Next Article in Journal
Measuring Compact Urban Form: A Case of Nagpur City, India
Previous Article in Journal
Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2014, 6(7), 4227-4245; doi:10.3390/su6074227

A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability

SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Box 857, S-501 15 Borås, Sweden
Department of Building Physics, Lund University, Box 118, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 March 2014 / Revised: 26 June 2014 / Accepted: 27 June 2014 / Published: 8 July 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [824 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  


In Sweden and in other countries, building owners are encouraged to help reduce energy consumption, both in order to contribute to national energy saving goals and, in terms of their own interests, to reduce the costs of heating and operation of the building. However, it is important to pursue the most optimal strategy available so as to achieve cost-effective energy usage while simultaneously maintaining excellent indoor environments, without sacrificing the architectural quality or negatively affecting the environment. Building managers often do not have the time or expertise required to make a proper evaluation of the available options before making a final decision. Renovation measures are often considered in the light of repaying investments in a short time rather than taking into account life cycle costs, despite the fact that a thoughtful, comprehensive renovation is often more cost-effective in the long run. This article presents a systematic approach for evaluating different renovation alternatives based on sustainability criteria. A methodology has been developed to evaluate different renovation alternatives from environmental, economic, and social perspectives. The benefit of using the proposed methodology is that building managers who face a major renovation work are provided with a clear comparison between the different renovation options, viewed from a sustainability perspective, this may facilitate, in the long run, a culture in which renovation measures which involve marginally increased costs, but are seen to lead to significant environmental and social benefits, will be considered and carried out. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable renovation; decision-making; life cycle cost; life cycle assessment; social indicators sustainable renovation; decision-making; life cycle cost; life cycle assessment; social indicators

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Mjörnell, K.; Boss, A.; Lindahl, M.; Molnar, S. A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability. Sustainability 2014, 6, 4227-4245.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top