Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Land Reforms and the Tragedy of the Anticommons—A Case Study from Cambodia
Previous Article in Journal
Approaches and Software for Multi-Objective Optimization of Nuclear Power Structures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Business: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?
Sustainability 2012, 4(4), 740-772; doi:10.3390/su4040740
Article

Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes

1,* , 1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
3
,
6
,
2
,
7
,
8
,
8
,
5
,
2
,
7
,
6
,
6
,
4
,
8
,
1
,
5
,
6
,
2
,
6
,
3
,
4
 and
1
Received: 8 March 2012 / Revised: 26 March 2012 / Accepted: 30 March 2012 / Published: 20 April 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [481 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |   Browse Figures

Abstract

Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.
Keywords: sustainability; future scenarios; scenario archetypes sustainability; future scenarios; scenario archetypes
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote
MDPI and ACS Style

Hunt, D.V.L.; Lombardi, D.R.; Atkinson, S.; Barber, A.R.G.; Barnes, M.; Boyko, C.T.; Brown, J.; Bryson, J.; Butler, D.; Caputo, S.; Caserio, M.; Coles, R.; Cooper, R.F.D.; Farmani, R.; Gaterell, M.; Hale, J.; Hales, C.; Hewitt, C.N.; Jankovic, L.; Jefferson, I.; Leach, J.; MacKenzie, A.R.; Memon, F.A.; Sadler, J.P.; Weingaertner, C.; Whyatt, J.D.; Rogers, C.D.F. Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes. Sustainability 2012, 4, 740-772.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal, click here

Comments

Cited By

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert