Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America
Section of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraîchers 13, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
Program in Environmental Science, State University of New York – College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 June 2011; in revised form: 7 July 2011 / Accepted: 5 August 2011 / Published: 20 October 2011
Abstract: The energy cost of drilling a natural gas well has never been publicly addressed in terms of the actual fuels and energy required to generate the physical materials consumed in construction. Part of the reason for this is that drilling practices are typically regarded as proprietary; hence the required information is difficult to obtain. We propose that conventional tight gas wells that have marginal production characteristics provide a baseline for energy return on energy invested (EROI) analyses. To develop an understanding of baseline energy requirements for natural gas extraction, we examined production from a mature shallow gas field composed of vertical wells in Pennsylvania and materials used in the drilling and completion of individual wells. The data were derived from state maintained databases and reports, personal experience as a production geologist, personal interviews with industry representatives, and literature sources. We examined only the “upstream” energy cost of providing gas and provide a minimal estimate of energy cost because of uncertainty about some inputs. Of the materials examined, steel and diesel fuel accounted for more than two-thirds of the energy cost for well construction. Average energy cost per foot for a tight gas well in Indiana County is 0.59 GJ per foot. Available production data for this natural gas play was used to calculate energy return on energy invested ratios (EROI) between 67:1 and 120:1, which depends mostly on the amount of materials consumed, drilling time, and highly variable production. Accounting for such inputs as chemicals used in well treatment, materials used to construct drill bits and drill pipe, post-gathering pipeline construction, and well completion maintenance would decrease EROI by an unknown amount. This study provides energy constraints at the single-well scale for the energy requirements for drilling in geologically simple systems. The energy and monetary costs of wells from Indiana County, Pennsylvania are useful for constructing an EROI model of United States natural gas production, which suggests a peak in the EROI of gas production, has already occurred twice in the past century.
Keywords: EROI; natural gas; tight gas; Appalachian Basin; Indiana County; depletion
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Sell, B.; Murphy, D.; Hall, C.A. Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America. Sustainability 2011, 3, 1986-2008.
Sell B, Murphy D, Hall CA. Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America. Sustainability. 2011; 3(10):1986-2008.
Sell, Bryan; Murphy, David; Hall, Charles A.S. 2011. "Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America." Sustainability 3, no. 10: 1986-2008.