A correction was published on 30 June 2011, see Sustainability 2011, 3(7), 955-956.

Sustainability 2011, 3(6), 847-874; doi:10.3390/su3060847
Article

The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability

1 Environmental Science and Management Program, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA 2 Department of Economics, 1721 SW Broadway, Cramer Hall, Suite 241, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA 3 Institute for Sustainable Solutions, P.O. Box 751, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA 4 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA 5 Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Room 107B Johnson Hall, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 May 2011; in revised form: 7 June 2011 / Accepted: 7 June 2011 / Published: 17 June 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnology and Sustainable Development)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [293 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 22 June 2011 12:14 CEST]
The original version is still available [365 KB, uploaded 17 June 2011 09:28 CEST]
Abstract: The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R&D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R&D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.
Keywords: genetic engineering; sustainable agriculture; social impacts; democratic participation

Correction

  • Correction

    Correction (PDF, 58 KB)

    http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ervin, D.E.; Glenna, L.L.; Jussaume, R.A., Jr. The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability. Sustainability 2011, 3, 847-874.

AMA Style

Ervin DE, Glenna LL, Jussaume RA, Jr. The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability. Sustainability. 2011; 3(6):847-874.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ervin, David E.; Glenna, Leland L.; Jussaume, Raymond A., Jr. 2011. "The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability." Sustainability 3, no. 6: 847-874.

Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert