Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Remote Sensing Images to Detect Soy Plantations in the Amazon Biome—The Soy Moratorium Initiative
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’s Only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance
Sustainability 2012, 4(5), 1059-1073; doi:10.3390/su4051059
Article

When Should We Care About Sustainability? Applying Human Security as the Decisive Criterion

1,*  and 2
Received: 14 February 2012; in revised form: 12 April 2012 / Accepted: 12 May 2012 / Published: 22 May 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [202 KB, uploaded 22 May 2012]
Abstract: It seems intuitively clear that not all human endeavours warrant equal concern over the extent of their sustainability. This raises the question about what criteria might best serve for their prioritisation. We refute, on empirical and theoretical grounds, the counterclaim that sustainability should be of no concern regardless of the circumstances. Human security can serve as a source of criteria that are both widely shared and can be assessed in a reasonably objective manner. Using established classifications, we explore how four forms of sustainability (environmental, economic, social, and cultural) relate to the four pillars of human security (environmental, economic, sociopolitical, and health-related). Our findings, based on probable correlations, suggest that the criteria of human security allow for a reliable discrimination between relatively trivial incidences of unsustainable behavior and those that warrant widely shared serious concern. They also confirm that certain sources of human insecurity, such as poverty or violent conflict, tend to perpetuate unsustainable behavior, a useful consideration for the design of development initiatives. Considering that human security enjoys wide and increasing political support among the international community, it is to be hoped that by publicizing the close correlation between human security and sustainability greater attention will be paid to the latter and to its careful definition.
Keywords: human security; assessing sustainability; human ecology; overshoot human security; assessing sustainability; human ecology; overshoot
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Lautensach, A.K.; Lautensach, S.W. When Should We Care About Sustainability? Applying Human Security as the Decisive Criterion. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1059-1073.

AMA Style

Lautensach AK, Lautensach SW. When Should We Care About Sustainability? Applying Human Security as the Decisive Criterion. Sustainability. 2012; 4(5):1059-1073.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lautensach, Alexander K.; Lautensach, Sabina W. 2012. "When Should We Care About Sustainability? Applying Human Security as the Decisive Criterion." Sustainability 4, no. 5: 1059-1073.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert