Next Article in Journal
Moving Universities: A Case Study on the Use of Unconferencing for Facilitating Sustainability Learning in a Swiss University
Next Article in Special Issue
Correction: The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability Sustainability 2011, 3, 847-874
Previous Article in Journal
Coping Strategies to Deal with Environmental Variability and Extreme Climatic Events in the Peruvian Anchovy Fishery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modern Biotechnology—Potential Contribution and Challenges for Sustainable Food Production in Sub-Saharan Africa
A correction was published on 30 June 2011, see Sustainability 2011, 3(7), 955-956.

Sustainability 2011, 3(6), 847-874; doi:10.3390/su3060847
Article

The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability

1,2,3,* , 4
 and Jr. 5
Received: 2 May 2011; in revised form: 7 June 2011 / Accepted: 7 June 2011 / Published: 17 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnology and Sustainable Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [293 KB, updated 22 June 2011; original version uploaded 17 June 2011]
Abstract: The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R&D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R&D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.
Keywords: genetic engineering; sustainable agriculture; social impacts; democratic participation genetic engineering; sustainable agriculture; social impacts; democratic participation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Correction

    Correction (PDF, 58 KB)

    http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Ervin, D.E.; Glenna, L.L.; Jussaume, R.A., Jr. The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability. Sustainability 2011, 3, 847-874.

AMA Style

Ervin DE, Glenna LL, Jussaume RA, Jr. The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability. Sustainability. 2011; 3(6):847-874.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ervin, David E.; Glenna, Leland L.; Jussaume, Raymond A., Jr. 2011. "The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability." Sustainability 3, no. 6: 847-874.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert