Next Article in Journal
Finite Element Simulation of Total Nitrogen Transport in Riparian Buffer in an Agricultural Watershed
Previous Article in Journal
Boom, Bust and Beyond: Arts and Sustainability in Calumet, Michigan
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(3), 286; doi:10.3390/su8030286

Planning Support Systems (PSS)-Based Spatial Plan Alternatives and Environmental Assessment

1
Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong City 30147, Korea
2
LANDRIX Research Center, 12 Samjeon-ro 1-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05579, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Tan Yigitcanlar
Received: 29 January 2016 / Revised: 11 March 2016 / Accepted: 15 March 2016 / Published: 21 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [8662 KB, uploaded 21 March 2016]   |  

Abstract

Spatial planning is at the core of national land and urban development. Many countries and cities seek sustainable development through various means such as coordinated environmental planning, environmental assessment, and internalization of environmental analysis and planning. A Planning Support System (PSS) is a GIS (Geographic Information System)-based, spatial decision-making support system that incorporates a variety of theories and pertinent models. This study adopted the “What if?” model to design an alternative spatial plan that includes generation of predictive scenarios and is relatively easy to use. In the cities studied, we identified a total of six scenarios based on the main drivers of development—namely, population and spatial policies. Subsequently, we assessed the alternatives for their environmental impact, preparing sensitivity maps for each major environmental issue in the target area (natural ecosystem, air and microclimate, natural disasters). One projected advantage of the “What if?” model is that its digital visualization of proposed plans may improve public awareness and involvement. Furthermore, the tool is expected to be highly useful in ensuring the objectivity of quantitative analyses. However, it is necessary to develop a PSS that is both standardized and tailored to the particular needs of each area. Finally, the development of an e-governance system will be beneficial in ensuring public access to the decision making process. View Full-Text
Keywords: “What if?”; decision-making system; spatial plan alternative; land use scenario; GISEA (GIS-based Strategic Environmental Assessment) “What if?”; decision-making system; spatial plan alternative; land use scenario; GISEA (GIS-based Strategic Environmental Assessment)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.-S.; Lee, G.-S. Planning Support Systems (PSS)-Based Spatial Plan Alternatives and Environmental Assessment. Sustainability 2016, 8, 286.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top