The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Blockchain Technology
2.2. Supply Chain Management (SCM)
2.3. Digital Industry 4.0 and the Circular Economy
2.4. Blockchain and Supply Chain Management (SCM)
2.5. Blockchain in Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. The Nature of Research
3.2. Research Design
- Literature should be relevant to the study goal and include words such as blockchain technology, digitalization, Industry 4.0, and circular economy.
- Literature that focuses on the relationship between blockchain applications and supply chain management in the logistics and courier industry.
- Previous studies related to digital transformation in courier and logistics services use technologies such as big data analytics, IoT, and AI.
- Studies related to integrating advanced technologies in industrial operations, particularly in logistics and supply chains.
- Articles connecting blockchain adoption and digital technologies with sustainable practices and circular economy concepts in supply chains. Moreover, the sources should be quality and credible such as peer-reviewed academic journals related to information systems, supply chain management, and industrial engineering.
- Recent articles within at least 5–10 years to ensure the current information, especially about digitalization and blockchain.
- Select studies that provide insights into the global experience about the influence of blockchain and digital technologies on supply chains, particularly addressing the courier industry, logistics, and SCM research papers.
- Using diverse methodologies, quantitative (statistical analysis) and qualitative (case studies), as well as including both theoretical and empirical research papers.
- Choosing related articles such as economics, environmental science, and computer science to study the effect of technology on supply chains from different viewpoints.
3.3. Case Selection
3.4. Data Collection
3.4.1. Ethical Considerations
3.4.2. Competence of Interview Participants
3.5. Data Analysis
The Articulation of Technical Challenges
- Scalability and performance issues such as transaction speed and throughput: Blockchain networks may suffer from slow transaction speeds and limited throughput.
- Data storage and management: The stability of blockchain may cause data storage problems, such as transaction volume increases, so storing and managing data efficiently can be challenging.
- Compatibility and integration: The integration of blockchain with current digital systems and platforms in courier supply chains is complex, so it may need changes in old processes and systems.
- Compatibility: Standardization is needed across several blockchain platforms for them to be compatible.
- Privacy and security of data v. confidentiality: Balancing between transparency and data privacy and confidentiality is a key challenge.
- Cybersecurity Threats: Blockchain technology is vulnerable to different cybersecurity threats.
- Energy consumption and environmental effects: Blockchain networks consume substantial amounts of energy, which have environmental issues, especially in a circular economy context.
- Regulatory and compliance challenges: The regularity of blockchain technology is evolving, creating new challenges for its adoption. Legal enforcement of smart contracts varies across different countries related to international courier supply chains.
4. Results and Discussions
4.1. The Benefits of Implementing Blockchain Technology in Courier Services in the Logistics Industry
4.2. The Role of Blockchain Technology in Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy
4.3. Approaches and Features of Blockchain Technology in Courier Services in the Supply Chain within the Circular Economy in Industry 4.0
4.4. Toward a Conceptual Framework of Blockchain Technology in Courier Services in Supply Chain
5. Conclusions
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Practical Contributions
5.3. Theoretical Contributions
6. Limitations
7. Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Feng, H.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Applying Blockchain Technology to Improve Agri-Food Traceability: A Review of Development Methods, Benefits, and Challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Del Vecchio, P.; Oropallo, E.; Secundo, G. Blockchain Technology for Bridging Trust, Traceability, and Transparency in Circular Supply Chain. Inf. Manag. 2022, 59, 103508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellani, H.; Sliman, L.; Samhat, A.E.; Exposito, E. On Blockchain Integration with Supply Chain: Overview on Data Transparency. Logistics 2021, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Han, J.H.; Davies, P.B. Understanding Blockchain Technology for Future Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J. 2019, 24, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, S.; Yilmaz, I.; Paksoy, T. Augmented reality in supply chain management. In Logistics 4.0; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 136–145. ISBN 9780429327636. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.R.; Razzaq, A.; Yu, Z.; Miller, S. Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy Practices: A New Era Business Strategies for Environmental Sustainability. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 4001–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain Technology and Its Relationships to Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Valle, F.; Oliver, M. Blockchain Enablers for Supply Chains: How to Boost Implementation in Industry. Spec. Sect. Blockchain Technol. Princ. Appl. 2020, 8, 209699–209716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hackius, N.; Petersen, M. Blockchain in Logistics and Supply Chain: Trick or Treat? In Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL); epubli GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 23, pp. 3–8. [Google Scholar]
- Stephen, R.; Alex, A. A Review on BlockChain Security. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 396, p. 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmamy, S.B.; Mrabet, H.; Gharbi, H.; Jemai, A.; Trentesaux, D. A Survey on the Usage of Blockchain Technology for Cyber-Threats in the Context of Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakhata, C.; Stock, J.R.; Texiera, T.B. Doctoral Dissertations in Logistics and Supply Chain-Related Areas: 2005–2009. Logist. Res. 2013, 6, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.S.; Jarrell, J.T.; Carpenter, K.A.; Cohen, D.S.; Huang, X. Blockchain in Healthcare: A Patient-Centered Model. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2019, 20, 15017. [Google Scholar]
- Santhi, A.R.; Muthuswamy, P. Influence of Blockchain Technology in Manufacturing Supply Chain and Logistics. Logistics 2022, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gohil, D.; Thakker, S.V. Blockchain-Integrated Technologies for Solving Supply Chain Challenges. Mod. Supply Chain Res. Appl. 2021, 3, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szozda, N. Industry 4.0 and its impact on the functioning of supply chains. Sci. J. Logist. 2017, 13, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borowski, P.F. Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dörner, K.; Edelman, D. What ‘Digital’ Really Means; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rouse, M. What Does Digital Mean? Available online: https://www.techopedia.com/contributors/margaret-rouse (accessed on 15 February 2024).
- Frenzel, A.; Muench, J.C.; Bruckner, M.T.; Veit, D.J. Digitization or Digitalization?—Toward an Understanding of Definitions, Use, and Application in IS Research. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2021), Online, 9–13 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Albach, H.; Meffert, H.; Pinkwart, A.; Reichwald, R. Change Through Digitization—Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0. In Management of Permanent Change; Springer: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2015; pp. 23–45. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Singh, R.K. Applications of Emerging Technologies in Logistics Sector for Achieving Circular Economy Goals during COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Critical Success Factors. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2024, 27, 451–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbunan-Fich, R.; Castellanos, A. Digitalization of Land Records: From Paper to Blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems 2018, ICIS 2018, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–16 December 2018; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Kurdi, B.; Alzoubi, H.M.; Akour, I.; Alshurideh, M.T. The Effect of Blockchain and Smart Inventory System on Supply Chain Performance: Empirical Evidence from Retail Industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 10, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garay-Rondero, C.L.; Martinez-Flores, J.L.; Smith, N.R.; Caballero Morales, S.O.; Aldrette-Malacara, A. Digital Supply Chain Model in Industry 4.0. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 887–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Lee, J.-Y.; Gharehgozli, A. Blockchain in Food Supply Chains: A Literature Review and Synthesis Analysis of Platforms, Benefits, and Challenges. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 3527–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goetschalckx, M.; Vidal, C.J.; Dogan, K. Modeling and Design of Global Logistics Systems: A Review of Integrated Strategic and Tactical Models and Design Algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 143, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peronja, I.; Lenac, K.; Glavinović, R. Blockchain Technology in Maritime Industry. Pomorstvo 2020, 34, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mylrea, M.; Gourisetti, S.N.G. Blockchain for Supply Chain Cybersecurity, Optimization, and Compliance. In Proceedings of the Proceedings—Resilience Week 2018, RWS 2018, Denver, CO, USA, 20–23 August 2018; pp. 70–76. [Google Scholar]
- Upadhyay, A.; Mukhuty, S.; Kumar, V.; Kazancoglu, Y. Blockchain Technology and the Circular Economy: Implications for Sustainability and Social Responsibility. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 293, 126130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boschi, A.A.; Borin, R.; Raimundo, J.C.; Batocchio, A. An Exploration of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. In Proceedings of the 22nd Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium, Cambridge, UK, 27–28 September 2018; pp. 27–28. [Google Scholar]
- Deshpande, A.; Stewart, K.; Lepetit, L.; Gunashekar, S. Understanding the Landscape of Distributed Ledger Technologies/Blockchain: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Prospects for Standards. Br. Stand. Inst. 2020, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tallyn, E.; Revans, J.; Morgan, E.; Fisken, K.; Murray-Rust, D. Enacting the Last Mile: Experiences of Smart Contracts in Courier Deliveries. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings, Online, 8–13 May 2021; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Markus, S.; Buijs, P. Beyond the Hype: How Blockchain Affects Supply Chain Performance. Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 27, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mordor Intelligence LLP. Italy Courier, Express, and Parcel (CEP) Market—Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2022–2027); Hyderabad: Telangana, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ejdys, J.; Gulc, A. Trust in Courier Services and Its Antecedents as a Determinant of Perceived Service Quality and Future Intention to Use Courier Service. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gulc, A. Determinants of Courier Service Quality in E-Commerce from Customers’ Perspective. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 2020, 24, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gia, K.H.; Huong, L.H.; Vo, H.K.; Trong, P.N.; Dang, K.T.; Le Van, H.; Phu, L.V.C.; Quoc, D.N.T.; Tran, N.H.; The, A.N.; et al. Delivery Management System Based on Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and NFT: A Case Study in Vietnam. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2023, 14, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, W.A.H.; Maccarthy, B.L. Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability in the Textile and Apparel Supply Chain: A Case Study of the Fiber Producer, Lenzing. Sustainability 2021, 13, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunny, J.; Undralla, N.; Madhusudanan Pillai, V. Supply Chain Transparency through Blockchain-Based Traceability: An Overview with Demonstration. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, E. An Approach for Improving Transparency and Traceability of Industrial Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology. Master’s Thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, P.; Litoriya, R. Promoting Trustless Computation Through Blockchain Technology. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2021, 44, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betti, Q.; Khoury, R.; Halle, S.; Montreuil, B. Improving Hyperconnected Logistics with Blockchains and Smart Contracts. IT Prof. 2019, 21, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani, E.; He, Y.; Phillips, M. On the Security Risks of the Blockchain. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2018, 60, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berneis, M.; Bartsch, D.; Winkler, H. Applications of Blockchain Technology in Logistics and Supply Chain Management—Insights from a Systematic Literature Review. Logistics 2021, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pareek, S. How Blockchain is Revolutionizing the Logistics Industry. Available online: https://medium.com/coinmonks/how-blockchain-is-revolutionizing-the-logistics-industry-e5cbf3be9ade (accessed on 10 March 2024).
- Jain, G.; Singh, H.; Chaturvedi, K.R.; Rakesh, S. Blockchain in Logistics Industry: In Fizz Customer Trust or Not. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 541–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Queiroz, M.M.; Pereira, S.C.F.; Telles, R.; Machado, M.C. Industry 4.0 and Digital Supply Chain Capabilities: A Framework for Understanding Digitalisation Challenges and Opportunities. Benchmarking 2019, 28, 1761–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Khan, S.; Suman, R. Blockchain Technology Applications for Industry 4.0: A Literature-Based Review. Blockchain Res. Appl. 2021, 2, 100027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis a Methods Sourcebook; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Gorard, S. The Role of Secondary Data in Combining Methodological Approaches. Educ. Rev. 2002, 54, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koziol, N.; Arthur, A. An Introduction to Secondary Data Analysis; Research Methodology Series; Lincoln: Dearborn, MI, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Noor, K. Case Study: A Strategic Research Methodology Khairul Baharein Mohd Noor. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2008, 5, 1602–1604. [Google Scholar]
- Leshem, S.; Trafford, V. Overlooking the Conceptual Framework. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 2007, 44, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, G.R. Overcoming Small to Medium Business Failure through Leadership Strategies. Open J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 09, 353–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oltmann, S.M. Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch. 2016, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Adhabi, E.A.R.; Anozie, C.B.L. Literature Review for the Type of Interview in Qualitative Research. Int. J. Educ. 2017, 9, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurpjuweit, S.; Schmidt, C.G.; Klöckner, M.; Wagner, S.M. Blockchain in Additive Manufacturing and Its Impact on Supply Chains. J. Bus. Logist. 2021, 42, 46–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintão, C.; Andrade, P.; Almeida, F. How to Improve the Validity and Reliability of a Case Study Approach. J. Interdiscip. Stud. Educ. 2020, 9, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, R. Collecting Data by In-Depth Interviewing. In Proceedings of the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Brighton, UK, 2–5 September 1999; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Benkharafa, M. The Present Situation of the Arabic Language and the Arab World Commitment to Arabization. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 2013, 3, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irvine, A. Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2011, 10, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, A.B.; Brandolini, A. Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of “Secondary” Data-Sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study. J. Econ. Lit. 2001, 39, 771–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Sin, C.H. Seeking Informed Consent: Reflections on Research Practice. Sociology 2005, 39, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, I. Qualitative Research with a Focus on Qualitative Data Analysis. Spec. Issue Res. Methodol. 2015, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeSantis, L.; Ugarriza, D.N. The Concept of Theme as Used in Qualitative Nursing Research. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2000, 22, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guest, G.; Namey, E.; Taylor, J.; Eley, N.; McKenna, K. Comparing Focus Groups and Individual Interviews: Findings from a Randomized Study. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2017, 20, 693–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaske, N.K. Research Methodologies and Transaction Log Analysis: Issues, Questions, and a Proposed Model. Libr. Hi Tech 1993, 11, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tijan, E.; Aksentijević, S.; Ivanić, K.; Jardas, M. Blockchain Technology Implementation in Logistics. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, P.; Hu, J.; Li, X.; Zhu, Q. Using Blockchain Technology to Enhance the Traceability of Original Achievements. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2023, 70, 1693–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsharari, N. Integrating Blockchain Technology with Internet of Things to Efficiency. Int. J. Technol. Innov. Manag. 2021, 1, 01–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, J.; Misra, M.; Goundar, S. An Overview of Food Supply Chain Virtualisation and Granular Traceability Using Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Blockchains Cryptocurrencies 2020, 1, 154–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrovnik, M.; Herold, D.; Fürst, E.; Kummer, S. Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start. Logistics 2018, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Zhu, J. Operation Mechanisms for Intelligent Logistics System: A Blockchain Perspective. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 144202–144213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, S.; Trentesaux, D.; McFarlane, D.; Montreuil, B.; Ballot, E.; Huang, G.Q. Digital Interoperability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: State-of-the-Art and Research Avenues towards Physical Internet. Comput. Ind. 2021, 128, 103435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issaoui, Y.; Khiat, A.; Bahnasse, A.; Ouajji, H. Smart Logistics: Study of the Application of Blockchain Technology. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 160, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeilian, B.; Sarkis, J.; Lewis, K.; Behdad, S. Blockchain for the Future of Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Industry 4.0. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 1675, 105064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brettel, M.; Friederichsen, N.; Keller, M.; Rosenberg, M. How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective. Int. J. Mech. Aerospace Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng. 2014, 8, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Z.; Khan, S.A.R.; Umar, M. Circular Economy Practices and Industry 4.0 Technologies: A Strategic Move of Automobile Industry. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2022, 31, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I.; Yıldız, B.; Çigdem, S.; Cincikait, R. An Integrated Impact of Blockchain on Supply. Logistics 2021, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tokkozhina, U.; Mataloto, B.M.; Martins, A.L.; Ferreira, J.C. Decentralizing Online Food Delivery Services: A Blockchain and IoT Model for Smart Cities. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhoeven, P.; Sinn, F.; Herden, T. Examples from Blockchain Implementations in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Exploring the Mindful Use of a New Technology. Logistics 2018, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezquita, Y.; Casado-Vara, R.; González Briones, A.; Prieto, J.; Corchado, J.M. Blockchain-Based Architecture for the Control of Logistics Activities: Pharmaceutical Utilities Case Study. Log. J. IGPL 2021, 29, 974–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wamba, S.F.; Queiroz, M.M. Blockchain in the Operations and Supply Chain Management: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Research Opportunities. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2020, 52, 102064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content. |
Article | Author | Publisher |
---|---|---|
“Blockchain-integrated technologies for solving supply chain challenges” | [15] | Emerald insight |
“Blockchain in the logistics industry: in fizz customer trust or not” | [47] | Emerald |
“How Blockchain Affects Supply Chain Performance” | [34] | Emerald insight |
“Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities: A framework for understanding digitalisation challenges and opportunities” | [48] | Emerald insight |
“Logistics 4.0: SCM in Industry 4.0 Era (Changing Patterns of Logistics in Industry 4.0 and Role of Digital Transformation in SCM)” | [5] | Taylor Francis |
“Blockchain technology applications for Industry 4.0” | [49] | Elsevier |
“Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities” | [48] | Emerald |
“Applications of emerging technologies in the logistics sector for achieving circular economy goals during COVID-19 pandemic” | [22] | Taylor Francis |
“Industry4.0 and circular economy practices” | [6] | Wiley |
“Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility” | [30] | Elsevier |
“Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability in the Textile and Apparel Supply Chain: A Case Study of the Fiber Producer, Lenzing” | [39] | MDPI |
“Applications of Blockchain Technology in Logistics and Supply Chain Management—Insights from a Systematic Literature Review” | [45] | MDPI |
“Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector” | [17] | MDPI |
“An exploration of blockchain technology in supply chain management” | [31] | University of Cambridge |
“Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability, and transparency in circular supply chain” | [2] | Elsevier |
Method Type | Source Type Each Manager | Firm (A) | Firm (B) | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Semi-Structured Interview | 1. IT Manager | 1 | 1 | |
2. Logistics Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
3. Supply Chain Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
4. Courier Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
5. Operation Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
6. Head of Business | 1 | 1 | ||
7. CFO | 1 | 1 | ||
8. Marketing Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
9. Quality Assurance Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
10. Customer Service Manager | 1 | 1 | ||
11. Transportation Manager | 1 | 1 | 22 | |
Blockchain impact on supply chain articles and reports | Available on websites -Available via academic engines | 35 | ||
Industry 4.0 articles and books | Available on websites -Available via academic engines | 20 | ||
Circular economy articles | Available on websites -Available via academic engines | 20 | 75 |
Sub-Heading | Key Benefits |
---|---|
Reasons for managers in logistics firms | 1. Increased Efficiency 2. Improved Traceability 3. Enhanced Security 4. Reduced Costs 5. Increased Trust |
Common strategies in logistics firm | 1. Collaborating with Partners 2. Implementing Smart Contracts 3. Enhancing Visibility 4. Integrating with Existing Systems 5. Embracing Innovation |
Third-party players for logistics firms | 1. Expertise 2. Interoperability 3. Standardization 4. Data Privacy |
More customers for logistics firms | 1. Increased demand 2. Increased trust 3. Greater transparency 4. Improve traceability |
Situation and sustainability | 1. Reduced environmental impact 2. Increased collaboration (reduce emissions and air pollution) 3. Improved efficiency (reducing waste) 4. Digitization |
Quality Service for the customer | 1. Cost savings 2. Real-time delivery 3. Time-saving 4. Transparency 5. Traceability |
The Main Points Focused on | Participants in the Interviews |
---|---|
Architecture and design | 18% |
Appropriate blockchain platform and consensus mechanism | 9% |
Integration with existing logistics and supply chain management (SCM) systems | 45% |
Safety and security | 64% |
Data privacy | 55% |
Smart contract development and implementation | 36% |
Scalability and performance optimization | 55% |
Interoperability with other blockchain networks or legacy systems | 36% |
Compliance with regulatory requirements and standards | 36% |
Training and education for employees and stakeholders | 36% |
Real-time traceability | 82% |
Accountability | 55% |
Transparency | 82% |
Automation | 82% |
Collaboration with partners | 45% |
Training and education | 45% |
Visibility | 45% |
Planning and scheduling | 55% |
Time-saving | 55% |
Efficiency | 73% |
Cost saving | 55% |
Decision making | 64% |
Compliance with regulatory requirements and standards | 45% |
Reduce errors and disputes in the supply chain | 55% |
Accuracy and reliability | 64% |
Leading to faster and more accurate deliveries and better customer service | 64% |
Customer experience and satisfaction | 55% |
Development of new products and services | 27% |
Competitive advantage in the market | 45% |
The initial investment in blockchain technology can be significant | 18% |
Increased revenue growth over the long term | 36% |
Reduce fraud | 45% |
Streamlined payment processing | 27% |
Management and optimization | 82% |
Sub-Heading | Key Benefits |
---|---|
Blockchain and Industry 4.0 | 1. Providing secure and transparent data sharing between machines 2. Enabling more efficient and automated supply chain management (SCM) 3. Facilitating decentralized and autonomous 4. Enhancing the security and privacy of sensitive data 5. Supporting the development of new business models 6. Enabling the creation of digital marketplaces for goods and services |
Blockchain and Circular Economy | 1. Tracking and verifying the origins and movements of products and materials 2. Enabling the creation of decentralized marketplaces for recycled or repurposed goods 3. Facilitating the exchange of renewable energy certificates 4. Providing transparent and secure payment systems for sustainable logistics services 5. Enhancing the traceability and transparency of waste management processes 6. Encouraging collaboration and data sharing between stakeholders in the circular economy |
Main Points Focused on (Industry 4.0) | Participants in the Interviews |
---|---|
Enables secure and transparent tracking of products and materials throughout the supply chain. | 82% |
Improves supply chain efficiency and reduces costs. | 64% |
Provides a tamper-proof ledger for tracking and auditing purposes. | 73% |
Facilitates the creation of a circular economy through digital tokens and blockchain-based marketplaces. | 82% |
Improves efficiency and reduces waste in logistics operations. | 27% |
Increases efficiency and reduces delivery times in courier operations. | 45% |
Enables new revenue streams and business models. | 27% |
Main Points Focused on (Circular Economy) | Participants in the Interviews |
---|---|
Enables transparent and secure tracking of resources and materials in the circular economy. | 82% |
Facilitates the creation of digital tokens for trading and incentivizing circular practices. | 73% |
Enables real-time tracking of material flows and product life cycles for better decision making. | 73% |
Provides a tamper-proof ledger for tracking and auditing purposes. | 82% |
Improves supply chain efficiency and reduces costs. | 64% |
Enable trust in circular economy transactions. | 36% |
Facilitates the creation of new business models and revenue streams in the circular economy. | 27% |
Collaboration and coordination between different stakeholders in the circular economy ecosystem. | 27% |
Sustainability and environmental responsibility by enabling better tracking and management of resources | 45% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Masa’deh, R.; Jaber, M.; Sharabati, A.-A.A.; Nasereddin, A.Y.; Marei, A. The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167218
Masa’deh R, Jaber M, Sharabati A-AA, Nasereddin AY, Marei A. The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16):7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167218
Chicago/Turabian StyleMasa’deh, Ra’ed, Mustafa Jaber, Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati, Ahmad Yacoub Nasereddin, and Ahmad Marei. 2024. "The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167218
APA StyleMasa’deh, R., Jaber, M., Sharabati, A.-A. A., Nasereddin, A. Y., & Marei, A. (2024). The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy. Sustainability, 16(16), 7218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167218