Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Influence of Viscoelastic Behaviour on the Lifetime of Short Fibre Reinforced Polymers
Previous Article in Journal
Micellar Nanocarriers from Dendritic Macromolecules Containing Fluorescent Coumarin Moieties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Seed Emergence and Seedling Growth of Artemisia Desertorum with Superabsorbent Polymers

1
Key Laboratory of Eco-functional Polymer Materials of the Ministry of Education, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
Key Laboratory of Eco-environmental Polymer Materials of Gansu Province, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(12), 2873; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122873
Submission received: 27 October 2020 / Revised: 21 November 2020 / Accepted: 28 November 2020 / Published: 30 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)

Abstract

:
In this study, the emergence rate, emergence potential, root length, stem length, water consumption, and biomass around a root system were used as evaluation indexes, and we used the laboratory-prepared super absorbent resin watermelon rind (WMR)-p (AA–co–DAAM) (superabsorbent polymer 1—SAP1), WMR-p (AA–co–DAAM)/palygorskite (PGS) (SAP2) in a laboratory and commercially available water-retaining agents (SAPRX and SAPHDB) to assist the emergence of Artemisia desertorum seeds and seedling growth; then, their water absorption and thermal stability were discussed. The results showed that the thermal stability of an SAP prepared in the laboratory and the water consumption during seed emergence, root length, and stem length after emergence were better than those of an SAP purchased on the market, and this information could help to promote the emergence and seedling growth of Artemisia desertorum. While enhancing the drought resistance of plants, using a laboratory-produced SAP can effectively reduce the number of artificial irrigations.

1. Introduction

The total area of arid and semi-arid areas in China has reached 4.55 million hm2, accounting for 47% of the total land area of China [1]. Especially in northwest China, where drought and water shortages are serious, the desertification area accounts for 80% of the national area [2]. Moreover, a long period of spring drought resulted in the failure of plant seeds to germinate and grow due to water shortage. Therefore, resisting drought and save water and make full use of rainfall is the key to solve this problem, as well as the key to the sustainable development of desertification prevention and control in northwest China.
Artemisia desertorum is a kind of drought-tolerant, perennial herbaceous plant that grows in desert and semi-desert areas of China [3,4]. It has strong and developed roots, and most of its stems are tufted. It has a good role in preventing wind and sand [5]. Its seeds sometimes cannot germinate and grow in time due to drought in desert areas, and the presence of a high absorbent resin could provide water to maintain emergence and seedling growth.
Superabsorbent polymers (SAPs) are kinds of three-dimensional crosslinked hydrophilic polymers that can absorb and retain large amounts of water even under a high pressure [6]. A superabsorbent polymer contains a large number of hydrophilic groups that can absorb at water tens to thousands of times of its weight and swell into a gel-like form [7]. It is non-toxic and harmless, and it has applications in various fields such as personal hygiene products [8], medical materials [9], drug release [10], building materials [11], wastewater treatment [12], fire extinguishing agent [13], and agriculture, forestry, and horticulture [14,15]. In agriculture, the application of SAPs can significantly reduce the frequency of irrigation, greatly improve soil water retention capacity, enhance plant survival rates, reduce pesticide residues, and improve microbial activity in soil [16]. SAPs can also be used as seed coatings and seed dressings [17], and applying them to soil can not only improve the soil by increasing soil fertility [18,19], maintaining soil moisture, and acting as "mini reservoirs" for plants [20], they can also assist the emergence and growth of plants in arid desert areas [21,22]. However, different preparation methods, preparation conditions, preparation raw materials, and production formulas can cause differences in the performances of superabsorbent resin in various aspects [23].
Therefore, the main content of this study is to take watermelon rind (WMR) as raw material, WMR-p (AA–co–DAAM) (SAP1) and WMR-p (AA–co–DAAM)/palygorskite clay (PGS) (SAP2) super absorbent resins were prepared as the research objects. The performances of water absorption, water retention, and thermal stability were evaluated. The effects of laboratory-made superabsorbent resins on the seed emergence and seedling growth of Artemisia desertorum were pinpointed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Materials

SAP1 and SAP2 were made in the laboratory, and two different water-preserving agents, Runxing (Yantai, China) and Handibao (Weifang, China), were purchased from the market.
Prior to synthesizing the superabsorbent polymer, WMR and PGS were pretreated. After being freeze-dried, the watermelon rind was crushed and sifted to obtain PGS powder.
PGS was processed in two steps. In the first step, distilled water was added to PGS powder and mixed evenly through mechanical agitation. After centrifugation at a speed of 8000 r/min for 5 min, the precipitate was washed multiple times with distilled water and fully dried in an oven at 70 °C. In the second step, the dried PGS was prepared into a powder, poured into a three-necked flask with a sufficient ratio of 1 mol/L HCl (mass ratio 1:10), stirred mechanically in a 65 °C water bath for 6 hours, and filtered and washed with distilled water until neutral.
The synthesis of SAP2: We weighed a certain amount of pretreated WMR powder and added into a 250 mL three-necked flask under a 70 °C water bath, and then we dispersed it evenly in 30 mL of ultrapure water via mechanical stirring; then, we added the partially neutralized AA, DAAM, PGS, and MBA into the reaction vessel after 40 min, and then we kept the whole reaction under nitrogen protection. After 30 min, the initiator APS was added and the reaction conditions were maintained to complete the polymerization. The reaction products were washed with anhydrous ethanol, cut into pieces, and placed in oven at 65 °C. Finally, the products crushed to obtain SAP2 at a constant weight.
SAP1 was synthesized in the same way as SAP2, except that PGS was not added in the synthesis process.
The structure, morphology, and thermodynamic properties of two kinds of superabsorbent resins that were made in the laboratory were characterized by FTIR, SEM, and TGA.

2.2. Characterization of Superabsorbent Polymer

2.2.1. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

The sample to be tested and potassium bromide were put into a mortar for grinding in accordance with a certain mass ratio (1:100) to mix the sample and potassium bromide evenly [24]. Then, the sample was made with a tablet pressing machine. FTIR spectra were taken over the range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 using a Bracher EQUINX55 FTIR Spectrometer [25].

2.2.2. Morphology Analysis

The dried sample was put into an anhydrous ethanol solution in the centrifuge tube and dispersed evenly by ultrasound for 10 min. Then it was dropped on the copper foil attached to the sample table and dried for later use. Before the test, the sample’s surface was sprayed with gold, and then the sample table was placed into a scanning electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV to observe its morphological characteristics and pore morphology.

2.2.3. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis of Superabsorbent Polymer

Dry samples of four different superabsorbent polymers were sampled at about 15 mg and placed in a thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGAQ100, City of New Castle, DE, USA) of the American TA Company for testing. The TGA analysis conditions were as follows. The temperature was raised from 0 to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere, wherein the nitrogen flow rate was 20 mL min−1.
Before the start of the experiment, we chose healthy seeds. The amount of water-retaining agent to be added was calculated based on the water holding capacity of the sand.

2.3. Experiment Design

The experiment was designed to be completely randomized. There were 5 experiments (treatments A, B, C, D, and E), and each was replicated 3 times. The water holding capacity of the sand (Tengger desert) was measured before the start of the experiment, the weight of the sand in each container was weighed, and the amount of the superabsorbent polymer to be applied was calculated from the weight of the sand. We sprinkled an appropriate amount of superabsorbent polymer into the sand and mixed them well. Then, we added an appropriate amount of water. Treatment E was the control group, as you can see from Table 1, as it had no superabsorbent polymer, only water. Then, we planted 30 seeds per group, and the weighed sand and superabsorbent polymer were mixed evenly and spread in an open box of 256 mm × 184 mm × 45 mm. The seeds were buried at a depth of 1 cm from the surface of the sand. The 30 seeds were evenly distributed throughout the box, and the calculated water quality was added. The entire emergence experiment was done in an artificial climate chamber. The emergence environment data required for the specific emergence experiment are shown in Table 2.
In Table 2, “part one” and “part two” represent the no-light and light phases, respectively, and the “0” and “4” represent the levels of light intensity in an artificial climate chamber (RQH-280C, Shanghai Kuangbei Industrial Co., Shanghai, China).

2.4. Determination of the Project

2.4.1. Balanced Swelling Rate Test of Superabsorbent Polymer in Distilled Water and Tap Water

The water absorption capacity of a superabsorbent polymer is expressed by its equilibrium water absorption ratio. At room temperature, a certain amount of dry sample with four different water retaining agents was weighed, and then the sample was immersed in excess distilled water to achieve a swelling balance. Finally, excess moisture was filtered through a gauze bag, the weight of the swelling balance superabsorbent polymer was weighed and recorded, and the equilibrium water absorption ratio was calculated using the following formula:
Q e q = ( w 2 w 1 ) / w 1
where w1 is the weight before sample processing, w2 is the weight at which the sample reaches the swelling equilibrium, and Qeq is the sample equilibrium water absorption ratio.

2.4.2. Seed Emergence Rate and Emergence Potential

The seed emergence rate is calculated by the following formula:
E R ( % ) = E t e r / T e r × 100
where GR represents the emergence rate of the seed, Eter represents the number of germinated seeds at time t, and Ter represents the total number of test seeds.
Emergence potential refers to the percentage of the number of emergence seeds in the tested sample when the number of emergence seeds reached its peak daily during the emergence process. Generally, the percentage of the number of emergence seeds in the first 1/3 period of the specified period of emergence is taken as the standard [26]. It is calculated by the following formula:
E P ( % ) = E t e p / T e p × 100
where EP represents the emergence potential, Etep is the number of emergence seeds that reached their peak daily within the specified time, and Tep is the total number of tested seeds.

2.4.3. Water Consumption

The sum of the mass of the sand, the amount of water held by the sand, the maximum amount of water absorbed by the superabsorbent polymer, and the mass of the seeds was taken as the initial mass. The difference between the mass measured at the same time interval and the corresponding initial mass was the amount of water added—that is, the amount of water consumed—when performing the emergence experiments. Because of the different swelling rates between different superabsorbent polymers, the amount of water added each time was different. Thus, we evaluated the water retention capacity of the superabsorbent polymer based on the water consumption and the weight of the added water.

2.4.4. Root length, Seedling Height, and Biomass

The root length and stem length of Artemisia desertorum seedlings were measured and recorded before the end of the experiment, and then fresh weight was measured. The seedlings were dried in an oven (105 °C) for 8 h, and the dry weight was weighed again. The oven was produced by Shanghai Experimental Instrument Factory Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) Model 101A-1.

2.4.5. Data Statistics and Analysis

The statistical analysis of the experimental data was performed using the SPSS19 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The effects of different experimental treatments were compared by an ANOVA, and the results were analyzed by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR spectra of palygorskite clay, treatment A, treatment B, treatment C, and treatment D are shown in Figure 1a–D, respectively. They were bought from the market. C contained C=C (1666 cm−1) and –OH (3423 cm−1); D contained C=O (1711 cm−1), –CONH– (1585 cm−1), and C=C (1401 cm−1). In Figure 1a, the characteristic absorption peaks at 1032, 1650, and 3555 cm−1 are consistent with the characteristic absorption of the Si–O stretching vibration, C=C stretching vibration, and –OH bending vibration of palygorskite clay. The C=C stretching vibration peaks at 1650 and 3555 cm−1 and the –OH bending vibration peak almost disappeared after the reaction, while the strong absorption peak caused by the Si–O stretching vibration of palygorskite clay at 1032 cm−1 significantly weakened after the reaction, as shown in Figure 1B. The weak absorption peaks of WMR at 1038 and 1638 cm−1 were the stretching vibration of C–O (H) and the bending vibration of the –OH group, respectively, as shown in Figure 1A,B, because treatments A and B contained the WMR raw material. As shown in Figure 1A, the characteristic peaks of palygorskite clay were nonexistent, but the characteristic peaks of watermelon rind did exist. The absorption peaks at 1563 and 1413 cm−1 in Figure 1B represent carboxyl (–COO–) and C=C groups, indicating a successful reaction between the cross-linking agent and the –OH group of palygorskite clay. The disappearance or weakening of these characteristic peaks indicated the successful grafting of watermelon rind and acrylic acid, as well as the successful preparation of WMR-p (AA–co–DAAM) and WMR-p (AA–co–DAAM)/PGS.

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

The surface morphology and structure of an SAP is one of the factors that affects water absorption. Figure 2 shows the SEMs of the surface morphology of the super absorbent resin and the watermelon rind. Figure 2a shows that the surface of the raw material was folded, Figure 2b shows that the surface of the raw material was smooth. Figure 2c,d shows that the surface of the SAP increased its folds and became loose and porous. Studies have shown that a material with a higher porosity has a larger specific surface area, which can increase the contact area between water and polymer networks and can help to expand and improve the water absorption performance of an SAP.

3.3. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis

Thermal analysis curves were obtained from the TGA of different SAPs. It can be observed from Figure 3 that the decomposition process of an SAP is a multi-step process. First, from the thermal gravimetric analysis curve, the mass loss of the sample between 0 and 250 °C due to the volatilization of other small molecular compounds or moisture can be seen [27]; compared to treatments A, C, and D, treatment B led to a lesser loss of mass. The mass loss in the temperature range of 250–400 °C may have come from the elimination of carbon dioxide molecules in the polymer chain, and the mass loss of treatment D at this stage was much greater than that of treatments A, B, and C because the maximum degradation temperature of treatment D was 364 °C and the maximum degradation temperatures of treatments A, B, and C were 446, 448, and 430 °C, respectively. The mass loss near this maximum degradation temperature could be attributed to the elimination of water molecules from the two adjacent carboxylic acid groups in the polymer chain to form anhydride molecules [28], resulting in polymer backbone cleavage and the decomposition of the cross-linked network structure [29]. Finally, when the temperature exceeded 500 °C, the most remaining mass was found in treatment B, and treatment D had the least remaining mass. Therefore, the thermal stability of SAPHDB and SAPRX was not as good as SAP1 and SAP2, which were made in the laboratory.

3.4. Water Absorption Capacity of Four Different Superabsorbent Polymers

The water absorption capacity of the different superabsorbent polymer can be seen in Figure 4. The water absorption ratios of treatments B and C in tap and distilled water were higher than those of treatments A and D. The water absorption capacity of the superabsorbent polymer was better. This means that when smaller amounts of SAP are required in an actual application process, the process becomes more environmentally friendly and conducive to reducing costs.

3.5. Emergence Rate

It can be seen from Figure 5 that the types of superabsorbent polymers were different, as were the emergence rates. Compared with control group E (98.9%), the emergence rates of Artemisia desertorum for treatments A, B, C, and D were 90.0%, 91.1%, 91.1%, and 52.2%, respectively, which were slightly lower than the control group. There was no significant difference between treatments B and C (p > 0.05), and there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between treatment A and the others. In the experiment, the highest emergence rate of treatment E was 98.9%, which indicated that the quality of the Artemisia desertorum seeds was good. Meanwhile, treatments B and C had no significant difference, and the superabsorbent polymer of these treatments had no obvious inhibitory effects on the seed emergence or growth of Artemisia desertorum [30]. Meanwhile, treatments A and C showed significant differences, indicating that the superabsorbent polymer of treatments A and C hurt the emergence of Artemisia desertorum. This also proved that the superabsorbent polymer prepared in the laboratory with the addition of palygorskite clay is practically applicable to aiding the seed emergence of Artemisia desertorum. The experimental data of emergence rate was shown in Table 3.

3.6. Emergence Potential

The results showed that there were significant differences in the emergence potential of Artemisia desertorum under different experimental treatments, as shown in Figure 6. The emergence potentials of treatments A, B, and C were 80.0%, 82.2%, and 86.7%, respectively, which were slightly lower than the control treatment group E (p > 0.05), while the emergence potential of treatment D was 37.7%, which was significantly lower than the control group with a significant difference (p < 0.05). This indicated that there was no significant difference in the emergence speed and uniformity of Artemisia desertorum seeds in treatments A, B, C, and E. The possible reasons for the emergence potentials of treatments A, B, C, and D being lower than that of control group E was that in the early stage of the emergence of the Artemisia desertorum seeds, the water was absorbed by the dry superabsorbent polymer and the Artemisia desertorum seeds together. The water absorbed by the superabsorbent polymer was fixed in its three-dimensional network structure and then slowly released, which made the seeds of Artemisia desertorum slowly obtain the moisture required for emergence in the early stages, thus prolonging the emergence time; however, this did not affect the normal emergence of the seeds.
Therefore, the laboratory-prepared SAP1 and SAP2 had no adverse effects on the normal emergence of Artemisia desertorum seeds. The experimental data of emergence potential was shown in Table 3.

3.7. Water Consumption

The water consumption of Artemisia desertorum after applying different superabsorbent polymers is shown in Figure 7. According to the figure, there were significant differences in the water consumption of Artemisia desertorum after applying different superabsorbent polymers. The water consumption of control group E was the highest at 1386.9 g, while the water consumption levels of treatments A and D were 1292.6 and 1291.3 g, respectively. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between treatments A and D, but treatment B (1184.5 g) had the lowest water consumption with a significant difference (p < 0.05) with other treatment groups. Overall, the water consumption of treatment C (1317.6 g) was significantly higher than the other treatments (p < 0.05), that is, SAPRX’s ability to retain moisture in the sand was weaker than other SAPs. From this result, we could see that the use of a superabsorbent polymer could effectively reduce water consumption, additionally proving the previous conclusion that a superabsorbent polymer has better water absorption and water retention properties than soil by itself. During the emergence and growth of the Artemisia desertorum seeds, the water absorbed by the polymer is slowly released, which improves the water use efficiency [31]. Compared with the control group, the application of a superabsorbent polymer led to the consumption of less water; the main reason for this was that some of the moisture absorbed by the superabsorbent polymer was fixed in the three-dimensional network structure of the superabsorbent polymer, so during the growth of Artemisia desertorum, it was not directly evaporated and therefore played a good role in water retention [21]. In the growth stage of Artemisia desertorum, when the environmental moisture was evaporated and absorbed, the water fixed in the superabsorbent polymer was slowly released to supply the emergence and growth of the plant. Therefore, under the same conditions, the addition of a superabsorbent polymer could effectively reduce the water consumption of Artemisia desertorum [32].

3.8. Root Length and Stem Length of Different Treatment Groups

As shown in Figure 8, there were differences between different processing groups. Specifically, the stem lengths of Artemisia desertorum for treatments A, B, and C were 4.92, 5.72, and 5.2 cm, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of control group E (p < 0.05). Among them, the stem length of treatment B was the highest, and it had no significant difference with that of treatment C (p > 0.05). There were significant differences between treatments A, D, and E (p < 0.05), though those these differences were significantly lower than those between treatments A, B, C, and E (p < 0.05). From this result, it could be seen that compared with control group E, SAP1, SAP2, and SAPRX all had significant promoting effects on the stem length of Artemisia desertorum [33].
The root lengths of Artemisia desertorum were different with different superabsorbent resins. The root length of treatment group B was 4.12 cm, which was significantly higher than control group E (p < 0.05), while the root lengths of treatments A and C were 3.52 and 3.91 cm, respectively, compared to control group E (3.20 cm); this was not a significant difference (p > 0.05). For treatment D, the root length of Artemisia desertorum was 2.12 cm, which was significantly lower than the other treatment groups (p < 0.05).
It can be seen from Figure 8 that the root length of treatment B with SAP1 was the longest. Therefore, SAP1 could significantly promote the root length of Artemisia desertorum in the growth process, but SAP2 and SAPRX were found to have no obvious effects on the growth process. SAPHDB harmed the root length of Artemisia desertorum, which may have been caused by different types of ions and their hydrophilic groups contained in the different superabsorbent polymers. Some ions can stimulate the growth of roots and some can harm the growth of roots because the ion concentration is too high. Watermelon rind as a biomass material contains a certain amount of sugar or minerals because fresh watermelon and palygorskite clay contain traces of elements such as calcium, iron, and magnesium. These are required for plant growth and, to a certain extent, promote plant growth. However, super absorbent polymers purchased from markets are all chemically synthesized, with a single element (such as nitrogen) at a high concentration, which does not significantly promote and may even inhibit the growth of plants [34]. SAP2 was found to have a very favorable effect on the root growth of Artemisia desertorum seedlings. The experimental data of root length and shoot length were shown in Table 3.

3.9. Aboveground Biomass, Belowground Biomass and Total Biomass in Different Treatment Groups

The aboveground biomass accumulation, belowground biomass accumulation, and total biomass accumulation in different treatment groups are shown in Figure 9. As can be seen from the figure, the total biomass of treatment C was 9.6 mg, which was significantly higher than the other treatment groups. Additionally, the differences between treatments A, B, and E were significant (p < 0.05), and the biomass values of treatments A and B were significantly lower than that of treatment C and significantly higher than that of control group E. At the same time, the difference between the aboveground biomass and total biomass of treatments B and C was not significant (p > 0.05), and the differences between the other treatment groups were consistent with the total biomass. As can be seen from the figure, there was no significant difference between the belowground biomass of the different treatments and control group E (p > 0.05).
Based on the determination of aboveground biomass and total biomass accumulation, it was found that the addition of SAP1, SAP2, and SAPRX significantly promoted the accumulation of the aboveground biomass of Artemisia desertorum. The promoting effect of treatment B was the most obvious, which also showed the longest stem length. This was mainly because developed lateral roots can provide nutrients for the growth of aboveground parts from multiple sources [35]. However, the effect of lateral roots on the accumulation of belowground biomass is not obvious because such biomass is predominantly influenced by climate and soil, in addition to root traits [36,37]. Aboveground environments are more exposed to air, so there were differences in aboveground biomass but not belowground biomass between treatment groups. The aboveground biomass of treatment C was higher than that of other groups because it formed the main root—the more developed a main root, the larger biomass of its root system [38,39]. Therefore, the laboratory-made SAP was found to have no inhibitory effects on the biomass accumulation of Artemisia desertorum, but it was found to have a certain promoting effect, which indicated that the SAP made in this laboratory is practical. The experimental data of total biomass, aboveground biomass and belowground biomass were shown in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, an experiment regarding the seed emergence of Artemisia desertorum was carried out by using laboratory-made and commercially available superabsorbent polymers. The effects of a superabsorbent polymer on the seed emergence and seedling growth of Artemisia desertorum were studied. At the same time, the water absorption, water retention, thermal stability, and salt tolerance of the laboratory-made superabsorbent polymers were studied. We found that the seed emergence and seedling growth of the Artemisia desertorum were significantly affected by different superabsorbent polymers. Our laboratory-made SAP2 (which had added palygorskite clay in the preparation process) had a better performance than SAP1, whether regarding water absorption, water retention, or the promotion of plant growth. SAP2 also performed better than SAPRX and SAPHDB, and we observed that it had the effect of crust fixation after application; this effect was not observed with SAPRX and SAPHDB. SAPRX promoted the biomass accumulation of Artemisia desertorum significantly more than other SAPs, which may have been related to its preparation materials. SAPHDB inhibited the emergence and growth of the Artemisia desertorum in this experiment, this reason must be further explored. In general, the laboratory-made superabsorbent polymers are low in cost, environmentally friendly, biodegradable, good in moisture retention, have certain promoting effects on the growth of plants, and have no toxic effects on seedlings. Thus a superabsorbent polymer can be applied to the growth process of plants to promote seedling growth, enhance drought resistance, reduce the amount of irrigation needed, and save water resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z.; methodology, W.Z. and Q.L.; validation, W.Z. and Q.L.; formal analysis, W.Z. and Q.L.; investigation, W.Z. and S.L.; resources, W.Z. and J.C.; data curation, W.Z. and L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.Z. and Q.L.; writing—review and editing, W.Z. and Q.L.; visualization, W.Z. and P.W.; supervision, W.Z.; project administration, W.Z. and Z.L.; funding acquisition, W.Z. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 31860237, 51863019. It was also funded by the Young Teachers’ Scientific Research Ability Enhancing Project of the Northwest Normal University, grant number NWNU-LKQN-17-10.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ying, Z.; Yinqiao, X.; Zheng, W.; Shengyu, L. Advances in Application of Soil Amendments in Desert Control. J. Ludong Univ. 2019, 35, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yuan, Z.; Guang, G.; Shu, Q.; Ming, Y.; Guo, D. Desertification detection and the evaluation indicators: A review. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 2019, 33, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, Z. Seasonal variation of assembled and naturally recruited plants in a subtropical constructed wetland. Biodivers. Sci. 2005, 13, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chuan, S. Preliminary Study on Succession of Artemisia ordosica Community in Gonghe Sandy Grassland. Technol. Qinghai Agric. For. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, W.U.; Xue, Z.; Yi, Z. Protecting Cities and Towns from Blown-sand Disasters in Semi-arid Area of China —A case study of Dabqig Town in Uxin Banner of Inner Mongolia. J. Desert Res. 2013, 7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fang, S.; Wang, G.; Xing, R.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.; Qin, Y.; Li, K.; Wang, X.; Li, R.; Li, P. Synthesis of superabsorbent polymers based on chitosan derivative graft acrylic acid-co-acrylamide and its property testing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.; Ning, A.; Xie, P.; Gao, G.; Xie, L.; Li, X.; Song, A. Synthesis and swelling behaviors of carboxymethyl cellulose-based superabsorbent resin hybridized with graphene oxide. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Varaprasad, K.; Raghavendra, G.M.; Jayaramudu, T.; Yallapu, M.M.; Sadiku, R. A mini review on hydrogels classification and recent developments in miscellaneous applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 79, 958–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yuan, M.; Bi, B.; Huang, J.; Zhuo, R.; Jiang, X. Thermosensitive and photocrosslinkable hydroxypropyl chitin-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, P. Effects of the multilayer structures on Exenatide release and bioactivity in microsphere/thermosensitive hydrogel system. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 171, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, H.; Wong, H.; Buenfeld, N. Self-sealing of cracks in concrete using superabsorbent polymers. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 79, 194–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Tong, Z.; Jin, S. Preparation of SA-g-(PAA-co-PDMC) polyampholytic superabsorbent polymer and its application to the anionic dye adsorption removal from effluents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 188, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tang, Y.; Wang, H. Development of a novel bentonite–acrylamide superabsorbent hydrogel for extinguishing gangue fire hazard. Powder Technol. 2018, 323, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tubert, E.; Amodeo, G.; Alvarez, M.; Tubert, F.; Baroli, I.; Amodeo, G. Synthesis and evaluation of a superabsorbent-fertilizer composite for maximizing the nutrient and water use efficiency in forestry plantations. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 210, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Mei, H.; Yong, D.; Li, J. Preparation, swelling behaviors and fertilizer-release properties of sodium humate modified superabsorbent resin. Mater. Today Commun. 2019, 19, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, S.; Wang, G.; Li, P.; Xing, R.; Liu, S.; Qin, Y.; Yu, H.; Chen, X.; Li, K. Synthesis of chitosan derivative graft acrylic acid superabsorbent polymers and its application as water retaining agent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Li, Q.; Su, Y.; Yue, Q.; Gao, B.; Su, Y. A novel wheat straw cellulose-based semi-IPNs superabsorbent with integration of water-retaining and controlled-release fertilizers. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 55, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qiao, D.; Liu, H.; Yu, L.; Bao, X.; Simon, G.P.; Petinakis, E.; Chen, L. Preparation and characterization of slow-release fertilizer encapsulated by starch-based superabsorbent polymer. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, T.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhao, Y. Synthesis composite hydrogels from inorganic-organic hybrids based on leftover rice for environment-friendly controlled-release urea fertilizers. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 615, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.; Luan, Q.; Huang, Q.; Tang, H.; Huang, F.-H.; Li, W.; Wan, C.; Liu, C.; Xu, J.; Guo, P.; et al. A facile and efficient strategy for the fabrication of porous linseed gum/cellulose superabsorbent hydrogels for water conservation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 157, 1830–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guilherme, M.R.; Aouada, F.A.; Fajardo, A.R.; Martins, A.F.; Paulino, A.T.; Davi, M.F.; Rubira, A.F.; Muniz, E.C. Superabsorbent hydrogels based on polysaccharides for application in agriculture as soil conditioner and nutrient carrier: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 72, 365–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Satriani, A.; Catalano, M.; Scalcione, E. The role of superabsorbent hydrogel in bean crop cultivation under deficit irrigation conditions: A case-study in Southern Italy. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 195, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, J.-P.; Zhang, F.-S. Recycling waste polyethylene film for amphoteric superabsorbent resin synthesis. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 331, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Simeng, B.; Xiaoran, S. Preparation and Structure Characterization of Graphene Nanoplatelets based on Humic Acid. Humic Acid 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shuwei, S.; Huiling, Z.; Caiyan, Y.U.; Ying, B.J.E.S. Technology. Experimental measurement and analysis of Raman/infrared methods for lithium batteries. Energy storage Sci. Technol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pouria, S.; Meisam, N.; Gunter, B. Effect of UV-C Radiation on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Maize. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 3312–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, J.; Yang, Q.; Ran, F.; Ma, G.; Lei, Z. Preparation and properties of novel eco-friendly superabsorbent composites based on raw wheat bran and clays. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gharekhani, H.; Olad, A.; Mirmohseni, A.; Baybordi, A. Superabsorbent hydrogel made of NaAlg-g-poly(AA-co-AAm) and rice husk ash: Synthesis, characterization, and swelling kinetic studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 168, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Essawy, H.A.; Ghazy, M.B.; El-Hai, F.A.; Mohamed, M.F. Superabsorbent hydrogels via graft polymerization of acrylic acid from chitosan-cellulose hybrid and their potential in controlled release of soil nutrients. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 89, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Montesano, F.F.; Parente, A.; Santamaria, P.; Sannino, A.; Di Serio, F. Biodegradable Superabsorbent Hydrogel IncreasesWater Retention Properties of Growing Media and Plant Growth. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2015, 4, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hasija, V.; Sharma, K.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, V. Green synthesis of agar/Gum Arabic based superabsorbent as an alternative for irrigation in agriculture. Vacuum 2018, 157, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Olad, A.; Gharekhani, H.; Mirmohseni, A.; Baybordi, A. Superabsorbent nanocomposite based on maize bran with integration of water-retaining and slow-release NPK fertilizer. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2017, 37, 1682–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hüttermann, A.; Orikiriza, L.J.B.; Agaba, H. Application of Superabsorbent Polymers for Improving the Ecological Chemistry of Degraded or Polluted Lands. CLEAN Soil Air Water 2009, 37, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Naz, F.S.; Yusuf, M.; Khan, T.A.; Fariduddin, Q.; Ahmad, A. Low level of selenium increases the efficacy of 24-epibrassinolide through altered physiological and biochemical traits of Brassica juncea plants. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, Y.; Tong, Z.; Geng, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, M. Biobased Polymer Composites Derived from Corn Stover and Feather Meals as Double-Coating Materials for Controlled-Release and Water-Retention Urea Fertilizers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8166–8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lei, X.; Hai-xia, X.; Qing, L.; Ting, G. Scaling from leaf to whole plant in biomass and nitrogen content of Nitraria tangutorum seedlings. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2018, 40, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, Z.; Yang, X.; Shu, X.; Yan, L.; Tan, Z.; Wang, J.; Tan, G.; Yu, W. Biomass variation, allocation pattern and heredity stability of Magnolia officinalis seedlings from different provenances. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 2011, 40, 351–359. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dorraji, S.S.; Golchin, A.; Ahmadi, S. The Effects of Hydrophilic Polymer and Soil Salinity on Corn Growth in Sandy and Loamy Soils. CLEAN Soil Air Water 2010, 38, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Islam, M.R.; Hu, Y.; Mao, S.; Mao, J.; Eneji, A.E.; Xue, X. Effectiveness of a water-saving super-absorbent polymer in soil water conservation for corn (Zea mays L.) based on eco-physiological parameters. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1998–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) palygorskite clay, (A) treatment A, (B) treatment B, (C) treatment C, and (D) treatment D.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of (a) palygorskite clay, (A) treatment A, (B) treatment B, (C) treatment C, and (D) treatment D.
Polymers 12 02873 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of WMP (a,b), SAP1 (c), and SAP2 (d).
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of WMP (a,b), SAP1 (c), and SAP2 (d).
Polymers 12 02873 g002
Figure 3. TGA of (A) treatment A, (B) treatment B, (C) treatment C, and (D) treatment D. TG: the percentage of the residual mass.
Figure 3. TGA of (A) treatment A, (B) treatment B, (C) treatment C, and (D) treatment D. TG: the percentage of the residual mass.
Polymers 12 02873 g003
Figure 4. Water absorbency of different SAPs—(A) SAP1, (B) SAP2, (C) SAPRX, and (D) SAPHDB—in distilled and tap water.
Figure 4. Water absorbency of different SAPs—(A) SAP1, (B) SAP2, (C) SAPRX, and (D) SAPHDB—in distilled and tap water.
Polymers 12 02873 g004
Figure 5. Emergence rate under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Figure 5. Emergence rate under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Polymers 12 02873 g005
Figure 6. Emergence potential under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Figure 6. Emergence potential under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Polymers 12 02873 g006
Figure 7. Water consumption under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Figure 7. Water consumption under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Polymers 12 02873 g007
Figure 8. Root length and shoot length under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Figure 8. Root length and shoot length under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Polymers 12 02873 g008
Figure 9. Belowground biomass, aboveground biomass and total biomass under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Figure 9. Belowground biomass, aboveground biomass and total biomass under different experimental treatments—A: SAP1; B: SAP2; C: SAPRX; D: SAPHDB; and E: water. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 30). The different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments, as determined by Duncan’s test.
Polymers 12 02873 g009
Table 1. The experimental design and treatment. SAP: Superabsorbent polymer
Table 1. The experimental design and treatment. SAP: Superabsorbent polymer
Varieties of SAPTreatmentSand (g)Water (g)SAPs (g)Source
SAP1A1535.8350.23.70Laboratory-Prepared
SAP2B1535.0350.02.52Laboratory-Prepared
SAPRXC1521.9347.02.40Purchased
SAPHDBD1536.7350.44.17Purchased
0E1533.3349.600
Table 2. Setting parameters of the artificial climate chamber in the experiment.
Table 2. Setting parameters of the artificial climate chamber in the experiment.
Setting ParametersPart OnePart Two
Temperature20 °C30 °C
Humidity40%25%
Light intensity04
Time720 min720 min
Table 3. The experimental data of emergence rate, emergence potential, root length, shoot length, total biomass, aboveground biomass and belowground biomass for treatments A, B, C, D, and E.
Table 3. The experimental data of emergence rate, emergence potential, root length, shoot length, total biomass, aboveground biomass and belowground biomass for treatments A, B, C, D, and E.
ABCDE
Emergence rate (%)90.091.191.152.298.9
Er13.3003.8116.9663.8681.905
Emergence potential (%)80.082.286.637.791.1
Er23.3008.4043.3505.0856.966
Root length (cm)3.524.123.982.123.17
Er30.0760.5480.8220.1260.325
Shoot length (cm)4.925.725.202.853.75
Er40.2570.6290.2650.3910.350
Total biomass (mg)6.837.679.604.574.73
Er50.6111.6621.3230.5510.231
Aboveground biomass (mg)6.177.208.534.004.13
Er60.4511.6091.8010.2650.208
Belowground biomass (mg)0.600.451.030.470.53
Er70.2650.0870.5510.3060.208
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Liu, Q.; Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Guo, L.; Wang, P.; Lei, Z. Study on Seed Emergence and Seedling Growth of Artemisia Desertorum with Superabsorbent Polymers. Polymers 2020, 12, 2873. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122873

AMA Style

Zhang W, Liu Q, Liu S, Chen J, Guo L, Wang P, Lei Z. Study on Seed Emergence and Seedling Growth of Artemisia Desertorum with Superabsorbent Polymers. Polymers. 2020; 12(12):2873. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Wenxu, Qian Liu, Shengfang Liu, Jing Chen, Lulu Guo, Peng Wang, and Ziqiang Lei. 2020. "Study on Seed Emergence and Seedling Growth of Artemisia Desertorum with Superabsorbent Polymers" Polymers 12, no. 12: 2873. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop