Games 2010, 1(1), 18-33; doi:10.3390/g1010018
Article

Punishment, Cooperation, and Cheater Detection in “Noisy” Social Exchange

 and * email
Received: 9 December 2009; in revised form: 1 March 2010 / Accepted: 12 March 2010 / Published: 15 March 2010
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Explaining human cooperation in large groups of non-kin is a major challenge to both rational choice theory and the theory of evolution. Recent research suggests that group cooperation can be explained by positing that cooperators can punish non-cooperators or cheaters. The experimental evidence comes from public goods games in which group members are fully informed about the behavior of all others and cheating occurs in full view. We demonstrate that under more realistic information conditions, where cheating is less obvious, punishment is much less effective in enforcing cooperation. Evidently, the explanatory power of punishment is constrained by the visibility of cheating.
Keywords: public-goods game; punishment; cooperation; reciprocity; experimental games
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [271 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 23 March 2010 15:41 CET]
The original version is still available [271 KB, uploaded 15 March 2010 15:09 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Bornstein, G.; Weisel, O. Punishment, Cooperation, and Cheater Detection in “Noisy” Social Exchange. Games 2010, 1, 18-33.

AMA Style

Bornstein G, Weisel O. Punishment, Cooperation, and Cheater Detection in “Noisy” Social Exchange. Games. 2010; 1(1):18-33.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bornstein, Gary; Weisel, Ori. 2010. "Punishment, Cooperation, and Cheater Detection in “Noisy” Social Exchange." Games 1, no. 1: 18-33.

Games EISSN 2073-4336 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert