Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Land Reforms and the Tragedy of the Anticommons—A Case Study from Cambodia
Previous Article in Journal
Approaches and Software for Multi-Objective Optimization of Nuclear Power Structures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Business: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?
Sustainability 2012, 4(4), 740-772; doi:10.3390/su4040740
Article

Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes

1,* , 1
, 2
, 3
, 4
, 5
, 3
, 6
, 2
, 7
, 8
, 8
, 5
, 2
, 7
, 6
, 6
, 4
, 8
, 1
, 5
, 6
, 2
, 6
, 3
, 4
 and 1
Received: 8 March 2012; in revised form: 26 March 2012 / Accepted: 30 March 2012 / Published: 20 April 2012
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [481 KB, uploaded 23 April 2012]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: Future scenarios provide challenging, plausible and relevant stories about how the future could unfold. Urban Futures (UF) research has identified a substantial set (>450) of seemingly disparate scenarios published over the period 1997–2011 and within this research, a sub-set of >160 scenarios has been identified (and categorized) based on their narratives according to the structure first proposed by the Global Scenario Group (GSG) in 1997; three world types (Business as Usual, Barbarization, and Great Transitions) and six scenarios, two for each world type (Policy Reform—PR, Market Forces—MF, Breakdown—B, Fortress World—FW, Eco-Communalism—EC and New Sustainability Paradigm—NSP). It is suggested that four of these scenario archetypes (MF, PR, NSP and FW) are sufficiently distinct to facilitate active stakeholder engagement in futures thinking. Moreover they are accompanied by a well-established, internally consistent set of narratives that provide a deeper understanding of the key fundamental drivers (e.g., STEEP—Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental and Political) that could bring about realistic world changes through a push or a pull effect. This is testament to the original concept of the GSG scenarios and their development and refinement over a 16 year period.
Keywords: sustainability; future scenarios; scenario archetypes sustainability; future scenarios; scenario archetypes
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Hunt, D.V.L.; Lombardi, D.R.; Atkinson, S.; Barber, A.R.G.; Barnes, M.; Boyko, C.T.; Brown, J.; Bryson, J.; Butler, D.; Caputo, S.; Caserio, M.; Coles, R.; Cooper, R.F.D.; Farmani, R.; Gaterell, M.; Hale, J.; Hales, C.; Hewitt, C.N.; Jankovic, L.; Jefferson, I.; Leach, J.; MacKenzie, A.R.; Memon, F.A.; Sadler, J.P.; Weingaertner, C.; Whyatt, J.D.; Rogers, C.D.F. Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes. Sustainability 2012, 4, 740-772.

AMA Style

Hunt DVL, Lombardi DR, Atkinson S, Barber ARG, Barnes M, Boyko CT, Brown J, Bryson J, Butler D, Caputo S, Caserio M, Coles R, Cooper RFD, Farmani R, Gaterell M, Hale J, Hales C, Hewitt CN, Jankovic L, Jefferson I, Leach J, MacKenzie AR, Memon FA, Sadler JP, Weingaertner C, Whyatt JD, Rogers CDF. Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes. Sustainability. 2012; 4(4):740-772.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hunt, Dexter V. L.; Lombardi, D. Rachel; Atkinson, Stuart; Barber, Austin R. G.; Barnes, Matthew; Boyko, Christopher T.; Brown, Julie; Bryson, John; Butler, David; Caputo, Silvio; Caserio, Maria; Coles, Richard; Cooper, Rachel F. D.; Farmani, Raziyeh; Gaterell, Mark; Hale, James; Hales, Chantal; Hewitt, C. Nicholas; Jankovic, Lubo; Jefferson, I.; Leach, J.; MacKenzie, A. Rob; Memon, Fayyaz Ali; Sadler, Jon P.; Weingaertner, Carina; Whyatt, J. Duncan; Rogers, Christopher D. F. 2012. "Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes." Sustainability 4, no. 4: 740-772.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert