Next Article in Journal
Poly (Dimethylsiloxane) Coating for Repellency of Polar and Non-Polar Liquids
Previous Article in Journal
Energy-Saving Electrospinning with a Concentric Teflon-Core Rod Spinneret to Create Medicated Nanofibers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Properties of Thiophene and Aniline Copolymer Using Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jets Copolymerization Technique
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/polym12102422
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Kinetics Modification Treated by Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma

by
João Freire de Medeiros Neto
1,
Ivan Alves de Souza
2,
Michelle Cequeira Feitor
1,
Talita Galvão Targino
1,
Gutembergy Ferreira Diniz
3,
Maxwell Santana Libório
1,
Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães Sousa
2 and
Thercio Henrique de Carvalho Costa
1,*
1
Plasma Materials Processing Laboratory, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38408-100, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(10), 2422; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102422
Submission received: 30 August 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 26 September 2020 / Published: 21 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plasma Processes for Polymers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, the plasma was used in the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) technique for modifying the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) surface. The treatments were performed via argon or oxygen, for 10 min, at a frequency of 820 Hz, voltage of 20 kV, 2 mm distance between electrodes, and atmospheric pressure. The efficiency of the plasma was determined through the triple Langmuir probe to check if it had enough energy to promote chemical changes on the material surface. Physicochemical changes were diagnosed through surface characterization techniques such as contact angle, attenuated total reflection to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), X-ray excited photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Plasma electronics temperature showed that it has enough energy to break or form chemical bonds on the material surface, impacting its wettability directly. The wettability test was performed before and after treatment through the sessile drop, using distilled water, glycerin, and dimethylformamide, to the profile of surface tensions by the Fowkes method, analyzing the contact angle variation. ATR-FTIR and XPS analyses showed that groups and bonds were altered or generated on the surface when compared with the untreated sample. The AFM showed a change in roughness, and this directly affected the increase of wettability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

High-density polyethylene (HDPE) is one of the commonly used polymers in industrial, medical, and biomedical applications, as it presents: mechanical properties, flexibility, and high chemical stability [1,2,3,4,5]. However, a problem associated with HDPE is that it has a partially hydrophobic surface, due to its low surface energy and lack of functional groups, resulting in limited adhesion and low chemical reactivity [6,7,8].
In the last decades, there was an increase in the number of technologies to superficial modification of materials that sought to increase hardness, wear resistance, adhesion strength, hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, among other materials’ properties [9,10,11,12]. Among these technologies, the treatment of plasma in dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) has been used to increase the surface energy of polymeric materials by incorporating polar groups on the surface without changing its mass composition [13,14,15,16,17]. The process occurs between two electrodes, where at least one of which must be covered by a dielectric [18,19,20]. An advantage over other plasma formation techniques is that DBD does not require low pressures, avoiding the use of vacuum systems and the use of high electrical currents, reducing energy consumption, and making it a low-cost process [21,22].
The modifications through the DBD plasma can be chemical, promoting the dissociation of bonds such as C–C or C–H and thus allowing the formation of hydrophilic character groups, associated with oxygen species. Otherwise, physical modification is possible, through the etching process of species, promoting changes in surface roughness. Despite having different characteristics, chemical and physical changes directly affect the wettability and surface adhesion of the material. [21,23,24,25].
Several attempts have been reported in the literature using DBD plasma to improve the wettability of polymeric surfaces, since it does not deteriorate and can modify the treated surface [17,23,25,26,27]. The authors justify that the increase in wettability in polymeric materials is directly associated with the incorporation of functional groups such as C–O, C=O, and O–C–O [11,28,29,30,31]. The incorporated functional groups were verified, by the authors, using the XPS or FTIR techniques, with the associated reduction of the peak of the C–C and C–H bonds [5,12,32]. These modifications have been made in polymers such as: polypropylene [11,31], polyethylene [3,12,32,33], poly (lactic acid) [4,34], polyester [9,26,35], and others [10,29,36,37,38,39,40].
The use of polyethylene surface modification techniques results in increased wettability, from the interaction with functional groups and morphological modification [41]. Researches have obtained an increase in the wettability of polyethylene using techniques such as plasma jet, direct fluorination, UV-radiation, leisure, and others [23,42,43,44,45,46]. The use of techniques reported the reduction of C–C and C–H bindings from the inclusion of oxygen and nitrogen in the surface [3,4,5,23]. It is also reported that the introduction of an inert gas facilitates the formation of plasma and promotes the dissociation of hydrocarbons [47,48].
Therefore, it is observed that several studies have investigated the high-density polyethylene wettability increase. However, DBD plasma has been little explored when compared to the high potential of this technique. Thus, this study will investigate the effect of this treatment on the HDPE surface properties based on the assessment of physicochemical changes and surface wettability. So, it is possible to assess how the treatment effect is optimized for applications where greater material adherence is required, since the HDPE initially does not have functional groups, making this type of interaction difficult.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Square shaped samples with 15 mm sides and 1.5 mm thickness were prepared using high-density polyethylene (HDPE) disk, processed by injection molding, supplied by the GFG PLASTICS FABRICATIONS LTD, Hull, United Kingdom. In thi.s work, 5 samples were treated to each treatment condition and the results showed are the average obtained in the analysis.

2.2. Plasma Reactor

The used reactor (Figure 1) consisted of an acrylic tube, closed by two Teflon (PTFE) flanges, at the top and bottom of the tube. An anode electrode was placed on the top flange, and a cathode was placed on the bottom. A disk-shaped alumina dielectric with a diameter of 56 mm and a thickness of 2 mm was mounted on the cathode, meeting the characteristics of the DBD plasma generation technique.
The acrylic tube was 110 mm in height, 80 mm in outer diameter, and 74 mm in inner diameter. It penetrated 5 mm in each Teflon flange, allowing a maximum distance of 100 mm between the electrodes. There was a rack that allowed 0.1 mm steps to adjust the distance between the electrodes [15].
The power source used in the reactor provided a voltage of 20 kV, a frequency between 200 and 1000 Hz, and a pulse width of the order of 200 μs.

2.3. Treatment

The treatments consisted of the plasma generated between the electrodes using argon and atmospheric pressure. The DBD was formed from the parameters shown in Table 1. Frequency monitoring was performed through a digital oscilloscope (Keysight DSO01072B).

2.4. Characterizations

The characterization techniques used in this work were: wettability test to determine the surface tension, infrared spectroscopy with Fourier transform by attenuated total reflectance (ATR-FTIR, Bruker FT-IR Vertex 70, Durham, UK, X-ray excited photoelectrons spectroscopy (XPS, ThermoFísher K-Alpha, Waltham, MA, USA), atomic force microscopy (AFM, Shimadzu SPM-9700, Kyoto, Japan), and the triple probe method of Langmuir (LP3–LabPlasma UFRN, Natal, Brasil), to quantify the energy generated by the plasma during the treatments.
The wettability test was carried out by determining the contact angle between the drop (20 µL) and the sample surface before and after treatments using the sessile drop method [49,50]. For the calculation of surface tensions, the Fowkes method [51] was used from the contact angle of three liquids: water, glycerol, and dimethylformamide. The test was done before, shortly after, and 2 and 7 days after treatment to study aging over time for each treatment [52,53].
The ATR-FTIR equipment from Bruker model FTIR VERTEX 70 was used to characterize the chemical groups of the sample surface [54,55] spectra in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1.
The XPS returned the spectrum of 1 up to 1360 eV, determining the power band of the elements and their percentage. It was also possible to observe the chemical bonds formed and quantify them, using a Thermo Fisher K-alpha X-ray photoelectron spectrometer equipment.
The AFM was used to characterize the surface morphology and the roughness, using a Shimadzu SPM-9700.
The Langmuir Triple probe is a disseminated technique for the diagnosis of plasma, which can provide the electronic temperature, i.e., the average energy of the electrons [56,57]. Then, it is possible to correlate the average energy of the electrons with the energy of the chemical bond, estimating the functional groups generated superficially during the plasma treatments [58,59,60,61].

3. Results

The plasma electron temperature, obtained from the triple probe of the Langmuir technique, is presented in Figure 2. The energy was calculated during the treatments, and the procedures are described elsewhere [61]. The behavior observed came from the plasma in the filamentary regime, featuring high-energy electrons during the peaks. The average energy collected during the treatments was 16.31 (in argon plasma) and 15.04 eV (in oxygen plasma), as presented in Table 2. Moreover, this behavior was predicted by the speed (energy) distribution of Boltzmann [62].
The energy values measured by this technique proved to be sufficient in altering the chemical bonds present in the HDPE chain, as shown in Table 2 [63]. It is thus possible to promote the breaking of surface bonds, as well as the incorporation of species, resulting in new functional groups.
The wettability test determined the angles measured with distilled water, glycerol, and dimethylformamide, before, right after, and two and seven days after treatment. Figure 3 lists the contact angles of water measured for each condition. Table 3 shows other angles and liquids surface tensions.
A decrease in the value of the angles was observed after all treatments, indicating a surface modification, as reported in the literature [37,59,64]. Then, as illustrated in Figure 4, to the decrease of the contact angle, the surface tension solid–gas (γSG) increased [65]. This figure shows the drop behavior in contact with the surface before and after the plasma treatment. With time, the values approach the angle measured before being treated, emphasizing the aging process. This result confirms what has already been reported for other studies that modified polymeric materials by plasma at low pressure or atmospheric pressure [3,9,16,42,59,66,67]. Because the bonds generated by plasma treatment are formed only on the HDPE surface, the mobility of the polymeric chain and reaction of these polar groups with the environment humidity can promote the breakage of this bond or the stabilization of the same [3,9,16,42,66].
Based on the contact angles, the interfacial stresses were calculated by the Fowkes method. Thus, in Figure 5, the polar, dispersive, and total surface tension values of each treatment are presented. The surface tension values point to broken bonds such as C–C and emphasize the permanent character of the changes that occurred in the dispersive coordinates because, in seven days, there were no changes in the values of this surface tension coordinate. However, The increase in polar coordinates suggests the formation of oxygen bonds, C–O or C=O, as well their reduction with time suggests that these groups were, in some way, stabilized by reactions with the medium, as reported in the literature [3,9,16].
To investigate the possible chemical changes in the surface structure of HDPE, based on electronic temperature and wettability, ATR-FTIR analysis was performed. Figure 6 shows the results of ATR-FTIR for the samples treated with oxygen, argon, and those untreated. It is possible to observe the well-defined bands at 2915 (C–H asymmetrical) and 2847 cm−1 (C–H symmetrical). The band at 1462 cm−1 is associated with –CH2–vibrations, and the band at 720 cm−1 is linked to the C–C vibration [23,31]. The calculation of relative percentages of the bands was performed to determine which bond was broken and formed in the treated samples. Some bands that appeared in the treated samples, and most prominent in the treatment with oxygen, as seen at 1019 cm−1, are a characteristic of C–C and C–O vibrations. The peaks at 1742 and 1645 cm−1 are caused by C=O and C=C vibrations, respectively [54,68].
Figure 7 shows the calculation of the relative area percentages for the untreated sample, treated with argon, oxygen, and aged (two days) for each treatment. It is possible to visualize that the characteristic bands of HDPE (symmetrical and asymmetric C–H, CH2, and C–C) have a reduction in their area for both argon and oxygen, which results in the formation of the other connections indicated in the FTIR, which implies increasing wettability. It is also possible to see that two days after the treatment, there was an increase in the band associated with the C–H bond, indicating that, as predicted by the surface tension analysis, there is a reaction of the functional groups formed by the plasma treatment on the HDPE surface with the environment, this being the main factor for the reduction of wettability.
The relative area calculation of the bands reported after the treatment can be seen in Figure 8. The connections involving oxygen (C–O–C, C–O, C=O, OH) influence the polar coordinate. With aging time, there is a loss of the bonds formed, directly impacting the reduction of wettability [27,59].
Based on the changed bonds, and the percentage on the plasma energy (16.3 eV) calculated with the Langmuir probe and the HDPE chain. Figure 9 shows how chemical changes occur during plasma treatment.
XPS was used to quantify the elements and chemical bonds for specimens treated with argon and untreated. The introduction of argon decreases the partial pressure of atmospheric gas. However, the treatments were done at atmospheric pressure, and this means that it still had atmospheric air along with an ozone formation, which is the agent responsible for the incorporation of oxygen on the HDPE surface. Figure 10 shows the spectrum before and after treatments. Here, it is possible to see the introduction of the band related to O 1s. Figure 10B illustrates the appearance of the O1s characteristic band, directing the investigation to the formation of some bindings such as C–O and C=O. It is possible to affirm the increase in the percentages of the peaks related to these bonds involving carbon and oxygen. The C1s spectrum shows a peak at 285 eV, which is characteristic of C–C/C–H bonds. In the treated samples, a peak at 288 eV can be observed, which is attributed to O–C–O and C=O bindings. Another peak founded out in the analysis was O1s. The peaks highlighted were around 332.5 and 334.6 eV, which are attributed to the O–C–O and O–C=O binding, respectively [23,58,69,70,71].
Figure 11 shows the relative percentages averages of HDPE bindings to compare the argon treated sample with untreated sample and, as like FTIR, the emergence of oxygen groups and a reduction in the percentage of carbon can be seen, signaling the break of connections at peak~285 eV and the formation of connections such as C–O and C=O when peaks 288, 332.5, and 334.6 eV increase their relative percentage.
In the XPS, the energy bands in the binding involving oxygen are much more evident than in the FTIR, showing that the modification is minimal in the material structure, being only in the surface threshold, as illustrated in Figure 12. With this, it promotes the instability of these connections guiding the cause of the treatment aging, evidenced by the wettability test to the lack of surface stability.
The atomic strength microscopy characterized the surface morphology. The details related to the increase and diminish surface roughness were compared with profile rugosity parameters. Figure 13 shows the AFM in a 5 × 5 µm2 area for untreated samples (Figure 13A), argon treated (Figure 13B), and oxygen treated (Figure 13C). The plasma treatment increased the roughness, which was more evident for argon. The physical and chemical modifications change the surface wettability. Table 4 shows the mean roughness to quantify the morphological improvements.
Since the chemical modifications have aged over time, influencing the polar coordinate more clearly, due to the formation of functional groups with oxygen, the physical modification tends to be maintained, with the aging of morphological modifications not evident in polymers [1,33]. This change in surface roughness is due to the etching action promoted by the species present in the plasma, as reported in the literature [67,72,73,74,75].
The etching is due, in its majority, to species with high kinetic energy, confirmed by the electronic temperature, which collides with the HDPE surface generating a material erosion. It is observed that the most significant roughness was for the argon plasma, revealing even more the inert character of this mechanism. Additionally, it is noteworthy that because it is a DBD plasma in the filamentary regime, the concentration of plasma in some areas of the sample contributes to the potentiation of this effect. With this, the dispersive coordinate is related to the increase in roughness.

4. Conclusions

The plasma generated in these treatment conditions has the necessary energy for modifying the polymeric material surface. It generated an electronic temperature of approximately 16 eV, proving to be sufficient to promote the break of C–C and C–H, the formation of C–O, O–C–O, O–C=O, and C=O bindings. These formed bonds are responsible for increasing the wettability of the material by increasing the polar coordinate. However, they were only formed on the surface and tended to suffer from aging. The material tends to return to its original wettability. Although plasma treatment promotes an increase in HDPE surface roughness, which is related to the increase in surface tension dispersive coordinate, this factor is not sufficient to maintain the hydrophobicity of HDPE after plasma treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F.d.M.N., I.A.d.S. and T.H.d.C.C.; methodology, J.F.d.M.N.; validation J.F.d.M.N., I.A.d.S. and T.H.d.C.C.; formal analysis, M.S.L., M.C.F. and R.R.M.S.; investigation, J.F.d.M.N., T.G.T. and G.F.D.; resources, T.H.d.C.C. and R.R.M.S.; data curation, J.F.d.M.N., I.A.d.S. and T.H.d.C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F.d.M.N., I.A.d.S. and T.H.d.C.C.; writing—review and editing, J.F.d.M.N., T.G.T., I.A.d.S. and T.H.d.C.C.; visualization, T.H.d.C.C., M.C.F. and R.R.M.S.; supervision, T.H.d.C.C., M.C.F. and R.R.M.S.; project administration, T.H.d.C.C.; funding acquisition, T.H.d.C.C., M.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001 and support from FAPEPI and CNPq-Regional Program for Scientific and Technological Development-PDCTR. Notice FAPEPI/CNPq N 010/2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Drnovská, H.; Lapčík, L.; Buršíková, V.; Zemek, J.; Barros-Timmons, A.M. Surface properties of polyethylene after low-temperature plasma treatment. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2003, 281, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Roy, A.; Joshi, M.; Butola, B.S. Preparation and antimicrobial assessment of zinc-montmorillonite intercalates based HDPE nanocomposites: A cost-effective and safe bioactive plastic. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 1518–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Slepička, P.; Kasálková, N.S.; Stránská, E.; Bačáková, L.; Švorčík, V. Surface characterization of plasma treated polymers for applications as biocompatible carriers. Express Polym. Lett. 2013, 7, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Toosi, S.F.; Moradi, S.; Ebrahimi, M.; Hatzikiriakos, S.G. Microfabrication of polymeric surfaces with extreme wettability using hot embossing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 378, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meemusaw, M.; Magaraphan, R. Surface and bulk properties improvement of HDPE by a batch plasma treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Encinas, N.; Pantoja, M.; Abenojar, J.; Martínez, M.A. Control of wettability of polymers by surface roughness modification. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2010, 24, 1869–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zaharescu, T.; Râpă, M.; Blanco, I.; Borbath, T.; Borbath, I. Durability of LDPE/UHMWPE Composites under Accelerated Degradation. Polymers 2020, 12, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Encinas, N.; Díaz-Benito, B.; Abenojar, J.; Martínez, M.A. Extreme durability of wettability changes on polyolefin surfaces by atmospheric pressure plasma torch. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vesel, A.; Junkar, I.; Cvelbar, U.; Kovac, J.; Mozetic, M. Surface modification of polyester by oxygen- And nitrogen-plasma treatment. Surf. Interface Anal. 2008, 40, 1444–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, S.; Awaja, F.; James, N.; McKenzie, D.R.; Ruys, A.J. A comparison of the strength of autohesion of plasma treated amorphous and semi-crystalline PEEK films. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2011, 22, 2496–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hünnekens, B.; Peters, F.; Avramidis, G.; Krause, A.; Militz, H.; Viöl, W. Plasma treatment of wood-polymer composites: A comparison of three different discharge types and their effect on surface properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muzammil, I.; Li, Y.; Lei, M. Tunable wettability and pH-responsiveness of plasma copolymers of acrylic acid and octafluorocyclobutane. Plasma Process. Polym. 2017, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ji, S.-H.; Choi, K.-H.; Pengkit, A.; Im, J.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, Y.; Hong, E.J.; Kyung Jung, S.; Choi, E.-H. Effects of high voltage nanosecond pulsed plasma and micro DBD plasma on seed germination, growth development and physiological activities in spinach. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 605, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.-H.; Teramoto, Y.; Ogata, A.; Takagi, H.; Nanba, T. Plasma Catalysis for Environmental Treatment and Energy Applications. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2016, 36, 45–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Souza, I.A.; Nascimento Neto, A.B.; Queiroz, J.C.A.; Matamoros, E.P.; Costa, T.H.; Feitor, M.C.; Souza, J.M.L.; Camara, N.T.; Severiano Sobrinho, V. Study of the Influence of Variation in Distances Between Electrodes in Spectral DBD Plasma Excitation. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Arpagaus, C.; Rossi, A.; Rudolf Von Rohr, P. Short-time plasma surface modification of HDPE powder in a Plasma Downer Reactor—Process, wettability improvement and ageing effects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1581–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Felix, T.; Cassini, F.A.; Benetoli, L.O.B.; Dotto, M.E.R.; Debacher, N.A. Morphological study of polymer surfaces exposed to non-thermal plasma based on contact angle and the use of scaling laws. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 403, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kostov, K.G.; Nishime, T.M.C.; Hein, L.R.O.; Toth, A. Study of polypropylene surface modification by air dielectric barrier discharge operated at two different frequencies. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 234, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wagner, H.E.; Brandenburg, R.; Kozlov, K.V.; Sonnenfeld, A.; Michel, P.; Behnke, J.F. The barrier discharge: Basic properties and applications to surface treatment. Vacuum 2003, 71, 417–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hua, L.I.; Zhengduo, W.; Lizhen, Y.; Qiang, C. Insight into the remaining high surface energy of atmospheric DBD plasma-treated polyethylene web after three months’ aging. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2018, 21, 15504. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dahle, S.; Gustus, R.; Viöl, W.; Maus-Friedrichs, W. DBD Plasma Treatment of Titanium in O2, N2 and Air. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2012, 32, 1109–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Misra, N.; Keener, K.; Bourke, P.; Cullen, P. Generation of In-Package Cold Plasma and Efficacy Assessment Using Methylene Blue. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2015, 35, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kostov, K.G.; Nishime, T.M.C.; Castro, A.H.R.; Toth, A.; Hein, L.R.O. Surface modification of polymeric materials by cold atmospheric plasma jet. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 314, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ulrich, N.W.; Andre, J.; Williamson, J.; Lee, K.-W.; Chen, Z. Plasma treatment effect on polymer buried interfacial structure and property. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 12144–12155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jia, C.; Wang, Q.; Chen, P.; Lu, S.; Ren, R. Wettability assessment of plasma-treated PBO fibers based on thermogravimetric analysis. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2017, 74, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, C.; Zhao, M.; Wang, L.; Qu, L.; Men, Y. Surface modification of polyester fabrics by atmospheric-pressure air/He plasma for color strength and adhesion enhancement. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 400, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ren, Y.; Xu, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Ding, Z.; Chen, Y. Effect of dielectric barrier discharge treatment on surface nanostructure and wettability of polylactic acid (PLA) nonwoven fabrics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 426, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Prysiazhnyi, V.; Kratochvil, J.; Stranak, V. Tailored wettability of plasma polymers made of C–F, C–H, and N–H. Plasma Process. Polym. 2019, 16, 1900076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Terpiłowski, K.; Wiącek, A.E.; Jurak, M. Influence of nitrogen plasma treatment on the wettability of polyetheretherketone and deposited chitosan layers. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Acsente, T.; Ionita, M.D.; Teodorescu, M.; Marascu, V.; Dinescu, G. Surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate foils using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet in presence of water vapors. Thin Solid Films 2016, 614, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Glaser, T.K.; Plohl, O.; Vesel, A.; Ajdnik, U.; Ulrih, N.P.; Hrnčič, M.K.; Bren, U.; Fras Zemljič, L. Functionalization of Polyethylene (PE) and Polypropylene (PP) Material Using Chitosan Nanoparticles with Incorporated Resveratrol as Potential Active Packaging. Materials 2019, 12, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Oberbossel, G.; Probst, C.; Giampietro, V.R.; Rudolf von Rohr, P. Plasma afterglow treatment of polymer powders: Process parameters, wettability improvement, and aging effects. Plasma Process. Polym. 2017, 14, 1600144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Popelka, A.; Lehocký, M.; Bílek, F. Antibacterial treatment of LDPE with halogen derivatives via cold plasma. Express Polym. Lett. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, L.; Cheng, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, J.; Cen, K. Amino-functionalized surface modification of polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber-supported polydimethylsiloxane membranes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 413, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rediguieri, C.F.; De Bank, P.A.; Zanin, M.H.A.; Leo, P.; Cerize, N.N.P.; de Oliveira, A.M.; de Jeus Andreoli Pinto, T. The effect of ozone gas sterilization on the properties and cell compatibility of electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. J. Biomater. Sci.—Polym. Ed. 2017, 28, 1918–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jha, S.; Bhowmik, S.; Bhatnagar, N.; Bhattacharya, N.K.; Deka, U.; Iqbal, H.M.S.; Benedictus, R. Experimental investigation into the effect of adhesion properties of PEEK modified by atmospheric pressure plasma and low pressure plasma. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 118, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rezaei, F.; Abbasi-Firouzjah, M.; Shokri, B. Investigation of antibacterial and wettability behaviours of plasma-modified PMMA films for application in ophthalmology. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 85401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ozgen, O.; Aksoy, E.A.; Hasirci, V.; Hasirci, N. Surface characterization and radical decay studies of oxygen plasma-treated PMMA films. Surf. Interface Anal. 2013, 45, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yalcinkaya, F. Effect of argon plasma treatment on hydrophilic stability of nanofiber webs. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Syromotina, D.S.; Surmenev, R.A.; Surmeneva, M.A.; Boyandin, A.N.; Nikolaeva, E.D.; Prymak, O.; Epple, M.; Ulbricht, M.; Oehr, C.; Volova, T.G. Surface wettability and energy effects on the biological performance of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate films treated with RF plasma. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dorey, S.; Gaston, F.; Marque, S.R.; Bortolotti, B.; Dupuy, N. XPS analysis of PE and EVA samples irradiated at different γ-doses. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van Deynse, A.; Cools, P.; Leys, C.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N. Surface modification of polyethylene in an argon atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 276, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Du, X.; Li, L.; Li, P. Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate films by direct fluorination. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 125333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Popelka, A.; Khanam, P.N.; AlMaadeed, M.A. Surface modification of polyethylene/graphene composite using corona discharge. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 105302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, H.; Pei, Y.; Xie, D.; Deng, X.; Leng, Y.X.; Jin, Y.; Huang, N. Surface modification of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) by argon plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 3941–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Verkuijlen, R.O.F.; Van Dongen, M.H.A.; Stevens, A.A.E.; Van Geldrop, J.; Bernards, J.P.C. Surface modification of polycarbonate and polyethylene naphtalate foils by UV-ozone treatment and μplasma printing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 290, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tajima, S.; Komvopoulos, K. Effect of ion energy fluence on the topography and wettability of low-density polyethylene exposed to inductively coupled argon plasma. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2006, 39, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vesel, A.; Zaplotnik, R.; Primc, G.; Mozetič, M. Evolution of the Surface Wettability of PET Polymer upon Treatment with an Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Jet. Polymers 2020, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Panousis, E.; Clément, F.; Loiseau, J.F.; Spyrou, N.; Held, B.; Larrieu, J.; Lecoq, E.; Guimon, C. Titanium alloy surface treatment using an atmospheric plasma jet in nitrogen pulsed discharge conditions. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 7292–7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, X.W.; Han, G.R. Microporous textured titanium dioxide films deposited at atmospheric pressure using dielectric barrier discharge assisted chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 6140–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jie-Rong, C.; Wakida, T. Studies on the surface free energy and surface structure of PTFE film treated with low temperature plasma. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 63, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fowkes, F.M. Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matykina, E.; Garcia, I.; de Damborenea, J.J.; Arenas, M.A. Comparative determination of TiO2 surface free energies for adhesive bonding application. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2011, 31, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chun, K.S.; Husseinsyah, S.; Syazwani, N.F. Properties of kapok husk-filled linear low-density polyethylene ecocomposites: Effect of polyethylene-grafted acrylic acid. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2016, 29, 1641–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zięba-Palus, J. The usefulness of infrared spectroscopy in examinations of adhesive tapes for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci. Criminol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kumar, A.; Singh, R.K.; Thomas, J.; Sunil, S. Parametric study of expanding plasma plume formed by laser-blow-off of thin film using triple Langmuir probe. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 43306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qayyum, A.; Ahmad, N.; Ahmad, S.; Deeba, F.; Ali, R.; Hussain, S. Time-resolved measurement of plasma parameters by means of triple probe. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013, 84, 123502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Král, P.; Ráhel’, J.; Stupavská, M.; Šrajer, J.; Klímek, P.; Mishra, P.K.; Wimmer, R. XPS depth profile of plasma-activated surface of beech wood (Fagus sylvatica) and its impact on polyvinyl acetate tensile shear bond strength. Wood Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zanini, S.; Barni, R.; Della Pergola, R.; Riccardi, C. Modification of the PTFE wettability by oxygen plasma treatments: Influence of the operating parameters and investigation of the ageing behaviour. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 325202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Farooq, M.U.; Ali, A.; Qayyum, A.; Naz, M.Y.; Khan, Y.; Shukrullah, S.; Ghaffar, C.A. Time function triple Langmuir probe measurements in low frequency pulsed DC discharge plasma. High Energy Chem. 2015, 49, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. De Souza, I.A.; de Medeiros Neto, J.F.; Nascimento, I.O.; Matamoros, E.P.; Feitor, M.C.; Fernandes de Melo, F.; Magalhães Sousa, R.R.; de Carvalho Costa, T.H. Triple langmuir probe, optical emission spectroscopy and lissajous figures for diagnosis of plasma produced by dielectric barrier discharge of parallel plates in atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2020, 63, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Biswas, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Palivela, Y.; Pal, R. Effect of fast drifting electrons on electron temperature measurement with a triple Langmuir probe. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 63302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ebnesajjad, S.; Ebnesajjad, C. Surface Treatment of Materials for Adhesive Bonding; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 0323265049. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ishida, N.; Matsuo, K.; Imamura, K.; Craig, V.S.J. Hydrophobic Attraction Measured between Asymmetric Hydrophobic Surfaces. Langmuir 2018, 34, 3588–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kozbial, A.; Trouba, C.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Characterization of the Intrinsic Water Wettability of Graphite Using Contact Angle Measurements: Effect of Defects on Static and Dynamic Contact Angles. Langmuir 2017, 33, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Macedo, M.J.P.; Silva, G.S.; Feitor, M.C.; Costa, T.H.C.; Ito, E.N.; Melo, J.D.D. Surface modification of kapok fibers by cold plasma surface treatment. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 9, 2467–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Song, X.; Cvelbar, U.; Strazar, P.; Vossebein, L.; Zille, A. Chemical, Thermo-Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties of DBD Plasma Treated Disinfectant-Impregnated Wipes during Storage. Polymers 2019, 11, 1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. De Geyter, N.; Morent, R.; Leys, C. Surface characterization of plasma-modified polyethylene by contact angle experiments and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Surf. Interface Anal. Int. J. Devoted Dev. Appl. Tech. Anal. Surf. Interfaces Thin Film. 2008, 40, 608–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qureshi, A.; Shah, S.; Pelagade, S.; Singh, N.L.; Mukherjee, S.; Tripathi, A.; Despande, U.P.; Shripathi, T. Surface modification of polycarbonate by plasma treatment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 208, 12108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsvetkova, T.; Balabanov, S.; Bischoff, L.; Krastev, V.; Stefanov, P.; Avramova, I. X-ray photoelectron study of Si+ ion implanted polymers. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2010, 253, 12070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Ji, J.-H.; Zhao, J.; Yan, Q.; Chu, P.K. Antimicrobial properties of copper plasma-modified polyethylene. Polymer 2006, 47, 7441–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, Y.; Yan, Y.; Shi, M.; Liu, Y. Effect of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet on the Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Waxy and Normal Maize Starch. Polymers 2018, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Borah, D.; Rasappa, S.; Senthamaraikannan, R.; Holmes, J.; Morris, M. Block Co-Polymers for Nanolithography: Rapid Microwave Annealing for Pattern Formation on Substrates. Polymers 2015, 7, 592–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ting, Y.-H.; Liu, C.-C.; Park, S.-M.; Jiang, H.; Nealey, P.F.; Wendt, A.E. Surface Roughening of Polystyrene and Poly(methyl methacrylate) in Ar/O2 Plasma Etching. Polymers 2010, 2, 649–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bès, A.; Koo, M.; Phan, T.L.; Lacoste, A.; Pelletier, J. Oxygen plasma etching of hydrocarbon-like polymers: Part I Modeling. Plasma Process. Polym. 2018, 15, 1800038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 02422 g001 550
Figure 1. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma reactor.
Figure 1. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma reactor.
Polymers 12 02422 g001
Polymers 12 02422 g002 550
Figure 2. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) during the treatment and the behavior of the electronic temperature of the plasma.
Figure 2. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) during the treatment and the behavior of the electronic temperature of the plasma.
Polymers 12 02422 g002
Polymers 12 02422 g003 550
Figure 3. Values of the angles of water obtained before and after the treatment in (a) argon and (b) oxygen.
Figure 3. Values of the angles of water obtained before and after the treatment in (a) argon and (b) oxygen.
Polymers 12 02422 g003
Polymers 12 02422 g004 550
Figure 4. The behavior of the drop in contact with the surface of material before and after treatment.
Figure 4. The behavior of the drop in contact with the surface of material before and after treatment.
Polymers 12 02422 g004
Polymers 12 02422 g005 550
Figure 5. HDPE superficial tensions over time in (a) argon and (b) oxygen.
Figure 5. HDPE superficial tensions over time in (a) argon and (b) oxygen.
Polymers 12 02422 g005
Polymers 12 02422 g006 550
Figure 6. FTIR of the treated samples and the standard sample.
Figure 6. FTIR of the treated samples and the standard sample.
Polymers 12 02422 g006
Polymers 12 02422 g007 550
Figure 7. Relative percentages of regions of the main peaks.
Figure 7. Relative percentages of regions of the main peaks.
Polymers 12 02422 g007
Polymers 12 02422 g008 550
Figure 8. Relative percentages of regions of the other peaks.
Figure 8. Relative percentages of regions of the other peaks.
Polymers 12 02422 g008
Polymers 12 02422 g009 550
Figure 9. Chemical bonds altered during plasma treatment.
Figure 9. Chemical bonds altered during plasma treatment.
Polymers 12 02422 g009
Polymers 12 02422 g010 550
Figure 10. XPS analysis (A) before and (B) after treatment of argon plasma treatment.
Figure 10. XPS analysis (A) before and (B) after treatment of argon plasma treatment.
Polymers 12 02422 g010
Polymers 12 02422 g011 550
Figure 11. Average percentages of the binding obtained by deconvolutions.
Figure 11. Average percentages of the binding obtained by deconvolutions.
Polymers 12 02422 g011
Polymers 12 02422 g012 550
Figure 12. HDPE surface modification by plasma DBD treatment.
Figure 12. HDPE surface modification by plasma DBD treatment.
Polymers 12 02422 g012
Polymers 12 02422 g013 550
Figure 13. AFM of HDPE samples (A) untreated, (B) treated with an argon plasma, (C) treated with oxygen plasma.
Figure 13. AFM of HDPE samples (A) untreated, (B) treated with an argon plasma, (C) treated with oxygen plasma.
Polymers 12 02422 g013
Table
Table 1. Parameters used for the treatments.
Table 1. Parameters used for the treatments.
Applied Voltage (kV)20
Frequency (Hz)820
Distance between the Electrodes (mm)1.7
Time treatment (s)600
Table
Table 2. Calculated plasma energy and energy of chemical bonds.
Table 2. Calculated plasma energy and energy of chemical bonds.
Mean Energy Calculated During the Plasma TreatmentsBonds that May Be Influenced by Plasma TreatmentConnection Energies (eV)
ArgonOxygen
16.31 (eV)15.04 (eV)C–H4.29
C–C3.60
C–O3.64
C=O7.37
C=C6.33
Table
Table 3. Values total, polar (γlp) and dispersive (γlp) coordinates of superficial tensions, and the values of contact angle for the liquids.
Table 3. Values total, polar (γlp) and dispersive (γlp) coordinates of superficial tensions, and the values of contact angle for the liquids.
LiquidSurface Tensions
(mJ/m2)		Contact Angle (Degrees)
γlγlpγldUntreatedArgonOxygen
0 Days2 Days7 Days0 Days2 Days7 Days
Water72.851.021.879.1728.5236.9448.6633.3444.1249.02
Dimethyl-formamide37.34.932.431.720000015.49
Glycerol63.426.237.253.179.9124.7552.7537.6345.3446.63
Table
Table 4. Average roughness obtained from treated and untreated samples.
Table 4. Average roughness obtained from treated and untreated samples.
UntreatedArgonOxygen
Ra (nm)14.08432.31416.659
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neto, J.F.d.M.; Alves de Souza, I.; Feitor, M.C.; Targino, T.G.; Diniz, G.F.; Libório, M.S.; Sousa, R.R.M.; Costa, T.H.d.C. Study of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Kinetics Modification Treated by Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma. Polymers 2020, 12, 2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102422

AMA Style

Neto JFdM, Alves de Souza I, Feitor MC, Targino TG, Diniz GF, Libório MS, Sousa RRM, Costa THdC. Study of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Kinetics Modification Treated by Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma. Polymers. 2020; 12(10):2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neto, João Freire de Medeiros, Ivan Alves de Souza, Michelle Cequeira Feitor, Talita Galvão Targino, Gutembergy Ferreira Diniz, Maxwell Santana Libório, Rômulo Ribeiro Magalhães Sousa, and Thercio Henrique de Carvalho Costa. 2020. "Study of High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Kinetics Modification Treated by Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma" Polymers 12, no. 10: 2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop