Next Article in Journal
Using Annual Landsat Time Series for the Detection of Dry Forest Degradation Processes in South-Central Angola
Previous Article in Journal
Diurnal Cycle in Atmospheric Water over Switzerland
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(9), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090901

The Impact of Mapping Error on the Performance of Upscaling Agricultural Maps

1
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2
Institute of Remote Sensing and Engineering, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
3
Department of Natural Resources & the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Clement Atzberger, Yoshio Inoue and Parth Sarathi Roy
Received: 19 July 2017 / Revised: 8 August 2017 / Accepted: 29 August 2017 / Published: 31 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [6310 KB, uploaded 8 September 2017]   |  

Abstract

Aggregation methods are the most common way of upscaling land cover maps. To analyze the impact of land cover mapping error on upscaling agricultural maps, we utilized the Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data with corresponding confidence level data and simulated eight levels of error using a Monte Carlo simulation for two Agriculture Statistic Districts (ASD) in the U.S.A. The results of the simulations were used as base maps for subsequent upscaling, utilizing the majority rule based aggregation method. The results show that increasing error level resulted in higher proportional errors for each crop in both study areas. As a result of increasing error level, landscape characteristics of the base map also changed greatly resulting in higher proportional error in the upscaled maps. Furthermore, the proportional error is sensitive to the crop area proportion in the base map and decreases as the crop proportion increases. These findings indicate that three factors, the error level of the thematic map, the change in landscape pattern/characteristics of the thematic map, and the objective of the project, should be considered before performing any upscaling. The first two factors can be estimated by using pre-existing land cover maps with relatively high accuracy. The third factor is dependent on the project requirements (e.g., landscape characteristics, proportions of cover types, and use of the upscaled map). Overall, improving our understanding of the impacts of land cover mapping error is necessary to the proper design for upscaling and obtaining the optimal upscaled map. View Full-Text
Keywords: upscaling; land cover map; proportional error; landscape pattern; Monte Carlo simulation upscaling; land cover map; proportional error; landscape pattern; Monte Carlo simulation
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, P.; Congalton, R.G.; Grybas, H.; Pan, Y. The Impact of Mapping Error on the Performance of Upscaling Agricultural Maps. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 901.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top