Next Article in Journal
Certification of Markets, Markets of Certificates: Tracing Sustainability in Global Agro-Food Value Chains
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Issues and Opportunities in the Sugar and Sugar-Bioproduct Industries
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2015, 7(9), 12236-12257; doi:10.3390/su70912236

Comparative Exergoeconomic Analyses of Gas Turbine Steam Injection Cycles with and without Fogging Inlet Cooling

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ataturk, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
Institute for Energy Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstr 18, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Andrew Kusiak
Received: 28 July 2015 / Revised: 24 August 2015 / Accepted: 28 August 2015 / Published: 3 September 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1517 KB, uploaded 3 September 2015]   |  


The results are reported of exergoeconomic analyses of a simple gas turbine cycle without a fogging system (SGT), a simple steam injection gas turbine cycle (STIG), and a steam injection gas turbine cycle with inlet fogging cooler (FSTIG). The results show that (1) a gas-turbine cycle with steam injection and simultaneous cooling has a higher power output than the other considered cycle; (2) at maximum energy efficiency conditions the gas turbine has the highest exergy efficiency of the cycle components and the lowest value of exergy efficiency is calculated for the fog cooler, where the mixing of air and water at greatly different temperatures causes the high exergy destruction; and (3) utilization of the fogging cooler in the steam injection cycle increases the exergy destruction in the combustion chamber. Furthermore, the simple gas turbine cycle is found to be more economic as its relative cost difference, total unit product cost, and exergoeconomic factors are less than those for the two other configurations. However, its efficiency and net power output are notably lower than for the gas turbine with steam injection and/or fog cooling. The total unit product cost is highest for the simple gas turbine with steam injection. View Full-Text
Keywords: gas turbine; fog cooling; steam injection; exergy; exergoeconomic analysis gas turbine; fog cooling; steam injection; exergy; exergoeconomic analysis

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Athari, H.; Soltani, S.; Rosen, M.A.; Mahmoudi, S.M.S.; Morosuk, T. Comparative Exergoeconomic Analyses of Gas Turbine Steam Injection Cycles with and without Fogging Inlet Cooling. Sustainability 2015, 7, 12236-12257.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top