Next Article in Journal
Millennial Generation and Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Social Media in the Consumer Purchasing Behavior for Wine
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Evolution and Bio-Social Construction: The Kichwa Agroforestry Systems (Chakras) in the Ecuadorian Amazonia
Article Menu
Issue 10 (October) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1921; doi:10.3390/su9101921

Attitudes in Korea toward Introducing Smart Policing Technologies: Differences between the General Public and Police Officers

1
Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanakro, Sillim-dong, Kwnank-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Department of Marine Police, Chonnam National University, 50 Daehak-ro, Yeosu, Jeonnam 59626, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 August 2017 / Revised: 20 October 2017 / Accepted: 21 October 2017 / Published: 24 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Engineering and Science)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1139 KB, uploaded 24 October 2017]   |  

Abstract

This study analyzes different attitudes toward introduction of smart policing technologies in cybercrime policing among the Korean public and police. Policing is essential for a sustainable community. Technological advances in policing have both positive and negative aspects, making it essential to investigate perceptions of both public and police when introducing smart policing technologies. A discrete choice experiment was undertaken to survey preferences of the public and police toward introduction of such technologies and conduct simulation analysis to compare changes in the acceptance of various scenarios. The study divides cybercrime policing into prevention and investigation. The sample included 500 members of the public and 161 police officers. The results show that the public thinks an increase in yearly taxes and invasion of privacy are the most important factors. Conversely, the police think factors enhancing the efficiency of policing are most important. Moreover, when smart policing technologies are introduced, the public and police perceive more utility in the prevention and investigation of cybercrime, respectively. Few studies in this field separate the prevention and investigation of crimes, or compare perceptions of the public and police toward the introduction of smart policing technologies. This study’s quantitative analysis provides insights lacking in previous literature. View Full-Text
Keywords: smart policing; discrete choice model; mixed logit model; willingness to pay smart policing; discrete choice model; mixed logit model; willingness to pay
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Moon, H.; Choi, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, K.S. Attitudes in Korea toward Introducing Smart Policing Technologies: Differences between the General Public and Police Officers. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1921.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top