Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Ultra-Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas: Energy Return on Financial Investment and a Preliminary Assessment of Energy Return on Energy Investment
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Dynamic Function for Energy Return on Investment
Sustainability 2011, 3(10), 1986-2008; doi:10.3390/su3101986
Article

Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America

1,* , 2
 and 2
Received: 26 June 2011; in revised form: 7 July 2011 / Accepted: 5 August 2011 / Published: 20 October 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment))
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1135 KB, uploaded 20 October 2011]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: The energy cost of drilling a natural gas well has never been publicly addressed in terms of the actual fuels and energy required to generate the physical materials consumed in construction. Part of the reason for this is that drilling practices are typically regarded as proprietary; hence the required information is difficult to obtain. We propose that conventional tight gas wells that have marginal production characteristics provide a baseline for energy return on energy invested (EROI) analyses. To develop an understanding of baseline energy requirements for natural gas extraction, we examined production from a mature shallow gas field composed of vertical wells in Pennsylvania and materials used in the drilling and completion of individual wells. The data were derived from state maintained databases and reports, personal experience as a production geologist, personal interviews with industry representatives, and literature sources. We examined only the “upstream” energy cost of providing gas and provide a minimal estimate of energy cost because of uncertainty about some inputs. Of the materials examined, steel and diesel fuel accounted for more than two-thirds of the energy cost for well construction. Average energy cost per foot for a tight gas well in Indiana County is 0.59 GJ per foot. Available production data for this natural gas play was used to calculate energy return on energy invested ratios (EROI) between 67:1 and 120:1, which depends mostly on the amount of materials consumed, drilling time, and highly variable production. Accounting for such inputs as chemicals used in well treatment, materials used to construct drill bits and drill pipe, post-gathering pipeline construction, and well completion maintenance would decrease EROI by an unknown amount. This study provides energy constraints at the single-well scale for the energy requirements for drilling in geologically simple systems. The energy and monetary costs of wells from Indiana County, Pennsylvania are useful for constructing an EROI model of United States natural gas production, which suggests a peak in the EROI of gas production, has already occurred twice in the past century.
Keywords: EROI; natural gas; tight gas; Appalachian Basin; Indiana County; depletion EROI; natural gas; tight gas; Appalachian Basin; Indiana County; depletion
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Sell, B.; Murphy, D.; Hall, C.A. Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1986-2008.

AMA Style

Sell B, Murphy D, Hall CA. Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America. Sustainability. 2011; 3(10):1986-2008.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sell, Bryan; Murphy, David; Hall, Charles A.S. 2011. "Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America." Sustainability 3, no. 10: 1986-2008.


Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert