Next Article in Journal
GIS-Based Integration of Subjective and Objective Weighting Methods for Regional Landslides Susceptibility Mapping
Next Article in Special Issue
International and Domestic Sustainable Forest Management Policies: Distributive Effects on Power among State Agencies in Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
How to Move China toward a Green-Energy Economy: From a Sector Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Urban Heat Assessment in Urban Plans
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(4), 331; doi:10.3390/su8040331

Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices

1
School of Engineering and Technology, University of Derby, Derby, DE22 3AW, UK
2
Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH1 1JZ, UK
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Manfred Max Bergman
Received: 1 January 2016 / Revised: 7 March 2016 / Accepted: 17 March 2016 / Published: 6 April 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 5th World Sustainability Forum - Selected Papers)

Abstract

This study compared building-related symptoms in personal and open plan offices, where high and low levels of control over the thermal environment were provided, respectively. The individualized approach in Norway provided every user with a personal office, where they had control over an openable window, door, blinds, and thermostat. In contrast, the open plan case studies in the United Kingdom provided control over openable windows and blinds only for limited occupants seated around the perimeter of the building, with users seated away from the windows having no means of environmental control. Air conditioning was deployed in the Norwegian case study buildings, while displacement ventilation and natural ventilation were utilized in the British examples. Field studies of thermal comfort were applied with questionnaires, environmental measurements, and interviews. Users’ health was better in the Norwegian model (28%), while the British model was much more energy efficient (up to 10 times). The follow-up interviews confirmed the effect of lack of thermal control on users’ health. A balanced appraisal was made of energy performance and users’ health between the two buildings. View Full-Text
Keywords: building-related symptoms; thermal comfort; individual control; workplace building-related symptoms; thermal comfort; individual control; workplace
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shahzad, S.S.; Brennan, J.; Theodossopoulos, D.; Hughes, B.; Calautit, J.K. Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices. Sustainability 2016, 8, 331.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top