Next Article in Journal
Overview of Current Microgrid Policies, Incentives and Barriers in the European Union, United States and China
Previous Article in Journal
Water Treatment Measures to Improve Ecological Value in Traditional Korean Villages: The Case of Oeam Village, Asan City, Korea
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(7), 1140; doi:10.3390/su9071140

Comparing Performance of Biomass Gasifier Stoves: Influence of a Multi-Context Approach

1
Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands
2
Research Group Open Innivation, NHL University of Applied Science, 8917 DD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
3
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, 9747 AE Groningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 May 2017 / Revised: 21 June 2017 / Accepted: 25 June 2017 / Published: 29 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Engineering and Science)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [748 KB, uploaded 29 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide die prematurely or suffer from severe health ailments due to cooking equipment that causes unhealthy doses of (household) air pollution. Many attempts to address this have fallen short because technology was not improved sufficiently or the way it was introduced constituted an ill fit with the broader “cooking eco-system”. In terms of technology, (biomass) gasifier stoves look promising on all three sustainability dimensions (people, planet, profit) but have not been adopted on a substantial scale across cultures and regions either. We therefore used a design approach that takes multiple contexts (target groups) into account and compared the performance of a gasifier stove that was developed following this multi-context approach with four previous gasifier versions. With the comparative assessment using criteria well beyond mere technological performance we found that it performed better than these versions as well as than what could be expected based on historical learning, while providing additional systemic advantages. These results encourage verification of the value of the multi-context approach in more settings while providing clues for refinement of the assessment method. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomass gasifier stoves; clean cooking; performance; context variation; assessment biomass gasifier stoves; clean cooking; performance; context variation; assessment
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kersten, W.C.; Long, N.H.; Diehl, J.C.; Crul, M.R.M.; Van Engelen, J.M.L. Comparing Performance of Biomass Gasifier Stoves: Influence of a Multi-Context Approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1140.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top