Experience with LEDS and NAMA Low Carbon Strategies: The Case of Georgia
AbstractLow Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) and National Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) have the potential to support developing countries in attaining low carbon goals. In spite of the evident potential, there is a need to learn from practice. This paper explores the case of Georgia. The main research question discussed is: What experience has been gained with the development of LEDS and NAMAs in Georgia? The study reveals that both LEDS and NAMAs are subject to barriers that considerably slow development processes: there is a lack of institutional capacity, little inter-governmental goal alignment and poor coordination of actions, a lack of experienced staff and insufficient, substantial, earmarked funding. Capacity building depends on support from organizations in donor countries. This paper contributes to a growing body of knowledge of the implementation of LEDS and NAMA. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Mdivani, K.; Hoppe, T. Experience with LEDS and NAMA Low Carbon Strategies: The Case of Georgia. Sustainability 2016, 8, 535.
Mdivani K, Hoppe T. Experience with LEDS and NAMA Low Carbon Strategies: The Case of Georgia. Sustainability. 2016; 8(6):535.Chicago/Turabian Style
Mdivani, Kakhaberi; Hoppe, Thomas. 2016. "Experience with LEDS and NAMA Low Carbon Strategies: The Case of Georgia." Sustainability 8, no. 6: 535.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.