A Study on the Sustainable Use Intention of Restaurant Companies Using the Information Attributes of SNS: The Dual Process Theory
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. SNS Information Attributes
2.3. Customer Satisfaction
2.4. Brand Attitude
2.5. Sustainable Use Intention
2.6. Hypothesis Development
2.6.1. Relationships between SNS Information Attributes and Customer Satisfaction
2.6.2. Relationships between Customer Satisfaction, Brand Attitude, and Sustainable Use Intention
3. Methodology
3.1. Measurement of Variables and Survey Method
3.2. Data Collection and Statistical Analyses
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Chatacteristics
4.2. Reliability Verification of Variables
4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.4. Result of Structural Equation Model
5. Conclusions and Limitations
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kim, H.S.; Choi, Y.S.; Shin, C.S. Relationship among restaurant owner’s SNS marketing, trust, purchase intention, and word of mouth intention. J. Distrib. Sci. 2019, 17, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Ko, E.; Woodside, A.; Yu, J. SNS marketing activities as a sustainable competitive advantage and traditional market equity. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, B.K.; Shin, H.S. Effects of SNS Characteristics on SNS Engagement and Consumer Brand Engagement. Korean J. Franch. Manag. 2020, 11, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chun, T.Y.; Lee, D.K.; Park, N.H. The Effect of Marketing Activities on the Brand Recognition, Brand Familiarity, and Purchase Intention on the SNS of Franchise Companies. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.J.; Lee, H.C. Effect of food service corporate SNS marketing activity on brand awareness, consumer satisfaction, and purchase intention. Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2017, 31, 195–209. [Google Scholar]
- Ji, Y.H.; Hu, K.S.; Byun, J.W. A Study of the Structural Relationship between the Information of SNS and the Impulsive Buying. Korean J. Hosp. Tourism. 2013, 22, 119–134. [Google Scholar]
- Joung, S.M.; Kim, Y.H. A Study on the Effects of SNS Information Characteristics and SNS Site Characteristics on the Intention to Visit a Restaurant. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2015, 21, 159–173. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.S.; Hwang, K.S.; Park, D.S. A Study on the Effects of SNS-WOM Characteristics in Restaurant Food on Trust, Perceived Risk and Purchase Intention: Focused on the Moderating Role of SNS Receivers Characteristics. J. Foodserv. Manag. 2016, 19, 255–282. [Google Scholar]
- Eagly, A.H.; Chaiken, S. The Psychology of Attitudes; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers: San Diego, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, T.J. Congruity between mood and brand involvement enhances the effectiveness of message appeals: Dual processing model perspective. J. Mark. Commun. 2021, 27, 651–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39, 752–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Watts, S. Online communities as communities of practice: A case study. J. Knowl. Manag. 2008, 12, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, K.Z.; Lee, M.K.; Zhao, S.J. Understanding the Informational Social Influence of Online Review Platforms. ICIS2010, Proceedings. 26 November 2010. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/71 (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Sussman, S.W.; Siegal, W.S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hu, K.S.; Ji, Y.H.; Byun, J.W. Effect of Information of SNS on the Brand Attitude and Behavioral Intention: Application of the Dual Process Theory. Korean J. Tour. Res. 2012, 7, 619–636. [Google Scholar]
- Seok, J.H. Consumer Purchase Experience and Consumption Happiness Based on Dual Process. Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd, D.M.; Ellison, N.B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 13, 210–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blackshaw, P. User-generated content in context. J. Advert. Res. 2011, 51, 108–111. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, H.Y.; Kim, J.K. A Study of Word-of-mouth Marketing using restaurant review Blog as Online Related Community. J. Korean Inst. Nest Gener. Comput. 2012, 8, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, D.W. The Impact of SNS Characteristics on Attitudes, Purchase Intention, and Recommending Behavior. Master’s Thesis, Yeonsae University, Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kwok, B.S. The Influence of SNS Properties on Involvement, Reliability, and Behavior Intention in Restaurants. Northeast Asia Tour. Res. 2013, 9, 103–123. [Google Scholar]
- Bae, J.H.; Yang, I.S.; Park, M.K. Relationships among the SNS characteristics, consumer attitudes, retransmission of online Word-of-Mouth(WOM) and purchase intention of snacks. J. Table Food Coord. 2018, 13, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, H.H. The Preocess of Casual Attribution. Am. Psychologist. 1973, 28, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiou, J.S.; Cheng, C. Should a company have message boards on its web sites? J. Interact. Mark. 2003, 17, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, X.; Ratchford, B.T.; Shankar, V. Can price dispersion in online markets be explained by differences in e-tailer service quality? J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2002, 30, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herr, P.M.; Kardes, F.R.; Kim, J. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consum. Res. 1991, 17, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Hinds, W.C.; Kim, S.; Sioutas, C. Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a major highway. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2002, 52, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, G. Information utility as a predictor of newspaper readership. J. Q. 1977, 54, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grinter, R.E.; Palen, L.; Eldridge, M. Chatting with teenagers: Considering the place of chat technologies in teen life. ACM Trans. Comput. -Hum. Interation(TOCHI) 2006, 13, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, K.D.; Bateson, J.E.G. Essentials of Services Marketing; The Dryden Press: Hinsdale, IL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, B.G.; Yoon, I.K. Factors Affecting the Quality of Social Network Service on User Satisfaction and Continuance Usage Intention. J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Manag. 2014, 21, 35–51. [Google Scholar]
- Im, Y.H. The Effects of SNS Activity in Foodservice Industry on Customer Value, Customer Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention. Ph.D. Thesis, Kyonggi University, Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jo, Y.H. SNS Characteristics of Hotel Corporation Influencing Brand Attitude and Purchase Intention. Matser’s Thesis, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Aaker, J.L. Dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 1997, 34, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M. An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Hum. Relat. 1963, 16, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, K.L. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark. 1993, 57, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grace, D.; O’cass, A. Examining the effects of service brand communications on brand evaluation. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2005, 12, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, G.T. The Effect of Blog Commitment to Bland Attitude and Visit Intention in Food Service Industry. Northeast. Asia Tourism Research. 2016, 12, 237–257. [Google Scholar]
- Luarn, P.; Huang, P.; Chiu, Y.P.; Chen, I.J. Motivations to engage in word-of-mouth behavior on social network sites. Inf. Dev. 2016, 32, 1253–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.H.; Jun, J.W. Brand webtoon as sustainable advertising in Korean consumers: A focus on hierarchical relationships. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hossain, M.; Kim, M. Does Multidimensional Service Quality Generate Sustainable Use Intention for Facebook? Sustainability 2018, 10, 2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hong, I.B. Social and personal dimensions as predictors of sustainable intention to use Facebook in Korea: An empirical analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.; Lee, H. Motivation and Reuse: How Does Motivation Affect Sustainable Use Intention for Brand Webtoons? Sustainability 2021, 13, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Lee, K. Getting in the flow together: The role of social presence, perceived enjoyment and concentration on sustainable use intention of mobile social network game. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3, 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sung, H.J.; Ko, J.Y.; Kim, Y.K. The Study of the Effects of Individual Characteristics on Customer Satisfaction and Intention of the Use, Intention of Site Recommendation Focused on the On-Line Social Network Service. J. Foodserv. Manag. 2012, 15, 81–101. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, S.H.; Go, J.Y. The Effect of SNS Characteristics on Food Service Enterprise related to the Customer Satisfaction and Purchasing Intention. e-Bus. Stud. 2017, 18, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, K.I.; Kim, D.J.; Lee, S.K. Positive and Negative Information on Family Restaurant Brands and Consumer Attitude—Using a Scenario Technique. J. Foodserv. Manag. 2013, 16, 119–137. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, S.A.; Hunter, G. An Exploratory Investigation into the Antecedents of Satisfaction, Brand Attitude, and Loyalty within the (B2B) eCRM Industry. J. Consum. Satisf. Dissatisfaction Complain. Behav. 2014, 27, 24–42. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, J.; Choe, J.Y.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, J.J. Human baristas and robot baristas: How does brand experience affect brand satisfaction, brand attitude, brand attachment, and brand loyalty? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 99, 103050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suh, W.J.; Won, W.Y.; Hong, J.W. An Empirical Study on the Effects of SNS Website Quality Factors on the User Satisfaction, Intention of Continuous Use, and Intention of Words-of-Mouth. Ind. Innov. Res. 2010, 26, 99–132. [Google Scholar]
- Lee., E.Y.; Lee, T.M. The Effects of Information Characteristics on Word of Mouth Performance in Online Environment: Focused on the Moderating Effect of Consumer Knowledge. Korean J. Advert. 2005, 16, 71–145. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, S.Y. Effects of Instagam eating-out information characteristics on satisfaction and intention to use. J. Korea Hotel Resort Assoc. 2019, 18, 241–261. [Google Scholar]
- Hellier, P.K.; Geursen, G.M.; Carr, R.A.; Rickard, J.A. Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. Eur. J. Mark. 2003, 37, 1762–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.M.; Kim, K.H.; Wang, J.K. Consumer Confidence, Identification, and a Brand Attitude according to the On-line Brand Community Type. Int. J. Contents. 2009, 9, 241–249. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigdon, E.E. CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling. Multidiscip. J. 1996, 3, 369–379. [Google Scholar]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.; Han, H.; Ariza-Montes, A. The impact of hotel attributes, well-being perception, and attitudes on brand loyalty: Examining the moderating role of COVID-19 pandemic. J. of Ret. Con. Serv. 2021, 62, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radic, A.; Koo, B.; Cordero, E.G.; Cabrera, J.P.; Han, H. Intention to take COVID-19 vaccine as precondition for international travel: Application of extended norm-activation model. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub Hea. 2021, 18, 3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | N | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 165 | 45.7 |
Female | 196 | 54.3 | |
Frequency of SNS using for Dining-out | Everyday | 62 | 17.2 |
1~2 times per week | 47 | 13.0 | |
3~4 times per week | 170 | 47.1 | |
5~6 times per week | 58 | 16.1 | |
3~4 times per month | 20 | 5.5 | |
1~2 times per month | 4 | 1.1 | |
Occupation | Student | 119 | 33.0 |
Government officer | 27 | 7.5 | |
Office worker | 123 | 34.1 | |
Personal business | 37 | 10.2 | |
Professional worker | 38 | 10.5 | |
Others | 17 | 4.7 | |
Age | 20~29 | 117 | 32.4 |
30~39 | 82 | 22.7 | |
40–49 | 87 | 24.1 | |
Over 50 y≤ | 75 | 20.8 | |
Education Level | High school graduate | 16 | 4.4 |
Technical college graduate | 43 | 12.1 | |
University graduate | 114 | 31.6 | |
Graduate degree | 148 | 41.0 | |
Others | 39 | 10.8 | |
Total | 361 | 100.0 |
Variables | Measurement Items | Mean | Cronbach’sα |
---|---|---|---|
Synonymy | There are many positive comments on the SNS information. | 5.25 | 0.799 |
A lot of comments with the same tendencies depend on various people on the SNS information. | 5.16 | ||
There is a lot of sympathy for the SNS information. | 5.25 | ||
Conciseness | The SNS information is concise | 4.89 | 0.860 |
The SNS information is well summarized. | 5.02 | ||
The SNS information is easy to read. | 5.12 | ||
Up-to dateness | The SNS information provides the latest information. | 5.33 | 0.875 |
The SNS information is continuously updated. | 5.11 | ||
The SNS information was most recently updated. | 4.79 | ||
The SNS information contains the latest trends. | 5.12 | ||
Reliability | The SNS information is reliable. | 4.89 | 0.860 |
The SNS information has expertise. | 4.52 | ||
The SNS information can be trusted and used. | 4.75 | ||
Usefulness | After using the SNS information, it actually helped me. | 5.45 | 0.907 |
The SNS information actually existed. | 5.52 | ||
I made an economical consumption choice due to the SNS information. | 5.49 | ||
The SNS information I searched for will be helpful in the future. | 5.46 | ||
Liveliness | The SNS information is very specific. | 5.07 | 0.875 |
The SNS information evokes a feeling as if I have actually experienced it. | 5.02 | ||
The SNS information is very realistic. | 4.96 | ||
Customer Satisfaction | Overall, I am satisfied with the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 5.10 | 0.860 |
I am satisfied with the promotions and events through the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 4.93 | ||
The evaluation through the SNS information of the restaurant I used was satisfactory. | 4.59 | ||
Brand Attitude | I had a good impression of the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant that I used. | 5.03 | 0.898 |
I was satisfied with the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 5.12 | ||
Using the SNS information of the restaurant I used, the brand feels familiar. | 4.99 | ||
I can trust the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 5.03 | ||
Sustainable use intention | I will use the SNS to find information about the restaurant in the future. | 5.16 | 0.942 |
I would use the SNS more than any other information. | 5.02 | ||
I will visit the SNS to find restaurant information as often as I can. | 5.10 | ||
I usually visit the SNS when I am online. | 5.08 |
Constructs and Indicators | Standardized Factor Loadings | Composit Reliability | AVE |
---|---|---|---|
Synonymy | 0.800 | 0.572 | |
There are many positive comments on the SNS information. | 0.728 | ||
A lot of comments with the same tendencies depend on various people on the SNS information. | 0.722 | ||
There is a lot of sympathy for the SNS information. | 0.815 | ||
Conciseness | 0.859 | 0.670 | |
The SNS information is concise. | 0.793 | ||
The SNS information is well summarized. | 0.860 | ||
The SNS information is easy to read. | 0.801 | ||
Up-to-dateness | 0.860 | 0.606 | |
The SNS information provides the latest information. | 0.725 | ||
The SNS information is continuously updated. | 0.791 | ||
The SNS information was most recently updated. | 0.820 | ||
The SNS information contains the latest trends. | 0.776 | ||
Reliability | 0.860 | 0.673 | |
The SNS information is reliable. | 0.826 | ||
The SNS information has expertise. | 0.801 | ||
The SNS information can be trusted and used. | 0.834 | ||
Usefulness | 0.907 | 0.710 | |
After using the SNS information, it actually helped me. | 0.842 | ||
The SNS information actually existed. | 0.812 | ||
I made an economical consumption choice due to the SNS information. | 0.884 | ||
The SNS information I searched for will be helpful in the future. | 0.831 | ||
Liveliness | 0.875 | 0.700 | |
The SNS information is very specific. | 0.850 | ||
The SNS information evokes a feeling as if I have actually experienced it. | 0.857 | ||
The SNS information is very realistic. | 0.802 | ||
Customer Satisfaction | 0.902 | 0.698 | |
Overall, I am satisfied with the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 0.774 | ||
I am satisfied with the promotions and events through the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 0.816 | ||
The evaluation through the SNS information of the restaurant I used was satisfactory. | 0.843 | ||
Brand Attitude | 0.852 | 0.659 | |
I had a good impression of the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant that I used. | 0.838 | ||
I was satisfied with the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 0.807 | ||
Using the SNS information of the restaurant I used, the brand feels familiar. | 0.856 | ||
I can trust the brand by using the SNS information of the restaurant I used. | 0.839 | ||
Sustainable use of intention | 0.937 | 0.787 | |
I will use the SNS to find information about the restaurant in the future. | 0.875 | ||
I would use the SNS more than any other information. | 0.886 | ||
I would visit the SNS to find restaurant information as often as I can. | 0.898 | ||
I usually visit the SNS when I am online. | 0.889 |
Constructs | SN | CC | UL | RL | UF | LV | CS | BA | SI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synonymy (SN) | 0.572 | ||||||||
Conciseness (CC) | 0.343 | 0.670 | |||||||
Up-to-dateness (UL) | 0.392 | 0.500 | 0.606 | ||||||
Reliability (RL) | 0.392 | 0.396 | 0.551 | 0.673 | |||||
Usefulness (UF) | 0.484 | 0.433 | 0.692 | 0.446 | 0.710 | ||||
Liveliness (LV) | 0.413 | 0.355 | 0.546 | 0.494 | 0.619 | 0.700 | |||
Customer Satisfaction (CS) | 0.473 | 0.564 | 0.588 | 0.555 | 0.635 | 0.582 | 0.698 | ||
Brand Attitude (BA) | 0.442 | 0.540 | 0.684 | 0.661 | 0.658 | 0.605 | 0.812 | 0.659 | |
Sustainable Use Intention (SI) | 0.433 | 0.441 | 0.479 | 0.452 | 0.610 | 0.442 | 0.863 | 0.717 | 0.787 |
Hypothesized Path | Coefficient | S.E. | t-Value | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intuitive Attributes→ Customer satisfaction | ||||
Hypothesis 1-a: Synonymy → Customer satisfaction | 0.039 | 0.059 | 0.668 | Not Supported |
Hypothesis 1-b: Conciseness → Customer satisfaction | 0.277 | 0.054 | 5.098 *** | Supported |
Hypothesis 1-c: Up-to-dateness → Customer satisfaction | 0.119 | 0.055 | 2.146 * | Supported |
Analytical Attributes→Customer satisfaction | ||||
Hypothesis 1-d: Reliability → Customer satisfaction | 0.115 | 0.082 | 1.407 | Not Supported |
Hypothesis 1-e: Usefulness → Customer satisfaction | 0.257 | 0.073 | 3.534 *** | Supported |
Hypothesis 1-f: Liveliness → Customer satisfaction | 0.215 | 0.052 | 4.149 *** | Supported |
Hypothesis 2: Customer Satisfaction → Brand Attitude | 0.951 | 0.054 | 17.578 *** | Supported |
Hypothesis 3: Customer Satisfaction → Sustainable use of intention | 0.258 | 0.117 | 2.201 * | Supported |
Hypothesis 4: Brand Attitude → Sustainable use of intention | 0.768 | 0.118 | 6.528 *** | Supported |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, S.; Bae, G.; Kim, H. A Study on the Sustainable Use Intention of Restaurant Companies Using the Information Attributes of SNS: The Dual Process Theory. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212922
Lee S, Bae G, Kim H. A Study on the Sustainable Use Intention of Restaurant Companies Using the Information Attributes of SNS: The Dual Process Theory. Sustainability. 2021; 13(22):12922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212922
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Sangmook, Gumkwang Bae, and Hyojin Kim. 2021. "A Study on the Sustainable Use Intention of Restaurant Companies Using the Information Attributes of SNS: The Dual Process Theory" Sustainability 13, no. 22: 12922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212922
APA StyleLee, S., Bae, G., & Kim, H. (2021). A Study on the Sustainable Use Intention of Restaurant Companies Using the Information Attributes of SNS: The Dual Process Theory. Sustainability, 13(22), 12922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212922