases with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR. As more epoxy groups react with silica [41,42], the hydrophilicity of silica decreases and the interaction between silica and rubber improves. It also can be seen that when the epoxy degree of ESSBR used remains at 25%, with the increase of the ratio of ESSBR/SSBR, the bound rubber content increases.

3.3.4. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

When rubber nanocomposite is applied to tire treads, the anti-wet skid performance is generally correlated with the tanδ values at 0 °C [46,47]. The higher the tanδ value at 0 °C is, the better the anti-skid performance is. Additionally, the rolling resistance of tires is correlated with the tanδ values at 60 °C [48,49], the lower the tanδ value at 60 °C is, the lower the rolling resistance is.
From Figure 7a, when the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%, it can be seen that with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, the glass transition temperature of rubber gradually increases [50,51]. As the rigidity of the molecular chain enhances after the increase of epoxy groups on the rubber molecule, the internal rotation hindrance of the molecular chain increases and the activity decreases. It can be seen from Table 3 that with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, the tanδ value at 0 °C increases, indicating that the anti-wet skid performance increases. The tanδ values at 0 °C of E20-SSBR/BR (E3) and E25-SSBR/BR (F3) exceeds that of TS-SSBR/BR. This result indicates that ESSBR is very useful to improve the wet-skid resistance performance of the tire tread and its effect is better than TESPD when the epoxy degree is up to 20%.
As shown in Figure 7b, the tanδ values at 60 °C of ESSBR-SSBR/BR composites and TS-SSBR/BR are both lower than that of PS-SSBR/BR. The rolling resistance of PS-SSBR/BR is significantly higher than that of ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR. The above situation happens mainly because there exists strong mutual friction between silica particles under cyclic reversed loading in PS-SSBR/BR. In contrast, for ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites, this friction loss between silica particles decreased due to the chemical interaction between silica and rubber molecular and less silica-silica interaction. It can be seen from Table 3 that with the increase of epoxy degree of ESSBR, tanδ values at 60 °C decreases, indicating that the rolling resistance of tires decreases. The tanδ values at 60 °C of E25-SSBR/BR (F3) is lower than that of TS-SSBR/BR and tanδ values at 60 °C of E20-SSBR/BR (E3) is similar to that of TS-SSBR/BR. This result indicates that ESSBR is beneficial for lowering the rolling resistance of tire tread and its effect is better than TESPD when the epoxy degree is up to 20%.
Table 4 and Figure 8a are the dynamic properties of E25-SSBR/BR composites with different ratios of ESSBR/SSBR. It can be seen that when the epoxy degree of ESSBR used remains up to 25%, with the increase of ratio of ESSBR/SSBR, the glass transition temperature of rubber increases. The tanδ values at 60 °C of E25-SSBR/BR composites decreases with the increase of ratio of ESSBR/SSBR, indicating that the rolling resistance of tires decreases.

3.3.5. Curing Behavior of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

When the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%, it can be seen from Table 5 that with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, T10 (the time when the torque reaches 10% of the maximum torque) increases. It was speculated that the epoxy group reacted with the promoter during the mixing process, which weakened the effect of the promoter, T90 (the time when the torque reaches 90% of the maximum torque) tends to decrease slightly. This is possibly because during the vulcanization process the epoxy group increases the reactivity of adjacent double bonds, thus the crosslinking time had been shortened. ML (the minimum torque) is related to filler-filler network, with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, filler-filler network is weakened and ML decreases. MH (the maximum torque) is influenced by filler–filler network, filler–rubber network, and rubber–rubber network, and there is no obvious rule to its changing. An optimal crosslink density is very important to achieve rubber with good mechanical properties, with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, crosslink density tends to increase.

3.3.6. Static Mechanical Properties of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

When the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%, it can be seen from Figure 9 and Table 6 that with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, the modulus at 100% and 300% strain, the tensile stress of vulcanized rubber increases, and the elongation at break decreases. The tensile strength is related to the crosslinking density and the interaction between filler and rubber matrix. The higher the epoxy degree is, the better the binding force of silica with the molecular chain is. This binding force limits the movement of the molecular chain, thereby the tensile strength and the modulus of constant elongation increases, and the elongation at break decreases.
It also can be seen from Figure 9 and Table 6 that when the epoxy degree of ESSBR used remains up to 25%, with the increase of ratio of ESSBR/SSBR, the Modulus at 100% and 300% strain of vulcanized rubber increases, the elongation at break decreases.

3.3.7. Abrasion Loss Properties of Silica/SSBR/BR Composites

When the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%, it can be seen from Figure 10, with the increase of the epoxy degree of ESSBR, the abrasion volume decreases gradually, due to more epoxy groups reacting with silica and creating more rubber–filler chemical interaction, which may be helpful to improve wear-resisting properties. It also can be seen that when the epoxy degree of ESSBR used remains up to 25%, with the increase of ratio of ESSBR/SSBR, the abrasion volume decreases.

4. Conclusions

In this research, SSBR was epoxidized to ESSBR with different epoxy degrees and then used as a macromolecular coupling agent to modify silica/rubber nanocomposites. Due to the ring- opening reaction between epoxy groups and the silicon hydroxyl without any VOCs emission, silica/rubber nanocomposite for tire tread can be made with no VOC emission. Additionally, as ESSBR has good compatibility with SSBR/BR matrix and can be crosslinked with the rubber matrix, silica–ESSBR–rubber matrix chemical bonds can be formed. As a result, ESSBR as a macromolecular coupling agent is beneficial for silica/SSBR/BR nanocomposites used for green tire treads to get better wet-skid resistance and lower rolling resistance, with no VOC emission. It is a hopeful candidate to replace the traditional coupling agent, TESPD, which has VOCs emission.

Author Contributions

L.Z., M.G., X.Y. and C.L. conceived and designed the experiments; C.L. performed the experiments; M.G., X.Y., C.L. and L.Z. analyzed the data; X.Z. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools and search literatures; X.Y. and C.L. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51790501) and the APC was funded by Beijing University of Chemical Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Choi, S.S. Improvement of properties of silica-filled styrene-butadiene rubber compounds using acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 79, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Han, B.; Wen, S.; Lu, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L. Effect of the temperature on surface modification of silica and properties of modified silica filled rubber composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 62, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qiao, H.; Chao, M.; Hui, D.; Liu, J.; Zheng, J.; Lei, W.; Zhou, X.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L. Enhanced interfacial interaction and excellent performance of silica/epoxy group-functionalized styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) nanocomposites without any coupling agent. Compos. Part B Eng. 2017, 114, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.; Zhao, S.H. Study on structure and properties of SSBR/SiO2 co-coagulated rubber and SSBR filled with nanosilica composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 3900–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, L.; Zhao, S.H.; Li, A.; Zhang, X.Y. Study on the structure and properties of SSBR with large-volume functional groups at the end of chains. Polymer 2010, 51, 2084–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davydov, V.Y.; Kiselev, A.V.; Zhuravlev, L.T. Study of the surface and bulk hydroxyl groups of silica by infra-red spectra and D2O-exchange. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1964, 60, 2254–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Legrand, A.P.; Hommel, H.; Tuel, A.P.; Vidal, A.; Balard, H.; Papirer, E.; Levitz, P.; Czernichowski, M.; Erre, R.; Van Damme, H.; et al. Hydroxyls of silica powders. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 33, 91–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shelby, J.E. Reaction of Hydrogen with Hydroxyl-Free Vitreous Silica. J. Appl. Phys. 1980, 51, 2589–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mauri, A.N.; Riccardi, C.C.; Williams, R.J. Neat and silica-enriched polysilsesquioxanes in dispersed media. Macromol. Symp. 2000, 151, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Y.; Du, W.; Xu, Y. Effect of Sintering Temperature on the Photocatalytic Activities and Stabilities of Hematite and Silica-Dispersed Hematite Particles for Organic Degradation in Aqueous Suspensions. Langmuir 2009, 25, 2895–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brinke, J.W.t.; Debnath, S.C.; Reuvekamp, L.A.E.M.; Noordermeer, J.W.M. Mechanistic aspects of the role of coupling agents in silica–rubber composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1165–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brunel, D.; Cauvel, A.; Renzo, F.D.; Fajula, F.o.; Fubini, B.; Onida, B.; Garrone, E. Preferential grafting of alkoxysilane coupling agents on the hydrophobic portion of the surface of micelle-templated silica. New J. Chem. 2000, 24, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaewsakul, W.; Sahakaro, K.; Dierkes, W.K.; Noordermeer, J.W.M. Mechanistic Aspects of Silane Coupling Agents with Different Functionalities on Reinforcement of Silica-Filled Natural Rubber Compounds. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2015, 55, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cataldo, F. Preparation of silica-based rubber compounds without the use of a silane coupling agent through the use of epoxidized natural rubber. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2002, 287, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jesionowski, T.; Krysztafkiewicz, A. Influence of silane coupling agents on surface properties of precipitated silicas. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 172, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kostiainen, R.; Kotiaho, T.; Mattila, I.; Mansikka, T.; Ojala, M.; Ketola, R.A. Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil Samples by Purge-and-Membrane Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3028–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, K.-J. Observation of Interfacial Adhesion in Silica-NR Compound by Using Bifunctional Silane Coupling Agent. Polymer-Korea 2015, 39, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tong, L.; Liao, X.; Chen, J.; Xiao, H.; Xu, L.; Zhang, F.; Niu, Z.; Yu, J. Pollution characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the southeast coastal cities of China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Xiaobin, X.U.; Mao, T.; Zhang, K.P.; Yin, L.Y.; Cheng, H. Analysis of atmospheric organic compounds by thermal desorption-comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. Sci. Sin. Chim. 2012, 42, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sengloyluan, K.; Sahakaro, K.; Dierkes, W.K.; Noordermeer, J.W.M. Reduced ethanol emissions by a combination of epdxidized natural rubber and silane coupling agent for silica-reinforced natural rubber-based tire treads. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2016, 89, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zheng, J.; Han, D.; Ye, X.; Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Chemical and physical interaction between silane coupling agent with long arms and silica and its effect on silica/natural rubber composites. Polymer 2018, 135, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ogasawara, A.; Han, J.; Fukunaga, K.; Wang, J.; Wang, D.; Namihira, T.; Sasaki, M.; Akiyama, H.; Zhang, P. Decomposition of Toluene Using Nanosecond-Pulsed-Discharge Plasma Assisted with Catalysts. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2015, 43, 3461–3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Viegi, G.; Enarson, D.A. Human health effects of air pollution from mobile sources in Europe. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 1998, 2, 947–967. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Chakraborty, S.K.; De, S.K. Technology. Silica- and Clay-Reinforced Carboxylated Nitrile Rubber Vulcanized by a Mixed Crosslinking System. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1982, 55, 990–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takamura, M.; Yamauchi, T.; Tsubokawa, N. Grafting and crosslinking reaction of carboxyl-terminated liquid rubber with silica nanoparticles and carbon black in the presence of Sc(OTf)(3). React. Funct. Polym. 2008, 68, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Perera, M.C.S.; Elix, J.A.; Bradbury, J.H. A 13C NMR study of hydroxylated natural rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1987, 33, 2731–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Min, X.; Fan, X. A New Strategy for the Synthesis of Hydroxyl Terminated Polystyrene-b-Polybutadiene-b-Polystyrene Triblock Copolymer with High Cis-1, 4 Content. Polymers 2019, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhou, Q.; Jie, S.; Li, B.-G. Facile synthesis of novel HTPBs and EHTPBs with high cis-1,4 content and extremely low glass transition temperature. Polymer 2015, 67, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, Q.; Wang, A.; Dai, L.; Jie, S.; Li, B.-G. Cleavable polybutadiene rubber: A versatile precursor to hydroxyl-terminated or multi-hydroxyl polybutadiene and polyethylene. Polymer 2016, 107, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Januszewski, R.; Kownacki, I.; Maciejewski, H.; Marciniec, B. Transition metal-catalyzed hydrosilylation of polybutadiene—The effect of substituents at silicon on efficiency of silylfunctionalization process. J. Catal. 2019, 371, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, E.; Lee, E.; Park, I.; Chang, T. End functionalization of styrene-butadiene rubber with poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(dimethylsiloxane) terminator. Polym. J. 2002, 34, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, X.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Bai, Y. Preparation, structure, and properties of solution-polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber with functionalized end-groups and its silica-filled composites. Polymer 2014, 55, 1964–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Quirk, R.P. Anionic polymerization and chain-end functionalization chemistry. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2020, 93, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahn, B.; Park, N.; Kim, D.; Kim, W. Influence of end-functionalized solution styrene-butadiene rubber on silica-filled vulcanizates with various silica-silane systems. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2019, 92, 364–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jacobi, M.M.; Neto, C.P.; Schneider, C.G.; Rocha, T.; Schuster, R.H. Study of the epoxidation of polydiene rubbers I. Influence of the microstructure on the epoxidation of SBR with performic acid. Kautsch. Gummi Kunstst. 2002, 55, 590–595. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jacobi, M.M.; Santin, C.K.; Alegre, M.E.V.; Schuster, R.H. Study of the epoxidation of polydiene rubbers II. Kautsch. Gummi Kunstst. 2004, 57, 82–89. [Google Scholar]
  37. Park, J.J. Mechanical Properties of Epoxy/Micro-silica and Epoxy/Micro-alumina Composites. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 2018, 19, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qu, L.L.; Yu, G.Z.; Xie, X.M.; Wang, L.L.; Li, J.; Zhao, Q.S. Effect of Silane Coupling Agent on Filler and Rubber Interaction of Silica Reinforced Solution Styrene Butadiene Rubber. Polym. Compos. 2013, 34, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sengloyluan, K.; Sahakaro, K.; Dierkes, W.K.; Noordermeer, J.W.M. Silica-reinforced tire tread compounds compatibilized by using epoxidized natural rubber. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 51, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Varughese, S.; Tripathy, D.K. Chemical interaction between epoxidized natural rubber and silica: Studies on cure characteristics and low-temperature dynamic mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 44, 1847–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, X.; Zheng, J.; Han, B.; Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Ye, X. Designing novel epoxy-terminated polybutadiene to construct chemical interface between nanosilica and rubbers with green nature. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2019, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lei, W.; Qiao, H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, R.; Hua, K.-C. Synthesis and evaluation of bio-based elastomer based on diethyl itaconate for oil-resistance applications. Sci. China-Chem. 2016, 59, 1376–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ramier, J.; Gauthier, C.; Chazeau, L.; Stelandre, L.; Guy, L. Payne effect in silica-filled styrene-butadiene rubber: Influence of surface treatment. J. Polym. Sci. Part B-Polym. Phys. 2007, 45, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Roychoudhury, A.; De, P.P.; Roychoudhury, N.; Vidal, A. Chemical Interaction between Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene and Silica—Effect of Surface Modifications of Silica. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1995, 68, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zheng, J.; Ye, X.; Han, D.; Zhao, S.; Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; Dong, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Silica Modified by Alcohol Polyoxyethylene Ether and Silane Coupling Agent Together to Achieve High Performance Rubber Composites Using the Latex Compounding Method. Polymers 2018, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Shanmugharaj, A.M.; Bhowmick, A.K. Dynamic mechanical properties of styrene-butadiene rubber vulcanizate filled with electron beam modified surface-treated dual-phase filler. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88, 2992–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, S.; Cen, L.; Wu, Q. Maleated glycidyl 3-pentadecenyl phenyl ether with styrene: Synthesis and application as compatibilizer in SBR/silica composite. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 953–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kong, L.; Li, F.; Wang, F.; Miao, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhu, H.; Lu, Y. In situ assembly of SiO2 nanodots/layered double hydroxide nanocomposite for the reinforcement of solution-polymerized butadiene styrene rubber/butadiene rubber. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 158, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, X.; Niu, K.; Xu, Y.; Peng, Z.; Jia, L.; Hui, D.; Zhang, L. Morphology and performance of NR/NBR/ENR ternary rubber composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2016, 107, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Blanco, I.; Oliveri, L.; Cicala, G.; Recca, A. Effects of novel reactive toughening agent on thermal stability of epoxy resin. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 108, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abate, L.; Blanco, I.; Cicala, G.; Mamo, A.; Recca, G.; Scamporrino, A. The influence of chain rigidity on the thermal properties of some novel random copolyethersulfones. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 798–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 01257 g001 550
Figure 1. Reaction principle and flow chart.
Figure 1. Reaction principle and flow chart.
Polymers 12 01257 g001
Polymers 12 01257 g002 550
Figure 2. The molecular structure of bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-disulfide (TESPD).
Figure 2. The molecular structure of bis-(γ-triethoxysilylpropyl)-disulfide (TESPD).
Polymers 12 01257 g002
Polymers 12 01257 g003 550
Figure 3. Structure characterization of SSBR and epoxidized solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers ESSBRs: (a) FT-IR spectra (b) 1H NMR spectra and (c) DSC.
Figure 3. Structure characterization of SSBR and epoxidized solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubbers ESSBRs: (a) FT-IR spectra (b) 1H NMR spectra and (c) DSC.
Polymers 12 01257 g003
Polymers 12 01257 g004 550
Figure 4. Strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus (G’) of silica/SSBR/BR compounds: (a) samples with different ESSBRs(epoxy degree), (b) samples with different content of E25.
Figure 4. Strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus (G’) of silica/SSBR/BR compounds: (a) samples with different ESSBRs(epoxy degree), (b) samples with different content of E25.
Polymers 12 01257 g004
Polymers 12 01257 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM images of PS-SSBR/BR(A1), TS-SSBR/BR(A2), E7-SSBR/BR(B3), E10-SSBR/BR(C3), E15-SSBR/BR(D3), E20-SSBR/BR(E3), E25a-SSBR/BR(F1), E25b-SSBR/BR(F2) and E25c-SSBR/BR(F3).
Figure 5. TEM images of PS-SSBR/BR(A1), TS-SSBR/BR(A2), E7-SSBR/BR(B3), E10-SSBR/BR(C3), E15-SSBR/BR(D3), E20-SSBR/BR(E3), E25a-SSBR/BR(F1), E25b-SSBR/BR(F2) and E25c-SSBR/BR(F3).
Polymers 12 01257 g005
Polymers 12 01257 g006 550
Figure 6. Bound rubber content of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites.
Figure 6. Bound rubber content of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites.
Polymers 12 01257 g006
Polymers 12 01257 g007 550
Figure 7. Dynamic properties of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites: (a) the relation of the tanδ with temperature and (b) the relation of the tanδ with strain amplitude.
Figure 7. Dynamic properties of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites: (a) the relation of the tanδ with temperature and (b) the relation of the tanδ with strain amplitude.
Polymers 12 01257 g007
Polymers 12 01257 g008 550
Figure 8. Dynamic properties of E25-SSBR/BR composites with different ratio of ESSBR/SSBR: (a) the relation of the tanδ with temperature and (b) the relation of the tanδ with strain amplitude.
Figure 8. Dynamic properties of E25-SSBR/BR composites with different ratio of ESSBR/SSBR: (a) the relation of the tanδ with temperature and (b) the relation of the tanδ with strain amplitude.
Polymers 12 01257 g008
Polymers 12 01257 g009 550
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites: (a) samples with different ESSBRs(epoxy degree), (b) samples with different content of E25.
Figure 9. Mechanical properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites: (a) samples with different ESSBRs(epoxy degree), (b) samples with different content of E25.
Polymers 12 01257 g009
Polymers 12 01257 g010 550
Figure 10. Abrasion loss properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
Figure 10. Abrasion loss properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
Polymers 12 01257 g010
Table
Table 1. Formulation of silica/ solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber (SSBR)/ butadiene rubber (BR) compounds.
Table 1. Formulation of silica/ solution polymerized styrene-butadiene rubber (SSBR)/ butadiene rubber (BR) compounds.
A1A2B3C3D3E3F1F2F3
MaterialsPS(pure silica)-SSBR/BR/phr aTS(TESPD-silica)-SSBR/BR/phr aE7-SSBR/BR/phr aE10-SSBR/BR/phr aE15-SSBR/BR/phr aE20-SSBR/BR/phr aE25a-SSBR/BR/phr aE25b-SSBR/BR/phr aE25c-SSBR/BR/phr a
SSBR747444.444.444.444.459.251.844.4
BR262626262626262626
Silica606060606060606060
ESSBR7% c0029.6c000000
ESSBR10% c00029.6c00000
ESSBR15% c000029.6c0000
ESSBR20% c0000029.6c000
ESSBR25% c00000014.822.229.6c
TESPD060000000
Other additives1# b1# b1# b1# b1# b1# b1# b1# b1# b
a Parts per hundred of rubber. b 1# stearic acid 2.0, zinc oxide 3.0, N-Isopropyl-N’-phenyl-1,4-phenylenediamine 2.0, N-Cyclohexyl-2-beozothiazole sulfenamide 1.5, 1,3-Diphenylguanidine 2.0 and sulfur 1.5. c 7%–25% indicates epoxy degree of ESSBR. c the ratio of SSBR replaced by ESSBR is 40%.
Table
Table 2. Compositions and molecular weights of SSBR2557, SSBR4526, CB24, and ESSBRs.
Table 2. Compositions and molecular weights of SSBR2557, SSBR4526, CB24, and ESSBRs.
SampleComposition (%) Mn × 10−5 (Da)Mw × 10−5 (Da)PDI
Bound Styrene1,4-unit1,2-unit
SSBR25572744563.969.062.28
SSBR45262655451.755.43.09
CB24-- 1.454.052.79
ESSBR7%-- 4.3510.112.32
ESSBR10%-- 4.4810.532.35
ESSBR15%-- 4.5810.682.33
ESSBR20%-- 4.3110.422.42
ESSBR25%-- 4.4610.712.40
Table
Table 3. tanδ at 0 °C, 60 °C and Tg (glass transition temperature) of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites.
Table 3. tanδ at 0 °C, 60 °C and Tg (glass transition temperature) of PS-SSBR/BR, ESSBR-SSBR/BR and TS-SSBR/BR composites.
A1A2B3C3D3E3F3
tanδ@0 °C0.2130.4330.2460.3240.3660.4670.605
tanδ@60 °C0.1670.1050.1270.1190.1080.1030.079
Table
Table 4. tanδ at 0 °C and 60 °C of E25-SSBR/BR composites with different ratio of ESSBR/SSBR.
Table 4. tanδ at 0 °C and 60 °C of E25-SSBR/BR composites with different ratio of ESSBR/SSBR.
F1F2F3
tanδ@0 °C0.5370.5680.627
tanδ@60 °C0.0960.0880.083
Table
Table 5. Curing behavior of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
Table 5. Curing behavior of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
T10 (min)T90 (min)ML (dNm)MH (dNm)ΔM (dNm)Crosslink Density (10−4 mol/cm3)
A11.553.438.956.317.41.12
A23.129.028.465.4371.54
B33.753.034.666.331.71.53
C34.453.533.168.1351.55
D34.851.231.765.633.91.58
E34.546.730.974.843.91.62
F16.647.331.276.144.91.59
F26.743.428.672.343.71.58
F36.244.626.769.7431.61
Table
Table 6. Mechanical properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
Table 6. Mechanical properties of silica/SSBR/BR composites.
SampleElongationat Break (%)Modulus at 100% (MPa)Modulus at 300% (MPa)Tensile Stress (MPa)Shore A Hardness
A1437 ± 392.6 ± 0.18.2 ± 0.316.5 ± 1.464
A2386 ± 34.8 ± 0.113.6 ± 0.321.2 ± 0.363
B3377 ± 73.9 ± 0.213.1 ± 0.418.2 ± 2.463
C3355 ± 114.7 ± 0.113.8 ± 0.119.7 ± 2.562
D3336 ± 274.9 ± 0.216.5 ± 0.420.3 ± 0.861
E3338 ± 345.8 ± 0.417.4 ± 0.721.6 ± 2.564
F1346 ± 295.5 ± 0.416.5 ± 0.421.9 ± 2.661
F2309 ± 166.1 ± 0.520.3 ± 0.520.6 ± 1.564
F3317 ± 266.6 ± 0.122.6 ± 0.323.9 ± 1.265

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, C.; Guo, M.; Zhai, X.; Ye, X.; Zhang, L. Using Epoxidized Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubbers (ESSBRs) as Coupling Agents to Modify Silica without Volatile Organic Compounds. Polymers 2020, 12, 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061257

AMA Style

Liu C, Guo M, Zhai X, Ye X, Zhang L. Using Epoxidized Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubbers (ESSBRs) as Coupling Agents to Modify Silica without Volatile Organic Compounds. Polymers. 2020; 12(6):1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Chaohao, Mingming Guo, Xiaobo Zhai, Xin Ye, and Liqun Zhang. 2020. "Using Epoxidized Solution Polymerized Styrene-Butadiene Rubbers (ESSBRs) as Coupling Agents to Modify Silica without Volatile Organic Compounds" Polymers 12, no. 6: 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop