A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen
AbstractThe port is an important node in logistics, and its energy consumption constitutes a considerable proportion of the transportation industry. In port logistics, not only does the energy consumption generate carbon emissions, but other business activities do as well. This paper firstly characterizes the sources of carbon emissions and the basic elements in the port system, and proposes the concept of a port-integrated logistics system. Secondly, a case study of The Port of Shenzhen is conducted and a method is provided to measure the carbon emissions in the port-integrated logistics system. This paper then suggests two approaches to reducing carbon emissions, and their economic and environmental benefits are compared. Finally, some policies are put forward to reduce carbon emissions, such as improving the efficiency of loading and unloading, and replacing the heavy fuel oil by low sulfur fuel oil and shore power. The proposed method of carbon emission reduction for port-integrated logistics systems can be generalized for the analysis of various types of ports. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Yang, L.; Cai, Y.; Zhong, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Z. A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen. Sustainability 2017, 9, 462.
Yang L, Cai Y, Zhong X, Shi Y, Zhang Z. A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen. Sustainability. 2017; 9(3):462.Chicago/Turabian Style
Yang, Lei; Cai, Yiji; Zhong, Xiaozhe; Shi, Yongqiang; Zhang, Zhiyong. 2017. "A Carbon Emission Evaluation for an Integrated Logistics System—A Case Study of the Port of Shenzhen." Sustainability 9, no. 3: 462.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.