Next Article in Journal
Land-Use Mapping in a Mixed Urban-Agricultural Arid Landscape Using Object-Based Image Analysis: A Case Study from Maricopa, Arizona
Previous Article in Journal
A Parallel Computing Paradigm for Pan-Sharpening Algorithms of Remotely Sensed Images on a Multi-Core Computer
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2014, 6(7), 6064-6088;

Mangrove Species Identification: Comparing WorldView-2 with Aerial Photographs

Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT 0909, Australia
Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Department of the Environment, G.P.O. Box 461, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 March 2014 / Revised: 20 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 June 2014 / Published: 27 June 2014
Full-Text   |   PDF [1675 KB, uploaded 27 June 2014]   |  


Remote sensing plays a critical role in mapping and monitoring mangroves. Aerial photographs and visual image interpretation techniques have historically been known to be the most common approach for mapping mangroves and species discrimination. However, with the availability of increased spectral resolution satellite imagery, and advances in digital image classification algorithms, there is now a potential to digitally classify mangroves to the species level. This study compares the accuracy of mangrove species maps derived from two different layer combinations of WorldView-2 images with those generated using high resolution aerial photographs captured by an UltraCamD camera over Rapid Creek coastal mangrove forest, Darwin, Australia. Mangrove and non-mangrove areas were discriminated using object-based image classification. Mangrove areas were then further classified into species using a support vector machine algorithm with best-fit parameters. Overall classification accuracy for the WorldView-2 data within the visible range was 89%. Kappa statistics provided a strong correlation between the classification and validation data. In contrast to this accuracy, the error matrix for the automated classification of aerial photographs indicated less promising results. In summary, it can be concluded that mangrove species mapping using a support vector machine algorithm is more successful with WorldView-2 data than with aerial photographs. View Full-Text
Keywords: mangrove species mapping; object-based image analysis; support vector machine; WorldView-2; aerial photographs mangrove species mapping; object-based image analysis; support vector machine; WorldView-2; aerial photographs

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Supplementary material


Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Heenkenda, M.K.; Joyce, K.E.; Maier, S.W.; Bartolo, R. Mangrove Species Identification: Comparing WorldView-2 with Aerial Photographs. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 6064-6088.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top