Next Article in Journal
A Feasibility Test on Adopting Electric Vehicles to Serve as Taxis in Daejeon Metropolitan City of South Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Sustainability Performance of Organic Farms in Denmark
Previous Article in Special Issue
International and Domestic Sustainable Forest Management Policies: Distributive Effects on Power among State Agencies in Bangladesh
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(9), 962; doi:10.3390/su8090962

An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means

Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama 240-0115, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Manfred Max Bergmann
Received: 5 February 2016 / Revised: 21 June 2016 / Accepted: 11 August 2016 / Published: 21 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 5th World Sustainability Forum - Selected Papers)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [601 KB, uploaded 21 September 2016]   |  

Abstract

A key but contentious aspect of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is the means of implementation (MOI). Many developing countries emphasize the importance of international assistance while developed countries focus more on domestic financing and the private sector. The text of the SDGs includes a broad range of MOI. However, a discussion has arisen about whether countries should prioritize some goals over others due partly to concerns that MOI may be insufficient. In contrast, this article argues for a more optimistic outlook concerning MOI and the feasibility of achieving the SDGs. First, most SDGs and targets are themselves means—or intermediate goals—contributing to the achievement of other goals. The structure of the SDGs blurs the fact that different goals have different functions, such as providing resources or enabling environments. Greater focus on the interlinkages and synergies among goals could enhance the effectiveness of implementation and reduce costs. Second, integrated planning and implementation, needed for leveraging synergies among goals, will require enhanced capacity, particularly for governance and coordination. We argue that the strengthening of such capacity is a central MOI that requires more attention since it is a precondition for the effective mobilization and deployment of other MOI. Third, although upfront investments may seem high in absolute terms, financial feasibility is realistic when considering existing global financial stocks and flows and the expected benefits. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable development goals; SDGs; means of implementation; capacity building; governance; financing for sustainable development sustainable development goals; SDGs; means of implementation; capacity building; governance; financing for sustainable development
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Elder, M.; Bengtsson, M.; Akenji, L. An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means. Sustainability 2016, 8, 962.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top